Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Neural Plasticity
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 3478742, 12 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3478742
Research Article

The Impact of Feedback on the Different Time Courses of Multisensory Temporal Recalibration

1Medical Scientist Training Program, Vanderbilt University Medical School, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
2Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical School, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
3Neuroscience Graduate Program, Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical School, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
4Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
5Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
6Department of Psychiatry, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Matthew A. De Niear; ude.tlibrednav@raein.ed.a.wehttam

Received 26 October 2016; Revised 14 January 2017; Accepted 26 January 2017; Published 21 February 2017

Academic Editor: Zili Liu

Copyright © 2017 Matthew A. De Niear et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. M. Ghose, “Learning in mammalian sensory cortex,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 513–518, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. Medina and B. Rapp, “Rapid experience-dependent plasticity following somatosensory damage,” Current Biology, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 677–680, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. L. Yu, B. E. Stein, and B. A. Rowland, “Adult plasticity in multisensory neurons: short-term experience-dependent changes in the superior colliculus,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 50, pp. 15910–15922, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. L. Shams and A. R. Seitz, “Benefits of multisensory learning,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 411–417, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Fahle, “Perceptual learning: specificity versus generalization,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 154–160, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Fahle, S. Edelman, and T. Poggio, “Fast perceptual learning in hyperacuity,” Vision Research, vol. 35, no. 21, pp. 3003–3013, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. R. Wozny and L. Shams, “Recalibration of auditory space following milliseconds of cross-modal discrepancy,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 4607–4612, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. Watanabe, J. E. Náñez Sr., S. Koyama, I. Mukai, J. Liederman, and Y. Sasaki, “Greater plasticity in lower-level than higher-level visual motion processing in a passive perceptual learning task,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 1003–1009, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Fahle and S. Edelman, “Long-term learning in vernier acuity: effects of stimulus orientation, range and of feedback,” Vision Research, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 397–412, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. R. Seitz and H. R. Dinse, “A common framework for perceptual learning,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 148–153, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. T. Wallace and R. A. Stevenson, “The construct of the multisensory temporal binding window and its dysregulation in developmental disabilities,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 64, pp. 105–123, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. W. Fujisaki, S. Shimojo, M. Kashino, and S. Nishida, “Recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 773–778, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Vroomen, M. Keetels, B. De Gelder, and P. Bertelson, “Recalibration of temporal order perception by exposure to audio-visual asynchrony,” Cognitive Brain Research, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 32–35, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Keetels and J. Vroomen, “No effect of auditory–visual spatial disparity on temporal recalibration,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 182, no. 4, pp. 559–565, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. E. Van der Burg, D. Alais, and J. Cass, “Rapid recalibration to audiovisual asynchrony,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 33, no. 37, pp. 14633–14637, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. Navarra, S. Soto-Faraco, and C. Spence, “Adaptation to audiotactile asynchrony,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 413, no. 1, pp. 72–76, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. Keetels and J. Vroomen, “Temporal recalibration to tactile-visual asynchronous stimuli,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 430, no. 2, pp. 130–134, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J.-P. Noel and M. Wallace, “Relative contributions of visual and auditory spatial representations to tactile localization,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 82, pp. 84–90, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. Vroomen and M. Keetels, “Perception of intersensory synchrony: a tutorial review,” Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 871–884, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. B. E. Stein, T. R. Stanford, and B. A. Rowland, “Development of multisensory integration from the perspective of the individual neuron,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 520–535, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J.-P. Noel, M. Łukowska, M. Wallace, and A. Serino, “Multisensory simultaneity judgment and proximity to the body,” Journal of Vision, vol. 16, no. 3, article no. 21, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. Harvey, E. Van Der Burg, and D. Alais, “Rapid temporal recalibration occurs crossmodally without stimulus specificity but is absent unimodally,” Brain Research, vol. 1585, pp. 120–130, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. E. Van der Burg and P. T. Goodbourn, “Rapid, generalized adaptation to asynchronous audiovisual speech,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 282, no. 1804, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. P. Bruns and B. Röder, “Sensory recalibration integrates information from the immediate and the cumulative past,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, Article ID 12739, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J.-P. Noel, M. A. De Niear, R. Stevenson, D. Alais, and M. T. Wallace, “Atypical rapid audio-visual temporal recalibration in autism spectrum disorders,” Autism Research, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 121–129, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. Noel, M. De Niear, E. Van der Burg, M. T. Wallace, and J. Ahveninen, “Audiovisual simultaneity judgment and rapid recalibration throughout the lifespan,” PLOS ONE, vol. 11, no. 8, Article ID e0161698, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. D. M. Simon, J. P. Noel, and M. Wallace, “Evoked related potentials index rapid recalibration to audiovisual temporal asynchrony,” Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, In press.
  28. E. Van Der Burg, D. Alais, and J. Cass, “Audiovisual temporal recalibration occurs independently at two different time scales,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, Article ID 14526, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. R. Seitz, J. E. Nanez Sr., S. Holloway, Y. Tsushima, and T. Watanabe, “Two cases requiring external reinforcement in perceptual learning,” Journal of Vision, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 966–973, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. R. Seitz, D. Kim, and T. Watanabe, “Rewards evoke learning of unconsciously processed visual stimuli in adult humans,” Neuron, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 700–707, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. C.-T. Law and J. I. Gold, “Neural correlates of perceptual learning in a sensory-motor, but not a sensory, cortical area,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 11, pp. 505–513, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. C.-T. Law and J. I. Gold, “Reinforcement learning can account for associative and perceptual learning on a visual-decision task,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 12, pp. 655–663, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. T. Watanabe and Y. Sasaki, “Perceptual learning: toward a comprehensive theory,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 66, pp. 197–221, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. R. Powers III, A. R. Hillock, and M. T. Wallace, “Perceptual training narrows the temporal window of multisensory binding,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 39, pp. 12265–12274, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. A. R. Powers, A. Hillock-Dunn, and M. T. Wallace, “Generalization of multisensory perceptual learning,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, Article ID 23374, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. A. de Niear, B. Koo, and M. T. Wallace, “Multisensory perceptual learning is dependent upon task difficulty,” Experimental Brain Research, pp. 1–9, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. A. R. Powers, M. A. Hevey, and M. T. Wallace, “Neural correlates of multisensory perceptual learning,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 18, pp. 6263–6274, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. R. A. Stevenson and M. T. Wallace, “Multisensory temporal integration: task and stimulus dependencies,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 227, no. 2, pp. 249–261, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. R. A. Stevenson, S. Park, C. Cochran et al., “The associations between multisensory temporal processing and symptoms of schizophrenia,” Schizophrenia Research, vol. 179, pp. 97–103, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. D. H. Brainard, “The psychophysics toolbox,” Spatial Vision, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 433–436, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. D. G. Pelli, “The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies,” Spatial Vision, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 437–442, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. E. Van der Burg, E. Orchard-Mills, and D. Alais, “Rapid temporal recalibration is unique to audiovisual stimuli,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 233, no. 1, pp. 53–59, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. J.-P. Noel, M. T. Wallace, E. Orchard-Mills, D. Alais, and E. Van Der Burg, “True and perceived synchrony are preferentially associated with particular sensory pairings,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, Article ID 17467, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. T. Watanabe, J. E. Náñez, and Y. Sasaki, “Perceptual learning without perception,” Nature, vol. 413, no. 6858, pp. 844–848, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. M. H. Herzog and M. Fahle, “The role of feedback in learning a vernier discrimination task,” Vision Research, vol. 37, no. 15, pp. 2133–2141, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. D. B. Polley, E. E. Steinberg, and M. M. Merzenich, “Perceptual learning directs auditory cortical map reorganization through top-down influences,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 26, no. 18, pp. 4970–4982, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. X. Liu, J. Hairston, M. Schrier, and J. Fan, “Common and distinct networks underlying reward valence and processing stages: a meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1219–1236, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. K. M. Lempert and E. Tricomi, “The value of being wrong: intermittent feedback delivery alters the striatal response to negative feedback,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 261–274, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. A. Bischoffgrethe, E. Hazeltine, L. Bergren, R. Ivry, and S. Grafton, “The influence of feedback valence in associative learning,” NeuroImage, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 243–251, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. N. F. Dixon and L. Spitz, “The detection of auditory visual desynchrony,” Perception, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 719–721, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. M. Zampini, D. I. Shore, and C. Spence, “Audiovisual temporal order judgments,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 152, no. 2, pp. 198–210, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. M. H. Herzog and M. Fahle, “Effects of biased feedback on learning and deciding in a vernier discrimination task,” Vision Research, vol. 39, no. 25, pp. 4232–4243, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. M. H. Herzog, K. R. F. Ewald, F. Hermens, and M. Fahle, “Reverse feedback induces position and orientation specific changes,” Vision Research, vol. 46, no. 22, pp. 3761–3770, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. K. C. Aberg and M. H. Herzog, “Different types of feedback change decision criterion and sensitivity differently in perceptual learning,” Journal of Vision, vol. 12, no. 3, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. N. Zilber, P. Ciuciu, A. Gramfort, L. Azizi, and V. Van Wassenhove, “Supramodal processing optimizes visual perceptual learning and plasticity,” NeuroImage, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 32–46, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. D. P. McGovern, A. T. Astle, S. L. Clavin, and F. N. Newell, “Task-specific transfer of perceptual learning across sensory modalities,” Current Biology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. R20–R21, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. B. Barakat, A. R. Seitz, and L. Shams, “Visual rhythm perception improves through auditory but not visual training,” Current Biology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. R60–R61, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. T. Rohe and U. Noppeney, “Distinct computational principles govern multisensory integration in primary sensory and association cortices,” Current Biology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 509–514, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus