Research Article

Recurrence Quantification Analysis of F-Waves and the Evaluation of Neuropathies

Table 1

Electrodiagnostic variables in the three groups of patients as well as %REC/%LAM values and statistical differences between groups.
(a)

Group AGroup BGroup C

Number29725
Distal motor latency4.8 ± 0.86 ms5.0 ± 0.64.7 ± 1.0
Conduction velocity37 ± 5.4 m/sec40.4 ± 2.637.5 ± 4.4
CMAP amplitude3.9 ± 3.9 mV8.4 ± 5.16.0 ± 3.9
CMAP duration9.0 ± 4.8 ms6.5 ± 2.78.2 ± 3.2
Mean F-latency69.4 ± 6.0 ms64.2 ± 7.367.1 ± 9.2
Mean/predicted F-latency1.3 ± 0.31.2 ± 0.11.2 ± 0.1
F-wave chronodispersion8.7 ± 3.6 ms8.0 ± 3.79.5 ± 3.8
F-wave persistence (%)75.8 ± 24.699.0 ± 2.690.2 ± 13.2
%REC/%LAM0.38 ± 0.200.35 ± 0.280.32 ± 0.31

Values mean ± standard deviation.
(b)

GroupsA versus CB versus C A versus BA and B versus CA versus B and C

CMAP amplitudesNS ()
F-wave persistence
%REC/%LAM >0.35NS ()NS ()

Group A: diabetic neuropathies; Group B: diabetes and other diagnoses; Group C: nondiabetic neuropathies.
-tests.
Mann-Whitney test.