Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Neural Plasticity
Volume 2017, Article ID 9297621, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9297621
Research Article

Correlation between Traits of Emotion-Based Impulsivity and Intrinsic Default-Mode Network Activity

1College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest Agriculture & Forestry University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
2Laboratory of Neuroimaging, National Institute on Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
3Center for Brain Imaging, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710071, China
4National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Gene-Jack Wang; vog.hin@gnaw.kcaj-eneg

Received 9 June 2017; Revised 24 September 2017; Accepted 15 October 2017; Published 31 October 2017

Academic Editor: Stuart C. Mangel

Copyright © 2017 Jizheng Zhao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Negative urgency (NU) and positive urgency (PU) are implicated in several high-risk behaviors, such as eating disorders, substance use disorders, and nonsuicidal self-injury behavior. The current study aimed to explore the possible link between trait of urgency and brain activity at rest. We assessed the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) of the resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signal in 85 healthy volunteers. Trait urgency measures were related to ALFF in the lateral orbitofrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, ventral and dorsal medial frontal cortex, anterior cingulate, and posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus. In addition, trait urgency measures showed significant correlations with the functional connectivity of the posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus seed with the thalamus and midbrain region. These findings suggest an association between intrinsic brain activity and impulsive behaviors in healthy humans.

1. Introduction

A considerable body of research has documented a strong link between alerted trait urgency and impulsive high-risk behaviors, such as excessive drinking and pathological gambling [1]. For example, negative urgency (NU) has been found to be significantly related to alcohol abuse [24], bulimic symptoms [35], and nonsuicidal self-injury behavior [2, 4], and positive urgency (PU) has been associated with nonsuicidal self-injury behavior [5], illegal drug use, and risky sexual behavior [6]. Recent longitudinal studies indicate that urgency is a reliable predictor of later risk behavior, for example, the quantity of alcohol consumption during a given drinking episode [7] and the level of alcohol use one year later [8], increases in illegal drug use, and risky sexual behavior [6].

Neuroimaging studies on neuropsychiatric disorders have shown a relationship between the frontal cortex and urgency. Cyders and Smith have documented amygdala, orbitofrontal cortex (OFC, especially the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC)) as key neural underpinnings of urgency [9]. Findings from neuroimaging studies in neurological populations also confirm this urgency theory. PU is associated with reduced cortical thickness in the left rostral anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and right frontal pole, whereas NU shows an inverse association with cortical thickness in the vmPFC and OFC in patients with schizophrenia [10]. In cocaine-dependent individuals, NU correlates positively with gray matter volume (GMV) in the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) [11]. In contrast, studies in healthy subjects have found that NU showed an inverse association with GMV in the IFG [11], dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC), and right temporal pole [12]; regions involved in emotion regulation and decision-making. NU is also found to be correlated with vmPFC BOLD response to alcohol cues in social drinkers, and the BOLD activation in bilateral vmPFC is indirectly associated with increasing subjective alcohol craving and problematic alcohol use during which NU acts as a mediator [13].

However, only a few studies have examined the neurocircuitry underlying trait urgency in healthy individuals [1012]. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rfMRI) [14] has been extensively used to evaluate functional coupling between brain regions during brief (3–6 minutes) MRI scanning [15, 16] and has demonstrated associations between spontaneous brain activity and phenotypic features such as personality traits [17] or mood ratings [18]. Two recent rfMRI studies reported on the association between brain functional connectivity and trait urgency in healthy subjects. In both studies, PU showed a negative correlation with the strength of the functional connectivity within the default-mode network (DMN) [19, 20].

The DMN consists of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), posterior cingulate/precuneus (PCC/precuneus), and angular gyrus, with other midline cortical cortices (such as ACC) and temporal lobe [21, 22]. Prior work has shown that the MPFC and ACC encode salience attribution of rewards and were important for emotion regulation and impulse control [21]. The PCC plays a central role in keeping the balance between internally and externally focused attention [22]. The activity of DMN is modulated by serotonin (5-HT) [23] and dopamine density [24, 25], both of which contribute to emotion-based actions [9]. Taken together, we hypothesized that activity in DMN was related to aspects of urgency trait. The amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) in the brain reflects intrinsic brain low-frequency activity and has been widely used to study cognitive and emotional processes and neuropsychiatric disorders [26]. First, we hypothesized that trait urgency was associated with intrinsic activity measured with ALFF within the DMN. More specifically, trait urgency would be associated with ALFF in medial prefrontal cortices (mPFC) and PCC/precuneus. Second, we hypothesized that NU and PU would correlate with the functional connectivity between the PCC/precuneus, thalamus, and midbrain [22, 27].

