Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 3012949 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3012949

Thomas Jin-Chee Liu, "Numerical Analysis of Joule Heating Behavior and Residual Compressive Stress around Crack Tip under High Electric Load", Modelling and Simulation in Engineering, vol. 2017, Article ID 3012949, 8 pages, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3012949

# Numerical Analysis of Joule Heating Behavior and Residual Compressive Stress around Crack Tip under High Electric Load

Accepted14 Sep 2017
Published19 Oct 2017

#### Abstract

This paper discusses the Joule heating effect and residual compressive stress near the crack tip under the electro-thermo-structural coupling state. For the crack tip field, the compressive condition is important for retarding or stopping the crack growth.

#### 1. Introduction

The Joule heating behavior and electro-thermo-structural coupled-field around the crack tip were firstly investigated and discussed by Russian scholars in the 1980s [1, 2]. They used mathematical methods to analyze the crack-tip field under the electric current. Following their pioneer research, many typical studies were done for solving this problem in the last decades [312].

Based on the past references, the Joule heating phenomenon near the crack tip is well known. Figure 1 illustrates the concept of this problem. Due to the Joule heating effect, the thermoelectric phenomenon occurs in the conductive material under the electric load. In other words, the material gets hotter when it is subjected to the electric current. If the material has cracks or fractures, the electric current density concentration occurs around the crack tip. Then this electric concentration causes a local hot region at the crack tip due to the Joule heating. In addition, the electric current density has singularity at the crack tip [6]. This is similar to the elastic stress field.

Under the Joule heating, the compressive stresses can be produced around the crack tip [1, 2]. This crack-tip compressive stress field is important to reduce or stop the potential crack growth. However, the past references did not show the time-history of the crack-tip stress. During the electric loading, unloading, and cooling process, the crack-tip stress may present the tensile or compressive state. If the plastic strain or deformation occurs at high temperature, the residual stress around the crack tip will be an important topic for the fracture problem.

In this paper, the Joule heating behavior and residual stress around the crack tip will be investigated using the electro-thermo-structural coupling finite element analysis. The temperature and electric current density fields will be also obtained for estimating the crack tip behavior. In particular, this primary study will discuss the residual compressive stress and its importance for stopping the crack growth.

#### 2. Problem Statement

Figure 2 shows the geometric and loading conditions of the steel plate in this study. The plate with an edge crack is subjected to the constant direct current (DC) . The electric loading time is . The plate is made of the mild steel with the dimension . The crack length is . This problem will be simulated by the three-dimensional finite element analysis with the solid model.

To consider practical conditions, the temperature-dependent material properties in Table 1 [9, 13] are adopted in the finite element analysis. Also, the elastoplastic material properties as shown in Figure 3 are considered. Under the Joule heating effect, the electric-current-induced thermo-structural problem is transient. The initial temperature is 21°C. The convection coefficients on all solid/air interfaces are set as 10 W/m2-°C.

 Temperature (°C) Young’s modulus E (GPa) Yielding strength (MPa) Coefficient of thermal expansion α(1/°C) Thermal conductivity k (W/m-°C) Specific heat (J/kg-°C) Resistivity ρ(Ω-m) 21 206.8 248 10.98 × 10−6 64.60 444 0.14224 × 10−6 93 196.5 238 11.52 × 10−6 63.15 452.38 0.18644 × 10−6 204 194.4 224 12.24 × 10−6 55.24 511.02 0.26670 × 10−6 315.5 186 200 12.96 × 10−6 49.87 561.29 0.37592 × 10−6 426.7 169 173 13.50 × 10−6 44.79 611.55 0.49530 × 10−6 537.8 117 145 14.04 × 10−6 39.71 661.81 0.64770 × 10−6 648.9 55 76 14.58 × 10−6 34.86 762.34 0.81788 × 10−6 760 6.9 14 14.05 × 10−6 30.46 1005.3 1.0109 × 10−6 871 — — 13.05 × 10−6 28.37 1005.3 1.1151 × 10−6 982 — — — 27.62 1005.3 1.1582 × 10−6 1093 — — — 28.52 1189.6 1.1786 × 10−6 1204 — — — — 1189.6 1.2090 × 10−6
Poisson’s ratio = 0.3, density = 7861.2 kg/m3, melting point = 1521°C.

The contact condition between crack surfaces is considered as the coupled-field problem. The electric current and heat flow can pass through the crack surfaces when the crack contact occurs. The detailed information of the contact condition will be described in the next section.

#### 3. Principles and Finite Element Modelling

##### 3.1. Basic Principles

In this paper, the analysis is the electro-thermo-structural coupled-field problem. First, for the electric current field, it obeys the following equations [14]: where , , , and are the electric field (V/m), electric current density (A/m2), electric potential (V), and resistivity (Ω-m), respectively.

For the transient thermal analysis, the rules are as follows [14, 15]: where , , , , , , and are the heat flux (W/m2), thermal conductivity (W/m-°C), temperature (°C), heat generation (W/m3) of Joule heating, mass density (kg/m3), specific heat (J/kg-°C), and time (s), respectively.

The thermoelastic analysis couples the thermal and elastic stress fields as follows [16]:where , , , , , E, , , , , and are the stress (Pa = N/m2), strain (dimensionless), body force (N/m3), displacement (m), acceleration (m/s2), Young’s modulus (Pa), Poisson’s ratio (dimensionless), stress invariant (), coefficient of thermal expansion (1/°C), temperature difference ( where is the reference temperature) and Kronecker delta, respectively.

In this study, the elastoplastic stress-strain behavior is considered. The von Mises yield criterion [17, 18] is used to analyze the plastic stress and strain. The yield surface is defined aswhere , , and () are the yielding strength, von Mises equivalent stress, and principal stress, respectively. In this study, the stress-strain relationships in Figure 3 are used.

The finite element equations of the electro-thermo-structural coupled-field analysis are as follows [18]: where U, T, V, F, Q, and I are the vector forms of the displacement, temperature, electric potential, force, heat flow rate, and electric current, respectively. The material constant matrices , , , , , , , and are the structural mass, structural damping, thermal specific heat, thermo-structural damping, structural stiffness, thermal conductivity, thermo-structural stiffness, and electric conductivity, respectively. The coupled heat flow matrix contains the effects of the thermal loading and Joule heating. and are thermo-structural coupled terms. Equation (5) is a directly coupled nonlinear equation which is solved using the Newton-Raphson iterative method [18].

##### 3.2. Boundary and Initial Conditions

Referring to Figure 2, the boundary and initial conditions are listed as follows: The convective heat transfer on all structure/air interfaces is considered. The convection condition  W/m2-°C and °C is applied.

##### 3.3. Finite Element Modelling

The software ANSYS is adopted to perform the finite element modelling and calculation. In Figure 4, it shows the finite element model of the steel plate with the typical dimensions: = 240 mm, =10 mm, = 1 mm, and  mm. The mesh is constructed by the 20-node solid element SOLID226 which has the capability of the electro-thermo-structural coupled-field analysis. Due to the symmetry, only half thickness is analyzed. In addition, the quarter-point elements are used to simulate the singularity at the crack tip [912, 19].

##### 3.4. Contact Condition on Crack Surfaces

The electro-thermo-structural contact condition on both crack surfaces is considered in the numerical analysis. In ANSYS, two contact element types, TARGE170 and CONTA174, are adopted. Aside from the contact stress, the electric and thermal contacts are considered as the following equations [18, 20]: where and are, respectively, the electric conductance and thermal conductance of the contact surfaces. The terms and are, respectively, the electric potential difference and temperature difference between both contact surfaces. In this study, is assumed to be very large so that the thermal contact resistance on crack surfaces can be ignored. However, is defined as follows [20]:where and are the electric contact resistivity and characteristic length, respectively. For mild steel, the typical values 1/(Ωm2), = 6.2586 × 10−5 Ωm, and = 2.54 × 10-5 m (0.001 inch) [13] are used. In addition, the coefficient of friction on crack surfaces is neglected.

#### 4. Results and Discussions

##### 4.1. Validation of Finite Element Model

The accuracy of the finite element model must be valid. For the validation, the coupled-field analysis is simplified to the pure electric problem. Furthermore, the SOLID226 elements are degenerated to SOLID231 elements for the ANSYS model in Figure 4. In this case, the resistivity is  Ω-m. Also, the distributed current  A/m2 is used to replace the concentrated current .

