Neural Plasticity

Copyright © 2016 Ivan Patané et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

1. V. Walsh, “A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 483–488, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
2. D. Bueti and V. Walsh, “The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 364, no. 1525, pp. 1831–1840, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
3. M. Ishihara, P. E. Keller, Y. Rossetti, and W. Prinz, “Horizontal spatial representations of time: evidence for the STEARC effect,” Cortex, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 454–461, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
4. S. Arzy, E. Adi-Japha, and O. Blanke, “The mental time line: an analogue of the mental number line in the mapping of life events,” Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 781–785, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
5. J. Santiago, J. Lupáñez, E. Pérez, and M. J. Funes, “Time (also) flies from left to right,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 512–516, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
6. A. Torralbo, J. Santiago, and J. Lupiáñez, “Flexible conceptual projection of time onto spatial frames of reference,” Cognitive Science, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 745–757, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
7. A. Vallesi, Y. Weisblatt, C. Semenza, and S. Shaki, “Cultural modulations of space-time compatibility effects,” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 666–669, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
8. M. Oliveri, G. Koch, S. Salerno, S. Torriero, E. L. Gerfo, and C. Caltagirone, “Representation of time intervals in the right posterior parietal cortex: Implications for a mental time line,” NeuroImage, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 1173–1179, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
9. M. G. Di Bono, M. Casarotti, K. Priftis, L. Gava, C. Umiltà, and M. Zorzi, “Priming the mental time line,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 838–842, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
10. C. M. Vicario, P. Pecoraro, P. Turriziani, G. Koch, C. Caltagirone, and M. Oliveri, “Relativistic compression and expansion of experiential time in the left and right space,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 3, Article ID e1716, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
11. F. Frassinetti, B. Magnani, and M. Oliveri, “Prismatic lenses shift time perception,” Psychological Science, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 949–954, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
12. V. Gaveau, C. Prablanc, D. Laurent, Y. Rossetti, and A.-E. Priot, “Visuomotor adaptation needs a validation of prediction error by feedback error,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 8, article 880, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
13. G. M. Redding and B. Wallace, “Prism adaptation in alternately exposed hands,” Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, vol. 75, no. 6, pp. 1168–1185, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
14. J. H. Bultitude, S. Van der Stigchel, and T. C. W. Nijboer, “Prism adaptation alters spatial remapping in healthy individuals: evidence from double-step saccades,” Cortex, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 759–770, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
15. G. M. Redding, Y. Rossetti, and B. Wallace, “Applications of prism adaptation: a tutorial in theory and method,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 431–444, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
16. S. Schintu, L. Pisella, S. Jacobs, R. Salemme, K. T. Reilly, and A. Farnè, “Prism adaptation in the healthy brain: the shift in line bisection judgments is long lasting and fluctuates,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 165–170, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
17. B. Magnani, M. Oliveri, G. Renata Mangano, and F. Frassinetti, “The role of posterior parietal cortex in spatial representation of time: a TMS study,” Behavioural Neurology, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 213–215, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
18. B. Magnani, F. Pavani, and F. Frassinetti, “Changing auditory time with prismatic goggles,” Cognition, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 233–243, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
19. G. Jewell and M. E. McCourt, “Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 93–110, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
20. R. Schmitz and P. Peigneux, “Age-related changes in visual pseudoneglect,” Brain and Cognition, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 382–389, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
21. M.-N. Toba, P. Cavanagh, and P. Bartolomeo, “Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 238–246, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
22. C. S. Y. Benwell, G. Thut, A. Grant, and M. Harvey, “A rightward shift in the visuospatial attention vector with healthy aging,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, vol. 6, article 113, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
23. M. R. Longo, S. Trippier, E. Vagnoni, and S. F. Lourenco, “Right hemisphere control of visuospatial attention in near space,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 70, pp. 350–357, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
24. C. Colent, L. Pisella, C. Bernieri, G. Rode, and Y. Rossetti, “Cognitive bias induced by visuo-motor adaptation to prisms: a simulation of unilateral neglect in normal individuals?” NeuroReport, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 1899–1902, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
25. C. Michel, L. Pisella, P. W. Halligan et al., “Simulating unilateral neglect in normals using prism adaptation: implications for theory,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 25–39, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
26. A. M. Loftus, N. Vijayakumar, and M. E. R. Nicholls, “Prism adaptation overcomes pseudoneglect for the greyscales task,” Cortex, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 537–543, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
27. T. Nijboer, A. Vree, C. Dijkerman, and S. Van der Stigchel, “Prism adaptation influences perception but not attention: evidence from antisaccades,” NeuroReport, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 386–389, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
28. L. Pisella, G. Rode, A. Farnè, D. Boisson, and Y. Rossetti, “Dissociated long lasting improvements of straight-ahead pointing and line bisection tasks in two hemineglect patients,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 327–334, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
