Research Article

Influence of High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Neurobehavioral and Electrophysiology in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness

Table 2

Comparison measured parameters at baseline and postintervention in the active and sham groups.

VariableBaselinePostintervention value95% CI

CRS-R total score
Active group9 (7.5-13)<0.001b
Sham group8 (6 -9)<0.001b
GCS total score
Active group8 (7-8)8 (8-9)<0.001b
Sham group8 (7-8)8 (7.5-8)0.007b
Latencies of N20 component (ms)
Active group<0.001a0.490, 0.900
Sham group0.113a-0.040, 0.350
N20-P25 amplitudes (μV)
Active group<0.001a-2.012, -1.076
Sham group<0.001a-1.163, -0.422
BAEP grade (number)
Active group (grade-I/II/III/IV)0/13/9/32/18/4/10.022b
Sham group (grade-I/II/III/IV)0/12/9/40/14/8/30.013b

Data are presented as deviation or median (interquartile range). Abbreviations: CRS-R: Coma Recovery Scale-Revised; GCS: Glasgow Coma Scale; BAEP: brainstem auditory-evoked potential; CI: confidence intervals. Significance level at value < 0.05; value refers to the results of atwo-tailed unpaired Student’s -test and the bpaired Wilcoxon rank-sum test.