Neural Plasticity

Neural Plasticity / 2021 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 5522717 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5522717

Yao Liu, Mei Wei, Xiang Mao, Taisheng Chen, Peng Lin, Wei Wang, "Key Signaling Pathways Regulate the Development and Survival of Auditory Hair Cells", Neural Plasticity, vol. 2021, Article ID 5522717, 12 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5522717

Key Signaling Pathways Regulate the Development and Survival of Auditory Hair Cells

Academic Editor: Daniela Tropea
Received08 Feb 2021
Revised01 May 2021
Accepted31 May 2021
Published12 Jun 2021

Abstract

The loss of auditory sensory hair cells (HCs) is the most common cause of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). As the main sound transmission structure in the cochlea, it is necessary to maintain the normal shape and survival of HCs. In this review, we described and summarized the signaling pathways that regulate the development and survival of auditory HCs in SNHL. The role of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), phosphoinositide-3 kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/Akt), Notch/Wnt/Atoh1, calcium channels, and oxidative stress/reactive oxygen species (ROS) signaling pathways are the most relevant. The molecular interactions of these signaling pathways play an important role in the survival of HCs, which may provide a theoretical basis and possible therapeutic interventions for the treatment of hearing loss.

1. Introduction

Globally, hearing loss is the most common sensory disorder, and its severity ranges from mild hearing impairment to total deafness. More than 500 million people are affected by this health problem, and 1 in every 500 newborns worldwide is deaf [1]. Hearing dysfunction may lead to speech retardation, as well as poor social integration and quality of life. Thus far, various causes of hearing loss have been identified and studied, such as aging, ototoxic drugs, genetic mutations of deafness genes, ear or brain tumors, and exposure to loud noises (even for short time) [2, 3]. These causes determine the specific type of hearing loss and the treatment orientation. Hearing loss can be divided into three types according to the location of the lesion: conductive hearing loss (CHL), sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), and mixed hearing loss. Etiologically, hearing loss can be roughly classified into two categories, including hereditary and nonhereditary [4]. SNHL is an etiologically heterogeneous disorder resulting from numerous genetic and environmental factors [5] and is caused by damage to the body’s sound transmission function. Considering that the cochlea is an important sound receiver, analysis of the structure and sound transmission processes of the cochlea form the basis of treatment.

Hair cells (HCs) and spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) are the main structures of sound transmission in the cochlea [611]. The auditory sensory HCs are located in the organ of Corti and include a row of inner hair cells (IHCs), three rows of outer hair cells (OHCs), and supporting cells. Vibrations caused by sound are amplified by the three rows of OHCs and subsequently reach the cochlea. This is turn causes the deflection of stereocilia on the top surface of IHCs, which opens mechanoelectrical transduction channels located at the tip of the stereocilia, and simultaneously leads to excitation of the SGNs [12]. The inner ear and the brain then collaborate to make us feel sound [13]. Hearing loss is caused by the irreversible loss of sensory HCs and degeneration of SGNs [1419]. Middle ear lesions, noise, trauma, and genetic mutations can cause damage to HCs, which ultimately lead to hearing loss [2024].

Several signaling cascades are activated following injury to the cochlea. These pathways can be proinflammatory, prodeath, and even prosurvival. The signaling cascades that occur at the cellular and molecular levels are highly complex and intertwined [25]. However, there is relatively little information about the cellular processes that mediate HC damage. As research and treatment in this area are critical, research regarding the cellular molecular pathway mechanisms has attracted considerable attention.

At present, there are an increasing number of studies that have focused on cellular molecular pathways that could represent potential checkpoints in the mechanism of hearing loss and HC damage. As research into the necrobiology of the inner ear progresses, the pathways specific to auditory HC death will become better defined. Among the identified pathways, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), phosphoinositide-3 kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/Akt), Notch/Wnt/Atoh1, calcium channel, and oxidative stress/reactive oxygen species (ROS) signaling pathways are the most relevant [2629]. Importantly, drug interventions in the majority of these processes can achieve benefit.

To summarize the research regarding hearing loss based on cellular molecular pathways in recent years and to guide hearing recovery and the prevention of hearing loss, this paper reviews the current research on the biology of HC damage. The various cellular molecular pathways are discussed systematically. The potential of damage and survival mechanisms as targets for pharmacological intervention to prevent or ameliorate hearing loss is reviewed, and conclusions are drawn in the last section.

2. MAPK Signaling

Metabolomic and bioinformatic analyses have indicated that MAPK signaling is the major pathway in various types of hearing loss [30, 31]. In the process of evolution, the MAPK cascade reaction has been conserved and consists of three tiers of protein kinases, namely, MAPKKK, MAPKK, and MAPK. This cascade regulates various cellular effects. There are several distinct groups of MAPKs; however, the most extensively studied is extracellular signal regulated kinases (ERK) 1 and 2 (ERK1/2), c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNK 1, 2, and 3), and p38 kinases [32]. They are activated by various factors; for example, ERK1/2 can be activated by growth factors, and JNK and p38 signaling can be activated by oxidative stress, UV irradiation, hypoxia, and various inflammatory factors (Figure 1).

The MAPK/ERK pathway is reportedly associated with cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, senescence, and apoptosis. It consists of a series of proteins including Ras, Raf, MEK, and ERK. In many cases, ERK1/2 activation is thought to promote cell proliferation and survival [33]. Studies have shown that inhibiting the activation of ERK1/2 in cochlear leads to the loss of OHCs, and gentamicin-induced toxicity is also enhanced [34]. Furthermore, an increasing number of studies have found that ERK1/2 plays an important role in the transformation of supporting cells into HCs. For example, within minutes of a mechanical injury to the cochlear, ERK1/2 signaling is transiently activated in Deiters’ and phalangeal cells (supporting cells) but not in HCs [35]. In addition, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) was found to activate the MEK/ERK pathway and induce cell cycle promotion of Hensen’s and Claudius’ cells, both of which are auditory supporting cells that are located lateral to the OHCs of the cochlea. The promotion of this cell cycle in the supporting cells results in the maintenance of the OHC numbers [36]. Another study also showed that forskolin- (FSK-) treated cochlear explants increase the level of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) in the auditory supporting cells, thus identifying the MAPK/Raf/ERK pathway as an important downstream signaling pathway in FSK-induced supporting cell proliferation [37]. Therefore, there is substantial evidence indicating that the activation of ERK1/2 in supporting cells can maintain the survival of OHCs.

JNKs, also known as stress-activated protein kinases, phosphorylate the transcription factor, c-Jun. JNK has three isoforms: JNK1, JNK2, and JNK3. The MAPK/JNK signal transduction pathway is activated in response to the exposure of cells to environmental stress and contributes to an apoptotic response by stressed cells that have been damaged by ROS [38]. Studies have shown that aminoglycosides can activate the JNK pathway via ROS, which is an enzyme of the MAPK family signaling pathway, and has been shown to contribute to the apoptosis of damaged cells [38]. In addition, ROS can activate apoptosis signal-regulating kinase-1 (ASK-1), which can phosphorylate and activate mediators of the JNK and p38 pathways of extrinsic programmed cell death [39]. It is well known that both c-fos and c-jun belong to a group of transcription factors called immediate early genes, which can promote apoptosis in response to cellular stress [40]. MAPK/JNK signaling is able to affect both c-fos and c-jun transcription factors, thereby promoting the expression of proapoptotic genes (such as TNFα, FasL, Bak, Bim, and Bax) and blocking transcription of antiapoptotic genes (such as Bcl-2) [4147]. Taken together, the MAPK/JNK signaling pathway is activated by oxidative stress-mediated ROS, and the JNK pathway promotes HC apoptosis by acting on downstream transcription factors.

P38 is another downstream protein of the MAPK pathway and is involved in many cellular processes, including inflammation, cell cycle regulation, and apoptosis [48]. It can be activated by a variety of environmental factors and endogenous stimuli [49]. After p38 activation by stress stimuli, prodeath factors such as Bim, FasL, and FasR are also positively regulated [5052]. Numerous studies have confirmed that inhibiting the activation of p38 has been associated with protection against aminoglycoside, noise, cisplatin, radiation, and tumor necrosis factor alpha- (TNFα-) induced ototoxicity [5359].

In conclusion, different MAPK kinases have different effects on HCs. In the future, treatments and drugs based on the MAPK pathway may play a significant role in HC regeneration and protection from ototoxic drug–induced hearing loss.

3. PI3K/Akt Signaling

The gradual loss of HCs leads to hearing loss, and thus identifying specific signaling pathways that promote HC survival is an effective therapy. Among the identified signaling pathways, PI3K is a powerful candidate for improving the survival of HCs. In recent decades, intensive investigations have been carried out towards PI3K pathway activation for the treatment of aminoglycoside-induced [6062], sudden sensory neural [63, 64], noise-induced [65, 66], and autosomal-dominant hereditary [67] hearing loss. PI3K plays a key role in various cellular processes, including cell survival, growth, and proliferation. PI3K family members are divided into three classes (class I, II, and III) based on their primary structure and regulatory function. Akt is a major downstream target of PI3K and PTEN and acts as a phosphatase to regulate phosphodiol inositol levels on cell membranes and regulate the PI3K signaling pathway [68]. Akt has serine 473 (p-Akt S473) and threonine 308 (p-Akt T308) phosphorylation sites and serves as a common hub in many antiapoptotic pathways. PI3K/Akt signaling is considered to play an important role in the development of HCs and is involved in the proliferation of auricular precursor cells [69].

Ototoxic drugs are the main environmental factors of hearing loss [7073]. However, cisplatin and aminoglycoside antibiotics such as kanamycin, gentamicin, or tobramycin are used worldwide, which may lead to the death of sensory HCs in the inner ear via downregulated expression of the PI3K/Akt pathway. Therefore, treatments targeting PI3K/Akt have become an area of intense research interest. Jadali et al. demonstrated that increased PI3K signaling activates Akt, which could directly phosphorylate CHK1 or indirectly increase expression level of pCHK1 levels through DNA damage response proteins, such as ATR. Activation of CHK1 allows supporting cells to repair cisplatin-induced DNA damage [74]. It has also been reported that the PI3K signaling pathway may actively maintain the viability of HCs. Activation of PI3K may be useful in promoting the survival of HCs after aminoglycoside-induced toxicity, and the lack of PI3K signaling could be a cause for congenital hearing loss [60]. To protect auditory HCs from gentamicin-induced apoptotic cell death, pasireotide acts as a novel otoprotective peptide via the PI3K/Akt pathway and activates survival genes, reduces caspase signaling, and increases HC survival [61]. Haake et al. reported that dexamethasone treatment could protect HCs against TNFα-induced apoptosis in vitro by activation of PI3K/Akt and NF-κB signaling [65]. Zhang et al. showed that epigallocatechin-3-gallate acts via PI3K/Akt signaling in the cochlea to promote cell growth and neuron differentiation [75].

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is a rapid and unexplained SNHL that occurs within 72 hours, with in at least 2 adjacent frequencies [76, 77]. By identifying the different expressions of miRNAs in SSNHL patients, it was found that most of the significantly altered miRNAs were abundant in the nervous system, which indicated that putative targeted miRNAs are enriched in the PI3K/Akt, Ras, and MAPK signaling pathways to affect the survival of cochlea HCs [63]. In terms of exhibiting a protective effect on cochlear cells, macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), as a proinflammatory cytokine, can protect cochlear cells from oxygen-glucose deprivation- (OGD-) induced injury by activating the Akt-Nrf2-HO-1 pathway [64]. It is known that insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) plays an important role in the treatment of SNHL [7880]. IGF1 protects HCs from aminoglycosides by activating the IGF1 receptor and its two main downstream pathways, PI3K/Akt and MEK/ERK, thus leading to the upregulation of the Netrin1-encoding gene (NTN1) expression [81].

Increased PI3K/Akt signaling has a protective effect on hearing loss induced by ototoxicity or adverse environmental factors. Understanding the mechanisms of PI3K/Akt signaling may provide therapeutic ideas for combating hearing loss and identifying new disease strategies.

4. Notch/Wnt/Atoh1 Signaling

The human cochlea has about 16,000 sensory HCs, which are necessary for normal hearing [82]. In contrast to nonmammalian vertebrates, most mammalian HCs cannot regenerate, resulting in permanent deafness [8387]. Cross-species microarrays have identified seven different known signaling pathways: TGFβ, PAX, Notch, Wnt, NFκB, insulin/IGF1, and AP-1 [88]. Among them, Notch and Wnt signaling pathways are highly complex and conserved that control a variety of cellular events necessary for sensory HCs formation, including cell proliferation and cell fate during cochlear development [8994]. Simultaneously, Notch and Wnt usually interact to regulate upstream and downstream targets, and Atoh1 is discussed as an important target preferentially [95100].

Atoh1 is one of the most important transcription factors involved in the development of the inner ear [101]. Previous studies have shown that Atoh1 is both necessary and sufficient for the differentiation, survival, maturation, establishment of auditory function, and long-term survival of HCs [102]. Studies have also shown that Atoh1 is capable of converting the phenotype of mature supporting cells into replacement HCs. Within the critical time window for HC survival, the loss of Atoh1 results in a severe loss of supporting cells and defects in the innervation of the cochlea, causing disruption of the entire auditory sensory epithelium [103]. Another study observed upregulated Atoh1 in supporting cells prior to the significant increase in vivo in the number of HCs without cell division. However, the identification of upstream and downstream targets of Atoh1 may better explain the role of Atoh1 in HC development at the molecular level. For example, the coexpression of EYA1, SIX1, and SOX2 as upstream regulators can effectively activate the HC development program [104]. The downstream target genes POU4F3, BARHL1, and GFI1 can promote Atoh1 to drive HC differentiation [105].

Notch signaling plays a key role in Atoh1 regulation and inner ear development. Atoh1-dependent cell development support and sensory patch patterning are currently believed to be dependent on Notch signaling-mediated lateral inhibition [102]. Cheng et al. demonstrated that HC determination or cell fate support is influenced by Notch signaling [106]. Lee et al. demonstrated that Notch signaling causes inhibition of bHLH proteins (HES1 and HES5) to block the action of Atoh1, which leads to inhibition of HC fate [107]. Therefore, inhibiting the Notch signaling pathway to promote the differentiation of supporting cells into HCs may be a strategy for HC regeneration [97]. The production of new HCs from supporting cells could be increased via inhibition of Notch signaling in the damaged cochlea.

During the development of the cochlea, the Notch signaling pathway interacts with the FGF signaling pathway to control the expression of Atoh1 [107]. Doetzlhofer et al. demonstrated that FGF receptor blockage allows supporting cells to be more responsive to Notch inhibition [108]. Another study demonstrated that FGF and Notch signaling inhibit the proliferation of supporting cells in parallel by inhibiting Wnt signaling [109]. Although FGF signaling inhibits proliferation during regeneration, blocking FGF signaling alone is not enough to enhance proliferation [99, 110].

Wnt/β-catenin signaling has been confirmed to be upstream of both Atoh1 and SOX2 during the development of cochlear HCs and retina cells [111, 112]. Wnt/β-catenin signaling can promote HC regeneration by increasing cell proliferation and Atoh1 expression. The Wnt pathway also interacts with the Notch pathway. Studies have demonstrated that Wnt activation followed by Notch inhibition significantly promotes the transformation of supporting cells into HCs. Lineage tracing has shown that new HCs, predominantly OHCs, arise from inner pillar and third-row Deiter’s cells [113, 114]. In the developing cochlea, Wnt acts on the upstream of Atoh1 to regulate the formation of HCs, while Notch-mediated lateral inhibition prevents supporting cells from adopting the HCs fate by inhibiting the Atoh1 expression [91]. Thus, Wnt may act as a bridge between Notch and Atoh1.

Based on the importance of the Notch/Wnt/Atoh1 pathway, the researchers provide novel therapeutic strategies. Pan et al. reported that genetically engineered Atoh1 knockout mice provide a novel model for establishing critical conditions needed to regenerate viable and functional hair cells with Atoh1 therapy [115]. Mizutari et al. showed that the γ-secretase inhibitor LY411575 on the Notch signaling pathway results in the formation of new hair cells in the outer hair cell region and a mild reduction in noise-induced auditory brainstem response (ABR) threshold shifts; although, the mice were still functionally deaf [116]. In addition, the in vitro hair cell that yields from Lgr5-positive cells isolated from neonatal mice and grown as organoids can be further improved by treatment with the Wnt activator CHIR99021 (CHIR) and the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor valproic acid [117, 118].

In summary, Notch interacts with the FGF to inhibit the expression of Wnt and further suppress the downstream molecule Atoh1, thereby preventing the differentiation of supporting cells into HCs (Figure 2) [97, 115, 119]. When targeting individual Notch or Wnt signaling in the cochlea, only a modest HC regenerative response (or no response) can be observed [116, 120]. Considering the synergistic role of these signaling pathways in regulating cochlear development, targeting multiple pathways may be a more promising HC regeneration strategy.

5. Calcium Channel

Acquired hearing loss, including noise-induced hearing loss, age-related deafness, and ototoxicity-induced hearing loss, has complex mechanisms for each disease. Despite the complexity of these mechanisms, numerous studies have shown that apoptosis of inner ear structures is a common theme among many types of acquired hearing loss [121123]. Calcium is one of the important cofactors involved in the degradation enzyme of apoptosis, and the interaction between calcium and apoptosis is becoming increasingly obvious [124]. Homeostatic control of calcium ions (Ca2+) is critical for cell survival. On this basis, transport channels, ligand-gated channels, and voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) are located on the plasma membrane of HCs and facilitate Ca2+ entry into HCs [125]. Also, within the inner ear, L- and T-type calcium channels of VGCCs are believed to contribute to calcium availability during apoptosis. Among them, the family of T-type calcium channels have three members (Cav3.1, Cav3.2, and Cav3.3), based on their respective main pore-forming alpha subunits: α1G, α1H, and α1I [126]. In the T-type calcium channels, Cav3.2 is the most significantly expressed T-type channel entity in the cochlea and auditory brainstem. The results have shown that Cav3.2 VGCCs are of great functional importance for spatiotemporal auditory processing in different regions of the auditory system [127].

Therapeutic agents aimed at preventing apoptosis are a concept central to many therapies that target acquired hearing loss. Research is currently underway to evaluate potential therapeutic targets within the peripheral auditory system and apoptotic pathways. Numerous studies have shown that calcium channel blockers (CCBs) can effectively prevent damage to cochlear cells. More recent in vivo research has provided evidence to suggest that systemic and intratympanic (direct) application of CCBs can prevent hearing loss in cisplatin- and noise-induced ototoxic models [128]. For example, the T-type calcium channel blocker flunarizine can significantly inhibit cisplatin-induced apoptosis; however, this is not mediated by the modulation of intracellular calcium levels. It can inhibit lipid peroxidation and mitochondrial permeability transition in cisplatin-treated cells [129]. Additionally, trimethadione and ethosuximide are two T-type calcium blockers which are antiepileptics approved by the Food and Drug Administration [126, 130]. Both of these drugs can significantly slow age-related auditory brainstem response (ABR) threshold shifts in mice and reduce noise-induced hearing loss when applied prior to noise exposure, most likely through effects on the α1H T-type calcium channel subunit comprising one or more Cav3 calcium channel types in the cochlea [130]. In addition, aminoglycosides such as gentamicin could trigger a Ca2+ influx that activates proapoptotic signaling cascades in HCs. There is evidence that the Ca2+-sensitive neuropeptide, somatostatin (SST), can antagonize aminoglycoside-induced cell death. SST analogs have the same effect [131].

In view of the apoptotic effect of calcium channels in cochlea HCs, these channels may become a potential pharmacological target for clinical interventions in the future. Pharmacological inhibition of CCBs may represent a promising approach to the treatment of auditory impairment of various etiologies.

6. Oxidative Stress and ROS Signaling

ROS-induced oxidative stress has been reported to play a key role in several systems and in cochlear damage [132136]. Numerous studies have demonstrated that the accumulation of ROS and subsequent apoptosis induction promote several major types of SNHL, including noise-induced hearing loss, drug-induced hearing loss, and age-related hearing loss [137142]. ROS are considered to be toxic products of cell metabolism and are signaling molecules that regulate a variety of physiological processes. ROS, including superoxide anions, hydroxyl radicals, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and singlet oxygen, are mainly generated by the mitochondria in most mammalian cells [143, 144]. In both physiological and pathological conditions, ROS-induced oxidative stress can induce apoptosis via both the extrinsic cell death receptor pathway and the intrinsic mitochondrial cell death pathway. Following a stimulus, mitochondrial aerobic respiration increases, and a large amount of ROS cannot be effectively neutralized. ROS-induced superoxide and lipid peroxidation production can lead to apoptosis, and vasoactive lipid peroxidation products reduce cochlear blood flow and further enhance the production of ROS. Furthermore, the production of ROS in the cochlea will promote the production of proinflammatory cytokines, which will cause further damage [145]. This eventually leads to the death of OHCs (predominantly) and IHCs through either apoptosis or necrosis [146, 147].

Many drugs, including cisplatin, gentamicin, and neomycin, are ototoxic and may cause irreversible apoptosis of cochlear HCs. These can increase the levels of ROS, which ultimately leads to cell injury and mitochondrial dysfunction. As for the important role of ROS in cell apoptosis, considerable research has been focused on inhibiting ROS production. For example, Guo et al. reported that FSK significantly reduced cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in both HEI-OC1 cells and cochlear explant cultures by inhibiting the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway and ROS production [107]. Shin et al. also demonstrated that KR-22332 exhibits similar mechanisms to prevent cisplatin-induced ototoxicity [148]. Quan et al. demonstrated that adjudin can regulate ROS production in cochlear cells and inhibit gentamicin-induced production of ROS and apoptotic cells [149].

Increased oxidative stress and ROS play an important role in the initiation and progression of hearing loss induced by diverse ototoxic agents or adverse health conditions. Understanding the mechanisms of oxidative stress and ROS signaling may provide therapeutic options for combating hearing loss and identifying new treatment strategies.

7. Conclusion

Numerous types of inner ear damage can cause harm to auditory HCs and ultimately result in hearing loss. Multiple signaling pathways are involved in ototoxicity, noise, aging, and traumatic stress events. The most well studied molecular mechanisms behind cell death in auditory HCs are the MAPK, PI3K/Akt, Notch/Wnt/Atoh1, calcium channel, and oxidative stress/ROS signaling pathways. In this review, we provide a schematic showing how the listed pathways interact within the hair cells [71, 150152] (Figure 3). Although their effects on cochlear HC proliferation and survival have been studied extensively, there are likely many levels of crosscommunication between signaling cascades that are still undiscovered. Research in this field is becoming increasingly prevalent, as is research into the mechanisms of regulated development and survival of auditory HCs. A number of otoprotective drug therapies target different levels along these signaling pathways to promote auditory HC viability and hearing protection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

YL and WW wrote the main manuscript. MW and XM collected literature. TC and PL revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by the Key Clinical Discipline of Tianjin, National Natural Science Foundation of China (81971698), and Tianjin Natural Science Foundation (19JCYBJC27200).

References

  1. A. M. Sheffield, R. J. H. Smith, and The Epidemiology of deafness, “The Epidemiology of Deafness,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, vol. 9, no. 9, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. Y. Wang, J. Li, X. Yao et al., “Loss of CIB2 causes profound hearing loss and abolishes mechanoelectrical transduction in mice,” Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, vol. 10, p. 401, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. Y. He, X. Lu, F. Qian, D. Liu, R. Chai, and H. Li, “Insm1a Is Required for Zebrafish Posterior Lateral Line Development,” Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, vol. 10, p. 241, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. Usami, S. Abe, M. Kasai et al., “Genetic and clinical features of sensorineural hearing loss associated with the 1555 mitochondrial mutation,” Laryngoscope, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 483–490, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. W. E. Nance, “The genetics of deafness,” Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 109–119, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. Y. Liu, J. Qi, X. Chen et al., “Critical role of spectrin in hearing development and deafness,” Science Advances, vol. 5, no. 4, article eaav7803, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. Qi, Y. Liu, C. Chu et al., “A cytoskeleton structure revealed by super-resolution fluorescence imaging in inner ear hair cells,” Cell Discovery, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 12, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. W. Yan, W. Liu, J. Qi et al., “A three-dimensional culture system with Matrigel promotes purified spiral ganglion neuron survival and function in vitro,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 2070–2084, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. Qi, L. Zhang, F. Tan et al., “Espin distribution as revealed by super-resolution microscopy of stereocilia,” American Journal of Translational Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 130–141, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  10. R. Guo, M. Xiao, W. Zhao et al., “2D Ti3C2Tx MXene couples electrical stimulation to promote proliferation and neural differentiation of neural stem cells,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. S1742-7061, no. 20, pp. 30749–30752, 2021. View at: Google Scholar
  11. R. Guo, X. Ma, M. Liao et al., “Development and application of cochlear implant-based electric-acoustic stimulation of spiral ganglion neurons,” ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 6735–6741, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Waqas, S. Sun, C. Xuan et al., “Bone morphogenetic protein 4 promotes the survival and preserves the structure of flow-sorted Bhlhb5+ cochlear spiral ganglion neurons in vitro,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 3506, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. Emptoz, V. Michel, A. Lelli et al., “Local gene therapy durably restores vestibular function in a mouse model of usher syndrome type 1G,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 114, no. 36, pp. 9695–9700, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Y. Dong et al., “Knockdown of Foxg1 in supporting cells increases the trans-differentiation of supporting cells into hair cells in the neonatal mouse cochlea,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 77, no. 7, pp. 1401–1419, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. Y. Zhang, S. Zhang, Z. Zhang et al., “Knockdown of <i>Foxg1</i> in Sox9+ supporting cells increases the trans-differentiation of supporting cells into hair cells in the neonatal mouse utricle,” Aging, vol. 12, no. 20, pp. 19834–19851, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. Zhang, R. Qiang, Y. Dong et al., “Hair cell regeneration from inner ear progenitors in the mammalian cochlea,” American Journal of Stem Cells, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 25–35, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  17. S. Zhang, D. Liu, Y. Dong et al., “Frizzled-9+ supporting cells are progenitors for the generation of hair cells in the postnatal mouse cochlea,” Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, vol. 12, p. 184, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. T. Wang, R. Chai, G. S. Kim et al., “Lgr5+ cells regenerate hair cells via proliferation and direct transdifferentiation in damaged neonatal mouse utricle,” Nature Communications, vol. 6, no. 1, article 6613, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. R. Guo, S. Zhang, M. Xiao et al., “Accelerating bioelectric functional development of neural stem cells by graphene coupling: implications for neural interfacing with conductive materials,” Biomaterials, vol. 106, pp. 193–204, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. Z. Zhong, X. Fu, H. Li et al., “Citicoline protects auditory hair cells against neomycin-induced damage,” Frontiers in Cell and Development Biology, vol. 8, p. 712, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. F. Qian, X. Wang, Z. Yin et al., “The <i>slc4a2b</i> gene is required for hair cell development in zebrafish,” Aging, vol. 12, no. 19, pp. 18804–18821, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. P. Jiang, S. Zhang, C. Cheng et al., “The roles of exosomes in visual and auditory systems,” Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, vol. 8, p. 525, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. Q. Fang, Y. Zhang, P. da et al., “Deletion of _Limk1_ and _Limk2_ in mice does not alter cochlear development or auditory function,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 3357, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. C. Zhu, C. Cheng, Y. Wang et al., “Loss of ARHGEF6 causes hair cell stereocilia deficits and hearing loss in mice,” Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, vol. 11, p. 362, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. C. T. Dinh, S. Goncalves, E. Bas, T. R. van de Water, and A. Zine, “Molecular regulation of auditory hair cell death and approaches to protect sensory receptor cells and/or stimulate repair following acoustic trauma,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 9, p. 96, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. W. Liu, X. Xu, Z. Fan et al., “Wnt signaling activates TP53-Induced Glycolysis and Apoptosis Regulator and protects against cisplatin-induced spiral ganglion neuron damage in the mouse cochlea,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 1389–1410, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. Z. He, Q. Fang, H. Li et al., “The role of FOXG1 in the postnatal development and survival of mouse cochlear hair cells,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 144, pp. 43–57, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. S. Gao, C. Cheng, M. Wang et al., “Blebbistatin inhibits neomycin-induced apoptosis in hair cell-like HEI-OC-1 cells and in cochlear hair cells,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 13, p. 590, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. Sun, M. Sun, Y. Zhang et al., “In vivo overexpression of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein protects against neomycin-induced hair cell loss in the apical turn of the cochlea during the ototoxic-sensitive period,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 8, p. 248, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. T. Muurling and K. M. Stankovic, “Metabolomic and network analysis of pharmacotherapies for sensorineural hearing Loss,” Otology & Neurotology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. K. N. Alagramam, R. Stepanyan, S. Jamesdaniel, D. H. C. Chen, and R. R. Davis, “Noise exposure immediately activates cochlear mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling,” Noise & Health, vol. 16, no. 73, pp. 400–409, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. P. P. Roux and J. Blenis, “ERK and p38 MAPK-activated protein kinases: a family of protein kinases with diverse biological functions,” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews: MMBR, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 320–344, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. D. B. Arthur, S. Georgi, K. Akassoglou, and P. A. Insel, “Inhibition of apoptosis by P2Y2 receptor activation: novel pathways for neuronal survival,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 26, no. 14, pp. 3798–3804, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. Battaglia, K. Pak, D. Brors, D. Bodmer, J. A. Frangos, and A. F. Ryan, “Involvement of ras activation in toxic hair cell damage of the mammalian cochlea,” Neuroscience, vol. 122, no. 4, pp. 1025–1035, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. M. Lahne and J. E. Gale, “Damage-induced activation of ERK1/2 in cochlear supporting cells is a hair cell death-promoting signal that depends on extracellular ATP and calcium,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 28, no. 19, pp. 4918–4928, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. Y. Hayashi, N. Yamamoto, T. Nakagawa, and J. Ito, “Insulin-like growth factor 1 inhibits hair cell apoptosis and promotes the cell cycle of supporting cells by activating different downstream cascades after pharmacological hair cell injury in neonatal mice,” Molecular and Cellular Neurosciences, vol. 56, pp. 29–38, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. T. J. Bell and J. C. Oberholtzer, “cAMP-induced auditory supporting cell proliferation is mediated by ERK MAPK signaling pathway,” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 173–185, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. R. J. Davis, “Signal transduction by the JNK group of MAP kinases,” Cell, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 239–252, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. H. Nagai, T. Noguchi, K. Takeda, and H. Ichijo, “Pathophysiological roles of ASK1-MAP kinase signaling pathways,” BMB Reports, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. J. Wang, T. R. van de Water, C. Bonny, F. de Ribaupierre, J. L. Puel, and A. Zine, “A peptide inhibitor of c-Jun N-terminal kinase protects against both aminoglycoside and acoustic trauma-induced auditory hair cell death and hearing loss,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 23, no. 24, pp. 8596–8607, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. V. Budhram-Mahadeo, P. J. Morris, M. D. Smith, C. A. Midgley, L. M. Boxer, and D. S. Latchman, “p53 suppresses the activation of the Bcl-2 promoter by the Brn-3a pou family transcription factor,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 21, pp. 15237–15244, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. S. T. Eichhorst, M. Müller, M. Li-Weber, H. Schulze-Bergkamen, P. Angel, and P. H. Krammer, “A novel AP-1 element in the CD95 ligand promoter is required for induction of apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma cells upon treatment with anticancer drugs,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 20, no. 20, pp. 7826–7837, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. M. Fan, M. E. Goodwin, M. J. Birrer, and T. C. Chambers, “The c-Jun NH(2)-terminal protein kinase/AP-1 pathway is required for efficient apoptosis induced by vinblastine,” Cancer Research, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 4450–4458, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  44. J. Liu and A. Lin, “Role of JNK activation in apoptosis: a double-edged sword,” Cell Research, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 36–42, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. M. Faris, N. Kokot, K. Latinis et al., “The c-Jun N-terminal kinase cascade plays a role in stress-induced apoptosis in jurkat cells by up-regulating fas ligand expression,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 160, no. 1, p. 134, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  46. J. Whitfield, S. J. Neame, L. Paquet, O. Bernard, and J. Ham, “Dominant-negative c-Jun promotes neuronal survival by reducing BIM expression and inhibiting mitochondrial cytochrome c release,” Neuron, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 629–643, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. N. V. Oleinik, N. I. Krupenko, and S. A. Krupenko, “Cooperation between JNK1 and JNK2 in activation of p53 apoptotic pathway,” Oncogene, vol. 26, no. 51, pp. 7222–7230, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. L. R. Coulthard, D. E. White, D. L. Jones, M. F. McDermott, and S. A. Burchill, “p38MAPK: stress responses from molecular mechanisms to therapeutics,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 369–379, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. P. Juo, C. J. Kuo, S. E. Reynolds et al., “Fas activation of the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling pathway requires ICE/CED-3 family proteases,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 24–35, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. A. Stephanou, T. M. Scarabelli, B. K. Brar et al., “Induction of apoptosis and Fas receptor/Fas ligand expression by ischemia/reperfusion in cardiac myocytes requires serine 727 of the STAT-1 transcription factor but not tyrosine 701,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 30, pp. 28340–28347, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. A. Porras, S. Zuluaga, E. Black et al., “P38α mitogen-activated protein kinase sensitizes cells to apoptosis induced by different stimuli,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 922–933, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. S.-C. Hsu, “p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase is involved in fas ligand Expression,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 36, pp. 25769–25776, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. X. Wei, L. Zhao, J. Liu, R. C. Dodel, M. R. Farlow, and Y. du, “Minocycline prevents gentamicin-induced ototoxicity by inhibiting p38 MAP kinase phosphorylation and caspase 3 activation,” Neuroscience, vol. 131, no. 2, pp. 513–521, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. K. Tabuchi, K. Pak, E. Chavez, and A. F. Ryan, “Role of inhibitor of apoptosis protein in gentamicin-induced cochlear hair cell damage,” Neuroscience, vol. 149, no. 1, pp. 213–222, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. E. Bas, T. van de Water, C. Gupta et al., “Efficacy of three drugs for protecting against gentamicin-induced hair cell and hearing losses,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 166, no. 6, pp. 1888–1904, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. H. Y. Park, M. H. Lee, S. U. Kang et al., “Nitric oxide mediates TNF-α-induced apoptosis in the auditory cell line,” The Laryngoscope, vol. 122, no. 10, pp. 2256–2264, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. Y. Maeda, K. Fukushima, R. Omichi, S. Kariya, and K. Nishizaki, “Time courses of changes in phospho- and total- MAP kinases in the cochlea after intense noise exposure,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 3, article e58775, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. J. Kim, H. J. Cho, B. Sagong et al., “Alpha-lipoic acid protects against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity via the regulation of MAPKs and proinflammatory cytokines,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 449, no. 2, pp. 183–189, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. Y. S. Shin, H. S. Hwang, S. U. Kang, J. W. Chang, Y.-T. Oh, and C.-H. Kim, “Inhibition of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase ameliorates radiation- induced ototoxicity in zebrafish and cochlea-derived cell lines,” Neurotoxicology, vol. 40, pp. 111–122, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. A. Jadali and K. Y. Kwan, “Activation of PI3K signaling prevents aminoglycoside-induced hair cell death in the murine cochlea,” Biology Open, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 698–708, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. K. Kucharava, M. Sekulic-Jablanovic, L. Horvath, D. Bodmer, and V. Petkovic, “Pasireotide protects mammalian cochlear hair cells from gentamicin ototoxicity by activating the PI3K-Akt pathway,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 110, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. H. Wiedenhoft, L. Hayashi, and A. B. Coffin, “PI3K and inhibitor of apoptosis proteins modulate gentamicin- induced hair cell death in the zebrafish lateral line,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 11, p. 326, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. D. A. Nunez, P. Wijesinghe, S. Nabi, D. Yeh, and C. Garnis, “MicroRNAs in sudden hearing loss,” The Laryngoscope, vol. 130, no. 6, pp. E416–E422, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  64. W. Y. Zhu, X. Jin, Y. C. Ma, and Z. B. Liu, “MIF protects against oxygen-glucose deprivation-induced ototoxicity in HEI-OC1 cochlear cells by enhancement of Akt-Nrf2-HO-1 pathway,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 503, no. 2, pp. 665–670, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. S. M. Haake, C. T. Dinh, S. Chen, A. A. Eshraghi, and T. R. van de Water, “Dexamethasone protects auditory hair cells against TNFα-initiated apoptosis via activation of PI3K/Akt and NFκB signaling,” Hearing Research, vol. 255, no. 1-2, pp. 22–32, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. J. Chen, H. Yuan, A. E. Talaska, K. Hill, and S. H. Sha, “Increased sensitivity to noise-induced hearing loss by blockade of endogenous PI3K/Akt signaling,” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 347–356, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. W. Xia, J. Hu, J. Ma et al., “Mutations inTOP2Bcause autosomal-dominant hereditary hearing lossviainhibition of thePI3K‐Akt signalling pathway,” FEBS Letters, vol. 593, no. 15, pp. 2008–2018, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. B. D. Manning and L. C. Cantley, “AKT/PKB signaling: navigating downstream,” Cell, vol. 129, no. 7, pp. 1261–1274, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. Y. Brand, C. Setz, S. Levano et al., “Simvastatin protects auditory hair cells from gentamicin-induced toxicity and activates Akt signaling in vitro,” BMC Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 114, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. Z. He, L. Guo, Y. Shu et al., “Autophagy protects auditory hair cells against neomycin-induced damage,” Autophagy, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1884–1904, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. Y. Zhang, W. Li, Z. He et al., “Pre-treatment with Fasudil prevents neomycin-induced hair cell damage by reducing the accumulation of reactive oxygen species,” Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, vol. 12, p. 264, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. X. Yu, W. Liu, Z. Fan et al., “c-Myb knockdown increases the neomycin-induced damage to hair-cell-like HEI-OC1 cells in vitro,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 41094, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. M. Guan, Q. Fang, Z. He et al., “Inhibition of ARC decreases the survival of HEI-OC-1 cells after neomycin damagein vitro,” Oncotarget, vol. 7, no. 41, pp. 66647–66659, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. A. Jadali, Y. M. Ying, and K. Y. Kwan, “Activation of CHK1 in supporting cells indirectly promotes hair cell survival,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 11, p. 137, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. Y. Zhang, Q. He, J. Dong, Z. Jia, F. Hao, and C. Shan, “Effects of epigallocatechin-3-gallate on proliferation and differentiation of mouse cochlear neural stem cells: involvement of PI3K/Akt signaling pathway,” European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 88, pp. 267–273, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. S. S. Chandrasekhar, B. S. Tsai Do, S. R. Schwartz et al., “Clinical practice guideline: sudden hearing loss (update) executive summary,” Otolaryngology--Head And Neck Surgery, vol. 161, no. 2, pp. 195–210, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. M. K. Wynne, “Sudden sensorineural hearing loss,” Trends in Amplification, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 91–105, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  78. T. Nakagawa, K. Kumakawa, S. Usami et al., “A randomized controlled clinical trial of topical insulin-like growth factor-1 therapy for sudden deafness refractory to systemic corticosteroid treatment,” BMC Medicine, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 219, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. T. Nakagawa, E. Ogino-Nishimura, H. Hiraumi, T. Sakamoto, N. Yamamoto, and J. Ito, “Audiometric outcomes of topical IGF1 treatment for sudden deafness refractory to systemic Steroids,” Otology & Neurotology, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 941–946, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. T. Nakagawa, T. Sakamoto, H. Hiraumi et al., “Topical insulin-like growth factor 1 treatment using gelatin hydrogels for glucocorticoid-resistant sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a prospective clinical trial,” BMC Medicine, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 76, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. K. Yamahara, T. Nakagawa, J. Ito, K. Kinoshita, K. Omori, and N. Yamamoto, “Netrin 1 mediates protective effects exerted by insulin-like growth factor 1 on cochlear hair cells,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 119, pp. 26–39, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. A. J. Hudspeth, “How hearing happens,” Neuron, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 947–950, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. F. Tan, C. Chu, J. Qi et al., “AAV-ie enables safe and efficient gene transfer to inner ear cells,” Nature Communications, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 3733, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. C. Cheng, Y. Wang, L. Guo et al., “Age-related transcriptome changes in Sox2+ supporting cells in the mouse cochlea,” Stem Cell Research & Therapy, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 365, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. Y. Zhang, L. Guo, X. Lu et al., “Characterization of Lgr6+ cells as an enriched population of hair cell progenitors compared to Lgr5+ cells for hair cell generation in the neonatal mouse cochlea,” Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, vol. 11, p. 147, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. S. Zhang, Y. Zhang, P. Yu et al., “Characterization of Lgr5+ progenitor cell transcriptomes after neomycin injury in the neonatal mouse cochlea,” Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, vol. 10, p. 213, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. C. Cheng, L. Guo, L. Lu et al., “Characterization of the transcriptomes of Lgr5+ hair cell progenitors and Lgr5- supporting cells in the mouse cochlea,” Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, vol. 10, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. R. D. Hawkins, S. Bashiardes, K. E. Powder et al., “Large scale gene expression profiles of regenerating inner ear sensory epithelia,” PLoS One, vol. 2, no. 6, article e525, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. W. Li, J. Wu, J. Yang et al., “Notch inhibition induces mitotically generated hair cells in mammalian cochleae via activating the Wnt pathway,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 166–171, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. L. Liu, Y. Chen, J. Qi et al., “Wnt activation protects against neomycin-induced hair cell damage in the mouse cochlea,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 7, no. 3, article e2136, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. D. You, L. Guo, W. Li et al., “Characterization of Wnt and notch-responsive Lgr5+ hair cell progenitors in the Striolar region of the neonatal mouse utricle,” Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, vol. 11, p. 137, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. Y. Chen, X. Lu, L. Guo et al., “Hedgehog signaling promotes the proliferation and subsequent hair cell formation of progenitor cells in the neonatal mouse cochlea,” Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, vol. 10, p. 426, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. X. Lu, S. Sun, J. Qi et al., “Bmi1 regulates the proliferation of Cochlear supporting cells via the canonical Wnt signaling pathway,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 1326–1339, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. M. Waqas, S. Zhang, Z. He, M. Tang, and R. Chai, “Role of Wnt and notch signaling in regulating hair cell regeneration in the cochlea,” Frontiers of Medicine, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 237–249, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. W. Ni, S. Zeng, W. Li et al., “Wnt activation followed by notch inhibition promotes mitotic hair cell regeneration in the postnatal mouse cochlea,” Oncotarget, vol. 7, no. 41, pp. 66754–66768, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. J. Wu, W. Li, C. Lin et al., “Co-regulation of the notch and Wnt signaling pathways promotes supporting cell proliferation and hair cell regeneration in mouse utricles,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 29418, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. W. Li, D. You, Y. Chen, R. Chai, and H. Li, “Regeneration of hair cells in the mammalian vestibular system,” Frontiers of Medicine, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 143–151, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. M. Waqas, L. Guo, S. Zhang et al., “Characterization of Lgr5+ progenitor cell transcriptomes in the apical and basal turns of the mouse cochlea,” Oncotarget, vol. 7, no. 27, pp. 41123–41141, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. R. Chai, B. Kuo, T. Wang et al., “Wnt signaling induces proliferation of sensory precursors in the postnatal mouse cochlea,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 21, pp. 8167–8172, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. T. A. Jan, R. Chai, Z. N. Sayyid et al., “Tympanic border cells are Wnt-responsive and can act as progenitors for postnatal mouse cochlear cells,” Development, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 1196–1206, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. N. A. Bermingham, B. A. Hassan, S. D. Price et al., “Math1: an essential gene for the generation of inner ear hair cells,” Science, vol. 284, no. 5421, pp. 1837–1841, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. C. Zhong, Y. Fu, W. Pan, J. Yu, and J. Wang, “Atoh1 and other related key regulators in the development of auditory sensory epithelium in the mammalian inner ear: function and interplay,” Developmental Biology, vol. 446, no. 2, pp. 133–141, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. T. Cai, M. L. Seymour, H. Zhang, F. A. Pereira, and A. K. Groves, “Conditional deletion of Atoh1 reveals distinct critical periods for survival and function of hair cells in the organ of Corti,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 33, no. 24, pp. 10110–10122, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. M. Ahmed, E. Y. Wong, J. Sun, J. Xu, F. Wang, and P. X. Xu, “Eya1-Six1 Interaction Is Sufficient to Induce Hair Cell Fate in the Cochlea by Activating _Atoh1_ Expression in Cooperation with Sox2,” Developmental Cell, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 377–390, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. A. Costa, L. Sanchez-Guardado, S. Juniat, J. E. Gale, N. Daudet, and D. Henrique, “Generation of sensory hair cells by genetic programming with a combination of transcription factors,” Development, vol. 142, no. 11, pp. 1948–1959, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. Y. F. Cheng, “Atoh1 regulation in the cochlea: more than just transcription,” Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 146–155, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. S. Lee, H. S. Jeong, and H. H. Cho, “Atoh1 as a coordinator of sensory hair cell development and regeneration in the cochlea,” Chonnam Medical Journal, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 37–46, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. A. Doetzlhofer, M. L. Basch, T. Ohyama, M. Gessler, A. K. Groves, and N. Segil, “Hey2 regulation by FGF provides a notch-independent mechanism for maintaining pillar cell fate in the organ of Corti,” Developmental Cell, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 58–69, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. M. E. Lush, D. C. Diaz, N. Koenecke et al., “scRNA-Seq reveals distinct stem cell populations that drive hair cell regeneration after loss of Fgf and Notch signaling,” eLife, vol. 8, p. 8, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. F. Shi, J. S. Kempfle, and A. S. Edge, “Wnt-responsive Lgr5-expressing stem cells are hair cell progenitors in the cochlea,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 28, pp. 9639–9648, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. F. Shi, Y. F. Cheng, X. L. Wang, and A. S. B. Edge, “β-Catenin up-regulates Atoh1 expression in neural progenitor cells by interaction with an Atoh1 3 enhancer,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 1, pp. 392–400, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  112. M. Agathocleous, I. Iordanova, M. I. Willardsen et al., “A directional Wnt/β-catenin-Sox2-proneural pathway regulates the transition from proliferation to differentiation in theXenopusretina,” Development, vol. 136, no. 19, pp. 3289–3299, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  113. N. Barker, J. H. van Es, J. Kuipers et al., “Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene _Lgr5_,” Nature, vol. 449, no. 7165, pp. 1003–1007, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  114. N. F. Bramhall, F. Shi, K. Arnold, K. Hochedlinger, and A. S. B. Edge, “Lgr5-positive supporting cells generate new hair cells in the postnatal cochlea,” Stem Cell Reports, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 311–322, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  115. N. Pan, I. Jahan, J. Kersigo, J. S. Duncan, B. Kopecky, and B. Fritzsch, “A novel Atoh1 “Self-terminating” mouse model reveals the necessity of proper Atoh1 level and duration for hair cell differentiation and viability,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 1, article e30358, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  116. K. Mizutari, M. Fujioka, M. Hosoya et al., “Notch inhibition induces cochlear hair cell regeneration and recovery of hearing after acoustic trauma,” Neuron, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 58–69, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  117. H. Hezroni, B. S. Sailaja, and E. Meshorer, “Pluripotency-related, Valproic acid (VPA)-induced genome-wide histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) acetylation patterns in embryonic stem cells,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 41, pp. 35977–35988, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  118. W. J. McLean, X. Yin, L. Lu et al., “Clonal expansion of Lgr5-positive cells from mammalian cochlea and high-purity generation of sensory hair cells,” Cell Reports, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1917–1929, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  119. F. Shi, L. Hu, B. E. Jacques, J. F. Mulvaney, A. Dabdoub, and A. S. B. Edge, “Catenin is required for hair-cell differentiation in the cochlea,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 34, no. 19, pp. 6470–6479, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  120. Y. Tona, K. Hamaguchi, M. Ishikawa et al., “Therapeutic potential of a gamma-secretase inhibitor for hearing restoration in a guinea pig model with noise-induced hearing loss,” BMC Neuroscience, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 66, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  121. S. F. Tadros, M. D’Souza, X. Zhu, and R. D. Frisina, “Apoptosis-related genes change their expression with age and hearing loss in the mouse cochlea,” Apoptosis, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1303–1321, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  122. T. Kamogashira, C. Fujimoto, and T. Yamasoba, “Reactive oxygen species, apoptosis, and mitochondrial dysfunction in hearing loss,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 617207, 7 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  123. X. Han, R. Ge, G. Xie et al., “Caspase-mediated apoptosis in the cochleae contributes to the early onset of hearing loss in A/J mice,” ASN Neuro, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 175909141557398, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  124. M. I. Pörn-Ares, M. P. S. Ares, and S. Orrenius, “Calcium signalling and the regulation of Apoptosis,” Toxicology In Vitro, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 539–543, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  125. I. Uemaetomari, K. Tabuchi, M. Nakamagoe, S. Tanaka, H. Murashita, and A. Hara, “L-type voltage-gated calcium channel is involved in the pathogenesis of acoustic injury in the cochlea,” Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 218, no. 1, pp. 41–47, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  126. D. Lei, X. Gao, P. Perez et al., “Anti-epileptic drugs delay age-related loss of spiral ganglion neurons via T-type calcium channel,” Hearing Research, vol. 278, no. 1-2, pp. 106–112, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  127. A. Lundt, R. Seidel, J. Soós et al., “Cav3.2 T-type calcium channels are physiologically mandatory for the auditory system,” Neuroscience, vol. 409, pp. 81–100, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  128. J. G. Naples, “Calcium-channel blockers as therapeutic agents for acquired sensorineural hearing loss,” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 104, pp. 121–125, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  129. H. S. So, C. Park, H. J. Kim et al., “Protective effect of T-type calcium channel blocker flunarizine on cisplatin-induced death of auditory cells,” Hearing Research, vol. 204, no. 1-2, pp. 127–139, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  130. H. Shen, B. Zhang, J. H. Shin et al., “Prophylactic and therapeutic functions of T-type calcium blockers against noise-induced hearing loss,” Hearing Research, vol. 226, no. 1-2, pp. 52–60, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  131. D. Bodmer, A. Perkovic, M. Sekulic-Jablanovic, M. B. Wright, and V. Petkovic, “Pasireotide prevents nuclear factor of activated T cells nuclear translocation and acts as a protective agent in aminoglycoside-induced auditory hair cell loss,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 139, no. 6, pp. 1113–1123, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  132. L. A. Sena and N. S. Chandel, “Physiological roles of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species,” Molecular Cell, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 158–167, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  133. B. Halliwell, “Reactive species and antioxidants. Redox biology is a fundamental theme of aerobic life,” Plant Physiology, vol. 141, no. 2, pp. 312–322, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  134. B. N. Ames, M. K. Shigenaga, and T. M. Hagen, “Oxidants, antioxidants, and the degenerative diseases of aging,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 90, no. 17, pp. 7915–7922, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  135. Z. H. He, S. Y. Zou, M. Li et al., “The nuclear transcription factor FoxG1 affects the sensitivity of mimetic aging hair cells to inflammation by regulating autophagy pathways,” Redox Biology, vol. 28, article 101364, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  136. H. Li, Y. Song, Z. He et al., “Meclofenamic acid reduces reactive oxygen species accumulation and apoptosis, inhibits excessive autophagy, and protects hair cell-like HEI-OC1 cells from cisplatin-induced damage,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 12, p. 139, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  137. S. Morioka, H. Sakaguchi, T. Yamaguchi et al., “Hearing vulnerability after noise exposure in a mouse model of reactive oxygen species overproduction,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 146, no. 4, pp. 459–473, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  138. S. Someya and T. A. Prolla, “Mitochondrial oxidative damage and apoptosis in age-related hearing loss,” Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, vol. 131, no. 7-8, pp. 480–486, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  139. X. Guo, X. Bai, L. Li, J. Li, and H. Wang, “Forskolin protects against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity by inhibiting apoptosis and ROS production,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 99, pp. 530–536, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  140. H. Zhou, X. Qian, N. Xu et al., “Disruption of Atg7-dependent autophagy causes electromotility disturbances, outer hair cell loss, and deafness in mice,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 11, no. 10, p. 913, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  141. A. Li, D. You, W. Li et al., “Novel compounds protect auditory hair cells against gentamycin-induced apoptosis by maintaining the expression level of H3K4me2,” Drug Delivery, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1033–1043, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  142. Z. He, S. Sun, M. Waqas et al., “Reduced TRMU expression increases the sensitivity of hair-cell-like HEI-OC-1 cells to neomycin damage in vitro,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, article 29621, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  143. T. L. Leto, S. Morand, D. Hurt, and T. Ueyama, “Targeting and regulation of reactive oxygen species generation by nox family NADPH oxidases,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 2607–2619, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  144. R. S. Balaban, “Mitochondria, oxidants, and aging,” Cell, vol. 120, no. 4, pp. 483–495, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  145. A. C. Wong and A. F. Ryan, “Mechanisms of sensorineural cell damage, death and survival in the cochlea,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, vol. 7, p. 58, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  146. M. D. Seidman, W. S. Quirk, and N. A. Shirwany, “Mechanisms of alterations in the microcirculation of the cochlea,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 884, no. 1, pp. 226–232, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  147. T. M. Nicotera, B. H. Hu, and D. Henderson, “The caspase pathway in noise-induced apoptosis of the chinchilla cochlea,” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 466–477, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  148. Y. S. Shin, S. J. Song, S. U. Kang et al., “A novel synthetic compound, 3-amino-3-(4-fluoro-phenyl)-1H-quinoline-2,4-dione, inhibits cisplatin-induced hearing loss by the suppression of reactive oxygen species: in vitro and in vivo study,” Neuroscience, vol. 232, pp. 1–12, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  149. Y. Quan, L. Xia, J. Shao et al., “Adjudin protects rodent cochlear hair cells against gentamicin ototoxicity via the SIRT3-ROS pathway,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 8181, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  150. Y. Chen, Y. Gu, Y. Li et al., “Generation of mature and functional hair cells by co-expression of _Gfi1_ , _Pou4f3_ , and _Atoh1_ in the postnatal mouse cochlea,” Cell Reports, vol. 35, no. 3, article 109016, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  151. Y. Chen, S. Zhang, R. Chai, and H. Li, “Hair cell regeneration,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 1130, pp. 1–16, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  152. W. Liu, L. Xu, X. Wang et al., “PRDX1 activates autophagy via the PTEN-AKT signaling pathway to protect against cisplatin-induced spiral ganglion neuron damage,” Autophagy, pp. 1–23, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Yao Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views492
Downloads578
Citations

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.