Neural Plasticity

Neural Plasticity / 2016 / Article
Special Issue

Neurorehabilitation: Neural Plasticity and Functional Recovery

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 4039580 |

Juanjuan Fu, Hongxing Wang, Lingxiao Deng, Jianan Li, "Exercise Training Promotes Functional Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury", Neural Plasticity, vol. 2016, Article ID 4039580, 7 pages, 2016.

Exercise Training Promotes Functional Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury

Academic Editor: Toshiyuki Fujiwara
Received31 Aug 2016
Revised21 Oct 2016
Accepted03 Nov 2016
Published06 Dec 2016


The exercise training is an effective therapy for spinal cord injury which has been applied to clinic. Traditionally, the exercise training has been considered to improve spinal cord function only through enhancement, compensation, and replacement of the remaining function of nerve and muscle. Recently, accumulating evidences indicated that exercise training can improve the function in different levels from end-effector organ such as skeletal muscle to cerebral cortex through reshaping skeletal muscle structure and muscle fiber type, regulating physiological and metabolic function of motor neurons in the spinal cord and remodeling function of the cerebral cortex. We compiled published data collected in different animal models and clinical studies into a succinct review of the current state of knowledge.

1. Introduction

Spinal cord injury (SCI) refers to a series of spinal injuries caused directly or indirectly by external factors. Depending on the segment affected by the injury, symptoms can range from motor and sensory dysfunction, muscle dystonia, and appearance of pathological reflexes. Primary SCI refers to the injury caused by the external forces acting directly or indirectly on the spinal cord. Secondary SCI refers to further damage caused by spinal cord compression, generated by edema, hematoma, compressive fractures, and broken intervertebral disc tissue. Spinal cord injury is characterized by high morbidity, high cost, and young patient age and it often leads to severe permanent disability. SCI not only affects the quality of patients’ lives, but it also adds a burden to the family and the society. The latest statistics showed that the global incidence of spinal cord injury is about 236–1009/million people [1]. In USA, about 250,000 people suffer from varying degrees of SCI each year, with an annual rate of up to 28–50/million. Currently, there is a lack of effective clinical therapy to restore nerve function after SCI [2, 3]. Instead, exercise has become the most important quantifiable means for functional recovery [4, 5], and its mechanism has been studied by both clinical doctors and basic researchers. Here, we review recent researches on the mechanisms by which exercise training promotes functional recovery after SCI. Exercise not only directly strengthens paralyzed muscles and promotes motor function recovery but is also promoting brain remodeling, improves spinal microenvironment, and protects damaged distal motoneuron functions, at multiple levels and through various channels, thereby promoting functional recovery.

2. Effect of Exercise Training on Cerebral Cortex

In vitro studies have demonstrated that exercise can induce changes in the local neural circuitry, suggesting that afferent activity can activate cortical cells and promote nerve function remodeling [6]. Research on cortical reorganization after peripheral nerve injury also supports the idea of cerebral cortex plasticity [7]. Synaptic contact immaturity is implied by the following observations: the length increase and density decrease of dendritic spines within 7 days in adult rats with the semisection but restoring to normal after 28 days [8]. This lays the foundation for exercise training promoting cortical reorganization after spinal cord injury.

It was shown that exercise after SCI could improve functional prognosis and induce cerebral cortex recombination in the somatic region. These observations have been recorded in both animal experiments and clinical studies. For example, rats exercises after SCI have shown a higher spontaneous firing rate of cortical neurons and enhanced forelimb sensory and sensorimotor stimulation (i.e., the forelimb motion projection area has been expanded to the lower limbs) [9]. In clinical studies, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in patients with cervical spinal cord injury has shown that functional improvement after exercise is related to the degree of activation of the motor cortex [10]. Studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings have further confirmed changes in the cortical sensorimotor area [11]. Compared with healthy subjects, the sensorimotor cortex area associated with the muscle tissue above the damaged region is expanded in SCI patients. Positron Emission Computed Tomography (PET) studies have shown that, for SCI patients, wrist strength exercises increase the activation of the representative area of the contralateral upper limb motor cortex [12]. In addition, case studies have shown that, after complete C6 spinal cord injury, hand exercise can promote functional improvement and increase the representation of the hand muscles in the cerebral cortex [13]. Thus, after SCI, the functional remodeling of the cerebral cortex occurs to promote functional recovery [14].

Moreover, exercise can affect post-SCI remodeling of the brain function, through generation of systemic changes, such as improving blood circulation and neuroendocrine regulation and reducing spasticity [15]. Studies have confirmed that in animals with passive exercise training after spinal cord transection injury, the plasticity related neurotrophic factor, adenylate cyclase type 1 (ADCY1), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BNDF) increase in the somatosensory cortex, at levels significantly higher than in animals without training [16]. BNDF is important for neuronal growth and differentiation, and ADCY1 is important for establishment of long-term synaptic plasticity [17]. It was suggested that exercise training could promote brain function remodeling by inducing BDNF expression [18]. Graziano et al. found that, in animals with cycling training after thoracic spinal cord transection, tactile stimulation of the hind paw induced a neural response remapped to the cortical regions of front paws and forelegs under deep anesthesia [16]. Such training also improved the neurological cortical reorganization corresponding to the lower limbs, despite the interruption of afferent input from these limbs [16]. Active exercise can also increase the complexity dendrites in the dentate gyrus and the density of dendritic spines in rats [3], although the functional significance of these changes is not really clear. Similar studies have demonstrated that treadmill training can promote axonal growth [19, 20] and lesion proximal collateral sprouting and increase synaptic establishment [21]. Other similar findings in mature rat hippocampus have also shown that long-term treadmill training can increase the number of astrocytes and neural stem cells in the lower granular cell layer of the dentate gyrus. Exercise stimulates the proliferation of endogenous neural stem cells and generates neurotrophic factors, such as BNDF, which in turn regulate neural plasticity and improve motor function [22, 23]. Some studies have found that early exercise training after the corticospinal motor system injury can restore the contact of corticospinal tract (CST) and the movement projection of primary motor cortex (M1), thus increasing the number of cholinergic intermediate neurons in the ipsilateral and contralateral spinal cord and reducing the physical control disorder [24]. Therefore, passive exercise training of the areas below the spinal cord injury level can promote functional reorganization of the cortex.

Although brain function remodeling is an important mechanism for functional recovery after SCI, excessive function remodeling can result in pathological consequences such as illusion of limb sensation [25] and neuropathic pain [26]. Therefore, further studies and a deeper understanding of the mechanisms of cortical remodeling are necessary in order to adopt the best strategy after the interruption of sensory afferent pathways [27].

3. Effect of Exercise Training on the Structure and Function of Spinal Cord

After SCI, the distal neuron pathways undergo a wide range of chemical, electrophysiological, and structural changes, which result in spontaneous neurological remodeling [28]. The effects of exercise training on the structure and function of the spinal cord post-SCI include reconstruction of the neuronal structure; cellular proliferation and differentiation; activation of the metabolism and expression of neuronal substances and neurotrophic factors; and regulation of the cellular electrophysiological function.

4. Effect on Neuronal Structure

Experimental studies demonstrate that, after spinal cord injury, the length and density of the distal motor neuron dendrites and the overall neuron cell size are reduced, suggesting that SCI can cause secondary damage to injured distal motor neurons. Studies have even shown that, after thoracic SCI in rats, exercise training can increase the axonal length of the soleus and tibialis anterior motor neurons, within the lumbar spinal cord. Research using synaptophysin immunohistochemistry has shown that treadmill training can significantly increase the formation of the lumbar spinal synapses [3]. Similarly, stepping training after transection of new born rat spinal cord can cause significant pathway changes and increase motor neuron synapse activation by stimulating primary afferent fibers or white matter tracts [29]. The expression of synaptophysin and PSD-95 in the area surrounding the ventral horn of the spinal motor neurons is significantly higher in rats training on the treadmill than in the untrained group [30]. Exercise training can activate the motor neuron N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor [31], by increasing the expression of BNDF and TrkB (tyrosine kinase gene) in spinal cord [32]. NMDA receptors further regulate neuronal survival, dendritic structure, synaptic plasticity, and neuronal circuits. Active training can also increase the expression of neurotrophic factors and nestin-GFP around the ependymal area. This promotes ependymal cell proliferation and differentiation into neural precursor cells (NPC) and further into oligodendrocytes and astrocytes [33], resulting in nerve regeneration and improved functional recovery.

Oligodendrocytes play a key role in leading and efficient signal transmission, and in maintaining and protecting a normal neuronal function. The immature oligodendrocytes markers, transferrin and cyclic nucleotide phosphohydrolase (CNP), increased significantly after seven days of active training [34]. The current consensus is that exercise can induce the neurotrophic factor BNDF, insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), to promote spinal oligodendrocyte regeneration [35]. Active training can also elevate the levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), regulate the astrocytes aggregation, and promote astrocytes maturation and differentiation [36].

