Review Article

Remote Sensing Image Classification: A Comprehensive Review and Applications

Table 9

Hybrid approaches.

Ref.ApproachesDatasetsAccuracy

Kantakumar et al. [149]Maximum likelihood supervised, decision tree, and ISODATA clustering techniqueLandsat-8’s dataset for dry period and wet periodDry: 84.54%; wet: 91.10%
Nguyen et al. [11]Fuzzy C-means clustering and multiple kernel interval-valued fuzzy C-means clusteringLANDSAT-7 Ba Ria area and Hanoi area98.2% and 94.13%
Qayyum et al. [150]DRT hybrid dictionary with Ricker wavelet functionUAS operating system recorded data for nearly 2 h without flight interruptions85.70%
Zhang et al. [151]CNN and MLP (multilayer perceptron)Urban and rural scenes of aerial imagery of Southampton90.93% for urban and 89.64% for rural
Nijhawan et al. [152]Hybrid of CNN integrated with handcrafted (LBP + GIST) featuresSatellite images of Uttarakhand, northern part of India88.43%
Prasad et al. [153]Landsat-8 satellite imagesSVM and ANNSVM: 93.15%; ANN:89.92%
Yang et al. [154]UAV images of rice fields in Chianan Plain and Taibao City, Chiayi CountyDSM and texture information90.67%
Alimjan et al. [148]SVM and KNNDS-1: ALOS data of the Yitong River in Changchun
DS-2: the ortho image of a factory region in Jiangsu Province
DS-1: 92.4%; DS-2: 97.9%
Akshya et al. [155]SVM and K-meansA dataset containing 200 flooded and non-flooded images92%
Hua et al. [156]Class-wise attention-based convolutional and bidirectional LSTM networkUCM and DFC15 multilabel datasets
Schuegraf et al. [157]U-Net on top of the Caffe deep learning frameworkWorld View-2 imagery of Munich, Germany97.40%