Research Article

Validation of the Danish Version of Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis: A Quality of Life Instrument

Table 4

Responsiveness to change: mean (sd) FAMS scores at admission and discharge for individuals who had same, better, or worse score at discharge on question 51: “Satisfaction with the way I handle my illness.’’

Satisfaction with the way
I handle my illness (Q51)
MobilitySymptomsEmotional well-beingGeneral contentmentThinking/
fatique
Family/social well-beingFAMS total

Same score ( ):
(i) Score at admission13.1 (5.7)21.3 (4.9)20.6 (5.9)18.6 (5.8)21.2 (7.8)22.0 (5.0)116.4 (27.0)
(ii) Change at discharge0.8 (4.2)0.9 (3.4)*0.7 (4.1)1.1 (4.1)*1.6 (5.0)*−0.3 (3.1)4.8 (16.9)*
(iii) Effect size 0.15 0.190.12 0.180.20−0.050.18

Better score ( ):
(i) Score at admission12.7 (5.0)21.0 (5.2)18.4 (6.0)16.8 (5.6)18.5 (8.3)19.0 (6.0)106.3 (24.7)
(ii) Change at discharge2.3 (4.0)*1.5 (4.0)*2.9 (4.5)*2.5 (3.9)*3.3 (7.5)*1.5 (3.8)*14.0 (16.8)*
(iii) Effect size0.440.290.480.450.400.240.57
Mean dif. from “same score” group
(i) Mean (95% CI)1.5 (0.1; 3.0)*0.6 (−0.7; 1.8)2.2 (0.7; 3.7)*1.5 (0.0; 2.9)*1.7 (−0.4; 3.7)1.7 (0.6; 2.9)*9.2 (3.0; 15.2)*

Worse score ( ):
(i) Score at admission11.5 (5.0)19.7 (5.4)17.4 (7.0)16.0 (5.9)16.7 (9.6)17.6 (5.8)97.8 (29.8)
(ii) Change at discharge−0.4 (5.6)−0.2 (2.9)−0.9 (5.1)−0.7 (4.0)−1.2 (6.8)−1.2 (2.7)*−7.3 (23.1)
(iii) Effect size−0.09−0.03−0.13−0.12−0.12−0.21−0.25
Mean dif. from“same score”group
(i) Mean (95% CI)−1.2 (−3.2; 0.7)1.1 (−2.5; 0.3)−1.6 (−3.5; 0.3)−1.8 (−3.5; 0)*−2.8 (−5.1;−.04)*−1.0 (−2.3; 0.4)−12.1 (−20.0;−4.3)*

*Indicates statistically significant difference ( ).