Research Article
Fractal Analysis of Failure Process and Damage Evolution of Jointed Sandstone Based on DIP Technique
Table 3
Calculation results of AE energy and fractal dimension of specimens under different stress levels.
| Stress level | Numerical sample | 10% | 20% | 30% | 40% | 50% | 60% | 70% | 80% | 90% | 100% |
| | AE | 0 | 1 | 18 | 22 | 33 | 65 | 73 | 78 | 82 | 102 | Ds | 0.92 | 0.88 | 1.05 | 1.10 | 1.20 | 1.26 | 1.29 | 1.36 | 1.37 | 1.41 |
| | AE | 0 | 7 | 28 | 42 | 63 | 71 | 86 | 91 | 98 | 116 | Ds | 0.84 | 0.88 | 1.02 | 1.09 | 1.19 | 1.27 | 1.31 | 1.35 | 1.39 | 1.47 |
| | AE | 0 | 18 | 19 | 24 | 38 | 55 | 67 | 88 | 92 | 106 | Ds | 0.83 | 0.90 | 1.04 | 1.12 | 1.18 | 1.24 | 1.28 | 1.34 | 1.39 | 1.45 |
| | AE | 0 | 7 | 18 | 34 | 49 | 66 | 71 | 80 | 95 | 102 | Ds | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 1.06 | 1.153 | 1.27 | 1.35 | 1.42 | 1.48 |
| | AE | 0 | 5 | 9 | 11 | 14 | 30 | 32 | 72 | 96 | 149 | Ds | 0 | 0.54 | 0.95 | 1.14 | 1.24 | 1.31 | 1.40 | 1.64 | 1.76 | 1.70 |
| | AE | 0 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 16 | 33 | 51 | 92 | 112 | 177 | Ds | 0.85 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 1.05 | 1.20 | 1.34 | 1.41 | 1.50 | 1.59 |
| | AE | 0 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 24 | 44 | 58 | 114 | 154 | 193 | Ds | 0.87 | 0.84 | 0.89 | 0.99 | 1.13 | 1.27 | 1.40 | 1.50 | 1.60 | 1.86 |
|
|