Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Modelling and Simulation in Engineering
Volume 2010, Article ID 736201, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/736201
Research Article

Integrated Simulation Environment for Unmanned Autonomous Systems—Towards a Conceptual Framework

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, Evansdale Campus, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA

Received 24 June 2009; Accepted 2 March 2010

Academic Editor: Agostino Bruzzone

Copyright © 2010 M. G. Perhinschi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Anonymous, Unmanned Systems Roadmap 2007–2032, Office of the Secretary of Defense, Washington, DC, USA, 2007.
  2. Anonymous, Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap 2005–2030, Office of the Secretary of Defense, Washington, DC, USA, 2005.
  3. H. M. Huang, Ed., Terminology for Specifying the Autonomy Levels for Unmanned Systems, Version 1.0, NIST Special Publication 1011, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Md, USA, 2004.
  4. H.-M. Huang, K. Pavek, B. Novak, J. Albus, and E. Messina, “A framework for autonomy levels for unmanned systems (ALFUS),” in Proceedings of the AUVSI's Unmanned Systems North America, pp. 849–863, Baltimore, Md, USA, 2005.
  5. Anonymous, Information Technology Standards Registry, U.S. Department of Defense, 2007.
  6. J. Albus et al., 4D/RCS: A Reference Model Architecture for Unmanned Vehicle Systems. Version 2.0, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Technology Administration, Gaithersburg, Md, USA, 2002.
  7. Anonymous, The Joint Architecture for Unmanned Systems—Domain Model, Version 3.2, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics, 2005.
  8. E. H. Page and R. Smith, “Introduction to military training simulation: a guide for discrete event simulationists,” in Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, vol. 1, pp. 53–60, Washington, DC, USA, 1998.
  9. A. Verbraeck and E. C. Valentin, “The use of building blocks to enhance flexibility and maintainability of simulation models and simulation libraries,” in Proceedings of the 13th European Simulation Symposium (ESS '01), Gent, Belgium, 2001.
  10. N. M. Jodeh, P. A. Blue, and A. A. Waldron, “Development of small unmanned aerial vehicle research platform: modeling and simulating with flight test validation,” in Proceedings of AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, vol. 1, pp. 369–391, Keystone, Colo, USA, 2006.
  11. E. R. Mueller, “Hardware-in-the-loop simulation design for evaluation of unmanned aerial vehicle control systems,” in Proceedings of AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, vol. 1, pp. 530–543, Hilton Head, SC, USA, 2007. View at Scopus
  12. M. G. Perhinschi, M. R. Napolitano, G. Campa, and M. L. Fravolini, “A simulation environment for testing and research of neurally augmented fault tolerant control laws based on non-linear dynamic inversion,” in Proceedings of the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, vol. 1, pp. 147–157, 2004. View at Scopus
  13. S. J. Rasmussen and P. R. Chandler, “MultiUAV: a multiple UAV simulation for investigation of cooperative control,” in Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, vol. 1, pp. 869–877, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2002.
  14. M. Yasar, D. O. Bridges, G. Mallapragada, and J. F. Horn, “A simulation test bed for coordination of unmanned rotorcraft and ground vehicles,” in Procedings of AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, vol. 1, pp. 400–412, Keystone, Colo, USA, 2006. View at Scopus
  15. C. Patchett and V. Sastry, “A preliminary model of accident causality for uninhabited autonomous air systems and its implications for their decision architectures,” in Proceedings of the UKSim 10th International Conference on Computer Modelling and Simulation (EUROSIM/UKSim '08), pp. 487–492, Cambridge, UK, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. Craighead, R. Murphy, J. Burke, and B. Goldiez, “A survey of commercial & open source unmanned vehicle simulators,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 852–857, Rome, Italy, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. I. Clark, R. Miksa, D. Childs, and K. Mead, “The benefits of simulation to support training,” Armour Bulletin, vol. 32, no. 1, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  18. J. Twesme and A. Corzine, “Naval air systems command (NAVAIR) unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) unmanned combat aerial vehicle (UCAV) distributed simulation infrastructure,” in Proceedings of the 2nd AIAA “Unmanned Unlimited” Systems, Technologies, and Operations—Aerospace, Land, and Sea Conference and Workshop and Exhibit, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2003.