2. Methods

2.1. Participants and Imaging Datasets

The rfMRI datasets of the Nathan Kline Institute [28] were downloaded from the International Neuroimaging Data-sharing Initiative (INDI) online database (http://fcon_1000.projects.nitrc.org/indi/pro/nki.html). All participants provided written informed consent and were scanned according to procedures approved by the local Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the Nathan Kline Institute. The data was shared with the approval of the IRB at the Nathan Kline Institute.

For the current study, 85 healthy subjects (female: 40, male: 45; age range: 18–70, mean ± SD = 38.46 ± 15.55 years) who completed resting state scans and the UPPS-p Impulsive Behavior Scale [29] were included. The UPPS Impulsive Behavior Scale assessed five dimensional characteristics of impulsivity: (1) lack of premeditation and (2) perseverance, which reflected deficits in conscientiousness to act without forethought or to tolerate a boredom task; (3) sensation-seeking, which reflected the reward-sensitive; and (4) negative urgency and (5) positive urgency, which reflected the emotion-based disposition to engage in rash actions [29]. Subjects with a history of psychiatric disorders or medical conditions were excluded. In addition, subjects with Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) [30] scores higher than 15, indicating mild-severe depression, were excluded.

Structural MRI scans were acquired with a Siemens MAGNETOM Tim Trio 3.0 T Scanner (TR = 2.5 s; TE = 3.5 ms; TI = 1200 ms; FOV: 256 × 256; slice thickness: 1 mm; flip angle: 8°; matrix size: 256 × 256; 200 transverse slices). Functional MRI images were acquired with a gradient echo-planar sequence (TR = 2.5 s; TE = 35 ms; flip angle = 80°; FOV: 256 × 256; in-plane resolution = 3 × 3 mm2, slice thickness: 3 mm, 260 time points = 10.83 min).

2.2. fMRI Preprocessing

Functional data were analyzed using SPM8 (Welcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, London, UK, http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm). Image preprocessing included slice-time correction, image realignment, and spatial normalization to the stereotactic space of the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) and resampling to 3 mm isotropic voxels. Head motion correction was conducted based on a “scrubbing” approach [31]. Specifically, if the framewise displacement (FD) was larger than 0.5 mm or the root mean square signal change (DVARS) was larger than 5%, the corresponding volume was linearly interpolated using its temporal neighbors [31]. Multiple linear regression was performed to remove nuisances such as the mean signal fluctuations in the whole brain, ventricles and white matter, and the six head realignment parameters and their derivatives. Detrending and a temporal band-pass filtering (0.01–0.08 Hz) were subsequently conducted to minimize temporal drifts and white noise.

2.3. ALFF

ALFF maps were calculated for each subject by using DPARSF toolbox [32]. ALFF was defined as the total power within the frequency range between 0.01 and 0.08 Hz, which represented the strength or intensity of low-frequency oscillations [32, 33].

2.4. Seed-Voxel Correlations

The PCC/precuneus [xyz = (−6, −28, 34) mm; cluster volume = 52 voxels] and subgenual ACC [xyz = (−6, 41, −2) mm; cluster volume = 107 voxels] were selected for seed-voxel correlation analysis (see Figure 1). In order to reduce the risk of circularity analysis, two independent masks were employed to be seed regions to conduct the functional connectivity analyses. The first brain mask for the seed was derived from the Human Brainnetome Atlas [34] (bilateral CG-6 region, supplementary figure a available online at https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9297621). The second brain mask for the seed was anatomically defined by bilateral dorsal posterior cingulate cortex [35] (supplementary figure b). The DPARSF toolbox was used to calculate seed-voxel correlations [32], and the Pearson correlation maps were converted to Fisher z-scores prior to statistical analyses.

