Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Neurology Research International
Volume 2010, Article ID 103094, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/103094
Review Article

Parkinson's Disease: Is It a Toxic Syndrome?

1Toxicology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35111, Egypt
2Clinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35111, Egypt

Received 8 February 2010; Revised 5 June 2010; Accepted 26 July 2010

Academic Editor: Changiz Geula

Copyright © 2010 Seham A. Gad ELhak et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) is one of the neurodegenerative diseases which we can by certainty identify its pathology, however, this confidence disappeares when talking about the cause. A long history of trials, suggestions, and theories tried linking PD to a specific causation. In this paper, a new suggestion is trying to find its way, could it be toxicology? Can we—in the future—look to PD as an occupational disease, in fact, many clues point to the possible toxic responsibility—either total or partial—in causing this disease. Searching for possible toxic causes for PD would help in designing perfect toxic models in animals.

1. Introduction

The term “Parkinson’s disease” refers to a neurodegenerative disease that affects several regions of the brain, including the pigmented nuclei in midbrain and brainstem, the olfactory tubercle, the cerebral cortex, and elements of the peripheral nervous system [1].

2. Historical Background

Parkinson’s disease was first described in a medical context in 1817 by James Parkinson, a general practitioner in London in his Essay on the Shaking Palsy [2].

Even earlier many physicians have picked up some of the features of Parkinson's disease and described them in their writings, for example, Franciscus de le Böe (1614–1672) who described tremors and François Boissier de Sauvages de la Croix (1706–1767) who described patients with “running disturbances of the limbs.”

Wilhelm von Humboldt (1767–1835), the celebrated academic reformer and writer who lived in the era of Parkinson, has described his own neurological condition in a series of letters [3].

2.1. PD Is a Significant Clinical Problem

PD represents a major clinical problem. Reviewing the multiple clinical findings in PD will show us the need of more researches to reach a possible curative therapy [4].

A group of neurobehavioral abnormalities can be found in PD such as apathy, fearfulness, anxiety, emotional liability, social withdrawal, increasing dependency, depression, dementia, bradyphrenia, a type of anomia termed the “tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon,” visual-spatial impairment, sleep disturbance, psychosis, and other psychiatric problems [5].

The variable presentations of PD often cause diagnostic confusion and a delay in treatment. In the early stages, Parkinsonian symptoms are often mistaken for simple arthritis or bursitis, depression, normal aging, Alzheimer’s disease, or stroke. Gonera et al. [6] characterized a prodromal phase 4–6 years before the main manifestation in PD patients. During this period, PD patients, compared with normal controls, had a higher frequency of mood disorder, “fibromyalgia,” and shoulder pain.

A sum of possible PD manifestations would be tremors at rest, rigidity, bradykinesia, and loss of postural reflexes which represents the cardinal manifestations besides possibility of the following.(i)Hypomimia (masked facies).(ii)Speech disturbance (hypokinetic dysarthria).(iii)Hypophonia.(iv)Dysphagia.(v)Sialorrhea.(vi)Respiratory difficulties.(vii)Loss of associated movements.(viii)Shuffling, short-step gait.(ix)Festination.(x)Freezing.(xi)Micrographia.(xii)Difficulty turning in bed.(xiii)Slowness in activities of daily living.(xiv)Stooped posture, kyphosis, and scoliosis.(xv)Dystonia, myoclonus, orofacial dyskinesia.(xvi)Neuro-ophthalmologic findings.(xvii)Impaired visual contrast sensitivity.(xviii)Visuospatial impairment.(xix)Impaired upward gaze, convergence, and smooth pursuit.(xx)Impaired vestibuloocular reflex.(xxi)Hypometric saccades.(xxii)Decreased blink rate.(xxiii)Spontaneous and reflex blepharospasm (glabellar or Myerson’s sign).(xxiv)Lid apraxia (opening or closure).(xxv)Motor findings related to dopaminergic therapy.(xxvi)Levodopa-induced dyskinesia (chorea, dystonia, myoclonus, tic) [7].

2.2. Neuropathology

Parkinsonism results primarily from abnormalities of basal ganglia function. The basal ganglia include the neostriatum (caudate nucleus and putamen) the external and internal pallidal segments (GPe, GPi), the subthalamic nucleus (STN), and the substantia nigra with its pars reticulata (SNr) and pars compacta (SNc) [1].

They participate in anatomically and functionally segregated loops that involve specific thalamic and cortical areas [8].

Striatum and STN receive glutamatergic afferents from specific areas of the cerebral cortex or thalamus, and transfer the information to the basal ganglia output nuclei, GPi and SNr [1].

The striatum also receives prominent dopaminergic input, from the SNc. The nigrostriatal projection terminates predominately at the necks of dendritic spines of the striatal medium spiny output neurons (MSNs). MSN spines also receive corticostriatal terminations. This anatomic arrangement places the dopaminergic inputs in a position to regulate or gate the corticostriatal transmission [9].

In Parkinson’s disease, the degeneration of dopaminergic SNc neurons and their projections to the striatum is a slowly evolving process that may take decades to develop [10].

SNc projections to the putamen degenerate earlier than projections to associative or limbic portions of the striatum. Corresponding to this time course of degeneration, the motor symptoms and signs of Parkinson’s disease develop before the nonmotor signs. Recognizable motor or nonmotor signs appear only after substantial degeneration of the nigrostriatal neurons (affecting at least 70%), this is due to the remarkable compensatory capacity within the dopaminergic system, or in the circuits it modulates [1].

The most frequent pathologic substrate for PD is Lewy body disease. The brain is usually grossly normal when viewed from the outer surface. There may be mild frontal atrophy is some cases, but this is variable.

Histologically, there is neuronal loss in the substantia nigra pars compacta along with compensatory astrocytic and microglial proliferation. Although biochemically there is loss of dopaminergic termini in the striatum, the striatum is histologically unremarkable [11].

Hyaline cytoplasmic inclusions or Lewy bodies and less well-defined “pale bodies” are found in some of the residual neurons in the substantia nigra [10].

Lewy bodies are proteinaceous neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions [12]. In some regions of the brain, such as the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus, Lewy bodies tend to form within neuronal processes and are sometimes referred to as intraneuritic Lewy bodies. In most cases, Lewy bodies are accompanied by a variable number of abnormal neuritic profiles, referred to as Lewy neurites.

Lewy neurites were first described in the hippocampus [13], but are also found in other regions of the brain, including the amygdala, cingulate gyrus, and temporal cortex.

At the electron microscopic level, Lewy bodies are composed of densely aggregated filaments [14] and Lewy neurites also are filamentous, but they are usually not as densely packed [13].

Some authors suggested that pre-Parkinsonian manifestations would be nonmotor (e.g., autonomic dysfunction and anosmia) and that the late stage would be associated with cortical Lewy body dementia [15].

2.3. Pathogenesis
2.3.1. -Synuclein: “The Culprit in Parkinson’s Disease?” [2]

Synuclein has gain interest for its role in PD neurodegeneration since the demonstration that -synuclein is the major component of Lewy bodies and Lewy neuritis in idiopathic PD [16].

The exact mechanisms of how conformational changes of α-synuclein induce cell death are currently the subject of intense investigation, but are still poorly understood. It has been suggested that α-synuclein oligomers might form pores on intracellular membranes such as the plasma membrane, and may increase cation permeability [16].

-Synuclein has been reported to negatively regulate the activity of tyrosine hydroxylase by maintaining the protein in the dephosphorylated inactive form, thus modulating dopamine biosynthesis in catecholaminergic neurons [17].

In addition, -synuclein was proposed to negatively regulate the function of the dopamine transporter in dopaminergic nerve terminals by controlling the amount of the transporter at the plasma membrane [18].

2.3.2. Tau in PD

Tau is a microtubule-binding protein that stabilizes microtubules and promotes their polymerization in neurons. Six isoforms of tau are present in the adult human brain [19].

While PD is the best known of the -synucleinopathies, tau pathology is also seen in many PD cases. staining of Lewy bodies with multiple tau antibodies has been reported, suggesting cellular colocalization of these two pathologies [20].

2.3.3. Parkin, UCHL1, -Synuclein, and the Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway: “Pieces of a Puzzle?” [2]

Both of the proteins (UCHL1 and parkin) are involved in the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway of abnormal protein degradation which is considered to be a cellular quality control [21].

When this pathway is impaired, disease can result. Thus, it is possible that mutations in the parkin and UCHL1 genes may lead to malfunction of the pathway [22] and damaged proteins are not degraded. Instead, they form aggregates that ultimately lead to cell degeneration with an unknown mechanism [23].

2.3.4. Mitochondrial Dysfunction in PD

The direct relation between mitochondrial dysfunction and PD came from the postmortem description of complex I deficiency in the substantia nigra of patients with PD. Subsequently, the deficiency was also seen in the skeletal muscle and platelets and there was a decrease in complex I proteins in the substantia nigra of patients with PD [24].

Dopaminergic (DA) neurons are particularly prone to oxidative stress. DA metabolism and auto-oxidation combined with increased iron, decreased total glutathione levels, and mitochondrial complex I inhibition can lead to cell death by exceeding the oxidative capacity of DA-containing cells in the region [25].

2.3.5. Calcium Homeostasis and Excitotoxicity

It has been an attractive hypothesis for decades that excitotoxicity and disturbance in calcium homeostasis are mechanisms leading to neurodegeneration; disturbed calcium homeostasis is done through the activation of calpains, a family of cysteine proteases [16].

These are elevated in the mesencephalon of patients with PD but not in other neurodegenerative disorders involving the mesencephalon. David Park and colleagues have shown that calpains are activated and required for MPTP-induced neuronal death in mice [26].

2.4. Toxic Parkinsonism, Why?

“In one of his Dialogues, the Greek philosopher Plato speculated that our minds contain a block of wax, the size, hardness, and consistency of which varies from person to person. Everything we think or perceive leaves an impression on the wax, and the quality and duration of this impression is the basis of our memory and knowledge.” This metaphor was used by Di Monte [27], to describe the relation between genetics and environmental risk factors in developing PD.

PD is considered a multifactorial disease resulting from the effect of environmental factors and genetic susceptibility. Linking PD to an environmental cause, however, seems difficult. This is because of the long presymptomatic period [28].

Despite the mysterious cause of PD, the pathologic and neurochemical basis of parkinsonian signs and symptoms have been in part unraveled as discussed earlier. Toxic insults could both modify the structure of -synuclein and interfere with the ubiquitin-proteasomal pathway, thus, promoting -synuclein aggregation and impairing the process of degradation of the abnormal protein [29].

Barlow et al. [30] found that even in utero exposure with subsequent genetic damage can be a risk factor for neurodegenerative diseases, for example, Alzheimer and PD. This can explain the finding of Tsai et al. [31] who described what he has called a young onset parkinsonian disease (YOPD) which is a peculiar group of patients developing PD before 40 years on contrary to normal age group of more than 50 years.

The reason for trying to identify toxic causes of PD (besides future protection) is the search for a perfect PD model. Scientists are trying to unravel the exact cause of PD; also we are trying to find out a perfect therapy and both the therapy and cause need a perfect model to act on. Finding a toxin that can be a true cause of PD would solve the problem.

So, what are those toxins that can be candidates for toxic PD models? Many have been described including the following.

2.4.1. Pesticides

Many risk factors have been implicated in PD. Since the discovery of MPTP, parkinsonian inducing effects this arouse the possibility of other similar compounds relevant to MPTP, for example, paraquat to induce PD [32].

Numerous classes of pesticides were introduced during the twentieth century. Although PD existed long before the introduction of these pesticides, the thought is that pesticide exposure has contributed to the increased incidence of the disease [33].

2.4.1.1. Fumigants
The fumigant class encompasses a variety of agents most commonly used to control insects or fungi in grains, soil, or other various consumables. Fumigants, such as ethylene dibromide, are highly toxic to humans but most adverse actions are nonneuronal [34]. Although there is some evidence that carbon disulfide-based fumigants can induce parkinsonian-like neurotoxicity [35]. This chemical class is not suitable for induction of PD in an animal model.

2.4.1.2. Fungicides
Fungicides are agents of a wide variety of chemical structures. Maneb, or manganese ethylene bis-dithiocarbamate, is one type with possible parkinsonian symptoms which may be secondary to exposure to the manganese metal core [33].
In fact, maneb is one of the toxins used to induce PD in animal models but usually in combination with other agents specially paraquat [36]. The maneb effect has been undoubtedly documented to increase the severity of PD models which make it one of the good candidates in PD research [37].

2.4.1.3. Herbicides (Paraquat)
The possibility that paraquat (1,1_-dimethyl-4,4_-bipyridinium) may damage the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system and therefore contribute to the neuropathology of Parkinson’s disease (PD) was first proposed in the mid 1980s following the observation that its chemical structure closely resembles that of MPP+(1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium ion) [38].
Animal studies confirmed the ability of paraquat to induce selective dopaminergic nigrostriatal degeneration [3941].
Li et al. [40] have developed subacute model for inducing PD in mice through using intraperitoneal injection of paraquat (10 mg/kg) in old C57/bl mice. Similar results were obtained 2 years later by Kuter et al. [41] using a similar approach.
As described earlier, an improvement in modeling of paraquat induced PD was through adding maneb. A combination which improved the results. It also supported the multiple hit theory of PD [42].
The presence of differences between paraquat and MPTP has been questioned and the answer would come from a group of articles in Toxicological Sciences journal regarding mechanism of paraquat toxicity. Richardson et al. [43] proposed that paraquat would have different mechanisms for toxicity than MPTP. Later, Ramachandiran et al. [44] have shown that paraquat and MPTP have divergent mechanisms of toxicity. Another hot debate emerged on the same journal regarding the possibility of different mechanisms of neurotoxicity between paraquat and MPTP [4548].
Despite the debate, there are certainly toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic differences which would give paraquat a unique pattern of neurotoxicity. Despite the fact that paraquat models are still less validated than the previous well-established MPTP models [49], combining maneb with paraquat would introduce a promising modeling technique that can be (in our opinion) a better model specially with the limitation in the other available toxic models.