Using the limited electric potential extrapolation technique (LEPET) [9], the electric current density factor at the crack tip can be obtained from the finite element results. In this case, the numerical result of is  Am-3/2. According to the analogy and analytical methods [8, 9, 21], the analytical solution of the edge crack problem under electric load iswhere for the case of . Substituting all values to (9), is  Am-3/2. By comparing both values of , the finite element result has good agreement with the analytical solution with the small numerical error 0.24%.

##### 4.2. Electric Concentration and Hot Spot at Crack Tip

The Joule heating effect makes high temperature field in the steel plate. Due to the local electric concentration at the crack tip, a hot spot exists. In Figure 5, it shows the electric current density and temperature fields around the crack under the following conditions:  mm,  mm,  mm,  mm, and  A. The electric loading time is  s. The numerical results obviously prove the phenomena of the electric concentration and hot spot at the crack tip.

##### 4.3. Residual Compressive Stress at Crack Tip

In this section, the geometric and loading conditions of the steel plate are the same as the above section. As shown in Figure 6, the unloading and cooling processes are added in the analysis to obtain the residual stress around the crack tip. The loading process is during = 0~0.3333 s. Then the electric current is removed and it remains the cooling process till  s.

In Figure 7, the time-history of the crack tip temperature is shown. It can be seen that the crack tip temperature reaches the maximum value (969°C) at the end of the loading time ( s). After the unloading process, the temperature decays quickly and approaches the steady state. At  s, the crack tip temperature decreases to 25°C.

Figures 810 show the time-history of the normal stress at the point B near the crack tip. The distance from B to the crack tip is 0.2 mm. In Figure 8, it shows the negative values of during the cooling process till  s. Also, it approaches the steady state. At  s, the value of is −301 MPa. The negative value implies the compressive normal stress. In other words, the residual compressive stress exists near the crack tip after the electric load is removed.

In Figures 9 and 10, the detailed stress values during shorter time intervals are shown. The stress causes complicated fluctuation during the electric loading and unloading processes. Then it decays and approaches the steady state with sufficient cooling time.

Figure 11 shows the contour of the stress near the crack tip at the end of the cooling process ( s). There are negative stress values around the crack tip. It means that the residual compressive stresses occur in this area. According to the results of Figure 11, Figure 12 shows the stress distribution in front to the crack tip. The compressive stress field is also investigated near the crack tip.

##### 4.4. Effects of Electric Load

Figure 13 shows the time-history of the stress at point B under  A and  A. Comparing two curves in the figure, it is found that there is no residual stress under  A. It implies that the magnitude of the electric load is an important parameter for producing the residual compressive stress near the crack tip. If the electric load is not sufficient, the temperature and stress will be too small to make the yielding (plastic) strain and residual stress.

#### 5. Conclusions

From the finite element results, the electric current density concentrates at the crack tip. Due to the Joule heating, it causes a hot spot at the crack tip. The residual compressive stress appears near the crack tip due to the high temperature and plastic deformation. Furthermore, the compressive condition can retard or stop the crack growth. The concept for stopping crack growth is shown in Figure 14.

This paper provides a primary study and conclusion of the residual compressive stress near the crack tip under the electro-thermo-structural coupling state. The compressive condition is practically important to the fracture mechanics problem.

It is important to study the fatigue crack growth due to the Joule heating caused stresses. The extending work will be considered in the future research.

#### Nomenclature

 : Electric load (direct current, DC) (A) : Time (s) : Electric loading time (s) , , : Plate dimensions (m) : Crack length (m) : Specific heat (J/kg-°C) , : Temperature (°C) : Mass density (kg/m3) : Electric field (V/m) , : Electric current density (A/m2) , : Electric potential (V) : Resistivity (Ω-m) : Heat flux (W/m2) : Thermal conductivity (W/m-°C) : Heat generation of Joule heating (W/m3) : Stress (Pa) : Strain (dimensionless) , : Displacement (m) : Young’s modulus (Pa) : Poisson’s ratio (dimensionless) : Coefficient of thermal expansion (1/°C) : Reference temperature (°C) : Yielding strength (Pa) : von Mises equivalent stress (Pa) : Force (N) : Heat flow rate (W) : Electric current (A) : Coefficient of convection (W/m2-°C) : Ambient temperature (°C) : Electric conductance of contact surface (m−2Ω−1) : Thermal conductance of contact surface (W/m2-°C) : Contact resistivity of contact surface (Ω-m).

#### Conflicts of Interest

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.

#### Acknowledgments

The author would like to acknowledge the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan for the financial support under Contract nos. MOST 104-2221-E-131-030 and MOST 105-2221-E-131-014.

#### References

1. V. Z. Parton and B. A. Kudryavtsev, Electromagnetoelasticity, Gordon and Breach, New York, NY, USA, 1988.
2. B. A. Kudryavtsev, V. Z. Parton, and B. D. Rubinskii, “Electromagnetic and thermoelastic fields in a conducting plate with a cut of finite length,” Mechanics of Solids, vol. 17, pp. 110–118, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
3. D. Hasanyan, L. Librescu, Z. Qin, and R. D. Young, “Thermoelastic cracked plates carrying nonstationary electrical current,” Journal of Thermal Stresses, vol. 28, no. 6-7, pp. 729–745, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
4. Z. Qin, L. Librescu, and D. Hasanyan, “Joule heating and its implications on crack detection/arrest in electrically conductive circular cylindrical shells,” Journal of Thermal Stresses, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 623–637, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
5. G. X. Cai and F. G. Yuan, “Electric current-induced stresses at the crack tip in conductors,” International Journal of Fracture, vol. 96, pp. 279–301, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
6. G. X. Cai and F. G. Yuan, “Stresses around the crack tip due to electric current and self-induced magnetic field,” Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 29, no. 3-6, pp. 297–306, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
7. F. u. YM, X. Z. Bai, G. Y. Qiao, H. u. YD, and J. Y. Luan, “Technique for producing crack arrest by electromagnetic heating,” Materials Science and Technology, vol. 17, pp. 1653–2656, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
8. X. Z. Bai, Z. G. Tian, and J. Zheng, Thermo-electric effects in fracture mechanics, National Defense Industry Press, China, 2009 (Chinese).
9. T. J. C. Liu, “Thermo-electro-structural coupled analyses of crack arrest by Joule heating,” Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 171–184, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
10. T. J. C. Liu, “Finite element modeling of melting crack tip under thermo-electric Joule heating,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 666–684, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
11. T. J. C. Liu, “Crack detection/arrest with Joule heating,” in Encyclopedia of Thermal Stresses, R. B. Hetnarski, Ed., Springer Science + Business Media Dordrecht, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
12. T. J.-C. Liu, “Joule heating behaviors around through crack emanating from circular hole under electric load,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 123, pp. 2–20, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
13. C. L. Tsai, W. L. Dai, and D. W. Dickinson, “Analysis and development of a real-time control methodology in resistance spot welding,” Welding Journal, vol. 70, pp. s339–s351, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
14. D. K. Cheng, Field and Wave Electromagnetics, Addison-Wesley, MA, USA, 1983.
15. F. P. Incropera and D. P. DeWitt, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, John Wiley & Sons, 5th edition, 2002.
16. A. P. Boresi and K. P. Chong, Elasticity in Engineering Mechanics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2000.
17. O. C. Zienkiewicz and R. L. Taylor, The Finite Element Method, vol. 2, McGraw-Hill, New York, 4th edition, 1991.
18. ANSYS Inc., ANSYS 16.2 Mechanical APDL Theory Reference, SAS IP, 2015.
19. R. S. Barsoum, “On the use of isoparametric finite elements in linear fracture mechanics,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 25–37, 1976. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
20. X. Sun and P. Dong, “Analysis of aluminum resistance spot welding processes using coupled finite element procedures,” Welding Journal, vol. 79, pp. s215–s221, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
21. G. C. Sih, Handbook of Stress Intensity Factors, Lehigh University, Pennsylvania, Pa, USA, 1973.

Copyright © 2017 Thomas Jin-Chee Liu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.