Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Neural Plasticity
Volume 2016, Article ID 3734646, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3734646
Research Article

Midbrain Frequency Representation following Moderately Intense Neonatal Sound Exposure in a Precocious Animal Model (Chinchilla laniger)

1Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S 1A8
2Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S 3G9
3The Auditory Science Laboratory, Program in Neurosciences and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada M5G 1X8
4Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5G 2N2

Received 2 May 2016; Accepted 28 September 2016

Academic Editor: J. Michael Wyss

Copyright © 2016 Lisa M. D’Alessandro and Robert V. Harrison. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H.-J. Kraus and K. Aulbach-Kraus, “Morphological changes in the cochlea of the mouse after the onset of hearing,” Hearing Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 89–102, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. J. Lim, “Development of the tectorial membrane,” Hearing Research, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 9–21, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. B. Roth and V. Bruns, “Postnatal development of the rat organ of Corti. I. General morphology, basilar membrane, tectorial membrane and border cells,” Anatomy and Embryology, vol. 185, no. 6, pp. 559–569, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. B. Roth and V. Bruns, “Postnatal development of the rat organ of Corti-II. Hair cell receptors and their supporting elements,” Anatomy and Embryology, vol. 185, no. 6, pp. 571–581, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Geal-Dor, S. Freeman, G. Li, and H. Sohmer, “Development of hearing in neonatal rats: air and bone conducted ABR thresholds,” Hearing Research, vol. 69, no. 1-2, pp. 236–242, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Uziel, R. Romand, and M. Marot, “Development of cochlear potentials in rats,” Audiology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 89–100, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. Pujol, M. Lavigne-Rebillard, and A. Uziel, “Development of the human cochlea,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol. 111, no. 482, pp. 7–13, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. C. Birnholz and B. R. Benacerraf, “The development of human fetal hearing,” Science, vol. 222, no. 4623, pp. 516–518, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. Querleu, X. Renard, F. Versyp, L. Paris-Delrue, and G. Crèpin, “Fetal hearing,” European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 191–212, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. V. Harrison, J. R. Cullen, S. Takeno, and R. J. Mount, “The neonatal chinchilla cochlea: morphological and functional study,” Scanning Microscopy, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 889–894, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Pienkowski and R. V. Harrison, “Tone frequency maps and receptive fields in the developing chinchilla auditory cortex,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 454–466, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. S. Heffner and H. E. Heffner, “Behavioral hearing range of the chinchilla,” Hearing Research, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 13–16, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. D. Miller, “Audibility curve of the chinchilla,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 513–523, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. E. F. Chang and M. M. Merzenich, “Environmental noise retards auditory cortical development,” Science, vol. 300, no. 5618, pp. 498–502, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. E. De Villers-Sidani, K. L. Simpson, Y.-F. Lu, R. C. S. Lin, and M. M. Merzenich, “Manipulating critical period closure across different sectors of the primary auditory cortex,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 957–965, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. J. Norẽa, B. Gourevich, N. Aizawa, and J. J. Eggermont, “Spectrally enhanced acoustic environment disrupts frequency representation in cat auditory cortex,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 932–939, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. G. Stanton and R. V. Harrison, “Abnormal cochleotopic organization in the auditory cortex of cats reared in a frequency augmented environment,” Auditory Neuroscience, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 97–107, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. G. Stanton and R. V. Harrison, “Projections from the medial geniculate body to primary auditory cortex in neonatally deafened cats,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 426, no. 1, pp. 117–129, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. R. V. Harrison, D. Ibrahim, and R. J. Mount, “Plasticity of tonotopic maps in auditory midbrain following partial cochlear damage in the developing chinchilla,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 449–460, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. X. Yu, D. H. Sanes, O. Aristizabal, Y. Z. Wadghiri, and D. H. Turnbull, “Large-scale reorganization of the tonotopic map in mouse auditory midbrain revealed by MRI,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 29, pp. 12193–12198, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. D. L. Oliver, M. A. Izquierdo, and M. S. Malmierca, “Persistent effects of early augmented acoustic environment on the auditory brainstem,” Neuroscience, vol. 184, pp. 75–87, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. T. A. Brown and R. V. Harrison, “Postnatal development of neuronal responses to frequency-modulated tones in chinchilla auditory cortex,” Brain Research, vol. 1309, pp. 29–39, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. T. A. Brown and R. V. Harrison, “Neuronal responses in chinchilla auditory cortex after postnatal exposure to frequency-modulated tones,” Hearing Research, vol. 275, no. 1-2, pp. 8–16, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. Pienkowski and R. V. Harrison, “Tone responses in core versus belt auditory cortex in the developing chinchilla,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 492, no. 1, pp. 101–109, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. D. R. Moore and L. M. Aitkin, “Rearing in an acoustically unusual environment—effects on neural auditory responses,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 29–34, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. P. W. F. Poon and X. Chen, “Postnatal exposure to tones alters the tuning characteristics of inferior collicular neurons in the rat,” Brain Research, vol. 585, no. 1-2, pp. 391–394, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. D. H. Sanes and M. Constantine-Paton, “The sharpening of frequency tuning curves requires patterned activity during development in the mouse, Mus musculus,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1152–1166, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. A. Miyakawa, R. Gibboni, and S. Bao, “Repeated exposure to a tone transiently alters spectral tuning bandwidth of neurons in the central nucleus of inferior colliculus in juvenile rats,” Neuroscience, vol. 230, pp. 114–120, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. C. E. Schreiner and D. B. Polley, “Auditory map plasticity: diversity in causes and consequences,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 143–156, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. R. V. Harrison, A. Nagasawa, D. W. Smith, S. Stanton, and R. J. Mount, “Reorganization of auditory cortex after neonatal high frequency cochlear hearing loss,” Hearing Research, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 11–19, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. G. G. Turrigiano, K. R. Leslie, N. S. Desai, L. C. Rutherford, and S. B. Nelson, “Activity-dependent scaling of quantal amplitude in neocortical neurons,” Nature, vol. 391, no. 6670, pp. 892–896, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. S. G. Kujawa and M. C. Liberman, “Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after ‘temporary’ noise-induced hearing loss,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 45, pp. 14077–14085, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. M. Pienkowski and J. J. Eggermont, “Long-term, partially-reversible reorganization of frequency tuning in mature cat primary auditory cortex can be induced by passive exposure to moderate-level sounds,” Hearing Research, vol. 257, no. 1-2, pp. 24–40, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. Pienkowski and J. J. Eggermont, “Passive exposure of adult cats to moderate-level tone pip ensembles differentially decreases AI and AII responsiveness in the exposure frequency range,” Hearing Research, vol. 268, no. 1-2, pp. 151–162, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. Pienkowski and J. J. Eggermont, “Cortical tonotopic map plasticity and behavior,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 2117–2128, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. B. M. Clopton and J. A. Winfield, “Effect of early exposure to patterned sound on unit activity in rat inferior colliculus,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1081–1089, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. H. Nakahara, L. I. Zhang, and M. M. Merzenich, “Specialization of primary auditory cortex processing by sound exposure in the ‘critical period’,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 18, pp. 7170–7174, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus