Hydrodynamic Modeling of a Tropical Tidal River Using the Dynamic Estuary Model (DYNHYD5): A Case Study in Sibu Laut River, Sarawak, Malaysia

Table 2

Summary of changes (%) of channel flow and mean depth in sensitivity analysis.

Channel	M. coeff. 0.015		M. coeff. 0.055		M. coeff. 0.075		−50% inflow		+50% inflow		−50% SB		+50% SB
	Flow	Depth	Flow	Depth	Flow	Depth	Flow	Depth	Flow	Depth	Flow	Depth	Flow	Depth
1	−0.3%	−0.2%	0.0%	0.4%	0.0%	0.9%	−50.1%	−0.2%	49.9%	0.2%	0.1%	−43.6%	0.6%	44.3%
2	0.1%	−0.2%	−0.1%	0.3%	−0.1%	0.8%	−50.0%	−0.1%	49.9%	0.2%	−0.1%	−42.0%	−0.6%	42.8%
3	0.2%	−0.4%	−0.3%	−0.1%	−0.3%	0.0%	−50.0%	−0.3%	49.8%	−0.2%	−0.3%	−50.1%	−2.2%	49.0%
4	0.3%	−0.1%	−0.4%	0.2%	−0.4%	0.5%	−49.9%	−0.1%	49.7%	0.1%	0.1%	−44.2%	−4.6%	44.5%
5	0.0%	−0.1%	0.0%	0.1%	−0.4%	−0.2%	−50.0%	0.0%	49.9%	−0.2%	−26.2%	−73.2%	−0.4%	66.8%
6	0.2%	−0.6%	−0.3%	0.1%	−0.4%	0.7%	−49.9%	−0.5%	49.8%	−0.1%	−12.1%	−55.4%	−3.6%	55.8%
7	0.7%	−0.1%	−0.5%	0.3%	−0.5%	0.6%	−49.9%	−0.1%	49.6%	0.2%	−8.4%	−26.8%	−5.2%	27.4%
8	−0.4%	−0.2%	0.3%	0.3%	0.3%	0.7%	−50.1%	−0.1%	50.2%	0.2%	4.4%	−28.3%	3.3%	28.9%
9	−0.5%	−0.2%	0.3%	0.3%	0.3%	0.7%	−50.1%	−0.1%	50.2%	0.2%	3.4%	−32.7%	3.1%	33.4%
10	−0.7%	−0.1%	0.4%	0.2%	0.4%	0.4%	−50.1%	−0.1%	50.3%	0.1%	4.7%	−33.1%	4.8%	33.6%
11	−0.1%	−0.2%	0.0%	0.3%	0.0%	0.8%	−50.0%	−0.1%	50.0%	0.1%	−15.0%	−97.8%	0.2%	114.9%
12	−0.2%	−6.1%	0.2%	6.5%	0.2%	13.0%	−50.2%	−5.6%	50.7%	−1.1%	0.4%	−38.7%	0.9%	216.2%
13	−0.1%	−0.2%	0.0%	0.4%	0.0%	0.9%	−50.1%	−0.1%	50.3%	0.1%	−11.0%	−96.8%	0.6%	110.5%
14	0.1%	−0.1%	0.0%	0.2%	−0.1%	0.4%	−50.0%	0.0%	50.2%	0.1%	−5.1%	−60.6%	0.7%	61.4%
15	−0.5%	0.0%	0.3%	0.1%	0.3%	0.2%	−50.1%	0.0%	50.2%	0.0%	1.2%	−32.3%	3.6%	32.7%

M. coeff., Manning’s coefficient; SB  seaward boundary.