2.4.1.4. Insecticides
There are several subclasses of insecticides, each with their own subdivisions. Many of the compounds in this class are, by design, neurotoxic. Similarities between the insect and human nervous systems can lead to cross-toxicity of these compounds [33].
2.4.1.4a. Organophosphates
Although evidence supporting a role for OPs in PD pathogenesis is scant, there are case reports of people with severe Parkinsonism after OP exposure [50]; however, the reversibility of the symptoms and lack of responsiveness to L-dopa are not consistent with PD. A recent family-based case-control study did implicate organophosphates and other insecticides in PD [51].
However, it might be that the effects of OP exposure probably involve disturbance of the balance between the dopamine and acetylcholine systems and not specific pathological changes in the dopamine system which makes them unsuitable in toxic modeling of PD [52].
2.4.1.4b. Rotenone
Due to its ability of inhibiting mitochondrial complex I (NADH dehydrogenase), rotenone has become one of the toxic models used to study PD in animals [33, 53].
Chronic systemic exposure to rotenone reproduced many features of PD, including nigrostriatal dopaminergic degeneration and the formation of cytoplasmic inclusions in these neurons. Rats exposed to rotenone showed bradykinesia, postural instability, unsteady gait, and some evidence of tremors [54, 55].
Recently, Cannon et al. [56] reported an improved rotenone model through giving 3 mg/kg daily with observation of behavioral changes including bradykinesia, postural instability/unsteady gait, and rigidity, which occurred maximally after 6 days of treatment where postmortem analysis (immunohistochemistry of the TH+ve neurons in substantia nigra) confirmed the behavioral observations. Others have shown the efficacy of rotenone as a model of PD in mice and suggested its use for assessing candidate anti-Parkinson drugs [57].
Rotenone model can be used as an alternative to other classical PD models, for example, MPTP and 6-OHDA, especially when testing the neuroprotective effects of novel therapeutic modalities [58]. A limiting factor of rotenone models would be the high mortality rate of the examined animals. Another limitation would be the less-accurate results that can be obtained usually in cases of oral administered rotenone [59].
2.4.1.4c. Organochlorines
The first clue of a relation between organochlorines and PD was the presence of them in postmortem specimens of PD patients [33]. Kanthasamy et al. [60] have postulated possible mechanisms for the influence of organochlorines on PD patients.
2.4.1.4c.i. Effects on Dopamine and Dopamine Transporters
The assumption that organochlorines deplete brain dopamine was supported by the findings of Miller et al. [61]. They measured the expression and activity of the dopamine transporter (DAT) and the vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT2) in presynaptic terminals of dopaminergic neurons in the striatum. Exposure of C57BL mice to an organochlorine pesticide (increased the expression of both DAT and VMAT2 in the striatum).
Sanchez-Ramos et al. [62] showed that dieldrin is selectively toxic to dopaminergic neurons compared to striatal GABAergic neurons in primary mesencephalic cultures.
2.4.1.4c.ii. Dieldrin-Induced Oxidative Stress
Dieldrin exposure was shown to induce ROS production in a number of cell culture models including neuronal cell lines, mouse lung fibroblasts, and in mouse liver [63, 64].
Chun et al. [63] showed that dieldrin exposure induces ROS production in a mouse nigral dopaminergic cell line.
2.4.1.4c.iii. Dieldrin and Mitochondrial Dysfunction
Dieldrin exposure has been shown to alter mitochondrial function and induce the release of cytochrome c in a human T cell leukemic cell line [64].
Neuronal death in PD seems to be mitochondrial dependent. Through oxidative mechanisms the soluble pool of cytochrome C in the mitochondrial intermembrane space is increased. For the release of cytochrome C into the cytosol, an activation of Bax to permeabilize the outer mitochondrial membrane appears to be necessary [60].
2.4.1.4c.iv. Effects on Caspases
Activation of caspases is an essential step in the apoptotic signaling pathway. Recently caspase 3 has been identified as a critical factor in apoptotic cell death in dopaminergic neurons [65].
PKCd is an important apoptotic substrate for caspase-3, and subsequent studies have implicated caspase-3-mediated proteolytic activation of PKCd in apoptotic cell death [6669].
Dieldrin treatment induced dose and time-dependent proteolytic cleavage of native PKCd (72 and 74 kDa) into two fragments, 38 kDa regulatory and 41 kDa catalytic subunits, in dopaminergic cells [70, 71].
2.4.1.4c.v. Effects of Dieldrin on -Synuclein Aggregation and Ubiquitin-Proteasome Function
Sun et al. [72] findings suggest that dieldrin can alter the function of the ubiquitin-proteasomal degradation machinery to promote protein aggregation.
These encouraging data would increase the organochlorines chance of being a new toxic PD model, especially with their potential of accumulation and so chronic exposure which is one of the characteristics needed to reproduce the exact pathological findings in animal PD models.
2.4.1.4d. Pyrethroids
Although pyrethroids are often considered environmentally labile, exposure of mice to the pyrethroid pesticides deltamethrin and permethrin has been demonstrated to increase DAT-mediated dopamine uptake [7375]. Acute toxicity of pyrethroids is primarily mediated through interaction with sodium channels, leading to prolonged depolarization and hyperexcitation of the nervous system [76].
Pyrethroids have also been shown to be potent releasers of neurotransmitters, including dopamine [73].
Although the mechanism by which pyrethroids are capable of increasing DAT-mediated dopamine uptake is not clear, Elwan et al. [77] suggest that the effects of pyrethroids on DAT are indirect and that longer-term exposures may be capable of damaging cells through an apoptotic mechanism.
The use of pyrethroids in modeling of PD is still far from validation as frequent researches are needed to reach a final exposure protocol.
2.4.1.5. Metals
The field of metals in neuroscience has expanded extraordinarily. The biometals, iron, copper, zinc, and manganese participate in many essential activities, and indeed deficiencies can be lethal. Zinc and iron are increased and copper is decreased in the substantia nigra (SN) in Parkinson’s disease (PD) [78].
2.4.1.5a. Iron and PD
Of great interest is the possible association between iron and nigral melanin as a source of free radicals. Also, iron is postulated to interact with DA or derived catecholic chrome derivatives discussed above, specifically by reacting with hydrogen peroxide that can be generated to produce short-lived hydroxyl radicals [79].
Searches for the mutation of genes associated with iron metabolism have revealed mutations in the ferritin-H, IRP2, and HFE gene in single PD patients. Ceruloplasmin mutations causing protein instability and loss-of-function lead to extrapyramidal symptoms and Parkinsonism, and are characterized by iron accumulation in the substantia nigra [78].
2.4.1.5b. Manganese: Nontypical PD Manifestations
Manganese is an essential metal for life, yet chronic exposure to this metal can cause a neurodegenerative disease named manganism. Despite similar clinical pictures, in Parkinson’s disease the domaninergic neurons in the substancia nigra are damaged, while in manganism, Mn accumulates in the globus pallidus and striatum, and it damages these two brain structures that control motor function [80]. So despite having some similar manifestations, Mn cannot be ranked as one of the causes of PD.
2.4.1.5c. Metals and -Synuclein
Uversky et al. [81] have shown that some metal ions can induce α-synuclein fibrillation (impaired metabolism of normal α-synuclein, known to accumulate massively in Lewy bodies (LBs), is considered the primary cause of neurodegeneration in idiopathic PD). The most effective ions were , , , , , , , in that order. Moreover, they found that combination of metals and pesticides have synergistic effects on -synuclein fibrillation.
The use of metals in toxic animal models however is difficult and did not gain any popularity due to difficulties in application and assessment.
2.4.1.6. Drug Abuse and PD
2.4.1.6a. Amphetamines
Abuse of amphetamine derivatives is a growing phenomenon in the Western World. Both MA and its derivative, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, “ecstasy”), are known to be toxic for dopamine nerve terminals, thus replicating striatal DA loss occurring in Parkinsonism. It has been shown that MA and MDMA induce neuronal inclusions in the substantia nigra and corpus striatum of mice [82].
However, in case of drug-induced PD, it is important to interpret neuronal damage—using markers—cautiously as there are usually compensatory changes in these enzymes which may not reflect neurodegeneration [83].
Amphetamine and its derivatives may be applied as toxic models for PD. They are similar to MPTP with safer profile.
2.4.1.6b. MPTP
The potent parkinsonian neurotoxin, 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) causes PD in animals and is one of the most accepted models. This may be due to its capacity to show some of PD pathological findings (SN neuron loss and striatal DA depletion similar to PD) [84].
MPTP-treated animals (including humans) do not exhibit Lewy bodies (LB), a hallmark neuronal inclusion of PD, but old treated primates have inclusions that are somewhat similar. Humans and many other animal species including nonhuman primates, guinea pigs, mice, and cats are susceptible to this neurotoxin [85].
One interesting feature of the MPTP mouse model of PD is the transient nature of the striatal damage in young mice. In contrast, administration of the drug to older mice would result in a permanent loss of nigrostriatal terminals, as well as cell bodies. This recovery potential in young mice allows for modeling of recovery [84].
Various techniques can be used to modulate the action of MPTP to induce the pathological findings needed to reach the desired PD model. One of these techniques is to give probenecid with MPTP to prolong its persistence in the tissues [86].
In sporadic PD, the generation of neural precursor cells in the subependymal zone is impaired by DA depletion, which is the hallmark of PD. MPTP-induced degeneration of dopaminergic SNpc-SVZ fibres impairs NSC proliferation in primates and in mice in a similar fashion to PD [87]. He et al. [88] raised the possibility that migrating neuroblasts in the SVZ may be more vulnerable to MPTP than nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons in the SN. Furthermore, they suggested that the death and subsequent loss of migrating neuroblasts in the acute or subacute model probably lead to a decreased potential for neurogenesis to some extent.
Several MPTP dosing regimens have been used. The acute regimen consists of multiple systemic administration of MPTP (usually four doses at 2-h intervals per day). The subacute regimen consists of a single systemic administration per day for several consecutive days (usually 5 days) and the chronic regimen through several weeks [89].
The comparison of these different models indicated clearly that different schedules of administration of MPTP mimic distinct stages of the disease and might induce different mechanisms of neuronal death [90].
One of the limitations of MPTP models is their inability to induce behavioral deficits apparent on standard motor mouse tests. However, new techniques for behavioral monitoring have shown promising results, for example, Grid test [84] and its modification, the vertical grid test and modified horizontal grid test [91], swim test [85], or the automated behavioural apparatus, LABORASTM (Laboratory Animal Behaviour Observation, Registration and Analysis System) [92].
Strain differences regarding the response to MPTP has been questioned where C57/bl mice show maximum response compared to BALB/c mice [85, 93, 94]. This does not contradict the old results of Hu et al. [95], who found prominent changes in BALB/c response to MPTP as BALB/c mice still show a possible alternative, though less effective to C57/bl.
An important property of the MPTP-lesioned mouse and nonhuman primate is the potential for intrinsic recovery. This capacity would be of great help in identifying new therapeutic targets for the treatment of PD [96].

3. Environment, Genetics, and PD

PD is a multifactorial disease, so despite role of environmental exposure, genetic predisposition in sporadic cases can be broadly grouped into four categories: genes involved in the metabolism of xenobiotics (e.g., CYP2D6, NAT2, GSTs), neurodegeneration (e.g., NOS), the functioning of dopaminergic neurons (e.g., dopamine transporters and receptors), and linkage-derived genes (e.g., UCHL1, alpha-synuclein) [97].

There is increasing evidence that genes involved in inherited forms of the disease may act as predisposing factors in the sporadic forms of PD. So, new models of PD produced in vivo on transgenic animals and in vitro on transfected cell cultures are considered important because they may be helpful in discovering the pathophysiology of PD [98].

Meredith et al. [89] have classified genetic models into three categories. First, mouse models based on the deletion of genes important for the development or maintenance of DA neurons or their phenotypes. Second, mouse or rat models based on expression or deletion of genes known to cause familial forms of PD. Finally, a third class of genetic models is based on virally mediated expression of genes or mutations known to cause familial PD, usually in nigrostriatal DA neurons.

Despite having some features of the human disease, genetic models do not provide an ideal choice for assessing regenerating capacity of new therapeutic approaches and so are of less use for pharmaceutical development [99].

4. Conclusion

In our search for an ideal toxic model of PD, we could not find a perfect one. It seems that all toxins when used alone can precipitate only some characters of PD pathology but not the exact PD condition.

These same findings may be the cause of the Manning-Bog and Langston [100] advice of using model fusion to overcome the single model limitation through combining genetic with toxic models. We would encourage the use of toxins combination in PD modeling as a new type of model fusion.

