Research Article

Inhibition of Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury by MSCs-Derived Small Extracellular Vesicles in Rodent Models: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 2

Risk of bias of the included studies.

IDStudyScore

1B. Feng [38]UYUYYUUYYY6
2C. Cheng [36]UUUUUUUYYY3
3G. Li [32]UUUYUUUUYY3
4H. Hao [28]YYUUUUUYYU4
5H. Yang [45]UYUYUUUYYY5
6H. Yu [49]UYUYUUUUYY4
7K. Chen [39]UYUYUUUYYY5
8K. Hou [29]UYUYUUUYYY5
9K. R. Nalamolu [27]UYUYUUUYYU4
10L. Xu [33]UUUYUUUYYY4
11M. Han [40]UYUYUUUUYY4
12Q. Pan [43]UYUYUUUUYY4
13W. Wang [44]UYUYUUUYYY5
14X. Huang [26]UYUYUUUUYY4
15X. Li [34]UYUUUUUYYY4
16X. Li [42]UYUYUUYUYY5
17X. Liu [35]UYUYUUUUYY4
18Y. AN [48]UYUYUUUYYY5
19Y. Ye [46]YYYYYUYYYY9
20Y. Zhao [30]UYUYUUUUYY4
21Y. Zhao [47]UYUYUUUYYY5
22Z. Hou [41]UYUYUUUUYY4
23Z. Pan [31]UYUYUUUYYY5
24Z. Zhang [37]UUUYUUYUYY4

①: Was the allocation sequence adequately generated and applied; ②: were the groups similar at baseline or were they adjusted for confounders in the analysis; ③: was the allocation adequately concealed; ④: were the animals randomly housed during the experiment; ⑤: were the caregivers and/or investigators blinded from knowledge which intervention each animal received during the experiment; ⑥: were animals selected at random for outcome assessment; ⑦: was the outcome assessor blinded; ⑧: were incomplete outcome data adequately addressed; ⑨: are reports of the study free of selective outcome reporting; ⑩: was the study apparently free of other problems that could result in high risk of bias. Y: yes; N: no; U: uncertain.