Figure 1: Brain mapping of intrinsic activity demonstrates a significant association with trait urgency (, family-wise error correction). (a) The brain regions indicate correlations with mean scores of negative and positive urgency. (b) The brain regions indicate stronger correlations with negative urgency than with positive urgency. PCC: posterior cingulate cortex; MedFG: medial frontal gyrus; ACC: anterior cingulate cortex; MFG: middle frontal gyrus; IFG: inferior frontal gyrus; SMA: supplementary motor area.
2.5. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using SPM8 (Welcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, London, UK; http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm). Multiple linear regression was used to assess the association between urgency and functional connectivity metrics (ALFF and seed-voxel correlation maps). Given the high correlation between scores of NU and PU (, ), the mean scores of NU and PU [(NU + PU)/2] and the difference between scores of NU and the mean scores [(NU − PU)/2] were entered in each statistical model. In addition, the subject’s age and gender were included as covariates. Statistical significance was based on a family-wise error (FWE) correction for multiple comparisons at the cluster-level () with a minimum cluster size of k = 30 voxels and a cluster-defining threshold [36, 37].

3. Results

3.1. ALFF

Table 1 shows that the mean scores of NU and PU were positively correlated with ALFF in the subgenual ACC (Brodmann areas (BA) BAs 32 and 11, sgACC), dorsal ACC (dACC, BA 32), medial frontal gyrus (BAs 10 and 8, mPFC), right middle frontal gyrus (BA 46, DLPFC), right IFG (BA 47), PCC/precuneus (BAs 23 and 31), left IFG (BA 44), and MFG (BAs, 8 and 9). There was no region in which intrinsic activity showed negative correlation with mean scores of NU and PU. Intrinsic activity in ACC (BA 32) and supplementary motor area (BA 6) showed tighter positive correlation with NU than PU. There was no region which intrinsic activity showed tighter positive correlation with PU than NU (Figure 1, Table 1).

Table 1: The foci of brain areas showed intrinsic activity associating with trait urgency (, family-wise error correction).
3.2. Functional Connectivity

The functional connectivity of the PCC/precuneus seed with the rest of the brain showed a significant positive correlation for mean scores of NU and PU with ventral tegmental areas of the midbrain, thalamus, lentiform nucleus of lateral globus pallidus, and medial globus pallidus, putamen, substantia nigra, and caudate (Table 2, Figure 2). The functional connectivity of the PCC/precuneus seed with the rest of the brain showed a significant negative correlation for mean scores of NU and PU with bilateral precentral gyrus (BAs 4 and 6). With regard to the functional connectivity with the PCC/precuneus, there was no region showing a significant different association between NU and PU (Figure 2, Table 2). No brain region showed that its functional connectivity with sgACC seed was significantly associated with urgency trait.

Table 2: The foci of brain areas in which functional connectivity with PCC/precuneus was significantly correlated with negative or positive urgency (, family-wise error correction).
Figure 2: Brain mapping of functional connectivity with PCC/precuneus demonstrates a significant association with mean scores of negative and positive urgency (, family-wise error correction). The hot color indicates a positive correlation with mean scores of negative and positive urgency; the cool color indicates a negative correlation with mean scores of negative and positive urgency. STN: substantia nigra; VTA: ventral tegmental areas; LenNu: lentiform nucleus; Precen_G: precentral gyrus.

Both of those two functional connectivity analyses with independent seeding mask replicated the former findings that the trait urgency was positively associated with functional connectivity between PCC and thalamus midbrain regions (supplementary figure ).

4. Discussion

Here, we report an association between trait urgency and ALFF within the DMN. Specifically, we found that ALFF in sgACC, mPFC, right DLPFC, left IFG and MFG, and PCC/precuneus were positively correlated with urgency. Furthermore, NU and PU showed significant correlations with the functional connectivity between PCC/precuneus and thalamus, as well as the functional connectivity between PCC/precuneus and substantia nigra and ventral tegmental areas of the midbrain, which is where dopamine neurons are located.

