Research Article

Exploring the Association between Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness and Initial Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Patients with Acute Optic Neuritis

Table 3

Comparing MRI status, corticosteroid therapy, and RNFL* values in nonaffected eyes.

RNFL Non-ON Eyes*Year 1P valueYear 2P value
MRI+§ ( )MRI−|| ( )MRI+ ( )MRI− ( )

Overall (SD)103.9 (10.5)102.2 (9.4).56104.1 (12.2)104.3 (9.9).94
Superior131.1 (15.6)132.9 (13.0).67134.4 (20.6)135.3 (13.6).87
Inferior134.0 (16.9)125.4 (12.7).07131.0 (17.9)127 (14.9).42
Nasal84.3 (17.0)80.4 (17.7).4684.0 (18.0)84.7 (21.4).89
Temporal66.3 (13.0)70.0 (10.1).3066.9 (13.6)70.7 (13.8).34

Steroid#
( )
Untreated** ( )Steroid ( )Untreated ( )

Overall (SD)103.6 (9.3)103.0 (11.0).84104.7 (10.5)103.6 (12.5).75
Superior130.7 (12.4)132.8 (16.7).63136.0 (14.7)133.5 (21.4).63
Inferior131.4 (14.2)130.5 (17.8).85130.2 (17.8)129.0 (16.2).80
Nasal85.8 (18.6)80.0 (15.5).2382.8 (19.8)85.7 (18.6).60
Temporal66.6 (11.2)68.6 (13.0).5669.7 (13.8)66.8 (13.7).47

*Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (μm); §Abnormal baseline magnetic resonance imaging study [8]; || Normal baseline magnetic resonance imaging study; Mean overall RNFL value (standard deviation), and mean RNFL values in the superior, inferior, nasal and temporal quadrants; # Patients treated with the equivalent of 1000 mg of intravenous methyl-prednisolone for acute management of optic neuritis; **Patients not treated acutely for optic neuritis.