5. Effect on Cell Biochemistry/Metabolism

In rats with treadmill training, the nucleolar area of motoneurons increases and becomes surrounded by basophilic granules. Also, the staining intensity of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase increases, indicating a boost in protein synthesis [37]. After training, motoneurons can transport more axonal protein, through either forward or reverse transport, and thus improve the overall adaptability of the motor units. For example, synaptic protein SNAP25 links synaptic vesicles and presynaptic membrane and motor neuron axons transport synaptic proteins SNAP25 with high selectivity after training [38]. Other proteins, such as the enzyme malate dehydrogenase and the trophic factor calcitonin gene-related peptide, are present in higher amounts in the motoneurons. Post-SCI cycling training can also raise the amount of phosphocreatine-S6 (P-S6) expressed by intermediate neurons and cause dendrites branching of motor neurons [39].

6. Effect on Electrophysiological Properties of Motor Neurons

Exercise training can alter the electrophysiological properties of transacted spinal motoneurons, such as the hyperpolarization of resting membrane potential and voltage threshold, the speed increase of action potential, and the increase of after-hyperpolarization potential amplitude of action potential. Studies have shown that depolarization of resting membrane potential (RMP) and spike trigger level (STL) occurs four weeks after complete transection of the thoracic spinal cord [40]. After training, the RMP can become hyperpolarized [41], thus altering the inhibition of the rubrospinal tract on stepping and promoting functional recovery [29]. Stepping training can enhance muscle spindle afferent signals [42, 43], promote aspartate NMDA receptors functioning [44], and increase the amplitude of the incoming signal of the motoneuron synapsis, causing an after-hyperpolarization in the action potential of motoneurons. In addition, the ventrolateral spinal cord white matter (VLF) can also induce changes in the electrophysiological activity of motoneurons.

In rats with SCI, a change in the after-hyperpolarization potential (AHPd) affects the rhythm, intensity, and duration of interneuron activity which affects the stepping function [45]. Passive exercise can enhance the magnitude of excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSP), increase the number of motoneurons that accept incoming signal, steer AHPd towards normal level, and restore normal stepping [46]. Ultra-microstructural analysis has shown that, after spinal cord transection, exercise training can increase the magnitude of gastrocnemius motor neuron (MNs) excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) but has no significant effect on the inhibitory postsynaptic potential (IPSP).

Spinal cord transection injury results in impaired stepping ability, causes reduced incoming signal from distal motoneuron synapses, enhances inhibitory effects, and thereby inhibits α- and γ-MNs activity. Studies suggest that this may be related to the significantly more numerous inhibitory F-type enlarged terminals than in the excitatory S-type enlarged terminals. It could also be due to the structural changes occurring in the parallel C-type and M-type enlarged terminals of γ-MNs cell bodies. Exercise training can maintain a normal ratio between the excitatory S-type and the inhibitory F-type enlarged terminals of γ-MNs and α-MNs [47], as such maintaining the ratio between excitatory and inhibitory signals to improve stepping function.

7. Effect of Exercise Training on the Structure and Function of Skeletal Muscles

After SCI, paralyzed muscles exhibit decreased fiber diameter, reduced voluntary contraction force, decreased metabolism, delayed conversion of slow-twitch to fast-twitch fibers, and a cross-sectional area comprised mainly of type I fibers. Currently, it is believed that skeletal muscle atrophy is characterized by lost [48, 49] or apoptotic muscle fiber nuclei [50], suggesting that reduced myoglobin nuclei number leads to “nuclear apoptosis.”

The lost function characterizing muscle atrophy can be restored by several methods, primarily by inducing IGF-1 [51], Pax7, and other molecules that promote myogenic cells (satellite cells) activation, proliferation, and differentiation and participating in muscle fibers (muscle cells) repair [52]. Studies have shown an increase in the soleus IGF-1 protein levels after spinal cord injury. After treadmill training, soleus IGF-1 shows additional increase, to activate proliferation and differentiation of satellite cells [53], and increase in the muscle fiber numbers. This implies that exercise training after SCI can enhance satellite cell activity and promote muscle fiber formation. Endurance training seems to increase terminal branching of nerves at the neuromuscular junction [54], although results are ambiguous [55].

Studies have shown that in cats with SCI the expression the levels of myosin heavy chain (MHC) in the soleus can be restored after stepping training. After one week of weight-bearing stepping training after SCI, the wet weight of the plantaris, medial/lateral gastrocnemius, soleus, and tibialis anterior muscles is significantly reduced. After three weeks of training, twitching and tonic tension peaks in the soleus muscle decrease significantly and the MHC expression in the extensor digitorum longus IIx increases. By 10 weeks, the muscle wet weight, contractile properties, and MHC levels returne to baseline levels, except for LG/MG atrophy [56].

