Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Neural Plasticity
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 1801979, 18 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1801979
Research Article

Pairing Cholinergic Enhancement with Perceptual Training Promotes Recovery of Age-Related Changes in Rat Primary Auditory Cortex

Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada H3A 2B4

Received 20 August 2015; Accepted 25 October 2015

Academic Editor: Aage R. Moller

Copyright © 2016 Patrice Voss et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. L. Goldstone, “Perceptual learning,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 49, pp. 585–612, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. Sagi, “Perceptual learning in vision research,” Vision Research, vol. 51, no. 13, pp. 1552–1566, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. Ball and R. Sekuler, “Direction-specific improvement in motion discrimination,” Vision Research, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 953–965, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. B. Fitzgerald and B. A. Wright, “A perceptual learning investigation of the pitch elicited by amplitude-modulated noise,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 118, no. 6, pp. 3794–3803, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. F. W. Ohl and H. Scheich, “Learning-induced plasticity in animal and human auditory cortex,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 470–477, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. G. H. Recanzone, C. E. Schreiner, and M. M. Merzenich, “Plasticity in the frequency representation of primary auditory cortex following discrimination training in adult owl monkeys,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 87–103, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Schoups, R. Vogels, N. Qian, and G. Orban, “Practising orientation identification improves orientation coding in V1 neurons,” Nature, vol. 412, no. 6846, pp. 549–553, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. E. Hasselmo and M. Sarter, “Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition,” Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 52–73, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. M. Greuel, H. J. Luhmann, and W. Singer, “Pharmacologial induction of use-dependent receptive field modifications in the visual cortex,” Science, vol. 241, no. 4875, pp. 74–77, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Rokem and M. A. Silver, “Cholinergic enhancement augments magnitude and specificity of visual perceptual learning in healthy humans,” Current Biology, vol. 20, no. 19, pp. 1723–1728, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. L. Furey, P. Pietrini, J. V. Haxby, and W. C. Drevets, “Selective effects of cholinergic modulation on task performance during selective attention,” Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 913–923, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. S. Bakin and N. M. Weinberger, “Induction of a physiological memory in the cerebral cortex by stimulation of the nucleus basalis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 93, no. 20, pp. 11219–11224, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. I. Kang, M. Groleau, F. Dotigny, H. Giguère, and E. Vaucher, “Visual training paired with electrical stimulation of the basal forebrain improves orientation-selective visual acuity in the rat,” Brain Structure and Function, vol. 219, no. 4, pp. 1493–1507, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. P. Kilgard and M. M. Merzenich, “Cortical map reorganization enabled by nucleus basalis activity,” Science, vol. 279, no. 5357, pp. 1714–1718, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. P. L. McGeer, E. G. McGeer, J. Suzuki, C. E. Dolman, and T. Nagai, “Aging, Alzheimer’s disease, and the cholinergic system of the basal forebrain,” Neurology, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 741–745, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. E. K. Perry, “The cholinergic system in old age and Alzheimer’s disease,” Age and Ageing, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. C. Altavista, P. Rossi, A. R. Bentivoglio, P. Crociani, and A. Albanese, “Aging is associated with a diffuse impairment of forebrain cholinergic neurons,” Brain Research, vol. 508, no. 1, pp. 51–59, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. G. E. Gibson, C. Peterson, and D. J. Jenden, “Brain acetylcholine synthesis declines with senescence,” Science, vol. 213, no. 4508, pp. 674–676, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. B. J. Everitt and T. W. Robbins, “Central cholinergic systems and cognition,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 48, pp. 649–684, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. Schliebs and T. Arendt, “The cholinergic system in aging and neuronal degeneration,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 221, no. 2, pp. 555–563, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. U. Freo, E. Ricciardi, P. Pietrini, M. B. Schapiro, S. I. Rapoport, and M. L. Furey, “Pharmacological modulation of prefrontal cortical activity during a working memory task in young and older humans: a pet study with physostigmine,” The American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 162, no. 11, pp. 2061–2070, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. E. Ricciardi, P. Pietrini, M. B. Schapiro, S. I. Rapoport, and M. L. Furey, “Cholinergic modulation of visual working memory during aging: a parametric PET study,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 322–332, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. P. M. Greenwood, “The frontal aging hypothesis evaluated,” Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 705–726, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. T. L. Wallace, T. M. Ballard, B. Pouzet, W. J. Riedel, and J. G. Wettstein, “Drug targets for cognitive enhancement in neuropsychiatric disorders,” Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 130–145, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. Kobayashi, M. Iwamoto, K. Kon, H. Waki, S. Ando, and Y. Tanaka, “Acetyl-l-carnitine improves aged brain function,” Geriatrics and Gerontology International, vol. 10, supplement 1, pp. S99–S106, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. H. L. Sterns and D. Doverspike, “Aging and the training and learning process,” in Training and Development in Organizations, pp. 299–332, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  27. J. Boyke, J. Driemeyer, C. Gaser, C. Büchel, and A. May, “Training-induced brain structure changes in the elderly,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 28, no. 28, pp. 7031–7035, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. C. Lustig, P. Shah, R. Seidler, and P. A. Reuter-Lorenz, “Aging, training, and the brain: a review and future directions,” Neuropsychology Review, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 504–522, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. E. de Villers-Sidani, L. Alzghoul, X. Zhou, K. L. Simpson, R. C. S. Lin, and M. M. Merzenich, “Recovery of functional and structural age-related changes in the rat primary auditory cortex with operant training,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 31, pp. 13900–13905, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. B. Čolović, D. Z. Krstić, T. D. Lazarević-Pašti, A. M. Bondžić, and V. M. Vasić, “Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors: pharmacology and toxicology,” Current Neuropharmacology, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 315–335, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. S. Bao, E. F. Chang, J. Woods, and M. M. Merzenich, “Temporal plasticity in the primary auditory cortex induced by operant perceptual learning,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 974–981, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. H. W. Mahncke, A. Bronstone, and M. M. Merzenich, “Brain plasticity and functional losses in the aged: scientific bases for a novel intervention,” Progress in Brain Research, vol. 157, pp. 81–109, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. D. B. Polley, E. E. Steinberg, and M. M. Merzenich, “Perceptual learning directs auditory cortical map reorganization through top-down influences,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 26, no. 18, pp. 4970–4982, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. Bao, E. F. Chang, J. D. Davis, K. T. Gobeske, and M. M. Merzenich, “Progressive degradation and subsequent refinement of acoustic representations in the adult auditory cortex,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 23, no. 34, pp. 10765–10775, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. D. M. Green and J. A. Swets, Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1966.
  36. T. Fawcett, “An introduction to ROC analysis,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 861–874, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. K. D. Games and J. A. Winer, “Layer V in rat auditory cortex: projections to the inferior colliculus and contralateral cortex,” Hearing Research, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1–25, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. R. Metherate, C. L. Cox, and J. H. Ashe, “Cellular bases of neocortical activation: modulation of neural oscillations by the nucleus basalis and endogenous acetylcholine,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 4701–4711, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. D. E. McLin III, A. A. Miasnikov, and N. M. Weinberger, “CS-specific gamma, theta, and alpha EEG activity detected in stimulus generalization following induction of behavioral memory by stimulation of the nucleus basalis,” Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 152–176, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. B. Cauli, X.-K. Tong, A. Rancillac et al., “Cortical GABA interneurons in neurovascular coupling: relays for subcortical vasoactive pathways,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 24, no. 41, pp. 8940–8949, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. C. Viollet, G. Lepousez, C. Loudes, C. Videau, A. Simon, and J. Epelbaum, “Somatostatinergic systems in brain: networks and functions,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 286, no. 1-2, pp. 75–87, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. H. Makino and T. Komiyama, “Learning enhances the relative impact of top-down processing in the visual cortex,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1116–1122, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. J. C. H. Cottam, S. L. Smith, and M. Häusser, “Target-specific effects of somatostatin-expressing interneurons on neocortical visual processing,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 33, no. 50, pp. 19567–19578, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. A. Gazzaley, J. W. Cooney, J. Rissman, and M. D’Esposito, “Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 1298–1300, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. A. Gazzaley, “Top-down modulation deficit in the aging brain: an emerging theory of cognitive aging,” in Principles of Frontal Lobe Function, R. T. Knight and D. T. Stuss, Eds., pp. 593–608, 2nd edition, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  46. H. Sato, Y. Hata, H. Masui, and T. Tsumoto, “A functional role of cholinergic innervation to neurons in the cat visual cortex,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 765–780, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. A. L. Beer, D. Vartak, and M. W. Greenlee, “Nicotine facilitates memory consolidation in perceptual learning,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 64, pp. 443–451, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. M. Sarter, M. E. Hasselmo, J. P. Bruno, and B. Givens, “Unraveling the attentional functions of cortical cholinergic inputs: interactions between signal-driven and cognitive modulation of signal detection,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 98–111, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. A. Rokem, A. N. Landau, D. Garg, W. Prinzmetal, and M. A. Silver, “Cholinergic enhancement increases the effects of voluntary attention but does not affect involuntary attention,” Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 35, no. 13, pp. 2538–2544, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. R. G. Rutkowski and N. M. Weinberger, “Encoding of learned importance of sound by magnitude of representational area in primary auditory cortex,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 38, pp. 13664–13669, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. J.-M. Edeline and N. M. Weinberger, “Receptive field plasticity in the auditory cortex during frequency discrimination training: selective retuning independent of task difficulty,” Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 82–103, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. N. S. Foldi, R. E. C. White, and L. A. Schaefer, “Detecting effects of donepezil on visual selective attention using signal detection parameters in Alzheimer’s disease,” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 485–488, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. M. Sarter and G. Paolone, “Deficits in attentional control: cholinergic mechanisms and circuitry-based treatment approaches,” Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 125, no. 6, pp. 825–835, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. M. Boucart, G. A. Michael, G. Bubicco et al., “Cholinergic modulation of stimulus-driven attentional capture,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 283, pp. 47–52, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. J. G. Turner, L. F. Hughes, and D. M. Caspary, “Affects of aging on receptive fields in rat primary auditory cortex layer V neurons,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 2738–2747, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. J. Mishra, E. de Villers-Sidani, M. Merzenich, and A. Gazzaley, “Adaptive training diminishes distractibility in aging across species,” Neuron, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 1091–1103, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. G. H. Recanzone, C. E. Schreiner, M. L. Sutter, R. E. Beitel, and M. M. Merzenich, “Functional organization of spectral receptive fields in the primary auditory cortex of the owl monkey,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 415, no. 4, pp. 460–481, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. L. Ouellet and E. de Villers-Sidani, “Trajectory of the main GABAergic interneuron populations from early development to old age in the rat primary auditory cortex,” Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, vol. 8, article 40, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. A. Cybulska-Klosowicz, A. Posluszny, K. Nowak, E. Siucinska, M. Kossut, and M. Liguz-Lecznar, “Interneurons containing somatostatin are affected by learning-induced cortical plasticity,” Neuroscience, vol. 254, pp. 18–25, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. A. El Idrissi, “Taurine improves learning and retention in aged mice,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 436, no. 1, pp. 19–22, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. Y. Kawaguchi, “Selective cholinergic modulation of cortical GABAergic cell subtypes,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 1743–1747, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. R. A. Peterfreund and W. W. Vale, “Muscarinic cholinergic stimulation of somatostatin secretion from long term dispersed cell cultures of fetal rat hypothalamus: inhibition by gamma-aminobutyric acid and serotonin,” Endocrinology, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 526–534, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. E. E. Fanselow, K. A. Richardson, and B. W. Connors, “Selective, state-dependent activation of somatostatin-expressing inhibitory interneurons in mouse neocortex,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 2640–2652, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus