Research Article
Inhibition of Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury by MSCs-Derived Small Extracellular Vesicles in Rodent Models: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Table 2
Risk of bias of the included studies.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
①: Was the allocation sequence adequately generated and applied; ②: were the groups similar at baseline or were they adjusted for confounders in the analysis; ③: was the allocation adequately concealed; ④: were the animals randomly housed during the experiment; ⑤: were the caregivers and/or investigators blinded from knowledge which intervention each animal received during the experiment; ⑥: were animals selected at random for outcome assessment; ⑦: was the outcome assessor blinded; ⑧: were incomplete outcome data adequately addressed; ⑨: are reports of the study free of selective outcome reporting; ⑩: was the study apparently free of other problems that could result in high risk of bias. Y: yes; N: no; U: uncertain. |