Review Article

Electrical Stimulation of the Ear, Head, Cranial Nerve, or Cortex for the Treatment of Tinnitus: A Scoping Review

Table 1

Summary of study findings.

InterventionReferenceStudy designPhysiological effect Clinical effectAdverse effectNotes on findings

Noninvasive electrical stimulation of the peripheral organsLee et al., 2014 [38]Randomized controlled trial. Not assessed.THI scores decreased from 49 to 43 in the treatment group with no change in controls. TENS seemed to be more effective in people with low frequency tinnitus and milder hearing losses. Mild side effects in eight patients: 4 had dizziness, 3 had headache, and 1 had facial numbness. Side effects disappeared after cessation of treatment. Although statistically significant the 6.6-point decrease in THI score is not clinically meaningful.
Mielczarek et al., 2013 [36]Nonrandomized controlled study.Not assessed.No clinical measures.Pain/discomfort during stimulation, which was resolved by reducing intensity of the current. Self-reported presence of tinnitus halved in both groups after treatment.
Mielczarek and Olszewski, 2014 [37]Double-blind placebo-controlled trial.Not assessed.No clinical measures.No harmful effects were observed. Self-reported presence of tinnitus halved in the treatment group but was only slightly reduced in placebo.

Vagus nerve stimulationDe Ridder et al., 2014 [53]Uncontrolled before and after study, pilot/phase I/safety and efficacy.VNS decreased band power in the delta (1–4 Hz) and theta (4–8 Hz) bands in subjects who responded to therapy and increased band power in those bands in subjects who did not respond to the therapy.
The average difference in band power change between VNS and sham trials in participants with tinnitus was strongly correlated with the THI for both delta () and theta () bands.
For the whole group the average decrease in THI score from the baseline was 11% immediately after the treatment and 12% for the follow-up in comparison with the baseline and therefore was not clinically significant.Patient 001: redness of the abdominal site and vocal cord hypomobility after the surgery; resolved within 2 weeks.
Patient 003: infection (lead and electrode explanted).
Patient 004: increased tinnitus symptoms for the first week, ongoing depression requiring medication, hoarseness during stimulation, difficulty tolerating standard settings, depressive episode, and failed suicide attempt.
Post hoc analysis of “drug-taking” versus “non-drug-taking” group: 3 of 5 patients in the nondrug group had clinically meaningful decrease in the THI. Only one patient had improvement of 20 points or more.
De Ridder et al., 2015 [55]Case study. Cross over- paired VNS followed by sham.EEG: resting state, a significant decrease of relative power in the delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma frequency band effects after VNS, suggestive of desynchronization.
No difference after sham stimulation.
At 4 weeks: THI reduced by 48% and TRQ reduced by 68%. 14-point reduction on the THQ and 23-point reduction on the TAQ.
Sham stimulation: increase in THI of 27% and TRQ of 15%. THQ increase 3% and TAQ increase 9%.
Hoarseness during stimulation, transient left vocal cord hypomobility, and slight inflammation at the abdominal surgical site (last two resolved after 2 weeks). Slight worsening of tinnitus after sham treatment.Reduction in all bands: usually lower bands go down and alpha goes up, contradictory to other studies.

Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) Kreuzer et al., 2012 [57]Pilot study, retrospective. Feasibility and safety study with an open, single-armed study design.Not assessed.Not assessed.Two adverse cardiac events (one severe) were registered but considered very unlikely to have been caused by the tVNS device.
Also reported were headache, breathing difficulties, chest sensation, dizziness, subjective hearing impairment, worsening of tinnitus, neck pain, croakiness, and sleeping disorder.
Nevertheless, in the light of the potential of tVNS to modulate conduction system of the heart, ECG recordings are recommended in every study of tVNS in order to obtain further safety data.
Kreuzer et al., 2014 [58]Single-arm open-label pilot study.Not assessed.Baseline to 24-week reduction in TQ score of 2 points; not significant in either group.Two cardiac events.
Adverse events: tingling sensation, dysesthesia, skin redness and pressure marks at the stimulation sites, painful stimulation, dyspnea of low intensity, and headaches. Chest pain, voice alteration/hoarseness, nausea, arrhythmia, dizziness, transient subjective hearing impairment, neck pain, and numbness.
High dropout rate suggests that a therapeutic tVNS application of several hours per day over a period of 6 months is only feasible for some patients.
There was no clinically relevant improvement of tinnitus complaints.
Data suggest tVNS to be considered safe in patients without a history of cardiac disease.
Hyvärinen al., 2015 [61]Prospective, control group and tinnitus group, comparisons both between control and TI and within TI and stimulation versus no stimulation.Tinnitus patients differed from controls in the baseline condition (no tVNS applied), measured by both cortical oscillatory power and synchronization, particularly in beta and gamma bands.
tVNS induced changes in synchrony.
Changes in synchrony correlated with THI scores, at whole-head beta (), whole-head gamma (), and frontal gamma bands ().None reported.
Lehtimäki et al., 2013 [59]Pilot study, short-term therapeutic trial, before and after study.Auditory N1m responses: “tVNS on” versus “tVNS off” conditions.
tVNS decreased amplitude of the auditory N1m response.
Peak latencies remained unchanged.
tVNS plus sound therapy led to improved well-being; WHO 5-point well-being questionnaire mean scores increased from 56 to 76.
Mean THI and mini-TQ questionnaires scores decreased significantly.
None reported.The most significant finding of this study was the MEG demonstration of acute neuromodulative effects of tVNS on evoked auditory cortical responses.

Vestibulocochlear nerve stimulationBartels et al., 2007 [63]Before and after study with long-term follow-up. No control group.Not assessed.Mean THI score reduced from 77 at baseline to 55 at 3 months and 38 points at 42.5 months.None reported.All four patients reported that treatment changes their tinnitus sound from an intrusive combination of noises into a single, pleasantly perceived noise.

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) Vanneste et al., 2013 [40]Randomized trial comparing three interventions.Not assessed.Numeric rating scales only. None reported.There were no significant improvements in the tACS group.
A large transient suppressive effect was noted for one comparison group receiving transcranial random noise stimulation.
Vanneste et al., 2013 [41]Randomized placebo-controlled trial of tACS. No significant EEG power changes after tACS. Numeric rating scales only.None reported.tACS did not improve rating of tinnitus annoyance or loudness.
Claes et al., 2014 [42]Retrospective analysis of clinical data from patients receiving tACS or random noise stimulation.Not assessed.Numeric rating scales only. None reported.Small statistically significant improvements in ratings noted for tRNS group only.

Brain surface stimulationDe Ridder et al., 2004 [64]Surgical case report, extradural electrical stimulation. Not assessed.No clinical measures.None reported.Tinnitus initially suppressed for three weeks after implantation with continuous stimulation which thereafter required adjustment.
De Ridder et al., 2006 [18]Cohort study, primary and secondary auditory cortex electrodes.NA.Visual analogue scales only. Some reports of dizziness, altered spatial localisation, and altered hearing. Epileptic seizure in 2 patients after prolonged stimulation with an external stimulator.Self-reported improvements were noted for a subgroup of patients who had pure tone tinnitus.
Seidman et al., 2008 [65]Two case reports, electrode arrays advanced into the brain tissue in Heschl’s gyrus.NA.Patient 1: clinically significant improvement in THI score 17 days after implantation. Patient 2: particle suppression of tinnitus only.None reported.Patient 1 experienced long-term improvements, whereas patient 2 reported tinnitus returning to original level 2 years after implantation.
De Ridder et al., 2016 [74]Two case reports, anterior cingulate implants.Not assessed.Tinnitus questionnaire not reported postoperatively.One implant removed after 2 years due to possible infection.Partial suppression of tinnitus in one patient only. Tinnitus was unchanged in patient 2.

Deep brain stimulationTorres et al., 2010 [78]Cohort study, ventral intermedius nucleus of the thalamus implant.Not assessed.Numeric rating scales only.None reported.Decreased tinnitus loudness during stimulation reported by 2 of 7 patients and for 15–20 minutes after stimulation was switched off.
Cheung and Larson, 2010 [80]Pilot study, locus of caudate neurons implant.Not assessed.Numeric rating scales only.Increased loudness in one ear reported by one patient (suggested likely micro-lesion effect).Tinnitus loudness was acutely reduced in all patients where the electrode traversed the locus of caudate neurons (5 out of 6).