  19. K. E. Lawson and C. T. Butler, “Overview of Man-in-the-Loop Air-to-Air System Performance Evaluation Model (MIL-AASPEM) II, D658-10485-1,” The Boeing Company, 1995.
  20. D. C. Mackenzie, R. C. Arkin, and J. M. Cameron, “Multiagent Mission Specification and Execution,” Autonomous Robots, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 29–52, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. M. Sardella and D. L. High, “Integration of fielded army aviation simulators with ModSAF: the eighth army training solution,” in Proceedings of Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference, Orlando, Fla, USA, November 2000.
  22. P. Drewes, “Simulation based approach for unmanned system command and control,” in Proceedings of Florida Conference on Recent Advances in Robotics, Miami, Fla, USA, 2006.
  23. S. O'Day, M. Steinberg, C. Yglesias et al., “Metrics for intelligent autonomy,” in Proceedings of Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems Workshop (PerMIS '04), Gaithersburg, Md, USA, 2004.
  24. A. Steinfeld, T. Fong, D. Kaber et al., “Common metrics for human-robot interaction,” in Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, vol. 2006, pp. 33–40, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, 2006. View at Scopus
  25. J. Albus, “Metrics and performance measures for intelligent unmanned ground vehicles,” in Proceedongs of Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems Workshop (PerMIS '02), Gaithersburg, Md, USA, 2002.
  26. J. L. Harbour, D. J. Bruemmer, and D. A. Few, “Measuring unmanned vehicle system performance: challenges and opportunities,” in AUVSI Unmanned Systems North America, Orlando, Fla, USA, 2006.
  27. C. Dimou, A. L. Symeonidis, and P. A. Mitkas, “Towards a generic methodology for evaluating MAS performance,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Integration of Knowledge Intensive Multi-Agent Systems (KIMAS '07), pp. 174–179, Waltham, Mass, USA, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. S. S. Mulgand, K. A. Harper, G. L. Zacharias, and T. Menke, “SAMPLE: situation awareness model for pilot-in-the-loop evaluation,” in Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Computer Generated Forces and Behavioral Representation, Orlando, Fla, USA, 2000.
  29. J. A. Adams, “Unmanned vehicle situation awareness: a path forward,” in Proceedings of the Human Systems Integration Symposium, Annapolis, Md, USA, 2007.
  30. B. Touchton, T. Galluzzo, D. Kent, and C. Crane, “Perception and planning architecture for autonomous ground vehicles,” Computer, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 40–47, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. A. Freedy, E. Freedy, J. DeVisser et al., “A complete simulation environment for measuring and assessing human-robot team performance,” in Proceedings of IEEE Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics Conference, and Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems Workshop, Gaithersburg, Md, USA, 2006.
  32. P. E. Pina, M. L. Cummings, J. W. Crandall, and M. Della Penna, “Identifying generalizable metric classes to evaluate human-robot teams,” in Proceedings of the Metrics for Human-Robot Interaction Workshop at the 3rd Annual Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Amsterdam, The Nederlands, 2008.
  33. Anonymous, Unmanned Aircraft System Operations in UK Airspace—Guidance, Civil Aviation Authority, Directorate of Airspace Policy CAP-722, London, UK, 2008.
  34. Anonymous, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Reliability Study, U.S. Department of Defense, Office of the Secretary of Defense, Washington, DC, USA, 2003.
  35. Anonymous, Reliability Modeling and Prediction, Military Standard MIL-STD-7566, Department of Defense, Washington, DC, USA, 1982.
  36. D. E. Peercy, “A software maintainability evaluation methodology,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 343–351, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. P. Dersin and J. Durand, “Mass-transit system service quality: tradeoff analysis on reliability, maintainability and logistics,” in Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, pp. 515–528, Washington, DC, USA, 1995.
