Research Article

The Quality of Ranking during Simulated Pairwise Judgments for Examined Approximation Procedures

Table 4

Mean performance measures of arbitrarily selected APs for 30,000 cases.

Scenario detailsProcedureMRERankMSRCRankMRRRankMean rank

Geometric scaleGamma distributionFR-PCMLLSM0.43843810.68230021.2124211.3 (3)
REV0.45261450.66838051.2205144.6 (6)
LUA0.44734920.67306731.2179222.3 (3)
SRDM0.44875930.67138041.2187033.3 (3)
SNCS0.45073440.69245311.2439853.3 (3)
Uniform distributionFR-PCMLLSM0.28860810.80486021.1281311.3 (3)
REV0.30234640.79258051.1353044.3 (3)
LUA0.29840120.79576731.1335022.3 (3)
SRDM0.29940030.79482041.1340033.3 (3)
SNCS0.30346350.80833311.1545053.6 (6)

Note: FR-PCM denotes forced reciprocity applied to PCM during simulations.