From a theoretical perspective on urgency, Cyders and Smith propose that the amygdala and vmPFC are involved in emotion-based rash action [9]. The amygdala encodes emotional significance of sensory input and influences subsequent cortical activity for cognitive processing. Meanwhile, amygdala affects the activity of the nucleus accumbens, and the ventral tegmental area to influence emotional experience and actions [38]. The vmPFC takes charge of regulating effects on the amygdala to provide information toward long-term goal-directed behavior [38]. Consistent with this theoretical point of view [9], we found that the intrinsic activity of sgACC and mPFC was associated with trait urgency (Figure 1). In addition, we found that trait urgency was associated with the amplitude of functional connectivity between PCC/precuneus and thalamus, responding for sensory processing, as well as between PCC/precuneus and midbrain regions for reward-related cognitive processing. These findings indicate that trait urgency is related to the dopamine reward system.

These results are consistent with previous findings showing an association between trait urgency and brain activation in the right lateral OFC during the presentation of negative emotional stimuli [39]. The lateral OFC is involved in motivation and reward sensitivity and has been suggested to inhibit neural processing associated with irrelevant sensations and actions when emotion influences attention [40]. A neuroimaging study in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has found enhanced local connectivity in the lateral OFC for ADHD children compared to controls, which was interpreted to reflect lower dopaminergic function [41]. Furthermore, increased OFC activation was consistently found during negative and positive emotional processing [42, 43]. These results hence suggest that urgency is related to the regulatory activity of the lateral OFC. Although Cyders et al. find no association between the lateral OFC’s response to positive images and PU [39], our findings indicate a link between urgency and resting OFC activity.

Our findings showed that both PU and NU were associated with the intrinsic activity in PCC/precuneus. The PCC/precuneus is a hub region of the DMN involved with high order information processing [44, 45]. A large body of literature has documented that activity in PCC/precuneus is suppressed during cognitive processes, such as attention [46, 47], memory [47], and decision-making [48, 49]. The magnitude of activity changes in PCC/precuneus has been related to task difficulty [50], and inappropriate deactivation in PCC/precuneus has been associated with weaker performances during cognitive tasks [5153]. Previous studies have shown a strong association between dopaminergic function and brain activity in the PCC/precuneus [41]. Specifically, activation of PCC/precuneus during a visual attention task is shown to increase with increased dopamine transporter levels in healthy volunteers [54]. Moreover, L-dopa administration is documented to decrease functional connectivity between PCC/precuneus and caudate, as compared to baseline [55]. Previous studies also show a positive correlation between resting state activity in the precuneus and personality traits of sensitivity to external environmental and social conditions [56]. Since urgency reflects poor cognitive control when facing salient stimuli, enhanced resting PCC activity in healthy participants may also indicate an alteration of reward-related cognitive function, which may contribute to the emergence of urgency behavior.

We further showed that trait urgency was associated with intrinsic activity in DLPFC and dACC. DLPFC is connected with premotor areas, lateral parietal cortex, and thalamus [57, 58], which are areas associated with cognitive control and executive function [59]. DLPFC takes part in rule-based working memory and top-down cognitive control, and dACC is involved in conflict monitoring [60]. Both areas are activated in emotion reappraisal tasks, indicative of their role in cognitive control [42], as well as in emotion regulation [61]. The positive relationship between the intrinsic activity of the DLPFC and the dACC with trait urgency may indicate that fast-acting emotional processes accompany an altered baseline activation of the cognitive control system. Given the functional connectivity between PCC and ACC and the structural connections between thalamus and DLPFC, future studies may use path analyses to further explore the augmented baseline activity in the cognitive control system for individuals with high trait PU.

In the current study, trait urgency was related to the functional connectivity between PCC and the thalamus, as well as the functional connectivity between PCC and substantia nigra and ventral tegmental areas of the midbrain. The thalamus is a relay for striatocortical and corticocortical communication [62] and a number of studies have implicated the thalamus in trait impulsivity. That is, increased volume of the anterior thalamus is associated with higher impulsivity in 14~15-year-old children [63], and impulsivity correlated negatively with functional connectivity between the thalamus and the ventral striatum [64]. In our study, both NU and PU show correlation with the functional connectivity between PCC and the medial dorsal, lateral posterior, and ventral lateral nuclei of the thalamus. The medial dorsal nucleus of the thalamus receives inputs from the amygdala and the olfactory cortex [27]. The lateral posterior and ventral lateral nuclei of the thalamus receive input from substantia nigra and globus pallidus and project to the premotor cortex [27]. In turn, the precuneus receives connections from the occipital, temporal, and posterior parietal subdivisions of the thalamus for sensory information translation [65] and their disruption might contribute to rash action. The amplitude of structural connectivity between PCC/precuneus and thalamus has also been associated with impairment of consciousness [66]. A recent study finds linear associations between dopamine D2/D3 receptors in the striatum and fMRI signals in the thalamus and precuneus during a visual attention task, indicative of the role of dopaminergic rewarding effects on the activity of thalamus and precuneus on cognitive functioning [54]. These studies provide evidence of a key role of PCC/precuneus and thalamus in consciousness and cognitive behaviors. Taken together with the results of the current study, the enhanced functional synchronization between PCC/precuneus and thalamus for high trait impulsivity individuals is in line with the proposed role for this circuitry in processes of reward-related information processing and further highlights the contributions of these two regions in the formation of impulsive responses when facing external emotions.