29. S. A. Reed and P. Dassonville, “Adaptation to leftward-shifting prisms enhances local processing in healthy individuals,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 418–427, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
30. E. R. Ferrè, M. R. Longo, F. Fiori, and P. Haggard, “Vestibular modulation of spatial perception,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 7, article 660, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
31. L. Gamberini, B. Seraglia, and K. Priftis, “Processing of peripersonal and extrapersonal space using tools: evidence from visual line bisection in real and virtual environments,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1298–1304, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
32. S. F. Lourenco and M. R. Longo, “The plasticity of near space: evidence for contraction,” Cognition, vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 451–456, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
33. M. R. Longo and S. F. Lourenco, “On the nature of near space: effects of tool use and the transition to far space,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 977–981, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
34. M. R. Longo and S. F. Lourenco, “Space perception and body morphology: extent of near space scales with arm length,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 177, no. 2, pp. 285–290, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
35. A. Berti and F. Frassinetti, “When far becomes near: remapping of space by tool use,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 415–420, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
36. J. K. Witt, D. R. Proffitt, and W. Epstein, “Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 880–888, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
37. L. Cardinali, F. Frassinetti, C. Brozzoli, C. Urquizar, A. C. Roy, and A. Farnè, “Tool-use induces morphological updating of the body schema,” Current Biology, vol. 19, no. 13, p. 1157, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
38. T. R. Makin, C. Brozzoli, L. Cardinali, N. P. Holmes, and A. Farnè, “Left or right? Rapid visuomotor coding of hand laterality during motor decisions,” Cortex, vol. 64, pp. 289–292, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
39. P. Cardellicchio, C. Sinigaglia, and M. Costantini, “The space of affordances: a TMS study,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1369–1372, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
40. T. R. Makin, N. P. Holmes, C. Brozzoli, Y. Rossetti, and A. Farnè, “Coding of visual space during motor preparation: approaching objects rapidly modulate corticospinal excitability in hand-centered coordinates,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 38, pp. 11841–11851, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
41. A. Serino, L. Annella, and A. Avenanti, “Motor properties of peripersonal space in humans,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 8, Article ID e6582, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
42. A. Farnè and E. Làdavas, “Dynamic size-change of hand peripersonal space following tool use,” NeuroReport, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1645–1649, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
43. A. Maravita, M. Husain, K. Clarke, and J. Driver, “Reaching with a tool extends visual-tactile interactions into far space: evidence from cross-modal extinction,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 580–585, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
44. M. Costantini, F. Frassinetti, M. Maini, E. Ambrosini, V. Gallese, and C. Sinigaglia, “When a laser pen becomes a stick: remapping of space by tool-use observation in hemispatial neglect,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 232, no. 10, pp. 3233–3241, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
45. T. R. Makin, N. P. Holmes, and E. Zohary, “Is that near my hand? Multisensory representation of peripersonal space in human intraparietal sulcus,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 731–740, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
46. C. Brozzoli, G. Gentile, V. I. Petkova, and H. H. Ehrsson, “fMRI adaptation reveals a cortical mechanism for the coding of space near the hand,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 24, pp. 9023–9031, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
47. C. Brozzoli, G. Gentile, and H. Henrik Ehrsson, “That's near my hand! Parietal and premotor coding of hand-centered space contributes to localization and self-attribution of the hand,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 42, pp. 14573–14582, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
48. C. Brozzoli, G. Gentile, L. Bergouignan, and H. H. Ehrsson, “A shared representation of the space near oneself and others in the human premotor cortex,” Current Biology, vol. 23, no. 18, pp. 1764–1768, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
49. J. Cléry, O. Guipponi, C. Wardak, and S. Ben Hamed, “Neuronal bases of peripersonal and extrapersonal spaces, their plasticity and their dynamics: knowns and unknowns,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 70, pp. 313–326, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
50. G. di Pellegrino and E. Làdavas, “Peripersonal space in the brain,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 66, pp. 126–133, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
51. C. Brozzoli, H. Ehrsson, and A. Farnè, “Multisensory representation of the space near the hand: from perception to action and interindividual interactions,” The Neuroscientist, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 122–135, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
52. A. D. Milner, M. Brechmann, and L. Pagliarini, “To halve and to halve not: an analysis of line bisection judgements in normal subjects,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 515–526, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
53. M. E. McCourt and C. Olafson, “Cognitive and perceptual influences on visual line bisection: psychophysical and chronometric analyses of pseudoneglect,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 369–380, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
54. B. Olk and M. Harvey, “Effects of visible and invisible cueing on line bisection and Landmark performance in hemispatial neglect,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 282–290, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
55. K. M. Kliegl, K. Limbrecht-Ecklundt, L. Dürr, H. C. Traue, and A. Huckauf, “The complex duration perception of emotional faces: effects of face direction,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 6, article 262, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
56. C. A. Lindbergh and P. D. Kieffaber, “The neural correlates of temporal judgments in the duration bisection task,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 191–196, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
