Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Modelling and Simulation in Engineering
Volume 2018, Article ID 8578272, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8578272
Research Article

Simulation of Train-Turnout Coupled Dynamics Using a Multibody Simulation Software

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

Correspondence should be addressed to Albert Lau; on.untn@ual.trebla

Received 7 December 2017; Revised 18 May 2018; Accepted 24 June 2018; Published 22 July 2018

Academic Editor: Gaetano Sequenzia

Copyright © 2018 Albert Lau and Inge Hoff. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. Alves, A. Paixão, E. Fortunato, and R. Calçada, “Under sleeper pads in transition zones at railway underpasses: numerical modelling and experimental validation,” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1432–1449, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Wiest, E. Kassa, W. Daves, J. C. O. Nielsen, and H. Ossberger, “Assessment of methods for calculating contact pressure in wheel-rail/switch contact,” Wear, vol. 265, no. 9-10, pp. 1439–1445, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Johansson, B. Pålsson, M. Ekh et al., “Simulation of wheel–rail contact and damage in switches & crossings,” Wear, vol. 271, no. 1-2, pp. 472–481, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Paixão, E. Fortunato, and R. Calçada, “A numerical study on the influence of backfill settlements in the train/track interaction at transition zones to railway bridges,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, vol. 230, no. 3, pp. 866–878, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. H. Wang, V. Markine, and I. Shevtsov, “The analysis of degradation mechanism in track transition zones using 3d finite element model,” in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Railway Technology: Research, Development and Maintenance, Civil-Comp Press, Stirlingshire, UK, 2014.
  6. E. Kassa and J. C. O. Nielsen, “Dynamic interaction between train and railway turnout: full-scale field test and validation of simulation models,” Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 521–534, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. Lagos, A. Alonso, J. Vinolas, and X. Pérez, “Rail vehicle passing through a turnout: analysis of different turnout designs and wheel profiles,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, vol. 226, no. 6, pp. 587–602, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C. Wan, V. L. Markine, and I. Y. Shevtsov, “Improvement of vehicle–turnout interaction by optimising the shape of crossing nose,” Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 1517–1540, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. B. Pålsson, “Design optimisation of switch rails in railway turnouts,” Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 1619–1639, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Lau and E. Kassa, “Simulation of vehicle-track interaction in small radius curves and switches and crossings,” in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Railway Technology: Research, Development and Maintenance, Civil-Comp Press, Stirlingshire, UK, 2014.
  11. C. Esveld, Modern Railway Track, MRT-Productions, Zaltbommel, Netherlands, 2001.
  12. J. Evans and M. Berg, “Challenges in simulation of rail vehicle dynamics,” Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1023–1048, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. W. Zhai and Z. Cai, “Dynamic interaction between a lumped mass vehicle and a discretely supported continuous rail track,” Computers and Structures, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 987–997, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. K. L. Knothe and S. L. Grassie, “Modelling of railway track and vehicle/track interaction at high frequencies,” Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 22, no. 3-4, pp. 209–262, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. G. Diana, F. Cheli, S. Bruni, and A. Collina, “Dynamic interaction between rail vehicles and track for high speed train,” Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 24, no. S1, pp. 15–30, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. N. Ottosen and H. Petersson, Introduction to the Finite Element Method, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1992.
  17. Y. Sun, C. Cole, M. Spiryagin, and M. Dhanasekar, “Vertical dynamic interaction of trains and rail steel bridges,” Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 88–97, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  18. S. Iwnicki, “Manchester benchmarks for rail vehicle simulation,” Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 30, no. 3-4, pp. 295–313, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. S. Iwnicki, Handbook of Railway Vehicle Dynamics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006.