Modelling Low-Salinity Water Flooding as a Tertiary Oil Recovery Technique

Table 7

Percentage oil recovery efficiency for Case 3.

Run no.	File name	Injection duration (years)	Pore volume (PV) low sal injected	% change in recovery factor (FOE)
1	2% SC @ 0.11 PV injected (A1)	0.5	0.11	10.98
2	2% SC @ 0.216 PV injected (A2)	1	0.216	12.62
3	2% SC @ 0.433 PV injected (A3)	2	0.433	16.59
4	2% SC @ 0.76 PV injected (A4)	3	0.76	21.03
5	2% SC @ 1 PV injected (A5)	7.417	1	27.23
6	2% SC @ 1.5 PV injected (A6)	7	1.5	26.77
7	2% SC @ 2 PV injected (A7)	9.417	2	28.93
8	20% SC @ 0.11 PV injected (B1)	0.5	0.11	10.30
9	20% SC @ 0.216 PV injected (B2)	1	0.216	10.60
10	20% SC @ 0.433 PV injected (B3)	2	0.433	11.16
11	20% SC @ 0.76 PV injected (B4)	3	0.76	11.91
12	20% SC @ 1 PV injected (B5)	7.417	1	13.37
13	20% SC @ 1.5 PV injected (B6)	7	1.5	13.25
14	20% SC @ 2 PV injected (B7)	9.417	2	13.85

Similar plot profile trend is obtained for the FWCT as in Case 1 and Case 2.