Research Article

Stimulus- and Neural-Referred Visual Receptive Field Properties following Hemispherectomy: A Case Study Revisited

Table 1

Median eccentricity and size estimates for CFAS and CFRS per area group, for the patient and averaged across controls. The medians’ 1st and 3rd quartiles are presented between brackets.

CFAS eccCFAS sizeCFRS eccCFRS sizepRF eccpRF size

Early visual areas
Patient4.73 (2.4–7.5)3.27 (1.8–5.1)3.96 (2.9–7.2)4.69 (1.4–8.6)3.63 (2.3–5.8)0.61 (0.2–3.6)
Controls4.28 (2.4–6.9)2.04 (0.8–3.9)4.04 (2.4–6.8)1.02 (0.4–2.4)3.89 (2.2–6.2)2.26 (1.5–3.2)

Late visual areas
Patient2.11 (1.6–4.1)5.10 (1.6–8.0)3.36 (2.2–4.0)3.06 (1.0–9.2)1.90 (0.9–4.2)1.36 (0.2–5.0)
Controls4.38 (2.5–6.7)2.86 (1.0–7.3)4.83 (2.8–8.0)1.02 (0.4–2.2)3.36 (1.7–6.1)4.30 (2.7–6.5)