Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Modelling and Simulation in Engineering
Volume 2017, Article ID 2034907, 17 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2034907
Research Article

Pareto Optimization of a Half Car Passive Suspension Model Using a Novel Multiobjective Heat Transfer Search Algorithm

1Mechanical Engineering Department, School of Technology, Pandit Deendayal Petroleum University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382007, India
2Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada
3Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, BC, Canada

Correspondence should be addressed to Vimal Savsani; moc.liamg@inasvas.lamiv

Received 16 August 2016; Revised 18 January 2017; Accepted 24 January 2017; Published 3 May 2017

Academic Editor: Mohamed B. Trabia

Copyright © 2017 Vimal Savsani et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. Deb, Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2001.
  2. J. D. Schaffer, “Multiple objective optimization with vector evaluated genetic algorithms,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pp. 93–100, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, July 1985.
  3. E. Zitzler and L. Thiele, “Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 257–271, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. E. Goldberg and J. H. Holland, “Genetic algorithms and machine learning,” Machine Learning, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 95–99, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Knowles and D. Corne, “The Pareto archived evolution strategy: a new baseline algorithm for Pareto multiobjective optimisation,” in Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC '99), pp. 98–105, July 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. N. Srinivas and K. Deb, “Muiltiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms,” Evolutionary Computation, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 221–248, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. J. Horn, N. Nafpliotis, and D. E. Goldberg, “A niched Pareto genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization,” in Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation, IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, pp. 82–87, Orlando, FL, USA, June 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. H. Li and Q. Zhang, “Multiobjective optimization problems with complicated pareto sets, MOEA/D and NSGA-II,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 284–302, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Zhou, B.-Y. Qu, H. Li, S.-Z. Zhao, P. N. Suganthan, and Q. Zhangd, “Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a survey of the state of the art,” Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 32–49, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. W. Corne, J. D. Knowles, and M. J. Oates, “The Pareto envelope-based selection algorithm for multiobjective optimization,” in Parallel Problem Solving from Nature PPSN VI, pp. 839–848, Springer, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  11. K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan, “A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 182–197, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Q. Zhang and H. Li, “MOEA/D: a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 712–731, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. A. Coello Coello and M. S. Lechuga, “MOPSO: a proposal for multiple objective particle swarm optimization,” in Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC '02), pp. 1051–1056, May 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Mostaghim and J. Teich, “Covering Pareto-optimal fronts by subswarms in multi-objective particle swarm optimization,” in Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC '04), pp. 1404–1411, IEEE, Portland, Ore, USA, June 2004. View at Scopus
  15. S. Agrawal, Y. Dashora, M. Tiwari, and Y.-J. Son, “Interactive particle swarm: a Pareto-adaptive metaheuristic to multiobjective optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A:Systems and Humans, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 258–277, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. X.-S. Yang, “Multiobjective firefly algorithm for continuous optimization,” Engineering with Computers, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 175–184, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. X.-S. Yang and S. Deb, “Multiobjective cuckoo search for design optimization,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1616–1624, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. V. K. Patel and V. J. Savsani, “A multi-objective improved teaching-learning based optimization algorithm (MO-ITLBO),” Information Sciences, vol. 357, pp. 182–200, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. Deb and H. Jain, “An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based nondominated sorting approach, part I: solving problems with box constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 577–601, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. Kennedy, “Particle swarm optimization,” in Encyclopedia of Machine Learning, pp. 760–766, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  21. A. Jamali, K. Atashkari, and N. Nariman-zadeh, Multi-Objective Uniform-Diversity Genetic Algorithm (MUGA), INTECH Open Access, Rijeka, Croatia, 2008.
  22. M. J. Mahmoodabadi, A. Adljooy Safaie, A. Bagheri, and N. Nariman-Zadeh, “A novel combination of Particle Swarm Optimization and Genetic Algorithm for Pareto optimal design of a five-degree of freedom vehicle vibration model,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 2577–2591, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. Bouazara, “Étudeetanalyse de la suspension active et semi-active des véhiculesroutiers,” 1998.
  24. Y. Gandhi, V. Mehta, M. Patel, B. Gadhvi, and A. Markana, “Improving PID Integrated Active Suspension System by using TLBO optimized parameters”.
  25. V. K. Patel and V. J. Savsani, “Heat transfer search (HTS): a novel optimization algorithm,” Information Sciences, vol. 324, pp. 217–246, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. S. Rao, Engineering Optimization: Theory and Practice, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. L. Sun, X. Cai, and J. Yang, “Genetic algorithm-based optimum vehicle suspension design using minimum dynamic pavement load as a design criterion,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 301, no. 1-2, pp. 18–27, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. Y. Gandhi, M. Patel, V. Mehta, B. Gadhvi, and A. Markana, “Control design and analysis of active vehicle suspension using integral pole placement controller,” Journal of Aeronautical and Automotive Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 33–37, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  29. A. E. Baumal, J. J. McPhee, and P. H. Calamai, “Application of genetic algorithms to the design optimization of an active vehicle suspension system,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 163, no. 1, pp. 87–94, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. W. L. Meisel, J. L. Cochrane, and M. Zeleny, “Tradeoff decision in multiple criteria decision making,” in Dicision Making, pp. 461–476, University of Columbia, New York, NY, USA, 1973. View at Google Scholar