  38. D. E. Mortin, “Analysis of logistic supportability for complex systems,” in Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, pp. 250–253, Los Angeles, Calif, USA, 1990.
  39. C. G. John and R. E. Schultz, “Simulation modeling for military logistics and supportability studies,” in Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 485–490, Phoenix, Ariz, USA, December 1991.
  40. Robby, S. A. DeLoach, and V. A. Kolesnikov, “Using design metrics for predicting system flexibility,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering (FASE '06), vol. 3922 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 184–198, Vienna, Austria, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. L. Chung and N. Subramanian, “Process-oriented metrics for software architecture adaptability,” in Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering, pp. 310–311, Toronto, Canada, 2001. View at Scopus
  42. O. P. Rotaru and M. Dobre, “Reusability metrics for software components,” in Proceedings of the 3rd ACS/IEEE International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications, pp. 81–88, Cairo, Egypt, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. M. D. Petty, “Two aspects of composability: lexicon and theory,” in Proceedings of Defense Modeling and Simulation Office Workshop on Composable Modeling and Simulation, Monterey, Calif, USA, 2002.
  44. H. Shim, T. J. Koo, F. Hoffmann, and S. Sastry, “A comprehensive study of control design for an autonomous helicopter,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC '98), vol. 4, pp. 3653–3658, Tampa, Fla, USA, 1998.
  45. G. S. Sukhatme and J. F. Montgomery, “Heterogeneous robot group control and applications,” in Proceedings of the International Conference of the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems, Baltimore, Md, USA, 1999.
  46. H. Durrant-Whyte, “A critical review of the state-of-the-art in autonomous land vehicle systems and technology,” Sandia Report SAND2001-3685, Sandia National Laboratories, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  47. A. Leonessa, J. Mandello, Y. Morel, and M. Vidal, “Design of a small, multi-purpose, autonomous surface vessel,” in Proceedings of IEEE Oceans Conference, vol. 1, pp. 544–550, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2003.
  48. Anonymous, The Navy Unmanned Undersea Vehicle (UUV) Master Plan, U.S. Department of the Navy, Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
  49. A. W. Stroupe, S. Singh, R. Simmons et al., “Technology for autonomous space systems,” Tech. Rep. CMU-RI-TR-00-02, The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  50. P. H. Zipfel, Modeling and Simulation of Aerospace Vehicle Dynamics, AIAA Education Series, AIAA, Reston, Va, USA, 2000.
  51. M. E. Dreier, Introduction to Helicopter and Tiltrotor Flight Simulation, AIAA Education Series, AIAA, Reston, Va, USA, 2007.
  52. D. Garg and M. Kumar, “Sensor modeling and multi-sensor data fusion,” Final Progress Report W911NF-01-10434, Army Research Office, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  53. P. Capone, “Actuator modeling and aircraft related performance: selection of the appropriate actuation system,” in Proceedings of the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, Denver, Colo, USA, 2000.
  54. J. Pritchard, “Overview of landing gear dynamics,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 130–137, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. M. Lichtsinder and Y. Levy, “Jet engine model for control and real-time simulations,” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 745–753, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. M. L. Steinberg, “A comparison of intelligent, adaptive, and nonlinear flight control laws,” in Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Portland Ore, USA, 1999, AIAA 99-4044.
  57. K. A. Wise, “Guidance and control for military systems: future challenges,” in Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, vol. 5, pp. 5382–5389, Hilton Head, SC, USA, 2007.
  58. F. De Crescenzio, G. Miranda, F. Persiani, and T. Bombardi, “Advanced interface for UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) ground control station,” in Proceedings of the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit, vol. 1, pp. 486–494, Hilton Head, SC, USA, 2007. View at Scopus
  59. M. L. Cummings, K. Meyers, and S. D. Scott, “Modified cooper harper evaluation tool for unmanned vehicle displays,” in Proceedings of the Unmanned Vehicle Systems Canada Conference, Montebello, Canada, 2006.
  60. J. Rasmussen, “Models of mental strategies in process plant diagnosis,” in Human Detection and Diagnosis of System Failures, J. Rasmussen and W. B. Rouse, Eds., Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  61. U. Metzger and R. Parasuraman, “Effects of automated conflict cueing and traffic density on air traffic controller performance and visual attention in a datalink environment,” International Journal of Aviation Psychology, vol. 16, pp. 343–362, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  62. G. Barbato, G. Feitshans, R. Williams, and T. Hughes, “Operator vehicle interface laboratory: unmanned combat air vehicle controls & displays for suppression of enemy air defences,” in Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Dayton, Ohio, USA, 2003.
  63. J. Keller, “Human performance modeling for discrete-event simulation: workload,” in Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, vol. 1, pp. 157–162, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2002.
  64. V. K. Kongezos and C. R. Allen, “Wireless communication between A.G.V.'s (Autonomous Guided Vehicle) and the industrial network C.A.N. (Controller Area Network),” in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 1, pp. 434–437, Washington, DC, USA, 2002.
  65. S. C. T. Poh, Simulations of diversity techniques for urban UAV data links, M.S. thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, Calif, USA, 2004.
  66. C. P. Evans III, Development of world modeling methods for autonomous systems based on the joint architecture for unmanned system, M.S. thesis, University of Florida, 2004.
  67. R. Touchton, D. Kent, T. Galluzzo et al., “Planning and modeling extensions to the joint architecture for unmanned systems (JAUS) for application to unmanned ground vehicles,” in Unmanned Ground Vehicle Technology VII, vol. 5804 of Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 146–155, Orlando Fla, USA, March 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. G. Vachtsevanos, L. Tang, G. Drozeski, and L. Gutierrez, “From mission planning to flight control of unmanned aerial vehicles: strategies and implementation tools,” Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 101–115, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. M. Pachter and P. Chandler, “Challengers of autonomous control,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 18, no. 4, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  70. S. A. Bortoff, “Path planning for UAVs,” in Proceedings of the American Control Conference, vol. 1, pp. 364–368, Chicago, Ill, USA, June 2000.
  71. J. S. Gansler and W. Lucyshyn, Evaluation of Performance Based Logistics, University of Maryland and Naval Postgraduate School, 2006, UMD-LM-06-040.
  72. Y. Haimes, Risk Modeling, Assessment, and Management, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2004.
  73. R. E. Weibel and R. J. Hansman Jr., “An integrated approach to evaluating risk mitigation measures for UAV operational concepts in the NAS,” in Proceedings of InfoTech at Aerospace: Advancing Contemporary Aerospace Technologies and Their Integration, vol. 1, pp. 509–519, Arlington, Va, USA, September 2005. View at Scopus
  74. C. Reece, R. Walker, N. Fulton, and D. Campbell, “A casualty risk analysis for unmanned aerial system (UAS) operations over inhabited areas,” in Proceedings of the 12th Australian International Aerospace Congress, and the 2nd Australasian Unmanned Air Vehicles Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 2007.
  75. J. D. Bošković, S.-M. Li, and R. K. Mehra, “On-line failure detection and identification (FDI) and adaptive reconfigurable control (ARC) in aerospace applications,” in Proceedings of the American Control Conference, vol. 4, pp. 2625–2626, 2001. View at Scopus
  76. M. G. Perhinschi, G. Campa, M. R. Napolitano, M. Lando, L. Massotti, and M. L. Fravolini, “Modeling and simulation of a fault tolerant control system,” International Journal of Modelling and Simulation, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  77. B. J. Bacon and I. M. Gregory, “General equations of motion for a damaged asymmetric aircraft,” in Proceedings of the AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit, vol. 1, pp. 63–75, Hilton Head, SC, USA, 2007.
  78. K. Jha, R. Wray, C. Lebiere et al., “Towards a complete, multi-level cognitive architecture,” in Proceedings of the International Conference for Cognitive Modeling, Ann Arbor, Mich, USA, 2007.
  79. M. L. Hanson and K. A. Harper, “An intelligent agent for supervisory control of teams of unihabited combat air vehicles (UCAVs),” in Proceedings of the Unmanned Systems Conference, Orlando, Fla, USA, 2000.
  80. R. Touchton, An adaptive planning framework for situation assessment and decision-making of an autonomous ground vehicle, Ph.D. thesis, University of Florida, 2006.
  81. P. Narayan, P. Wu, D. Campbell, and R. Walker, “An intelligent control architecture for unmanned aerial systems (Uas) in the national airspace system (Nas),” in Proceedings of the 2nd Australasian Unmanned Air Vehicle Systems Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 2007.
  82. C. E. Nehme, J. W. Crandall, and M. L. Cumming, “Using discrete-event simulation to model situational awareness of unmanned-vehicle operators,” in Proceedings of the Virginia Modeling, Analysis and Simulation Center Capstone Conference, Norfolk, Va, USA, 2008.
  83. K. M. Reichard and E. C. Crow, “Intelligent self-situational awareness for unmanned and robotic platforms,” in Proceedings of AUVSI Unmanned Systems North America, pp. 1221–1235, Baltimore, Md, USA, 2005. View at Scopus
  84. K. Pederson, R. Lethin, J. Springer, R. Manohar, and R. Melhem, “Enabling cognitive architectures for UAV mission planning,” in Proceedings of the 10th Annual Workshop High Performance Embedded Computing, Burlington, Mass, USA, 2006.
  85. X. Zhang, S. Yoon, P. DiBona et al., “An ensemble learning and problem solving architecture for airspace management,” in Proceedings of the 21st Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, pp. 203–210, 2009. View at Scopus
  86. S. Yoon and S. Kambhampati, “Hierarchical strategy learning with hybrid representations,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Acquiring Planning Knowledge via Demonstration, pp. 52–56, 2007. View at Scopus
  87. L. Mazzucchelli and A. Monteleone, “A 4D immersive virtual reality system for air traffic control,” in Proceedings of the 7th EUROCONTROL Innovative Research Workshop & Exhibition, EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre, December 2008.
  88. M. Porretta, M.-D. Dupuy, W. Schuster, A. Majumdar, and W. Ochieng, “Performance evaluation of a novel 4D trajectory prediction model for civil aircraft,” Journal of Navigation, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 393–420, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. J. Kosecka, C. Tomlin, G. Pappas, and S. Sastry, “Generation of conflict resolution maneuvers for air traffic management,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, vol. 3, pp. 1598–1603, Grenoble, France, 1997. View at Scopus
  90. J. K. Kuchar and L. C. Yang, “A review of conflict detection and resolution modeling methods,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 179–189, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. G. Dowek and C. Muñoz, “Conflict detection and resolution for 1,2,... N aircraft,” in Proceedings of the 7th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, vol. 1, pp. 403–415, Belfast, Northern Ireland, 2007. View at Scopus
  92. T. C. Farley and H. Erzberger, “Fast-time simulation evaluation of a conflict resolution algorithm under high air traffic demand,” in Proceedings of the 7th USA/Europe ATM R&D Seminar, Barcelona, Spain, July 2007.
  93. R. Sharma and D. Ghose, “Swarm intelligence based collision avoidance between realistically modelled UAV clusters,” in Proceedings of the American Control Conference, pp. 3892–3897, New York, NY, USA, July 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. A. Kelly, A. Stentz, O. Amidi et al., “Toward reliable off road autonomous vehicles operating in challenging environments,” International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 25, no. 5-6, pp. 449–483, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. M. T. DeGarmo, Issues Concerning Integration of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Civil Airspace, Federal Aviation Administration, MITRE Center for Advanced Aviation System Development, McLean, Va, USA, 2004.
  96. R. Sleeman, A. Cox, and J. Colledge, “Systems approach to unmanned air vehicle development and certification,” in Improvements in System Safety: Proceedings of the 16th Safety-Critical Systems Symposium, Bristol, UK, 2008.