Research Article

Quantitative and Fiber-Selective Evaluation for Central Poststroke Pain

Table 3

Comparison between the location of the stroke lesion and the distribution of the sensory disturbance, the class of the abnormal sensory fibers, and the clinical sign.

VariableThalamus ()Internal capsule () value

Test site
 Shoulder
  Abnormal9 (69.23%)15 (34.09%)0.027
  Normal4 (30.77%)29 (65.91%)
 Elbow
  Abnormal9 (69.23%)24 (54.55%)0.269
  Normal4 (30.77%)20 (45.45%)
 Index finger
  Abnormal8 (61.54%)13 (29.55%)0.040
  Normal5 (38.46%)31 (70.45%)
 Knee
  Abnormal1 (7.69%)16 (36.36%)0.040
  Normal12 (92.31%)28 (63.64%)
 Big toe
  Abnormal2 (15.38%)29 (65.91%)0.005
  Normal11 (84.62%)15 (34.09%)
Fiber type
 Aβ
  Abnormal3 (23.08%)28 (63.64%)0.011
  Normal10 (76.92%)16 (36.36%)
 Aδ
  Abnormal9 (69.23%)16 (36.36%)0.038
  Normal4 (30.77%)28 (63.64%)
 C
  Abnormal7 (53.85%)11 (25.00%)0.038
  Normal6 (46.15%)33 (75.00%)
Clinical sign
 Hypoesthesia4 (30.77%)41 (93.18%)<0.001
 Hyperesthesia9 (69.23%)3 (6.82%)
VAS score6 (5-8)6 (4-7)0.30

Hyperesthesia is indicated when the upper limit of the normal range is exceeded. Hypoesthesia is indicated when the lower limit of the normal range is exceeded. : number. Data are number of patients (%). value refers to the results of Fisher’s exact test. Significance level at .