8. The Effect of Combinatorial Strategy with Exercise

Although exercise training can improve neurological and skeletal muscle function by modulating the multilevel structures and function of the cerebral cortex, spinal cord, and skeletal muscle following spinal cord injury (SCI), current evidence suggests that exercise training has limited efficacy in improving motor function after SCI in rodents or cats [5760]. Such inadequate effects are believed to be attributed to insufficient neurotrophic factor production induced by training. Therefore, in addition to exercise, more and more combinatory strategies have been investigated. Many studies have shown that combined therapy can significantly promote the recovery after SCI and relieve spasticity in rats compared to single treatments alone [61]. Current strategies focus on combinatorial effects of hematopoietic stem cells, neurotrophic factors, drugs, and electrical or magnetic stimulation. Tashiro et al. showed that neural stem cell transplantation combined with treadmill training significantly improved spinal cord pathway conduction and increased central pattern generator activity, resulting in significantly improved motor function [62]. Dental pulp stem cell transplantation not only promoted motor function recovery but also significantly reduced lesion cavity and glial scar formation [60]. Trophic support appears to be the key to effective combination therapy. The secretion of neurotrophic factors can be stimulated in the injured spinal cord by neural stem cell transplantation or exercise training [20, 63, 64]. Combining these two therapies can significantly increase neurotrophic factor secretion. Direct neurotrophic factor application combined with exercise training can also promote functional recovery following SCI [65]. Han et al. combined Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) with early rehabilitation significantly reduced pathological changes and motor dysfunction in patients with SCI [61]. Other neurotrophic factors such as Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and Neurotrophin-3 (NT-3) can also significantly increase BBB scores, indicating improved functional recovery [66]. The above studies suggest that trophic support from combinatorial treatment is an effective intervention to improve motor recovery after spinal cord injury.

In addition, many studies have shown that electrical stimulation or magnetic stimulation combined with exercise training can influence motor function in SCI patients [67]. Petrosyan et al. showed that spinal cord electrical stimulation combined with exercise training can induce sustained enhancement of synaptic transmission, thereby improving lumbar anatomical plasticity to promote motor function recovery [59]. Chao et al. demonstrated that functional electrical stimulation combined with treadmill training could activate intraspinal circuits to improve gait control [68]. After SCI, load-bearing training combined with functional electrical stimulation can activate ankle flexion to prevent swing phase drag, also reduced swing phase time and improved limb coordination [69, 70]. Sensory stimulation of the tongue combined with specific training significantly improved the balance and gait of patients with incomplete SCI [71]. There are also reports that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with plate training can significantly reduce lower limb stiffness in patients with SCI [72]. Therefore, the combination of electrical or magnetic stimulation and exercise training could significantly improve motor function and maximize functional recovery, which provides a new perspective for clinical rehabilitation.

The effects of drug therapy combined with exercise training have also been reported. Intraperitoneal injection of fluoxetine combined with exercise training significantly increased BDNF in the hippocampus which promoted nerve regeneration and BBB score [73, 74]. The combined use of meta-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP) and quipazine in SCI not only improved BBB scores but also improved weight-bearing walking [66]. The implantation of polypyrrole/iodine (PPy/I) can protect nerve tissue and promote functional recovery [75]. If combined with treadmill exercise training, this effect is more significant [2]. Alluin et al. showed that combination therapy of chondroitinase ABC, neurotrophic factors, and exercise training not only enhanced active motor function recovery by enhancing neuroanatomical plasticity of the descending tracts (corticospinal tract and 5-HT pathway) but also significantly reduced the astrocyte proliferation and inflammation around lesions [76]. Transplantation of Schwann cells and olfactory ensheathing cells in the spinal cord of cats combined with chondroitinase ABC treatment significantly improved motor function [77]. Drug therapy combined with exercise training is more favorable in the treatment of SCI, suggesting that adjuvant drug treatment may have a better prognosis in SCI patients in the clinic.

In conclusion, exercise training can induce structural and functional changes in the cerebral cortex, spinal cord, and skeletal muscles, thus improving neural and muscular function following spinal cord injury. Exercise appears to promote nerve regeneration with functional restoration, to induce corticospinal pathway connectivity [36], to maintain the functional status of spinal cord neurons, to activate skeletal muscle satellite cells, and to promote muscle fiber regeneration. Exercise training combined with other treatments in SCI is the future direction with the most promise. More research is needed to optimize the specific training parameters, such as intensity, duration, frequency, and so forth. Also, the effect of exercise on SCI secondary complications (e.g., chronic pain, bladder and gastrointestinal dysfunction, muscle mass loss, osteoporosis, pressure ulcers, joint and muscle pain, fatigue, sleep problems, depression, and temperature control loss) is rarely discussed in literature and needs further exploration.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors appreciate very much the Clarity Manuscript Consultant LLC (Indianapolis) for their language editing.


  1. R. A. Cripps, B. B. Lee, P. Wing, E. Weerts, J. MacKay, and D. Brown, “A global map for traumatic spinal cord injury epidemiology: towards a living data repository for injury prevention,” Spinal Cord, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 493–501, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. L. Alvarez-Mejia, J. Morales, G. J. Cruz et al., “Functional recovery in spinal cord injured rats using polypyrrole/iodine implants and treadmill training,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, vol. 26, no. 7, article no. 209, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. H. Wang, N.-K. Liu, Y. P. Zhang et al., “Treadmill training induced lumbar motoneuron dendritic plasticity and behavior recovery in adult rats after a thoracic contusive spinal cord injury,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 271, pp. 368–378, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. D. E. R. Warburton, J. J. Eng, A. Krassioukov, and S. Sproule, “Cardiovascular health and exercise rehabilitation in spinal cord injury,” Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 98–122, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. H. R. Sandrow-Feinberg, J. Izzi, J. S. Shumsky, V. Zhukareva, and J. D. Houle, “Forced exercise as a rehabilitation strategy after unilateral cervical spinal cord contusion injury,” Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 721–731, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. P. W. Hickmott and M. M. Merzenich, “Local circuit properties underlying cortical reorganization,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 1288–1301, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. R. D. Lane, A. S. Stojic, H. P. Killackey, and R. W. Rhoades, “Source of inappropriate receptive fields in cortical somatotopic maps from rats that sustained neonatal forelimb removal,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 625–633, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  8. B. G. Kim, H.-N. Dai, M. McAtee, S. Vicini, and B. S. Bregman, “Remodeling of synaptic structures in the motor cortex following spinal cord injury,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 198, no. 2, pp. 401–415, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. T. Kao, J. S. Shumsky, E. B. Knudsen, M. Murray, and K. A. Moxon, “Functional role of exercise-induced cortical organization of sensorimotor cortex after spinal transection,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 2662–2674, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. T. Jurkiewicz, D. J. Mikulis, W. E. McIlroy, M. G. Fehlings, and M. C. Verrier, “Sensorimotor cortical plasticity during recovery following spinal cord injury: a longitudinal fMRI study,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 527–538, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. H. Topka, L. G. Cohen, R. A. Cole, and M. Hallett, “Reorganization of corticospinal pathways following spinal cord injury,” Neurology, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 1276–1283, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. Curt, H. Alkadhi, G. R. Crelier, S. H. Boendermaker, M.-C. Hepp-Reymond, and S. S. Kollias, “Changes of non-affected upper limb cortical representation in paraplegic patients as assessed by fMRI,” Brain, vol. 125, no. 11, pp. 2567–2578, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. Curt, M. Bruehlmeier, K. L. Leenders, U. Roelcke, and V. Dietz, “Differential effect of spinal cord injury and functional impairment on human brain activation,” Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 43–51, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. C. Bowes, J. M. Massey, M. Burish, C. M. Cerkevich, and J. H. Kaas, “Chondroitinase ABC promotes selective reactivation of somatosensory cortex in squirrel monkeys after a cervical dorsal column lesion,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 7, pp. 2595–2600, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. M. Rayegani, H. Shojaee, L. Sedighipour, M. R. Soroush, M. Baghbani, and O. B. Amirani, “The effect of electrical passive cycling on spasticity in war veterans with spinal cord injury,” Frontiers in Neurology, vol. 2, article 39, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. Graziano, G. Foffani, E. B. Knudsen, J. Shumsky, and K. A. Moxon, “Passive exercise of the hind limbs after complete thoracic transection of the spinal cord promotes cortical reorganization,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 1, Article ID e54350, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. P. Bekinschtein, M. Cammarota, C. Katche et al., “BDNF is essential to promote persistence of long-term memory storage,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 7, pp. 2711–2716, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. C. W. Cotman, N. C. Berchtold, and L.-A. Christie, “Exercise builds brain health: key roles of growth factor cascades and inflammation,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 464–472, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. L.-X. Deng, P. Deng, Y. Ruan et al., “A novel growth-promoting pathway formed by GDNF-overexpressing Schwann cells promotes propriospinal axonal regeneration, synapse formation, and partial recovery of function after spinal cord injury,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 33, no. 13, pp. 5655–5667, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. J. D. Houle and M.-P. Côté, “Axon regeneration and exercise-dependent plasticity after spinal cord injury,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1279, no. 1, pp. 154–163, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. P. Gardiner, Y. Dai, and C. J. Heckman, “Effects of exercise training on α-motoneurons,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 1228–1236, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M.-P. Côté, G. A. Azzam, M. A. Lemay, V. Zhukareva, and J. D. Houlé, “Activity-dependent increase in neurotrophic factors is associated with an enhanced modulation of spinal reflexes after spinal cord injury,” Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 299–309, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. B. E. Keeler, G. Liu, R. N. Siegfried, V. Zhukareva, M. Murray, and J. D. Houlé, “Acute and prolonged hindlimb exercise elicits different gene expression in motoneurons than sensory neurons after spinal cord injury,” Brain Research, vol. 1438, pp. 8–21, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. K. Friel, S. Chakrabarty, H.-C. Kuo, and J. Martin, “Using motor behavior during an early critical period to restore skilled limb movement after damage to the corticospinal system during development,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 27, pp. 9265–9276, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. E. L. Simões, I. Bramati, E. Rodrigues et al., “Functional expansion of sensorimotor representation and structural reorganization of callosal connections in lower limb amputees,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 3211–3220, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. P. J. Wrigley, S. R. Press, S. M. Gustin et al., “Neuropathic pain and primary somatosensory cortex reorganization following spinal cord injury,” Pain, vol. 141, no. 1-2, pp. 52–59, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. N. D. Engineer, J. R. Riley, J. D. Seale et al., “Reversing pathological neural activity using targeted plasticity,” Nature, vol. 470, no. 7332, pp. 101–106, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. R. M. Ichiyama, J. Broman, R. R. Roy, H. Zhong, V. R. Edgerton, and L. A. Havton, “Locomotor training maintains normal inhibitory influence on both alpha- and gamma-motoneurons after neonatal spinal cord transection,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 26–33, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. J. C. Petruska, R. M. Ichiyama, D. L. Jindrich et al., “Changes in motoneuron properties and synaptic inputs related to step training after spinal cord transection in rats,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 16, pp. 4460–4471, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. Y. Goldshmit, N. Lythgo, M. P. Galea, and A. M. Turnley, “Treadmill training after spinal cord hemisection in mice promotes axonal sprouting and synapse formation and improves motor recovery,” Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 449–465, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. V. L. Arvanian and L. M. Mendell, “Acute modulation of synaptic transmission to motoneurons by BDNF in the neonatal rat spinal cord,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1800–1808, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. K. J. Hutchinson, F. Gómez-Pinilla, M. J. Crowe, Z. Ying, and D. M. Basso, “Three exercise paradigms differentially improve sensory recovery after spinal cord contusion in rats,” Brain, vol. 127, no. 6, pp. 1403–1414, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. I. Kulbatski, A. J. Mothe, A. Keating, Y. Hakamata, E. Kobayashi, and C. H. Tator, “Oligodendrocytes and radial glia derived from adult rat spinal cord progenitors: morphological and immunocytochemical characterization,” Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 209–222, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. W. Krityakiarana, A. Espinosa-Jeffrey, C. A. Ghiani et al., “Voluntary exercise increases oligodendrogenesis in spinal cord,” International Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 120, no. 4, pp. 280–290, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. F. Gómez-Pinilla, J. R. Huie, Z. Ying et al., “BDNF and learning: evidence that instrumental training promotes learning within the spinal cord by up-regulating BDNF expression,” Neuroscience, vol. 148, no. 4, pp. 893–906, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. J. Li, Y.-H. Ding, J. A. Rafols, Q. Lai, J. P. McAllister II, and Y. Ding, “Increased astrocyte proliferation in rats after running exercise,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 386, no. 3, pp. 160–164, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. L. B. Gerchman, V. R. Edgerton, and R. E. Carrow, “Effects of physical training on the histochemistry and morphology of ventral motor neurons,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 790–801, 1975. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. C.-M. Kang, P.-A. Lavoie, and P. F. Gardiner, “Chronic exercise increases SNAP-25 abundance in fast-transported proteins of rat motoneurones,” NeuroReport, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 549–553, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. H. Y. Shin, H. Kim, M. J. Kwon, D. H. Hwang, K. Lee, and B. G. Kim, “Molecular and cellular changes in the lumbar spinal cord following thoracic injury: regulation by treadmill locomotor training,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 2, Article ID e88215, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. E. Beaumont, J. D. Houlé, C. A. Peterson, and P. F. Gardiner, “Passive exercise and fetal spinal cord transplant both help to restore motoneuronal properties after spinal cord transection in rats,” Muscle & Nerve, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 234–242, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. E. Beaumont and P. Gardiner, “Effects of daily spontaneous running on the electro-physiological properties of hindlimb motoneurones in rats,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 540, no. 1, pp. 129–138, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. A. Prochazka, J. A. Stephens, and P. Wand, “Muscle spindle discharge in normal and obstructed movements,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 287, pp. 57–66, 1979. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. B. Gustafsson, H. Wigstrom, W. C. Abraham, and Y.-Y. Huang, “Long-term potentiation in the hippocampus using depolarizing current pulses as the conditioning stimulus to single volley synaptic potentials,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 774–780, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  44. V. L. Arvanian, W. J. Bowers, J. C. Petruska et al., “Viral delivery of NR2D subunits reduces Mg2+ block of NMDA receptor and restores NT-3-induced potentiation of AMPA-kainate responses in maturing rat motoneurons,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 2394–2404, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. P. Wallen, O. Ekeberg, A. Lansner, L. Brodin, H. Traven, and S. Grillner, “A computer-based model for realistic simulations of neural networks. II. The segmental network generating locomotor rhythmicity in the lamprey,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 1939–1950, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  46. I. Lavrov, Y. P. Gerasimenko, R. M. Ichiyama et al., “Plasticity of spinal cord reflexes after a complete transection in adult rats: relationship to stepping ability,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 1699–1710, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. V. Dietz, “Body weight supported gait training: from laboratory to clinical setting,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. I–VI, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. D. L. Allen, S. R. Monke, R. J. Talmadge, R. R. Roy, and V. R. Edgerton, “Plasticity of myonuclear number in hypertrophied and atrophied mammalian skeletal muscle fibers,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 1969–1976, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  49. D. L. Allen, W. Yasui, T. Tanaka et al., “Myonuclear number and myosin heavy chain expression in rat soleus single muscle fibers after spaceflight,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 145–151, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  50. E. E. Dupont-Versteegden, R. J. L. Murphy, J. D. Houle, C. M. Gurley, and C. A. Peterson, “Activated satellite cells fail to restore myonuclear number in spinal cord transected and exercised rats,” American Journal of Physiology—Cell Physiology, vol. 277, no. 3, pp. C589–C597, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  51. J. E. Stevens-Lapsley, F. Ye, M. Liu et al., “Impact of viral-mediated IGF-I gene transfer on skeletal muscle following cast immobilization,” American Journal of Physiology—Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 299, no. 5, pp. E730–E740, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. J. Ehrhardt and J. Morgan, “Regenerative capacity of skeletal muscle,” Current Opinion in Neurology, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 548–553, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. P. Seale, L. A. Sabourin, A. Girgis-Gabardo, A. Mansouri, P. Gruss, and M. A. Rudnicki, “Pax7 is required for the specification of myogenic satellite cells,” Cell, vol. 102, no. 6, pp. 777–786, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. M. R. Deschenes, C. M. Maresh, J. F. Crivello, L. E. Armstrong, W. J. Kraemer, and J. Covault, “The effects of exercise training of different intensities on neuromuscular junction morphology,” Journal of Neurocytology, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 603–615, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. O. Wærhaug, H. A. Dahl, and K. Kardel, “Different effects of physical training on the morphology of motor nerve terminals in the rat extensor digitorum longus and soleus muscles,” Anatomy and Embryology, vol. 186, no. 2, pp. 125–128, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. K. J. Hutchinson, J. K. Linderman, and D. M. Basso, “Skeletal muscle adaptations following spinal cord contusion injury in rat and the relationship to locomotor function: a time course study,” Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1075–1089, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. O. Alluin, S. Karimi-Abdolrezaee, H. Delivet-Mongrain, H. Leblond, M. G. Fehlings, and S. Rossignol, “Kinematic study of locomotor recovery after spinal cord clip compression injury in rats,” Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1963–1981, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. L. B. Jakeman, E. L. Hoschouer, and D. M. Basso, “Injured mice at the gym: review, results and considerations for combining chondroitinase and locomotor exercise to enhance recovery after spinal cord injury,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 84, no. 4-5, pp. 317–326, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. H. A. Petrosyan, V. Alessi, A. S. Hunanyan, S. A. Sisto, and V. L. Arvanian, “Spinal electro-magnetic stimulation combined with transgene delivery of neurotrophin NT-3 and exercise: novel combination therapy for spinal contusion injury,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 114, no. 5, pp. 2923–2940, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. F. C. Nicola, L. P. Rodrigues, T. Crestani et al., “Human dental pulp stem cells transplantation combined with treadmill training in rats after traumatic spinal cord injury,” Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, vol. 49, no. 9, Article ID e5319, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. Q. Q. Han, J. J. Xiang, Y. Zhang, H. J. Qiao, Y. W. Shen, and C. Zhang, “Enhanced neuroprotection and improved motor function in traumatized rat spinal cords by rAAV2-mediated glial-derived neurotrophic factor combined with early rehabilitation training,” Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 127, no. 24, pp. 4220–4225, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  62. S. Tashiro, S. Nishimura, H. Iwai et al., “Functional recovery from neural stem/progenitor cell transplantation combined with treadmill training in mice with chronic spinal cord injury,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, Article ID 30898, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. K. Kusano, M. Enomoto, T. Hirai et al., “Transplanted neural progenitor cells expressing mutant NT3 promote myelination and partial hindlimb recovery in the chronic phase after spinal cord injury,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 393, no. 4, pp. 812–817, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. Z. Ying, R. R. Roy, V. R. Edgerton, and F. Gómez-Pinilla, “Exercise restores levels of neurotrophins and synaptic plasticity following spinal cord injury,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 193, no. 2, pp. 411–419, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. C.-H. Kao, S.-H. Chen, C.-C. Chio, C.-K. Chang, and M.-T. Lin, “Exogenous administration of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor improves recovery after spinal cord injury,” Resuscitation, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 395–400, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. J.-M. Nothias, T. Mitsui, J. S. Shumsky, I. Fischer, M. D. Antonacci, and M. Murray, “Combined effects of neurotrophin secreting transplants, exercise, and serotonergic drug challenge improve function in spinal rats,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 296–312, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. S. Askari, T. Chao, L. Conn et al., “Effect of functional electrical stimulation (FES) combined with robotically assisted treadmill training on the EMG profile,” in Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol. 2011, pp. 3043–3046, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  68. T. Chao, S. Askari, R. De Leon, and D. Won, “A system to integrate electrical stimulation with robotically controlled treadmill training to rehabilitate stepping after spinal cord injury,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 730–737, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. E. C. Field-Fote, “Combined use of body weight support, functional electric stimulation, and treadmill training to improve walking ability in individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 818–824, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. R. Jung, A. Belanger, T. Kanchiku, M. Fairchild, and J. J. Abbas, “Neuromuscular stimulation therapy after incomplete spinal cord injury promotes recovery of interlimb coordination during locomotion,” Journal of Neural Engineering, vol. 6, no. 5, Article ID 055010, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. A. E. Chisholm, R. N. Malik, J.-S. Blouin, J. Borisoff, S. Forwell, and T. Lam, “Feasibility of sensory tongue stimulation combined with task-specific therapy in people with spinal cord injury: A Case Study,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 11, no. 1, article no. 96, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. R. S. Calabro, A. Naro, A. Leo, and P. Bramanti, “Usefulness of robotic gait training plus neuromodulation in chronic spinal cord injury: a case report,” The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. C. Engesser-Cesar, A. J. Anderson, and C. W. Cotman, “Wheel running and fluoxetine antidepressant treatment have differential effects in the hippocampus and the spinal cord,” Neuroscience, vol. 144, no. 3, pp. 1033–1044, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. A. F. Cristante, T. E. P. B. Filho, R. P. Oliveira, R. M. Marcon, R. Ferreira, and G. B. Santos, “Effects of antidepressant and treadmill gait training on recovery from spinal cord injury in rats,” Spinal Cord, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 501–507, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. G. J. Cruz, R. Mondragón-Lozano, A. Diaz-Ruiz et al., “Plasma polypyrrole implants recover motor function in rats after spinal cord transection,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 2583–2592, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. O. Alluin, H. Delivet-Mongrain, M.-K. Gauthier, M. G. Fehlings, S. Rossignol, and S. Karimi-Abdolrezaee, “Examination of the combined effects of chondroitinase ABC, growth factors and locomotor training following compressive spinal cord injury on neuroanatomical plasticity and kinematics,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 10, Article ID e111072, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. K. Fouad, L. Schnell, M. B. Bunge, M. E. Schwab, T. Liebscher, and D. D. Pearse, “Combining Schwann cell bridges and olfactory-ensheathing glia grafts with chondroitinase promotes locomotor recovery after complete transection of the spinal cord,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1169–1178, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Juanjuan Fu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.