References

  1. A. Galvan and T. Wichmann, “Pathophysiology of Parkinsonism,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 119, no. 7, pp. 1459–1474, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. O. Corti, C. Hampe, F. Darios, P. Ibanez, M. Ruberg, and A. Brice, “Parkinson's disease: from causes to mechanisms,” Comptes Rendus, vol. 328, no. 2, pp. 131–142, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. Goetz, “Early iconography of Parkinson’s disease,” in Hand Book Of Parkinson's Disease, R. Pahwa and K. Lyons, Eds., pp. 1–18, Informa Healthcare, New York, NY, USA, 4th edition, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  4. K. R. Chaudhuri, D. G. Healy, and A. H. V. Schapira, “Non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease: diagnosis and management,” Lancet Neurology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 235–245, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Jankovic and A. E. Lang, “Movement disorders: diagnosis and assessment,” in Neurology in Clinical Practice, W. G. Bradley, R. B. Daroff, G. M. Fenichel, and J. Jankovic, Eds., chapter 24, pp. 293–322, Butterworth-Heinemann (Elsevier), Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 4th edition, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  6. E. G. Gonera, M. van't Hof, H. J. C. Berger, C. Van Weel, and M. W. I. M. Horstink, “Symptoms and duration of the prodromal phase in Parkinson's disease,” Movement Disorders, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 871–876, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. Jankovic, “Pathophysiology and clinical assessment,” in Hand Book of Parkinson's Disease, R. Pahwa and K. Lyons, Eds., pp. 49–67, Informa Healthcare, New York, NY, USA, 4th edition, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  8. R. M. Kelly and P. L. Strick, “Macro-architecture of basal ganglia loops with the cerebral cortex: use of rabies virus to reveal multisynaptic circuits,” Progress in Brain Research, vol. 143, pp. 449–459, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. R. DeLong and T. Wichmann, “Circuits and circuit disorders of the basal ganglia,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 20–24, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. W. Dickson, “Neuropathology and staging of Parkinson’s disease,” in Parkinson's Disease Genetics and Pathogenesis, T. M. Dawson, Ed., pp. 1–18, Informa Healthcare, New York, NY, USA, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  11. M. S. Pollanen, D. W. Dickson, and C. Bergeron, “Pathology and biology of the Lewy body,” Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 183–191, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. H. Braak, E. Braak, D. Yilmazer et al., “Amygdala pathology in Parkinson's disease,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 493–500, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. E. Braak, D. Sandmann-Keil, U. Rüb et al., “α-synuclein immunopositive Parkinson's disease-related inclusion bodies in lower brain stem nuclei,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 195–201, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. E. Kuusisto, L. Parkkinen, and I. Alafuzoff, “Morphogenesis of Lewy bodies: dissimilar incorporation of α-synuclein, ubiquitin, and p62,” Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 1241–1253, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. K. A. Jellinger and J. Mizuno, “Parkinson’s disease,” in Neurodegeneration: The Molecular Pathology of Dementia and Movement Disorders, D. W. Dickson, Ed., pp. 159–187, ISN Neuropath Press, Basel, Switzerland, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  16. J. B. Schulz, “Mechanisms of neurodegeneration in idiopathic Parkinson's disease,” Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. S306–S308, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. G. Perez, J. C. Waymire, E. Lin, J. J. Liu, F. Guo, and M. J. Zigmond, “A role for α-synuclein in the regulation of dopamine biosynthesis,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 3090–3099, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Sidhu, C. Wersinger, and P. Vernier, “α-synuclein regulation of the dopaminergic transporter: a possible role in the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease,” FEBS Letters, vol. 565, no. 1–3, pp. 1–5, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. D. M. Skovronsky, “Tau in Parkinsonian diseases,” in Parkinson's Disease Genetics and Pathogenesis, T. M. Dawson, Ed., pp. 187–198, Informa Healthcare, New York, NY, USA, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  20. T. Ishizawa, P. Mattila, P. Davies, D. Wang, and D. W. Dickson, “Colocalization of tau and alpha-synuclein epitopes in Lewy bodies,” Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 389–397, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. S. Goldberg, S. M. Fleming, J. J. Palacino et al., “Parkin-deficient mice exhibit nigrostriatal deficits but not loss of dopaminergic neurons,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 44, pp. 43628–43635, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Y. Zhang, J. Gao, K. K. K. Chung, H. Huang, V. L. Dawson, and T. M. Dawson, “Parkin functions as an E2-dependent ubiquitin-protein ligase and promotes the degradation of the synaptic vesicle-associated protein, CDCrel-1,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 24, pp. 13354–13359, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. B. S. Shastry, “Parkinson disease: etiology, pathogenesis and future of gene therapy,” Neuroscience Research, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 5–12, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. H. Schapira, “Mitochondria in the aetiology and pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease,” The Lancet Neurology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 97–109, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. J. Chinta and J. K. Andersen, “Redox imbalance in Parkinson's disease,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1780, no. 11, pp. 1362–1367, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. J. Crocker, P. D. Smith, V. Jackson-Lewis et al., “Inhibition of calpains prevents neuronal and behavioral deficits in an MPTP mouse model of Parkinson's disease,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 4081–4091, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. D. A. Di Monte, “The environment and Parkinson's disease: is the nigrostriatal system preferentially targeted by neurotoxins?” Lancet Neurology, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 531–538, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. A. Elbaz and C. Tranchant, “Epidemiologic studies of environmental exposures in Parkinson's disease,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 262, no. 1-2, pp. 37–44, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. D. A. Di Monte, M. Lavasani, and A. B. Manning-Bog, “Environmental factors in Parkinson's disease,” NeuroToxicology, vol. 23, no. 4-5, pp. 487–502, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. B. K. Barlow, D. A. Cory-Slechta, E. K. Richfield, and M. Thiruchelvam, “The gestational environment and Parkinson's disease: evidence for neurodevelopmental origins of a neurodegenerative disorder,” Reproductive Toxicology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 457–470, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. C. H. Tsai, S. K. Lo, L. C. See et al., “Environmental risk factors of young onset Parkinson's disease: a case-control study,” Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 328–333, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. T. P. Brown, P. C. Rumsby, A. C. Capleton, L. Rushton, and L. S. Levy, “Pesticides and Parkinson's disease—is there a link?” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 156–164, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. M. Hatcher, K. D. Pennell, and G. W. Miller, “Parkinson's disease and pesticides: a toxicological perspective,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 322–329, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. C. D. Klaassen, Ed., Casarett & Doull’s Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons, McGraw-Hill, Boston, Mass, USA, 2001.
  35. L. J. Chapman, S. L. Sauter, R. A. Henning, R. L. Levine, C. G. Matthews, and H. A. Peters, “Finger tremor after carbon disulfide-based pesticide exposures,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 866–870, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. Thiruchelvam, E. K. Richfield, R. B. Baggs, A. W. Tank, and D. A. Cory-Slechta, “The nigrostriatal dopaminergic system as a preferential target of repeated exposures to combined paraquat and maneb: implications for Parkinson's disease,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 24, pp. 9207–9214, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. M. Thiruchelvam, B. J. Brockel, E. K. Richfield, R. B. Baggs, and D. A. Cory-Slechta, “Potentiated and preferential effects of combined paraquat and maneb on nigrostriatal dopamine systems: environmental risk factors for Parkinson's disease?” Brain Research, vol. 873, no. 2, pp. 225–234, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. A. L. McCormack, M. Thiruchelvam, A. B. Manning-Bog et al., “Environmental risk factors and Parkinson's disease: selective degeneration of nigral dopaminergic neurons caused by the herbicide paraquat,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 119–127, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. J. Peng, F. F. Stevenson, S. R. Doctrow, and J. K. Andersen, “Superoxide dismutase/catalase mimetics are neuroprotective against selective paraquat-mediated dopaminergic neuron death in the substantial Nigra: implications for Parkinson disease,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 32, pp. 29194–29198, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. X. Li, J. Yin, C.-M. Cheng, J.-L. Sun, Z. Li, and Y.-L. Wu, “Paraquat induces selective dopaminergic nigrostriatal degeneration in aging C57BL/6 mice,” Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 118, no. 16, pp. 1357–1361, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. K. Kuter, M. Śmiałowska, J. Wierońska et al., “Toxic influence of subchronic paraquat administration on dopaminergic neurons in rats,” Brain Research, vol. 1155, no. 1, pp. 196–207, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. V. N. Uversky, “Neurotoxicant-induced animal models of Parkinson's disease: understanding the role of rotenone, maneb and paraquat in neurodegeneration,” Cell and Tissue Research, vol. 318, no. 1, pp. 225–241, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. J. R. Richardson, Y. Quan, T. B. Sherer, J. T. Greenamyre, and G. W. Miller, “Paraquat neurotoxicity is distinct from that of MPTP and rotenone,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 193–201, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. S. Ramachandiran, J. M. Hansen, D. P. Jones, J. R. Richardson, and G. W. Miller, “Divergent mechanisms of paraquat, MPP+, and rotenone toxicity: oxidation of thioredoxin and caspase-3 activation,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 163–171, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. G. W. Miller, “Paraquat: the red herring of Parkinson's disease research,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 1–2, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. D. A. Cory-slechta, M. Thiruchelvam, and D. A. Di Monte, “Letter regarding: “Paraquat: the red herring of parkinson's disease research”,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 215–216, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. G. W. Miller, “Paraquat and parkinson's disease: response by Dr. Miller, Part II,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 222–223, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. R. M. LoPachin and T. Gavin, “Response to “Paraquat: the red herring of Parkinson's disease research”,” Toxicological sciences, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 219–221, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  49. K. Prasad, E. Tarasewicz, J. Mathew et al., “Toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics of paraquat accumulation in mouse brain,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 215, no. 2, pp. 358–367, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. M. H. Bhatt, M. A. Elias, and A. K. Mankodi, “Acute and reversible parkinsonism due to organophosphate pesticide intoxication: five cases,” Neurology, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 1467–1471, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. D. B. Hancock, E. R. Martin, G. M. Mayhew et al., “Pesticide exposure and risk of Parkinson's disease: a family-based case-control study,” BMC Neurology, vol. 8, article 6, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. D. J. Karen, W. Li, P. R. Harp, J. S. Gillette, and J. R. Bloomquist, “Striatal dopaminergic pathways as a target tor the insecticides permethrin and chlorpyrifos,” NeuroToxicology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 811–817, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. R. Betarbet, R. M. Canet-Aviles, T. B. Sherer et al., “Intersecting pathways to neurodegeneration in Parkinson's disease: effects of the pesticide rotenone on DJ-1, α-synuclein, and the ubiquitin-proteasome system,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 404–420, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. S. Shimohama, H. Sawada, Y. Kitamura, and T. Taniguchi, “Disease model: Parkinson's disease,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 360–365, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. P. Caboni, T. B. Sherer, N. Zhang et al., “Rotenone, deguelin, their metabolites, and the rat model of Parkinson's disease,” Chemical Research in Toxicology, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 1540–1548, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. J. R. Cannon, V. Tapias, H. M. Na, A. S. Honick, R. E. Drolet, and J. T. Greenamyre, “A highly reproducible rotenone model of Parkinson's disease,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 279–290, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. H. Takeuchi, T. Yanagida, M. Inden et al., “Nicotinic receptor stimulation protects nigral dopaminergic neurons in rotenone-induced Parkinson's disease models,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 576–585, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. B. Monti, V. Gatta, F. Piretti, S. S. Raffaelli, M. Virgili, and A. Contestabile, “Valproic acid is neuroprotective in the rotenone rat model of Parkinson's disease: involvement of α-synuclein,” Neurotoxicity Research, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 130–141, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. T. M. Dawson, A. S. Mandir, and M. K. Lee, “Animal models of PD: pieces of the same puzzle?” Neuron, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 219–222, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. A. G. Kanthasamy, M. Kitazawa, A. Kanthasamy, and V. Anantharam, “Dieldrin-induced neurotoxicity: relevance to Parkinson's disease pathogenesis,” NeuroToxicology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 701–719, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. G. W. Miller, J. D. Erickson, J. T. Perez et al., “Immunochemical analysis of vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT2) protein in Parkinson's disease,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 156, no. 1, pp. 138–148, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. J. Sanchez-Ramos, A. Facca, A. Basit, and S. Song, “Toxicity of dieldrin for dopaminergic neurons in mesencephalic cultures,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 150, no. 2, pp. 263–271, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. H. S. Chun, G. E. Gibson, L. A. DeGiorgio, H. Zhang, V. J. Kidd, and J. H. Son, “Dopaminergic cell death induced by MPP+, oxidant and specific neurotoxicants shares the common molecular mechanism,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 1010–1021, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. K. Kannan, R. F. Holcombe, S. K. Jain et al., “Evidence for the induction of apoptosis by endosulfan in a human T-cell leukemic line,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 205, no. 1-2, pp. 53–66, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. L. Annunziato, S. Amoroso, A. Pannaccione et al., “Apoptosis induced in neuronal cells by oxidative stress: role played by caspases and intracellular calcium ions,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 139, no. 2-3, pp. 125–133, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. V. Anantharam, M. Kitazawa, J. Wagner, S. Kaul, and A. G. Kanthasamy, “Caspase-3-dependent proteolytic cleavage of protein kinase Cδ is essential for oxidative stress-mediated dopaminergic cell death after exposure to methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1738–1751, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. A. G. Kanthasamy, M. Kitazawa, A. Kanthasamy, and V. Anantharam, “Role of proteolytic activation of protein kinase Cδ in oxidative stress-induced apoptosis,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 609–620, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. A. G. Kanthasamy, M. Kitazawa, S. Kaul et al., “Proteolytic activation of proapoptotic kinase PKCδ is regulated by overexpression of Bcl-2: implications for oxidative stress and environmental factors in Parkinson's disease,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1010, pp. 683–686, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. S. Kaul, A. Kanthasamy, M. Kitazawa, V. Anantharam, and A. G. Kanthasamy, “Caspase-3 dependent proteolytic activation of protein kinase Cδ mediates and regulates 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP+)-induced apoptotic cell death in dopaminergic cells: relevance to oxidative stress in dopaminergic degeneration,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1387–1401, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. M. Kitazawa, V. Anantharam, and A. G. Kanthasamy, “Dieldrin induces apoptosis by promoting caspase-3-dependent proteolytic cleavage of protein kinase Cδ in dopaminergic cells: relevance to oxidative stress and dopaminergic degeneration,” Neuroscience, vol. 119, no. 4, pp. 945–964, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. M. Kitazawa, V. Anantharam, A. Kanthasamy, and A. G. Kanthasamy, “Dieldrin promotes proteolytic cleavage of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and apoptosis in dopaminergic cells: protective effect of mitochondrial anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2,” NeuroToxicology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 589–598, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. F. Sun, V. Anantharam, and A. G. Kanthasamy, “Dieldrin exposure impairs the ubiquitin-proteosome function and promotes-synuclein aggregation in mesencephalic dopaminergic neuronal cells: relevance of environmental factors in the etiopathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease,” Toxicologist, vol. 78, p. 621, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  73. M. L. Kirby, K. Castagnoli, and J. R. Bloomquist, “In vivo effects of deltamethrin on dopamine neurochemistry and the role of augmented neurotransmitter release,” Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 160–168, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. D. J. Karen, W. Li, P. R. Harp, J. S. Gillette, and J. R. Bloomquist, “Striatal dopaminergic pathways as a target tor the insecticides permethrin and chlorpyrifos,” NeuroToxicology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 811–817, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. J. S. Gillette and J. R. Bloomquist, “Differential up-regulation of striatal dopamine transporter and α-synuclein by the pyrethroid insecticide permethrin,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 192, no. 3, pp. 287–293, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. I. V. Tabarean and T. Narahashi, “Kinetics of modulation of tetrodotoxin-sensitive and tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channels by tetramethrin and deltamethrin,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 299, no. 3, pp. 988–997, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. M. A. Elwan, J. R. Richardson, T. S. Guillot, W. M. Caudle, and G. W. Miller, “Pyrethroid pesticide-induced alterations in dopamine transporter function,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 211, no. 3, pp. 188–197, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. K. J. Barnham and A. I. Bush, “Metals in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases,” Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 222–228, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. M. A. Collins and E. J. Neafsey, “Potential neurotoxic “agents provocateurs” in Parkinson's disease,” Neurotoxicology and Teratology, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 571–577, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. L. Quintanar, “Manganese neurotoxicity: a bioinorganic chemist's perspective,” Inorganica Chimica Acta, vol. 361, no. 4, pp. 875–884, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. V. N. Uversky, J. Li, K. Bower, and A. L. Fink, “Synergistic effects of pesticides and metals on the fibrillation of α-synuclein: implications for Parkinson's disease,” NeuroToxicology, vol. 23, no. 4-5, pp. 527–536, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. L. Iacovelli, F. Fulceri, A. De Blasi, F. Nicoletti, S. Ruggieri, and F. Fornai, “The neurotoxicity of amphetamines: bridging drugs of abuse and neurodegenerative disorders,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 201, no. 1, pp. 24–31, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. T. R. Guilarte, “Is methamphetamine abuse a risk factor in parkinsonism?” Neurotoxicology, vol. 22, pp. 725–731, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  84. J. L. Tillerson and G. W. Miller, “Grid performance test to measure behavioral impairment in the MPTP-treated-mouse model of parkinsonism,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 189–200, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. R. Haobam, K. M. Sindhu, G. Chandra, and K. P. Mohanakumar, “Swim-test as a function of motor impairment in MPTP model of Parkinson's disease: a comparative study in two mouse strains,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 163, no. 2, pp. 159–167, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. E. Petroske, G. E. Meredith, S. Callen, S. Totterdell, and Y. S. Lau, “Mouse model of parkinsonism: a comparison between subacute MPTP and chronic MPTP/probenecid treatment,” Neuroscience, vol. 106, pp. 589–601, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  87. P. A. Serra, S. Pluchino, B. Marchetti, M. S. Desole, and E. Miele, “The MPTP mouse model: cues on DA release and neural stem cell restorative role,” Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, vol. 14, pp. S189–S193, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  88. X. J. He, H. Yamauchi, K. Uetsuka, and H. Nakayama, “Neurotoxicity of MPTP to migrating neuroblasts: studies in acute and subacute mouse models of Parkinson's disease,” NeuroToxicology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 413–420, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. G. E. Meredith, S. Totterdell, J. A. Potashkin, and D. J. Surmeier, “Modeling PD pathogenesis in mice: advantages of a chronic MPTP protocol,” Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. S112–S115, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. A. Schober, “Classic toxin-induced animal models of Parkinson's disease: 6-OHDA and MPTP,” Cell and Tissue Research, vol. 318, no. 1, pp. 215–224, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. S. T. Kim, H. J. Son, J. H. Choi, I. J. Ji, and O. Hwang, “Vertical grid test and modified horizontal grid test are sensitive methods for evaluating motor dysfunctions in the MPTP mouse model of Parkinson's disease,” Brain Research, vol. 1306, pp. 176–183, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. L. P. Quinn, T. O. Stean, H. Chapman et al., “Further validation of LABORAS using various dopaminergic manipulations in mice including MPTP-induced nigro-striatal degeneration,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 156, no. 1-2, pp. 218–227, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. M. Sedelis, K. Hofele, G. W. Auburger, S. Morgan, J. P. Huston, and K. W. R. Schwarting, “MPTP susceptibility in the mouse: behavioral, neurochemical, and histological analysis of gender and strain differences,” Behavior Genetics, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 171–182, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  94. Y. Yasuda, T. Shimoda, K. Uno et al., “The effects of MPTP on the activation of microglia/astrocytes and cytokine/chemokine levels in different mice strains,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 204, no. 1, pp. 43–51, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  95. S. C. Hu, F. W. Chang, Y. J. Sung, W. M. Hsu, and E. H. Lee, “Neurotoxic effects of 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine in the substantia nigra and the locus coeruleus in BALB/c mice,” The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 259, no. 3, pp. 1379–1387, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  96. M. W. Jakowec and G. M. Petzinger, “1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-lesioned model of Parkinson's disease, with emphasis on mice and nonhuman primates,” Comparative Medicine, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 497–513, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. A. Elbaz and C. Tranchant, “Epidemiologic studies of environmental exposures in Parkinson's disease,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 262, no. 1-2, pp. 37–44, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. F. Fornai, “Novel Therapeutic Target in PD: Experimental Models,” in Advances in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s Disease, A. Fisher, Ed., vol. 57, pp. 57–73, Springer, NY, USA, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  99. E. Lane and S. Dunnett, “Animal models of Parkinson's disease and L-dopa induced dyskinesia: how close are we to the clinic?” Psychopharmacology, vol. 199, no. 3, pp. 303–312, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. A. B. Manning-Bog and J. W. Langston, “Model fusion: the next phase in developing animal models for Parkinson's disease,” Neurotoxicity Research, vol. 11, no. 3-4, pp. 219–240, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus