Cerebellar Cathodal Transcranial Direct Stimulation and Performance on a Verb Generation Task: A Replication Study

Table 1

Results of the study: verbal response time, response variability, learning, and learning variability.

Variable	Effect	df
Verbal response time	Condition	1, 23	4.81	0.039	0.173
	Task	1.16, 26.71	808.98	<0.001	0.972
	Block	5, 115	121.63	<0.001	0.841
	Task × Block	4.22, 97.15	37.16	<0.001	0.618
	Session	1, 23	0.10	0.750	0.004
	Task × Session	1.38, 1.20	0.77	0.427	0.032
	Condition × Task × Block	4.33, 99.63	0.77	0.558	0.032
Response variability	Session	1, 23	6.49	0.018	0.220
	Task	1.19, 27.37	655.93	<0.001	0.966
	Block	5, 115	17.63	<0.001	0.434
	Task × Block	4.31, 99.12	8.65	<0.001	0.273
	Condition × Block	5, 115	0.62	0.689	0.026
	Condition × Task × Block	4.00, 91.96	1.42	0.233	0.058
Learning	Task	1.20, 27.52	21.76	<0.001	0.486
	Task × Session	1.22, 27.96	0.47	0.537	0.020
	Task × Condition	1.18, 27.11	1.48	0.240	0.060
	Session × Condition	1, 23	0.36	0.555	0.015
	Session × Task × Condition	1.27, 29.10	0.35	0.608	0.015
Learning variability	Session	1, 23	5.45	0.029	0.192
	Task	1.09, 25.00	6.66	0.014	0.225
	Condition	1, 23	0.63	0.435	0.027
	Task × Session	1.24, 28.44	7.09	0.009	0.236
	Task × Condition	1.17, 26.84	0.34	0.600	0.014
	Session × Condition	1, 23	0.70	0.411	0.030
	Session × Task × Condition	1.06, 24.34	0.44	0.524	0.019