Research Article

Does Measurement of Corticospinal Tract Involvement Add Value to Clinical Behavioral Biomarkers in Predicting Motor Recovery after Stroke?

Table 2

Correlation and multiple regression analyses between FMA-UE and other variables.

CorrelationTotal (n = 53)Initial FMA-UE <35 (n = 39)
Correlation coefficientP valueCorrelation coefficientP value

Age−0.0150.917−0.0760.646
Sex−0.0440.7530.1300.430
Lesion location0.0730.6030.0890.591
CST injury−0.3460.011−0.4560.004
Lesion volume−0.0980.487−0.0450.787
Initial FMA-UE0.789<0.0010.611<0.001
Multiple regressionβP valuePartialPartβP valuePartialPart
Initial FMA-UE0.750<0.0010.7690.7220.532<0.0010.5800.517
CST injury−0.1410.117−0.220−0.135−0.3280.012−0.402−0.318
R2 = 0.641, adjusted R2 = 0.626R2 = 0.475, adjusted R2 = 0.445

FMA-UE: Fugl-Meyer assessment of the hemiplegic upper extremity; CST: corticospinal tract. P <0.05. Partial correlations (shared contributions) of the variables. Semipartial correlations (unique contributions) of the variables.