We found that urgency was associated with extensive areas in the medial prefrontal cortex (sgACC, mPFC), which was necessary for autobiographical and self-referential processing [67]. The mPFC is anatomically and functionally connected with the amygdala, which is involved in the detection and evaluation of emotional salience [68].

The association between NU and mPFC (ACC/supplementary motor area) is stronger than that between PU and mPFC, which may be related to the key role of mPFC in negative emotion processing [69]. These results implicate different brain networks underlying NU and PU, and further studies aim at replicating this finding may help better understand the overlapping and distinct neurocircuitry of PU and NU.

In the current study, we found that trait urgency was associated with the intrinsic brain activity in sgACC and vmPFC in response to emotion experience [70]. Notably, traits related to urgency are also related to the intrinsic brain activity of lateral OFC, DLPFC, and dACC, which are recruited in successful emotional regulation [21]. The concept of urgency describes a process which links emotion and many different risky behaviors. In line with the theory of urgency, the association of trait urgency and brain activity in those regions confirms that the dysfunction of emotion regulation may contribute to the rash action under intense emotion condition, which may suggest that it is possible to employ emotion regulation strategy to ameliorate trait urgency to avoid risky behaviors [71].

5. Limitation

In the current study, there are some limitations that should be noted. First, we employed a cross-sectional design to explore the possible link between trait urgency and brain intrinsic activity. The cross-sectional design made it difficult to clarify any causal relationships. For example, we could not clarify whether the increase of intrinsic activity of sgACC/vmPFC will enhance emotional-based rash action. Further longitudinal studies with neuroimaging technology should be conducted to identify the causal effect of brain activity and trait urgency. Second, we did not perform a test-retest examination on an independent data due to unavailability of a similar resting fMRI data with UPPS scale. Future studies are needed to replicate our findings.

6. Conclusion

The current study employs ALFF and functional connectivity methods to explore the signatures of NU and PU in intrinsic activity of the brain. NU and PU are related to activity of frontal and cingulate cortices and are associated with the functional connectivity between the PCC/precuneus and thalamus and with the functional connectivity between the PCC/precuneus and midbrain. In summary, we provide evidence that aspects of intrinsic brain activity are related to urgency in behavior and may shed light on the neural mechanism underlying impulsivity.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant nos. 81601563, 81271549, 81470816, 61431013, 81501543, and 81571753 and in part from the National Institute on Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse of the United States, Z01AA3009 (Dardo Tomasi, Corinde E. Wiers, Ehsan Shokri-Kojori, Şükrü B. Demiral, Gene-Jack Wang, Nora D. Volkow).

References

  1. M. A. Cyders, G. T. Smith, N. S. Spillane, S. Fischer, A. M. Annus, and C. Peterson, “Integration of impulsivity and positive mood to predict risky behavior: development and validation of a measure of positive urgency,” Psychological Assessment, vol. 19, pp. 107–118, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. K. Bresin, D. L. Carter, and K. H. Gordon, “The relationship between trait impulsivity, negative affective states, and urge for nonsuicidal self-injury: a daily diary study,” Psychiatry Research, vol. 205, pp. 227–231, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Fischer, K. G. Anderson, and G. T. Smith, “Coping with distress by eating or drinking: role of trait urgency and expectancies,” Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, vol. 18, pp. 269–274, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Fischer and G. T. Smith, “Binge eating, problem drinking, and pathological gambling: linking behavior to shared traits and social learning,” Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 44, pp. 789–800, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. L. Claes and J. Muehlenkamp, “The relationship between the UPPS-P impulsivity dimensions and nonsuicidal self-injury characteristics in male and female high-school students,” Psychiatry Journal, vol. 2013, Article ID 654847, 5 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. T. C. Zapolski, M. A. Cyders, and G. T. Smith, “Positive urgency predicts illegal drug use and risky sexual behavior,” Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, vol. 23, pp. 348–354, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. A. Cyders, K. Flory, S. Rainer, and G. T. Smith, “The role of personality dispositions to risky behavior in predicting first-year college drinking,” Addiction, vol. 104, pp. 193–202, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Kaiser, J. A. Bonsu, R. J. Charnigo, R. Milich, and D. R. Lynam, “Impulsive personality and alcohol use: bidirectional relations over one year,” Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, vol. 77, pp. 473–482, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. A. Cyders and G. T. Smith, “Emotion-based dispositions to rash action: positive and negative urgency,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 134, p. 807, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. J. Hoptman, D. Antonius, C. J. Mauro, E. M. Parker, and D. C. Javitt, “Cortical thinning, functional connectivity, and mood-related impulsivity in schizophrenia: relationship to aggressive attitudes and behavior,” The American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 171, pp. 939–948, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. L. Moreno-López, A. Catena, M. J. Fernández-Serrano et al., “Trait impulsivity and prefrontal gray matter reductions in cocaine dependent individuals,” Drug and Alcohol Dependence, vol. 125, pp. 208–214, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. N. Muhlert and A. D. Lawrence, “Brain structure correlates of emotion-based rash impulsivity,” NeuroImage, vol. 115, pp. 138–146, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. A. Cyders, M. Dzemidzic, W. J. Eiler, A. Coskunpinar, K. Karyadi, and D. A. Kareken, “Negative urgency and ventromedial prefrontal cortex responses to alcohol cues: fMRI evidence of emotion-based impulsivity,” Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, vol. 38, pp. 409–417, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. B. Biswal, F. Z. Yetkin, V. M. Haughton, and J. S. Hyde, “Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 34, pp. 537–541, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. D. Fox, A. Z. Snyder, J. L. Vincent, M. Corbetta, D. C. Van Essen, and M. E. Raichle, “The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, pp. 9673–9678, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. B. B. Biswal, M. Mennes, X. N. Zuo et al., “Toward discovery science of human brain function,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, pp. 4734–4739, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. X. Cohen, J.-C. Schoene-Bake, C. E. Elger, and B. Weber, “Connectivity-based segregation of the human striatum predicts personality characteristics,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 12, pp. 32–34, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. E. Shokri-Kojori, D. Tomasi, C. E. Wiers, G.-J. Wang, and N. D. Volkow, “Alcohol affects brain functional connectivity and its coupling with behavior: greater effects in male heavy drinkers,” Molecular Psychiatry, vol. 22, pp. 1185–1195, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. Golchert, J. Smallwood, E. Jefferies et al., “In need of constraint: understanding the role of the cingulate cortex in the impulsive mind,” NeuroImage, vol. 146, pp. 804–813, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. X. Zhu, C. R. Cortes, K. Mathur, D. Tomasi, and R. Momenan, “Model-free functional connectivity and impulsivity correlates of alcohol dependence: a resting-state study,” Addiction Biology, vol. 22, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. R. Goldin, K. McRae, W. Ramel, and J. J. Gross, “The neural bases of emotion regulation: reappraisal and suppression of negative emotion,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 63, pp. 577–586, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. Leech and D. J. Sharp, “The role of the posterior cingulate cortex in cognition and disease,” Brain, vol. 137, p. 12, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. C. Biskup, K. Helmbold, D. Baurmann et al., “Resting state default mode network connectivity in children and adolescents with ADHD after acute tryptophan depletion,” Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, vol. 134, pp. 161–171, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. Nagano-Saito, J. Liu, J. Doyon, and A. Dagher, “Dopamine modulates default mode network deactivation in elderly individuals during the Tower of London task,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 458, pp. 1–5, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. D. Tomasi, N. D. Volkow, R. Wang et al., “Dopamine transporters in striatum correlate with deactivation in the default mode network during visuospatial attention,” PLoS One, vol. 4, article e6102, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. D. S. Margulies, J. Böttger, X. Long et al., “Resting developments: a review of fMRI post-processing methodologies for spontaneous brain activity,” Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, vol. 23, pp. 289–307, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. S. N. Haber and R. Calzavara, “The cortico-basal ganglia integrative network: the role of the thalamus,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 78, pp. 69–74, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. K. B. Nooner, S. Colcombe, R. Tobe et al., “The NKI-Rockland Sample: a model for accelerating the pace of discovery science in psychiatry,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 6, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. S. P. Whiteside and D. R. Lynam, “The five factor model and impulsivity: using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity,” Personality & Individual Differences, vol. 30, pp. 669–689, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. T. Beck, R. A. Steer, and M. G. Carbin, “Psychometric properties of the Beck depression inventory: twenty-five years of evaluation,” Clinical Psychology Review, vol. 8, pp. 77–100, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. D. Power, A. Mitra, T. O. Laumann, A. Z. Snyder, B. L. Schlaggar, and S. E. Petersen, “Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI,” NeuroImage, vol. 84, pp. 320–341, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. C. Yan and Y. Zang, “DPARSF: a MATLAB toolbox for “pipeline” data analysis of resting-state fMRI,” Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, vol. 4, p. 13, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. Z. Yu-Feng, H. Yong, Z. Chao-Zhe et al., “Altered baseline brain activity in children with ADHD revealed by resting-state functional MRI,” Brain and Development, vol. 29, pp. 83–91, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. L. Fan, H. Li, J. Zhuo et al., “The human brainnetome atlas: a new brain atlas based on connectional architecture,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 26, pp. 3508–3526, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. B. A. Vogt, L. Vogt, and S. Laureys, “Cytology and functionally correlated circuits of human posterior cingulate areas,” NeuroImage, vol. 29, pp. 452–466, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. L. Palaniyappan, M. Simmonite, T. P. White, E. B. Liddle, and P. F. Liddle, “Neural primacy of the salience processing system in schizophrenia,” Neuron, vol. 79, pp. 814–828, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. A. Eklund, T. E. Nichols, and H. Knutsson, “Cluster failure: why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 113, pp. 7900–7905, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. G. T. Smith and M. A. Cyders, “Integrating affect and impulsivity: the role of positive and negative urgency in substance use risk,” Drug and Alcohol Dependence, vol. 163, pp. S3–S12, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M. A. Cyders, M. Dzemidzic, W. J. Eiler, A. Coskunpinar, K. A. Karyadi, and D. A. Kareken, “Negative urgency mediates the relationship between amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex activation to negative emotional stimuli and general risk-taking,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 25, pp. 4094–4102, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. M. L. Kringelbach, “The human orbitofrontal cortex: linking reward to hedonic experience,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 6, pp. 691–702, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. D. Tomasi and N. D. Volkow, “Abnormal functional connectivity in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 71, pp. 443–450, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. J. Lévesque, Y. Joanette, B. Mensour et al., “Neural basis of emotional self-regulation in childhood,” Neuroscience, vol. 129, pp. 361–369, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. A. K. Mak, Z.-g. Hu, J. X. Zhang, Z.-w. Xiao, and T. M. Lee, “Neural correlates of regulation of positive and negative emotions: an fMRI study,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 457, pp. 101–106, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. D. Tomasi and N. D. Volkow, “Association between functional connectivity hubs and brain networks,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 21, pp. 2003–2013, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. D. Tomasi and N. D. Volkow, “Functional connectivity density mapping,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 107, pp. 9885–9890, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. R. N. Spreng, W. D. Stevens, J. P. Chamberlain, A. W. Gilmore, and D. L. Schacter, “Default network activity, coupled with the frontoparietal control network, supports goal-directed cognition,” NeuroImage, vol. 53, pp. 303–317, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. R. J. Maddock, A. S. Garrett, and M. H. Buonocore, “Remembering familiar people: the posterior cingulate cortex and autobiographical memory retrieval,” Neuroscience, vol. 104, pp. 667–676, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. B. Y. Hayden, A. C. Nair, A. N. McCoy, and M. L. Platt, “Posterior cingulate cortex mediates outcome-contingent allocation of behavior,” Neuron, vol. 60, pp. 19–25, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. J. M. Pearson, S. R. Heilbronner, D. L. Barack, B. Y. Hayden, and M. L. Platt, “Posterior cingulate cortex: adapting behavior to a changing world,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 15, pp. 143–151, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. K. D. Singh and I. Fawcett, “Transient and linearly graded deactivation of the human default-mode network by a visual detection task,” NeuroImage, vol. 41, pp. 100–112, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. E. J. Sonuga-Barke and F. X. Castellanos, “Spontaneous attentional fluctuations in impaired states and pathological conditions: a neurobiological hypothesis,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 31, pp. 977–986, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. D. H. Weissman, K. Roberts, K. Visscher, and M. Woldorff, “The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 9, pp. 971–978, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. V. Bonnelle, R. Leech, K. M. Kinnunen et al., “Default mode network connectivity predicts sustained attention deficits after traumatic brain injury,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 31, pp. 13442–13451, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. D. Tomasi, G. J. Wang, and N. D. Volkow, “Association between striatal dopamine D2/D3 receptors and brain activation during visual attention: effects of sleep deprivation,” Translational Psychiatry, vol. 6, article e828, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. C. Kelly, Z. G. De, M. A. Di et al., “L-Dopa modulates functional connectivity in striatal cognitive and motor networks: a double-blind placebo-controlled study,” NeuroImage, vol. 47, pp. 7364–7378, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. C. Chen, D. Xiu, C. Chen et al., “Regional homogeneity of resting-state brain activity suppresses the effect of dopamine-related genes on sensory processing sensitivity,” PLoS One, vol. 10, article e0133143, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. M. L. Dixon and K. Christoff, “The lateral prefrontal cortex and complex value-based learning and decision making,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 45, pp. 9–18, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. P. J. Le Reste, C. Haegelen, B. Gibaud, T. Moreau, and X. Morandi, “Connections of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with the thalamus: a probabilistic tractography study,” Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, vol. 38, pp. 705–710, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. M. Koenigs and J. Grafman, “The functional neuroanatomy of depression: distinct roles for ventromedial and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 201, pp. 239–243, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. A. W. MacDonald, J. D. Cohen, V. A. Stenger, and C. S. Carter, “Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control,” Science, vol. 288, pp. 1835–1838, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. T. Canli and K.-P. Lesch, “Long story short: the serotonin transporter in emotion regulation and social cognition,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 10, pp. 1103–1109, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. P. T. Bell and J. M. Shine, “Subcortical contributions to large-scale network communication,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 71, pp. 313–322, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. S. Mackey, B. Chaarani, K.-J. Kan et al., “Brain regions related to impulsivity mediate the effects of early adversity on antisocial behavior,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 275–282, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. J. G. Ramaekers, J. H. van Wel, D. Spronk et al., “Cannabis and cocaine decrease cognitive impulse control and functional corticostriatal connectivity in drug users with low activity DBH genotypes,” Brain Imaging and Behavior, vol. 10, pp. 1254–1263, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. P. Fransson and G. Marrelec, “The precuneus/posterior cingulate cortex plays a pivotal role in the default mode network: evidence from a partial correlation network analysis,” NeuroImage, vol. 42, pp. 1178–1184, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. S. I. Cunningham, D. Tomasi, and N. D. Volkow, “Structural and functional connectivity of the precuneus and thalamus to the default mode network,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 38, pp. 938–956, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. R. N. Spreng, R. A. Mar, and A. S. N. Kim, “The common neural basis of autobiographical memory, prospection, navigation, theory of mind, and the default mode: a quantitative meta-analysis,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 21, pp. 489–510, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. S. Delli Pizzi, P. Chiacchieretta, D. Mantini et al., “GABA content within medial prefrontal cortex predicts the variability of fronto-limbic effective connectivity,” Brain Structure and Function, vol. 222, pp. 3217–3229, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  69. S. H. Kim and S. Hamann, “Neural correlates of positive and negative emotion regulation,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 19, pp. 776–798, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. T. F. Heatherton and D. D. Wagner, “Cognitive neuroscience of self-regulation failure,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 15, pp. 132–139, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. P. C. Broderick and P. A. Jennings, “Mindfulness for adolescents: a promising approach to supporting emotion regulation and preventing risky behavior,” New Directions for Student Leadership, vol. 2012, pp. 111–126, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus