Clinical Study
Exploiting Interlimb Arm and Leg Connections for Walking Rehabilitation: A Training Intervention in Stroke
Table 1
Participant data and clinical assessment parameters.
| | Sex/age/MA | Modified Ashworth (ankle/knee) | FAC (/6) | Chedoke-McMaster (A/H/L/F) | Monofilament (hand/foot) | Reflexes (S1/L1) | Years since stroke |
| | 1 | M/74/R | 3/1+ | 4 | 2/2/3/2 | J 4.31/J 4.31 | 3+/1+ | 5 | | 2 | F/70/R | 0/0 | 5 | 7/5/7/7 | J 4.31/J 4.31 | 2+/2+ | 2 | | 3 | F/45/R | 1/0 | 5 | 5/5/6/5 | F 3.61/J 4.31 | 0/0 | 7 | | 4 | M/59/R | 2/0 | 5 | 2/2/4/2 | T 6.65/J 4.31 | 3+/3+ | 3 | | 5 | M/82/R | 0/1 | 3 | 4/6/6/5 | UTF/UTF | 3+/0 | 3 | | 6 | M/86/L | 1+/0 | 5 | 7/7/6/5 | J 4.31/T 6.65 | 0/0 | 4 | | 7 | F/80/R | 0/0 | 5 | 3/5/5/5 | J 4.31/J 4.31 | 0/0 | 6 | | 8 | M/59/R | 2/1 | 5 | 5/5/5/4 | T 6.65/T 6.65 | 3+/4+ | 11 | | 9 | M/74/R | 1/1 | 5 | 6/5/6/5 | J 4.31/F 3.61 | 3+/2+ | 6 | | 10 | M/47/L | 4/2 | 4 | 2/1/2/2 | T 6.65/T 6.65 | 4+/3+ | 6 | | 11 | M/69/L | 2/3 | 4 | 2/2/3/2 | T 6.65/T 6.65 | 3+/3+ | 5 | | 12 | F/72/R | 2/2 | 3 | 2/3/2/3 | UTF/J 4.31 | 1+/3+ | 6 | | 13 | M/59/L | 1/1 | 6 | 6/6/6/4 | J 4.31/J 4.31 | 3+/2+ | 5 | | 14 | M/56/L | 1/1 | 5 | 1/1/4/2 | T 6.65/T 6.65 | 3+/3+ | 8 | | 15 | M/77/L | 2/2 | 3 | 4/5/5/3 | UTF/T 6.65 | 3+/3+ | 8 | | 16 | F/63/L | 1/2 | 5 | 2/2/3/4 | T 6.65/K 4.56 | 3+/1+ | 13 | | 17 | M/71/R | 1/2 | 4 | 3/2/4/4 | F 3.61/J 4.31 | 2+/3+ | 6 | | 18 | M/62/R | 1+/2 | 4 | 4/3/4/5 | D 2.83/D 2.83 | 3+/3+ | 8 | | 19 | M/78/L | 3/1+ | 4 | 3/3/4/4 | T 6.65/T 6.65 | 0/0 | 29 |
|
|
MA, more affected; M, male; F, female; L, left; R, right; FAC, Functional Ambulation Category; A, arm; H, hand; L, leg; F, foot; UTF, unable to feel; S1, 1st sacral vertebrae; and L1, 1st lumbar vertebrae.
|