57. I. Suarez, F. Lopera, D. Pineda, and L. Casini, “The cognitive structure of time estimation impairments in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder,” Cognitive Neuropsychology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 195–207, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
58. R. C. Oldfield, “The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 97–113, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
59. F. Frassinetti, V. Angeli, F. Meneghello, S. Avanzi, and E. Làdavas, “Long-lasting amelioration of visuospatial neglect by prism adaptation,” Brain, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 608–623, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
60. N. Berberovic and J. B. Mattingley, “Effects of prismatic adaptation on judgements of spatial extent in peripersonal and extrapersonal space,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 493–503, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
61. Y. Rossetti, G. Rode, L. Pisella et al., “Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect,” Nature, vol. 395, no. 6698, pp. 166–169, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
62. A. Farnè, Y. Rossetti, S. Toniolo, and E. Làdavas, “Ameliorating neglect with prism adaptation: visuo-manual and visuo-verbal measures,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 718–729, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
63. C. L. Striemer and J. Danckert, “Dissociating perceptual and motor effects of prism adaptation in neglect,” NeuroReport, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 436–441, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
64. R. Newport and T. Schenk, “Prisms and neglect: what have we learned?” Neuropsychologia, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1080–1091, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
65. V. Angeli, M. G. Benassi, and E. Làdavas, “Recovery of oculo-motor bias in neglect patients after prism adaptation,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 1223–1234, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
66. A. Serino, V. Angeli, F. Frassinetti, and E. Làdavas, “Mechanisms underlying neglect recovery after prism adaptation,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 1068–1078, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
67. A. Serino, M. Barbiani, M. L. Rinaldesi, and E. Ladavas, “Effectiveness of prism adaptation in neglect rehabilitation: a controlled trial study,” Stroke, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1392–1398, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
68. G. Rizzolatti and V. Gallese, “Mechanisms and theories of spatial neglect,” in Handbook of Neuropsychology, F. Boller and J. Grafman, Eds., vol. 1, pp. 223–249, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1st edition, 1988. View at Google Scholar
69. C. L. Colby, J.-R. Duhamel, and M. E. Goldberg, “Visual, presaccadic, and cognitive activation of single neurons in monkey lateral intraparietal area,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 2841–2852, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
70. K. J. Meador, D. W. Loring, D. Bowers, and K. M. Heilman, “Remote memory and neglect syndrome,” Neurology, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 522–526, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
71. J. Luauté, S. Jacquin-Courtois, J. O'Shea et al., “Left-deviating prism adaptation in left neglect patient: reflexions on a negative result,” Neural Plasticity, vol. 2012, Article ID 718604, 10 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
72. K. M. Goedert, A. Leblanc, S.-W. Tsai, and A. M. Barrett, “Asymmetrical effects of adaptation to left- and right-shifting prisms depends on pre-existing attentional biases,” Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 795–804, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
73. L. Pisella, G. Rode, A. Farnè, C. Tilikete, and Y. Rossetti, “Prism adaptation in the rehabilitation of patients with visuo-spatial cognitive disorders,” Current Opinion in Neurology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 534–542, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
74. M. Oliveri, B. Magnani, A. Filipelli, S. Avanzi, and F. Frassinetti, “Prismatic adaptation effects on spatial representation of time in neglect patients,” Cortex, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 120–130, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
75. B. Winter, T. Marghetis, and T. Matlock, “Of magnitudes and metaphors: explaining cognitive interactions between space, time, and number,” Cortex, vol. 64, pp. 209–224, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
76. N. Masson, M. Pesenti, and V. Dormal, “Duration and numerical estimation in right brain-damaged patients with and without neglect: lack of support for a mental time line,” British Journal of Psychology, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
77. A. Saj, O. Fuhrman, P. Vuilleumier, and L. Boroditsky, “Patients with left spatial neglect also neglect the ‘left side’ of time,” Psychological Science, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 207–214, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
78. U. W. Weger and J. Pratt, “Time flies like an arrow: space-time compatibility effects suggest the use of a mental timeline,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 426–430, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
79. M. Bonato, M. Zorzi, and C. Umiltà, “When time is space: evidence for a mental time line,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 2257–2273, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
80. R. E. Núñez and E. Sweetser, “With the future behind them: convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time,” Cognitive Science, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 401–450, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
81. R. Núñez and K. Cooperrider, “The tangle of space and time in human cognition,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 220–229, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
82. D. Casasanto and L. Boroditsky, “Time in the mind: using space to think about time,” Cognition, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 579–593, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
83. R. Bottini and D. Casasanto, “Space and time in the child's mind: metaphoric or ATOMic,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 4, article 803, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
84. D. Casasanto, O. Fotakopoulou, and L. Boroditsky, “Space and time in the child's mind: evidence for a cross-dimensional asymmetry,” Cognitive Science, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 387–405, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus