Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Neurology Research International
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 794829, 20 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/794829
Review Article

The Role of the Craniocervical Junction in Craniospinal Hydrodynamics and Neurodegenerative Conditions

1American Chiropractic Association, 1701 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 200, Arlington, VA 22209, USA
2American Chiropractic Neurology Board, 3710 Robinhood Drive, Temple, TX 76502, USA

Received 4 May 2015; Revised 7 September 2015; Accepted 17 September 2015

Academic Editor: Mamede de Carvalho

Copyright © 2015 Michael F. Flanagan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The craniocervical junction (CCJ) is a potential choke point for craniospinal hydrodynamics and may play a causative or contributory role in the pathogenesis and progression of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, MS, and ALS, as well as many other neurological conditions including hydrocephalus, idiopathic intracranial hypertension, migraines, seizures, silent-strokes, affective disorders, schizophrenia, and psychosis. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the critical role of the CCJ in craniospinal hydrodynamics and to stimulate further research that may lead to new approaches for the prevention and treatment of the above neurodegenerative and neurological conditions.

1. Introduction

The CCJ comprises the base of the skull, atlas (C1), and axis (C2), as well as muscles and connective tissues that connect the skull to the cervical spine. It further includes the dura mater and dentate ligament attachments of the brain and cord to the foramen magnum and upper cervical spine [18]. Moreover, the CCJ links the vascular and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) systems in the cranial vault to those in the spinal canal. Craniospinal hydrodynamics refer to the relationship between blood and CSF volume, pressure, and flow in the relatively closed confines of the compartments of the cranial vault and spinal canal. Malformations and misalignments of the CCJ cause deformation and obstruction of blood and CSF pathways and flow between the cranial vault and spinal canal that can result in faulty craniospinal hydrodynamics and subsequent neurological and neurodegenerative disorders.

While the exact source, such as the arteries at the base of the brain or choroidal vessels, is still debated, in either case, it is generally accepted that craniospinal hydrodynamics are primarily driven by arterial pulsations [919] and further modified by respiration, Valsalva maneuvers, body movements, upright posture, inversion, and recumbent position. The arterial pulsations pump a relatively large volume of blood into the brain and cord during systole causing a spike in intracranial pressure (ICP). To prevent damage to the brain from excess pulsatility pressure, the increase in volume must be matched by a simultaneous increase in drainage of venous blood and CSF from the cranial vault. In addition to the internal jugular veins humans developed an accessory drainage system comprising emissary veins that link the dural sinuses to the vertebral venous plexus and serve as the primary drainage routes of the brain during upright posture [2030]. Because the dural sinuses, facial veins, and vertebral veins have no valves, the direction of venous blood flow is determined by hydrostatic pressure gradients. The pressure gradients produced by upright posture cause blood to flow preferentially from the dural sinuses into the vertebral veins. Conversely, inversion reverses the pressure gradient causing blood to flow from the vertebral veins to the dural sinuses, which increases intracranial and intraocular pressures [2030]. CSF flow between the subarachnoid space in the cranial vault and spinal canal is likewise determined by the same pressure gradients.

There are many different types of malformations and anomalies of the CCJ such as atlantooccipital assimilation, basiocciput hypoplasia, malformations of the condyles, and malformations of the dens [31]. Certain types of malformations and anomalies of the CCJ, such as Chiari malformations [3236], abnormal clivoaxial angle [3741], hypoplasia of the posterior fossa [4247], basilar invagination, and platybasia [4851] are predisposed to coning of the cerebellar tonsils into the foramen magnum that can block blood and CSF flow between the cranial vault and spinal canal resulting in hydrocephalus. Other malformations, such as hypoplasia of the foramen magnum, hypoplasia of the jugular foramen, and anomalies of the odontoid process of axis can also affect craniospinal hydrodynamics and cause hydrocephalus [3741, 5256]. Premature closure of the sutures of the cranial vault, called craniosynostosis, especially craniosynostosis of the lambdoid suture, has also been associated with hypoplasia and crowding of the posterior fossa, Chiari malformations, and hydrocephalus [5460]. Craniofacial anomalies such Crouzon, Pfeiffer, Apert, and Saethre-Chotzen are likewise often associated with malformations of the base of the skull and Chiari malformations that can block CSF flow resulting in hydrocephalus [6165]. Connective tissue disorders, such as rheumatoid arthritis and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, can cause tears, degeneration, ligament laxity, and cranial settling. Cranial settling causes the skull to rock back on the CCJ and sink onto the upper cervical spine during upright posture [66, 67]. In contrast to the brainstem getting pushed down into the foramen magnum as occurs in Chiari malformation, cranial settling shifts the position of the CCJ upward relative to the brainstem. The outcome is similar to basilar invagination and can cause hydrocephalus.

In addition to blocking CSF flow and causing hydrocephalus, malformations, anomalies, and misalignments of the CCJ can obstruct blood flow through the vertebral arteries [5963] and veins that can lead to chronic ischemia and edema. Furthermore, chronic edema decreases perfusion pressure and arterial flow in the brain which can result in oxidative stress and chronic ischemia as well. Oxidative stress and chronic ischemia have been implicated in the cause of atrophy of the brain. Many authors have also maintained that venous insufficiency can cause hydrocephalus [6879]. Moreover, venous insufficiency and hydrocephalus can lead to increased pulsatility, which is a major suspect in hydrocephalus and ventriculomegaly [8084]. It is possible, therefore, that blockage of blood and CSF flow due to malformations and misalignments of the CCJ may play a role in chronic ischemia, edema, hydrocephalus, and ventriculomegaly.

In brief, the CCJ is a potential choke point for blood and CSF flow between the cranial vault and spinal canal that can cause faulty craniospinal hydrodynamics and subsequent chronic ischemia, edema, and hydrocephalus. Upright posture and motion of the cervical spine compound the strains and deformation of blood and CSF pathways of the CCJ further contributing to blockage of flow. Faulty craniospinal hydrodynamics have been associated with Chiari malformations [3136], craniosynostosis [5460], craniofacial anomalies [6165], anomalies of the CCJ [3153, 8587], and Dandy-Walker complex in children [8890]. Faulty craniospinal hydrodynamics may also play a role in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer [9197], Parkinson [98101], multiple sclerosis [102108], dementia [109113], and motor neuron diseases [114121]. Lastly, faulty craniospinal hydrodynamics may play a role in migraines [122128], silent-strokes [128130], seizures [131134], psychosis [135145], depression [146148], and mania [149153]. The aim of this paper is to stimulate further research into the role of the craniocervical junction and faulty craniospinal hydrodynamics in neurodegenerative and other neurological conditions that will lead to prevention and more effective treatments.

2. Arteries and Veins of the CCJ

The arteries and veins of the CCJ play key roles in craniospinal hydrodynamics. The main arteries that pass through the CCJ include the vertebral and spinal arteries. The venous system of the CCJ includes the (1) dural sinuses of the posterior fossa, (2) suboccipital cavernous sinus, (3) occipital-marginal sinuses, (4) emissary veins, and (5) vertebral veins.

The vertebral arteries make up the posterior blood supply routes that provide about twenty percent of blood flow to the brain. The twenty percent of blood flow they supply includes most of the diencephalon (thalamus and hypothalamus) and all of the brainstem, as well as the medial temporal and occipital lobes. The internal carotid arteries are the anterior supply routes and supply about eighty percent of blood flow to the brain including most of the lobes and some of the diencephalon.

The circle of Willis encircles the infundibulum located above the sella turcica and links the anterior blood supply routes to the posterior blood supply routes. There are variations in the layout of the circle. In some cases it is incomplete. The design of the circle of Willis affects its ability to supply collateral circulation to the brain. It also affects the direction of arterial flows in the anterior and posterior supply routes under normal and pathological conditions, such as steal syndromes involving the vertebral arteries.

The vertebral arteries arise from the proximal segments of the subclavian arteries and are broken down into four segments. The first segment is from the origin at the subclavian artery to where it enters the intervertebral foramen of C6 or C5. The second segment passes through the intervertebral foramen from C6 up to C2. The third segment of the vertebral artery passes through the intervertebral foramen of the CCJ, turns back around the condyles, and then pierces the suboccipital cavernous sinus of the posterior atlantooccipital membrane through which it travels toward the midline of the occiput. As they approach the midline of the occiput the vertebral arteries turn cephalward and pass through the foramen magnum. After passing through the foramen magnum the vertebral arteries penetrate the dura mater and enter the brain. The fourth segment continues from where the vertebral arteries enter the brain up to the pontomedullary junction where they unite to become the basilar artery (see Figure 1).

Figure 1: Vertebral-basilar arteries and circle of Willis.

Subclavian steal syndromes occur when the proximal portion of the subclavian artery is obstructed due to stenosis resulting in decreased blood flow and pressure downstream in the vertebral and axillary arteries. This creates a pressure gradient that causes the arm to draw blood from the ipsilateral vertebral artery, which in turn gets its supply from the contralateral vertebral artery via their connection to the basilar artery [153161]. Subclavian steal syndromes can in turn steal blood flow from upstream vessels of the brain including the ophthalmic arteries of the eyes.

The ophthalmic arteries are the first branches of the internal carotid artery. Decreased pressure in the circle of Willis relative to arterial pressure in the ophthalmic artery can draw blood away from the eye to the ipsilateral brain. Consequently, relatively lower downstream pressure in the posterior portion of the circle of Willis, basilar, and vertebral arteries, which occurs in a subclavian steal syndrome can result in an ophthalmic steal syndrome and hypoperfusion of the optic nerve head (see Figure 1). Hypoperfusion of the optic nerve head can cause a loss of vision, which occurs in certain cases of multiple sclerosis associated with amaurosis fugax [162164], as well as in retinal migraine headaches [165167]. Hypoperfusion of the optic nerve head may also play a role in low tension glaucoma [168171]. Interestingly, researchers have shown that the design of the eye also affects glaucoma. Patients with smaller globes relative to the size of the optic nerve appear to be more susceptible to glaucoma as a consequence of crowding and congestion of the nerve similar to hypoplasia of the posterior fossa causing crowding and congestion of the brainstem and cerebellum and predisposition to Chiari malformations associated with hydrocephalus.

It is further interesting to note that migraines have been associated with hyperintensity signals on brain scans that indicate ischemic damage. The hyperintensity signals are often found in the distribution of the posterior blood supply, especially the cerebellum [128130, 172, 173]. The vertebral arteries also supply the medial temporal and occipital lobes. Decreased blood flow to the medial temporal and occipital lobes may play a role in the déjà vu and aura symptoms associated with migraines. It seems plausible that malformations, misalignments, and deformation of the CCJ and dura mater can obstruct blood flow through the vertebral arteries resulting in ischemia and signs and symptoms associated with of migraine headaches.

In addition to providing twenty percent of blood flow to the brain, the vertebral arteries provide a significant portion of the blood supply to the cord via the anterior and posterior spinal arteries. The anterior spinal arteries typically arise from the fourth segment of the vertebral arteries after the posterior inferior cerebellar arteries (see Figure 1). The posterior spinal arteries are the first branches of the anterior spinal arteries. Alternatively, in some cases the posterior spinal arteries arise from the posterior inferior cerebellar arteries. The two anterior spinal arteries unite while the posterior spinal arteries remain paired as they descend through the CCJ to supply the anterior and posterior aspects of the cord. Long and short circumferential arteries branch off from the anterior spinal arteries to supply the dorsolateral surface of the medulla and upper cervical cord. It seems plausible that malformations, misalignments, and deformation of the CCJ can obstruct blood flow through the anterior and posterior spinal arteries resulting in decreased blood flow to the cord.

Recent clinical evidence by Rafael further suggests that ALS may be due to progressive ischemia in the intraparenchymal territory of the anterior-ventral spinal arteries and/or the anterior spinal artery. The anterior-ventral spinal arteries are branches of the inferior thyroid and ascending cervical arteries that stem from the thyrocervical trunk, which arises from the subclavian artery distal to the vertebral artery. The anterior spinal and anterior-ventral spinal arteries supply the ventral aspect of the cord. Rafael found some key common characteristics in ALS patients based on CT and MRI scans of the skull and cervical spine, as well as from observations made during surgery that included (1) anatomical variants of the fourth segment of the vertebral arteries; (2) atherosclerosis of the fourth segment of the vertebral arteries, as well as the basilar artery; (3) atrophy of the pyramids; (4) atrophy of the frontoparietal cortex; (5) questionable zones that appeared to be microinfarcts in the medulla oblongata and cervical cord; (6) exsanguinated short and long circumferential arteries that branch off from the anterior-ventral spinal and/or the anterior spinal arteries; (7) atrophy of small nerve roots in cranial nerves IX, X, and XI; and (8) degeneration of the cervical spine. Based on his clinical and neurosurgical observations, as well as the following omental transplantation for revascularization, Rafael posits that the primary cause in certain cases of olivopontocerebellar atrophy (Parkinson’s plus), ALS, and possibly central pontine myelinolysis is ischemic in origin and related to vascular anomalies and atherosclerotic plaques located at the mouths of the collateral branches from the vertebral and basilar arteries [119, 121].

Many authors have also suggested that ALS may be related to trauma, especially head trauma [114120]. Among other things, trauma can tear ligaments of the craniocervical junction resulting in joint instability and misalignments. Misalignments due to degeneration and ligament laxity are also associated with connective tissue disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis and Ehlers-Danlos [66, 67, 174], which have in turn been associated with cranial settling causing a similar effect to basilar invagination mentioned previously. Trauma superimposed on malformations, anomalies, and degenerative changes in the arteries and spine may further compromise circulation in the distribution of the vertebral-basilar arteries. It is possible that obstruction to blood flow through the anterior and posterior spinal arteries due to malformations and misalignments of the CCJ may play a causative or contributory role in neurodegenerative conditions of the cord such as ALS.

The third segment of the vertebral artery passes through the suboccipital cavernous sinus (also known as the posterior atlantooccipital membrane) of the CCJ (see Figure 2). The extracranial suboccipital cavernous sinus is the homolog of the intracranial cavernous sinus [175], which contains the internal carotid artery. The cavernous and suboccipital cavernous sinuses are part of the dural sinus system of the brain.

Figure 2: CCJ and suboccipital cavernous sinus.

The dural sinuses are the large drainage veins of the brain (see Figure 3 striped blue lines). They are not true veins. Instead, they are tunnels formed from dura mater lined with endothelium of veins. The outer coat of dura mater makes them stronger than veins and better suited to resist deformation by the brain, as well as collapse due to sudden drops and negative pressures caused by upright posture. The dural sinuses have no valves to check inversion flows and are connected to an extensive system of valveless emissary, scalp, face, and diploic and vertebral veins (see Figure 3 bold semicircles at top and bottom of the skull). The diploic veins are located between the inner and outer cortices of the skull. Emissary veins link the dural sinuses to the diploic and extracranial veins including the valveless veins of the vertebral venous plexus of the spine and spinal canal (see Figure 3 V. vertebralis). The direction of venous blood flow in this vast system of interconnected valveless veins is determined by hydrostatic pressure gradients that are affected by body movements, respiration, Valsalva maneuvers, upright posture, and inversion [2230]. Although it lies outside the cranial vault, the suboccipital cavernous sinus is structurally similar and has connections to the dural sinuses inside the cranial vault.

Figure 3: Ventricles, sinuses, and veins.

The cavernous and suboccipital cavernous sinuses are also part of the cerebral autoregulatory and brain cooling mechanisms. As part of the cerebral autoregulatory system the cavernous and suboccipital cavernous sinuses contain chemo- and baroreceptors used to maintain steady blood flow in the brain by way of vasoconstriction or relaxation [25, 28, 175180]. Their role in brain cooling is to serve as countercurrent heat exchangers that bath the carotid and vertebral arteries in venous blood that has been cooled at the surface by conduction, convection, radiation, and sweating. The cavernous sinuses are primarily cooled by the eyes and ophthalmic veins. The suboccipital cavernous sinus is cooled by emissary veins from the scalp, face, and neck, as well as diploic veins located between the inner and outer cortices of the cranial vault. The diploic veins are similarly cooled by surface veins and provide an additional layer of thermal protection for the cranial vault. The diploic veins and countercurrent heat exchange system keep the brain two to three degrees cooler than the rest of the body [175, 179, 180].

The occipital-marginal sinuses of the CCJ are part of the dural sinus system of the brain that evolved in primates, hominids, and humans to accommodate increased venous outflow that occurs during upright posture by increasing the capacity and efficiency of the drainage system. The occipital sinus is connected to the torcula, also known as the confluence of sinuses, located adjacent to the internal occipital protuberance. The torcula links the superior and inferior sagittal sinuses to the transverse sinuses. There are several variations of the torcula and occipital sinus connections. In some cases they are absent. The marginal sinus is located around the rim of the foramen magnum. The occipital-marginal sinuses connect to the vertebral venous plexus of the spine and spinal canal through the CCJ. Although it plays a less prominent role, the occipital-marginal sinus system still persists in humans [25].

More than the occipital-marginal sinuses, human evolution tended to favor the development of a robust system of emissary veins to connect to the vertebral venous plexus. Some of the emissary veins pass through emissary foramen in the cranial vault such as the parietal, sphenoid, mastoid, and occipital emissary foramen, as well as others. The most favored and well developed emissary venous outlets used to drain the brain during upright posture in humans, however, pass through the foramen magnum and hypoglossal and condylar canals of the CCJ [2230]. These outlets are located in the bottom of the posterior fossa below the level of the jugular foramen when the head is held upright. The lower location of the emissary venous outlets in and around the foramen magnum makes them more suitable for draining the bottom of the bowl during upright posture than the internal jugular veins.

The occipital-marginal sinus, emissary, and hypoglossal and condylar venous routes all connect to the vertebral venous plexus. The vertebral venous plexus is an extensive network of valveless veins located along the length of the spine and inside the spinal canal with connections between them (see Figures 3 and 4 V. vertebralis). The veins of the internal vertebral venous plexus are located in the epidural space between the cord and spinal canal. This makes the internal vertebral venous plexus the homologue of the cortical or bridging veins located between the brain and the cranial vault. Blood flow in the epidural vertebral veins is affected by motion, respiration, Valsalva maneuvers, abdominal pressure, upright posture, and inversion. It is also affected by spondylosis, scoliosis, and stenosis in the lower spine [2230].

Figure 4: Vertebral venous plexus.

Malformations and misalignments of the CCJ cause strains and deformation of the dura mater and suboccipital cavernous sinus, which can affect circulatory pathways and blood flow in the brain. Spondylosis, stenosis, and scoliosis in the lower spine cause deformation of the epidural space of the spinal canal, as well as deformation of the dura mater (thecal sac) that can similarly affect blood flow in the vertebral veins and cord. In addition to straining the dura of the CCJ, cervical kyphosis (reversal of the normal lordotic curve) also causes the internal jugular vein to bend around the transverse process of atlas, reversing its normal course, as well as potentially compressing the vein and increasing resistance to blood flow. In brief, malformations and misalignments of the CCJ may play a role in chronic ischemia and edema, which may in turn lead to neurodegenerative processes and subsequent diseases.

3. The CCJ and CSF Flow

CSF is produced in the ventricles. The lateral ventricles are the highest and largest ventricles located in the left and right hemispheres beneath the corpus callosum. CSF flows from the lateral ventricles through the foramen of Monroe into the third ventricle located within the walls of the thalamus of the diencephalon. It flows out of the third ventricle through the cerebral aqueduct of Sylvius in the midbrain and into the fourth ventricle located anterior to the cerebellum and posterior to the pons and medulla. CSF flows out of the fourth ventricle through four openings. The foramen of Magendie, located in the midline of the fourth ventricle, and the two foramens of Luschka, located on the lateral walls, drain into the prepontine cistern and cisterna magna. The central canal of the medulla and cord is connected to the obex of the fourth ventricle. The central canal of the cord is the embryological remnant of the neural tube and homolog of the ventricles and cerebral aqueduct of Sylvius. Although it is often discontiguous in adults, the central canal passes through the center of the lower brainstem and spinal cord and terminates as a cistern in the conus medullaris (see Figure 5).

Figure 5: CSF circulation.

The cisterns are expansions of the subarachnoid space (see Figure 5, stippled gray area around the brain). The subarachnoid space is located between the arachnoid and pia mater of the leptomeninges and serves as a conduit for CSF flow and for the passage and protection of the large arteries and veins of the brain and cord. The subarachnoid space is fortified with struts called trabecula to maintain its structural integrity and patency to protect the blood vessels within from compression. The cisterns are strategically located to provide extra protection and buoyancy for the brain, especially the brainstem due to its location above the base of the skull and foramen magnum. The cisterna magna is the lowest cistern located beneath the cerebellum above the foramen magnum. The premedullary cistern is located ventral to the medulla. The lower cisterns, such as the cisterna magna, premedullary, and prepontine cisterns, help to prevent the cerebellum from sinking into the foramen magnum, which is called a pressure cone [181185]. Pressure cones cause cerebellar tonsillar ectopia similar to Chiari malformations.

The correct volume and pressure of CSF in the brain are also important for turgor, which is necessary to maintain openings, pathways, separation, and spatial orientation of the different parts of the brain [186, 187], as well as prevent the brain from sagging and sinking. Proper CSF pressure also plays a role in the development of the ventricles, cerebral aqueduct, foramen, cisterns, and subarachnoid space. In fact, low CSF pressure may be detrimental to the formation and development of the outlets of the fourth ventricle. Delays and maldevelopment of the foramen of the fourth ventricle can cause Dandy-Walker complex [8890]. More importantly, CSF buffers incoming arterial pulsations and pressure waves. It also prevents the veins in the brain from collapsing due to negative pressure that occurs during upright posture. It does so due to a simultaneous drop in CSF pressure in the subarachnoid space, which offsets the drop in pressure inside the veins.

CSF is produced in the brain by active and passive means. Both active and passive production draw CSF from blood contained in the capillaries of the choroid plexuses of the ventricles. The choroid plexuses are covered by a layer of ependymal columnar salt secreting cells. Although it is far more complex, in brief, active production is a continuous process that secretes salts from the ependymal cells into the ventricles. The salts draw blood out of the choroid plexus by osmosis across the extra-fine filter of the blood brain barrier. CSF is thus an extra-fine filtrate of the blood. More recent research shows that a relatively large portion of CSF also comes from interstitial fluids that flow through the blood brain barrier driven by concentration and pressure gradients, as well as more active means such as through aquaporin channels [188204].

The passive production of CSF uses hydrostatic pressure gradients. Passive production occurs during upright posture which decreases venous pressure in the vertebral veins and dural sinuses. The decrease in pressure in the superior sagittal sinus increases the CSF pressure gradient. The increase in the CSF pressure gradient draws additional blood from the choroid plexus, which is called passive production. The increase in passive production is necessary to make up for the loss of volume due to increased CSF outflow to prevent coning of the brainstem.

The cisterna magna and premedullary cisterns of the posterior fossa are connected to the subarachnoid space of the cord through the CCJ. The subarachnoid space of the cord and lumbar cistern, which is an enlargement of the subarachnoid space in the lumbar spine, serves as an expansion tank for excess CSF intracranial volume and pressure. Its role as an expansion tank is important in order to maintain proper CSF volume, which is essential to prevent coning of the brainstem. Two common surgical procedures known to cause coning are excess drainage by CSF shunts and spinal taps (lumbar puncture). Trauma can also cause dural tears resulting in CSF leaks and coning. Connective tissue disorders such as Ehlers-Danlos appear to be predisposed to CSF leaks as well. In addition to preventing coning, proper CSF volume is essential to the regulation of intracranial pressure (ICP), which increases exponentially with increases in volume.

Chiari malformations are typically attributed to malformations of the brainstem in children in which the lower portion of the cerebellum, called the tonsils, are found to be descended five millimeters or more beneath the level of foramen magnum into the CCJ. In contrast to an oversized cerebellum, research has shown that Chiari malformations are often due to hypoplasia of the posterior fossa resulting in crowding and downward displacement of the cerebellar tonsils [3236]. Some authors have also attributed cerebellar tonsillar ectopia to faulty craniospinal hydrodynamics [181185]. While further studies need to be done before drawing conclusions, recent research has shown a possible connection between cerebellar tonsillar ectopia and structural strains due to trauma [205, 206]. Structural strains can also occur due to an abnormal clivoaxial angle (craniocervical angulation) and intervals, including retroflexed odontoid, which are often associated with Chiari malformations [36, 207]. Among other things, structural strains of the CCJ affect the dura mater, which can cause displacement (ectopia) of the brainstem and deformation of the neurovascular and CSF tunnels and pathways. An abnormal clivoaxial angle or retroflexed odontoid can cause cervicomedullary kinking and compression of the ventral epidural space of the neural canal of the CCJ. In any case, regardless of the cause, Chiari malformations and coning of the brainstem cause blockage of CSF flow through the CCJ. They also compress the epidural space which contains the vertebral veins that connect to the emissary veins and dural sinuses used to drain the brain during upright posture. The most abundant vertebral veins are found in the anterior aspect of the canal.

Although still hotly debated, most of the CSF in spinal cord and cisterns eventually flows up through the subarachnoid space and CCJ toward the top of the brain where it is absorbed back into venous circulation by the arachnoid granulations. The arachnoid granulations are special one-way valves that develop during infancy as a child starts to hold its head up, crawl, and walk. While they can be found in other dural sinuses as well, the bulk of arachnoid granulations are found at the top of the brain in humans and drain into the venous lacunae and superior sagittal sinus [198]. In quadrupeds the arachnoid granulations are predominantly found in the transverse sinuses. Their locations are most likely driven by pressure gradients associated with head posture and locomotion. The force of flow through the arachnoid granulations is strong enough to leave deep impressions on the roof of the cranial vault. Researchers have also argued and shown that a significant amount of CSF flows into the capillary veins to exit the subarachnoid space. In either case, the absorption of CSF by the arachnoid granulations or by the capillary veins is affected by downstream venous pressure and flow. An increase in venous pressure in the superior sagittal sinus decreases the CSF pressure gradient, which decreases flow and increases CSF volume in the brain. Conversely, venous drainage is affected by the free flow of CSF. An increase in CSF volume in the brain can compress veins and decrease drainage [7279, 190204]. Malformations, misalignments, and deformation of the CCJ compress the vertebral veins, which may affect CSF flow.

In addition to flow within the craniospinal compartment, research has further shown that CSF flows along cranial nerve roots, especially the olfactory and optic nerves. In fact, enlargement of the optic nerve sheath is a sign of increased CSF volume and possible hydrocephalus. CSF can also be seen in the trigeminal and other cranial nerves as well. Alternatively CSF can exit the cranial vault and flow through the CCJ into the subarachnoid space of the cord. As in the brain, there is ongoing debate about optional routes for CSF to leave the subarachnoid space of the cord including pathways that follow the nerve roots of the cord similar to cranial nerves in the brain. The bulk of CSF in the subarachnoid space of the cord, however, appears to return to the cranial vault and exit through the arachnoid granulations [190204]. The CCJ is thus a potential choke point for CSF flow between the cranial vault and spinal canal.

4. Hydrocephalus, Hydromyelia, and CCJ

Classic hydrocephalus is an increase in CSF volume coupled with ventriculomegaly. In children, hydrocephalus is typically, but not always, associated with an increase in intracranial pressure (ICP) and head size. For the most part, hydrocephalus is considered a childhood condition. Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is seen mostly in adults but it is sometimes seen in children as well. NPH is associated with increased CSF volume, ventriculomegaly, and normal or slightly elevated ICP. The size of the head is unaffected in adults. The decrease in compliance of the skull most likely puts a damper on ICP in adults with NPH compared to the highly compliant skulls seen in infants and young children. Despite the development of shunts, decades of research, and recent advances in brain imaging we know very little about the role of faulty craniospinal hydrodynamics in hydrocephalus.

According to Rekate a new definition for hydrocephalus is long overdue and so he proposed one as a starting point for discussion in which he maintains that “hydrocephalus is an active distension of the ventricular system of the brain resulting from inadequate passage of CSF from its point of production within the cerebral ventricles to its point of absorption into the systemic circulation” [208, 209]. Because it requires an active process of production and an inadequate passage of CSF flow, Rekate’s definition omits hydrocephalus due to other causes, such as vasogenic and cytotoxic edema, as well as brain atrophy, which causes normal pressure hydrocephalus ex vacuo in which CSF volume increases to fill the void. Since it further includes ventriculomegaly it also omits idiopathic intracranial hypertension without ventriculomegaly. Moreover, it omits conditions associated with increased extraventricular CSF volume and enlargement of the subarachnoid spaces and cisterns without ventriculomegaly, such as those seen in certain cases of Dandy-Walker complex and Parkinson’s plus syndromes called multisystem atrophy and olivopontocerebellar atrophy.

Other definitions for hydrocephalus have also been proposed over the years. One definition previously proposed by Raimondi is that hydrocephalus is a pathologic increase in CSF volume independent of hydrostatic or barometric pressure that can be classified as either intra- or extraparenchymal. Intraparenchymal hydrocephalus is essentially the same as cerebral edema, which is an increase in interstitial fluids in the parenchyma. Extraparenchymal hydrocephalus can be further broken down into intraventricular, cisternal, and subarachnoid space forms [210].

Some authors maintain that hydrocephalus is simply cerebral edema regardless of the cause or location of the excess CSF volume [208211]. This is probably the broadest definition as it includes vasogenic and cytotoxic edema, which have nothing to do with blockage of CSF flow. Interestingly the term hyperemic hydrocephalus was recently introduced to describe a condition in which venous outflows fail to match intracranial arterial inflows [78]. Moreover, studies suggest that hyperemic hydrocephalus seen in children and idiopathic intracranial hypertension seen in adults may both be due to venous insufficiency. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension has further been associated with a decrease in the capacity and compliance of the vertebral veins in the spinal canal. In this regard, females tend to have smaller spinal canals and less venous capacity compared to males. The internal volume of the female pelvis is also smaller and further crowded by ovaries and a uterus that swell during menstruation. Obesity and pregnancy increase pressure on the abdominal veins. Increased pressure against the abdominal and vertebral veins may affect the vertebral venous plexus similar to a Valsalva maneuver and cause an increase in ICP. Thus females may be predisposed to idiopathic intracranial hypertension due to their physiology along with the smaller design of the spine and pelvis.

The generally accepted theory is that, aside from frank blockage, such as stenosis of the cerebral aqueduct, the cause of hydrocephalus is due to insufficient absorption, which occurs primarily by way of the arachnoid granulations, as well as arterial and venous capillary routes. According to Greitz, however, the bulk CSF flow theory fails to explain key issues regarding communicating hydrocephalus, such as what causes the ventricles to enlarge, why CSF pressure remains normal in certain cases, and why some patients improve with shunts or endoscopic third ventriculostomy [212]. Greitz thus proposed his hydrodynamic theory in which the patent cerebral aqueduct in communicating hydrocephalus is simply too narrow (insufficient) to adequately drain the lateral and third ventricles. Subsequent saturation of the brain due to hydrocephalus and edema causes a decrease in compliance. The loss of compliance of the veins in the subarachnoid space decreases their buffering capacity. Consequently, high pulsatile arterial pressure waves are transmitted from the subarachnoid space to delicate tissues of the brain parenchyma, as well as the walls of the ventricles in the core of the brain and brainstem. The turgor of the ventricles resists deformation from the incoming forces. The periventricular parenchymal tissues and blood vessels caught between the expanding brain and ventricles take the brunt of the force from the increased arterial pulsations [8084, 213, 214]. Chronic increased pulsatility can cause damage, atrophy, and subsequent ventriculomegaly. Greitz maintains that the larger pressure waves in the parenchyma cause an overall distention of the brain and subsequent compression of the cortex and periventricular areas by the skull and ventricles, respectively. In contrast to the skull, the ventricles can expand. Chronic increased pressure waves causing tension, compression, and shear stresses of periventricular tissues may lead to atrophy and subsequent enlargement of the ventricles. This would explain why periventricular structures are often affected in hydrocephalus and neurodegenerative diseases and associated with periventricular hyperintensity signals on MRI. The outcome of chronic compression of the brain is enlargement of the ventricles and narrowing of the subarachnoid space. Greitz maintains that endoscopic third ventriculostomy decreases the destructive impact of increased systolic pressure waves in the brain parenchyma by bypassing the restriction and venting CSF through the surgical stoma in the floor of the third ventricle. Fenestration increases the drainage capacity of the third ventricle and dissipates the intraventricular CSF volume, velocity, and pulsatility, which decreases the water hammer effect [212]. Conversely, Rekate proposed that ventriculomegaly may be due to loss of brain turgor and softening of the brain associated with aging [187, 208, 209].

Hydrocephalus in children is typically attributed to blockage of CSF flow somewhere between the ventricles where it is produced and the arachnoid granulations where it is absorbed into venous circulation, which meets the criteria proposed by Rekate’s definition. In contrast to children with hydrocephalus, however, blockage of CSF flow is rarely found in adults with normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH), which is also known as the Hakim-Adams syndrome. Consequently, researchers have long suspected that NPH might be due to insufficient venous drainage of the brain by the dural sinuses [77, 78, 215224]. Blockages of dural sinuses, however, are likewise rarely found. Earlier research, however, was limited to the dural sinuses and essentially stopped at the cranial vault.

In 1988 this author proposed that neurodegenerative diseases may be due to obstruction and back pressure in the accessory drainage system of the brain as it passes through the CCJ to connect to the vertebral veins [20, 21]. Obstruction can occur due to many types of malformations and misalignments of the CCJ. More recently, in 2009, Zamboni et al. proposed that MS can be caused by venous insufficiency due to stenosis or faulty valves in jugular veins [222]. The many different types of malformations and misalignments of the CCJ that can potentially cause vertebral venous insufficiency, however, far outnumber those due to jugular insufficiency [3153, 8587]. Moreover, the vertebral veins are the primary drainage routes used to drain the brain during upright posture [2030].

One of the primary causes of hydrocephalus due to blockage of CSF flow is stenosis or mass effects causing compression of the cerebral aqueduct that links the third and fourth ventricle. Current research, however, suggests that certain cases of communicating hydrocephalus in children may be due to insufficient venous drainage of the brain. Among other things, researchers now suspect that insufficient venous drainage can cause stenosis of the cerebral aqueduct due to increased CSF volume and pressure in the parenchymal spaces surrounding the midbrain resulting in compression of the aqueduct [223, 224]. In this regard, the cerebral aqueduct passes through the midbrain, which is surrounded by the suprasellar and superior cerebellar (quadrigeminal) cisterns. An increase in CSF volume in the suprasellar and superior cerebellar cisterns (extraparenchymal cisternal hydrocephalus) may play a role in certain cases of aqueductal stenosis and hydrocephalus (ventriculomegaly).

Further adding to the theory regarding the role of the CCJ in faulty craniospinal hydrodynamics and neurodegenerative diseases, in 2008 Williams proposed a unifying hypothesis for the cause of hydrocephalus, Chiari malformations, syringomyelia, anencephaly, and spina bifida based on dissociation of CSF flow between the cranial vault and spinal canal [225, 226]. Typically, the two compartments are connected and act in concert which allows for an ebb and flow of CSF between the cranial vault and spinal canal based on pressure gradients. Under normal conditions, excess blood and CSF volume in the cranial vault are diverted into the epidural vertebral veins of the spinal canal and the subarachnoid space of the cord. Conversely, the proper volume and pressure of CSF in the subarachnoid space of the cord is necessary to maintain the correct volume of CSF in the cisterns of the cranial vault in order to provide buoyancy of the brainstem and prevent coning into the foramen magnum. According to Williams’ hypothesis, Chiari malformations cause blockage of CSF flow through the CCJ resulting in dissociation of CSF flow in the cranial and spinal compartments. The dissociation of the compartments causes them to behave independently [225, 226] resulting in increased pulsatility and CSF pressure waves that can be potentially destructive. According to Williams’ theory, blockage of CSF flow between the cranial vault and spinal canal may play a role in hydrocephalus and edema.

Among other things, Williams also suggests that relatively lower spinal canal pressure in females in utero allows the cranial vault to close sooner potentially resulting in hypoplasia of the posterior fossa and disposition to crowding of the brainstem and cerebellum resulting in a Chiari malformation [43, 226]. The Chiari malformation causes dissociation of CSF flow and subsequent hydrocephalus. Conversely, greater spinal canal pressure and larger cisterns in males keep the cranial vault pressurized and expanding in utero allowing for a larger cranial vault. Greater spinal canal pressure and larger cisterns, however, may make males susceptible to higher and more destructive pressure waves in the cisterns, which may play a role in autism [43, 226, 227]. Interestingly, research by Shahinian and others regarding obstetrical factors governing the etiopathogenesis of lambdoid synostosis suggests that increased infant head size coupled with early labor along with engagement and contact with a smaller maternal pelvis may play a role in craniosynostosis seen more frequently in males [228]. Craniosynostosis is associated with hypoplasia of the posterior fossa, jugular foramen, and foramen magnum, as well as Chiari malformations that can block blood and CSF flow and cause hydrocephalus. Lastly, according to this author’s theory, loss of intracranial compliance due to obstruction of venous blood and CSF outflow in the CCJ may similarly cause increased pulsatility and pressure waves in the cisterns. It is possible that increased pulsatility and pressure waves in the cisterns may play a role in neurodegenerative disorders associated with enlargement of the cisterns and atrophy of the brainstem seen in adults with Parkinson’s plus conditions including olivopontocerebellar atrophy, multisystem atrophy, and progressive supranuclear palsy, as well as certain cases of Dandy-Walker Complex, such as mega cisterna magna seen in children.

Some authors have shown a causal relation between low brain blood flow and symptoms of NPH. They surmise that clinical deterioration is probably due to impaired periventricular blood flow associated with interstitial edema, ependymal disruption, microvascular infarctions, gliosis, and neuronal degeneration. Neuronal injury may result from several factors such as (1) mechanical stretching of the anterior cerebral arteries over the corpus callosum due to ventriculomegaly; (2) periventricular impairment of the blood brain barrier; and (3) reduced CSF turnover with decreased elimination of neurotoxic substances, such as β-amyloid, tau-protein, and proinflammatory cytokines. Reduction in blood flow in the anterior cerebral arteries decreases blood flow to the frontal regions resulting in local ischemia and possibly clinical signs. Decreased blood flow could also lead to periventricular axonal dysfunction. Prolonged periventricular ischemia would eventually result in myelin degeneration and irreversible axonal loss, possibly explaining why some patients with NPH do not improve after a shunt. The decrease in CSF clearance may also explain the high cooccurrence of Alzheimer-like changes in the cortex of patients with idiopathic NPH. A possible association with Alzheimer’s disease, particularly when there is concurrent arterial hypertension and cerebral arteriosclerosis, may explain why many NPH cases remain with severe cognitive and motor deficits after shunting, even when ventricular size decreases postoperatively [68, 71, 73].

Among other things, hydrocephalus compresses the cortical bridging veins against the cranial vault, which can further increase venous insufficiency. Compression of the veins and decreased venous outflow also decreases cerebral perfusion pressure and blood flow in the brain [71, 186, 229]. In addition to veins, hydrocephalus compresses smaller arteries in the brain parenchyma, such as those surrounding the ventricles. Decreases in blood flow due to a decrease in perfusion pressure or compression of arteries can result in ischemia. Ischemia is a major suspect in the cause of atrophy and subsequent normal pressure hydrocephalus ex vacuo in adults by creating a void for CSF to fill [229232]. Ventriculomegaly also causes potentially destructive tension, compression, and shear stress of susceptible periventricular tissues. Lastly, according to Foltz [80, 81], Greitz [14, 82, 212], Madsen [16, 84], Bateman [231, 233], and others, hydrocephalus causes increased CSF pulsatility and high pressure waves resulting in destructive water hammer effects on delicate parenchymal tissues. In this author’s opinion, the enlarged cisterns (extraparenchymal cisternal hydrocephalus), such as those seen in Dandy-Walker complex and Parkinson’s plus syndromes, may likewise be due to destructive pressure waves [20, 21, 28, 91, 98, 102, 128, 234].

In addition to ischemia, edema, structural strains, and pressure waves, hydrocephalus causes sluggish CSF flow. As arteries and veins leave the subarachnoid space the pia mater peels away and follows their course into the parenchyma. This creates a perivascular space (Virchow-Robins space) between the pia mater and tunica adventitia of the blood vessels. CSF flows out of the subarachnoid spaces through the perivascular spaces and into the brain parenchyma where it mixes with interstitial fluids. Interstitial fluids flow out of the parenchyma along perivascular pathways. Since the brain has no lymphatic vessels or glands and it is not connected to the lymphatic system, it instead uses the perivascular spaces to move nutrients in and wastes out. Because of this, the author has also long maintained that the perivascular spaces serve as the lymphatic system of the brain and that sluggish CSF flow may play a role in pathology of neurodegenerative diseases and the increase in the presence of breakdown byproducts, viruses, bacteria, and heavy metals such as aluminum and iron [20, 21, 28, 91, 98, 102, 128, 234]. More recently it was discovered that in addition to providing pathways for the removal of wastes, the glial support cells that form the perivascular spaces also act as macrophages, which led to the term glymphatic system. Researchers now suspect that protein aggregation diseases, such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s and the accumulation of beta amyloids and alpha synuclein, respectively, may be due to sluggish CSF flow [235239]. The aggregation of wastes and breakdown byproducts, as well as bacteria and viruses due to sluggish CSF flow, may play a role neurodegenerative processes resulting in atrophy and subsequent ventriculomegaly.

In this regard, the ventricles are the high side of the CSF pressure gradient. The low side of the CSF pressure gradient is venous pressure in the superior sagittal sinus. Superior sagittal sinus venous pressure and flow is affected by posture, respiration, and movement. It is also affected by downstream pressure in the internal jugular and vertebral veins. Obstruction of flow in the internal jugular veins, such as in Queckenstedt’s test, is transmitted to the dural sinuses and increases ICP. Likewise, back pressure against abdominal and thoracic veins, such as in a Valsalva maneuver, is transmitted via the vertebral veins to the dural sinuses, which increases ICP. During upright posture the brain preferentially drains into the vertebral venous plexus (VVP). Blockage of the VVP in the CCJ due to malformations and misalignments may cause chronic venous hypertension, decreased CSF flow, and an increase in CSF volume and pulsatility in the cranial vault.

A syrinx, also known as syringomyelia, is enlargement of a portion of the central canal of the cord. It is the homolog of hydrocephalus and sometimes referred to as hydromyelia. The central canal of the cord is typically connected to the obex of the fourth ventricle. In many cases it is not. There are currently three basic theories regarding the cause of syrinx formation and its maintenance. The first theory, called Gardner’s theory [240, 241], is that syrinxes are caused by a water hammer effect due to insufficient drainage through the foramen of Magendie and Luschka. The second cause is based on Oldfield’s theory, which maintains that the descent of the cerebellum into the foramen magnum causes a piston-like effect that forces fluids into the syrinx [242, 243]. The third theory is William’s theory. According to William’s theory, syringomyelia is caused by dissociation of craniospinal hydrodynamics [225, 244]. A similar theory was later proposed by Williams, mentioned previously, regarding Chiari malformations and syringomyelia. According to Williams, dissociation of craniospinal hydrodynamics causes lower pressure in the subarachnoid space relative to the central canal [226]. The decrease in flow through the foramen magnum to the spinal canal decreases the volume and pressure of CSF in the surrounding subarachnoid space of the cord that would normally oppose enlargement of the syrinx. It also decreases venous blood flow and volume in the epidural vertebral veins. Both William and Williams further propose that an insufficient return of CSF flow from the spinal canal to the cranial vault can cause CSF volume, pressure, and pulsatility to increase the subarachnoid space of the cord and lumbar cistern, which can lead to spina bifida and meningomyeloceles [225, 226, 244].

Most syrinxes are found in the cervical and thoracic cord. They are frequently associated with Chiari malformations and attributed to blockage and faulty CSF flow through the CCJ [242, 245, 246]. A syrinx located in the lower one-third of the cord is called a terminal syrinx. A terminal syrinx is often associated with a tethered cord and likewise attributed to faulty CSF flow. Tethered cords are also associated with Chiari malformations and scoliosis [247, 248]. A holocord is a syrinx that extends the full length of the cord from the cervicomedullary junction to the terminal ventricle located at the caudal end of the central canal in the conus medullaris of the thoracolumbar spine. In addition to tumors, holocords are likewise frequently associated with Chiari malformations [244, 249251]. Complex Chiari is a term recently coined by Brockmeyer. A complex Chiari is a condition in which CTE is further complicated by malformations and abnormalities of the CCJ such as abnormal clivoaxial angle, retroflexed odontoid, occipitalization of atlas, basilar invagination, cervicomedullary kinking, syringomyelia, and scoliosis [207].

Although rare, syrinx and holocord have more recently been associated with previously unsuspected conditions such as (1) a dural arteriovenous fistula at the level of the foramen magnum [252], (2) cervical spondylosis [253], (3) stenosis of the thoracic spine [254], (4) a sacral arachnoid cyst [255], and (5) a tethered cord [256]. All of these cases were likewise attributed to altered CSF flow and pressure gradients in the spinal canal and cord. Surprisingly, surgical correction of the above conditions often resulted in complete resolution of the syrinx. Perhaps the most perplexing case was the sacral arachnoid cyst since most syrinxes are classically attributed to blockage of CSF flow in the CCJ. All of these cases underscore the complexity of hydrodynamics in the spinal canal, which is similar to those seen in the cranial vault but beyond the scope of this paper.

Interestingly, in 2003 Chang and Nakagawa proposed a hypothesis regarding the pathogenesis of syringomyelia in which the cisterna magna functions as a shock absorber against the pulsatile CSF pressure waves emanating from within the brain [257]. The loss of buffering capacity of the cisterna magna shifts pressure to the central canal. The increase in pulsatility in the central canal leads to syrinx formation in patients with Chiari I malformation. As mentioned above, according to these authors’ hypothesis, an increase in CSF volume in the cisterns may cause potentially destructive increases in pulsatility and pressure waves surrounding the brainstem, which may cause or contribute to atrophy of the brainstem seen in Dandy-Walker complex and Parkinson’s plus syndromes mentioned previously. In any case, the CCJ is the critical link between hydraulics in the cranial vault and spinal canal that can affect CSF flow and pulsatility in the brain and cord.

5. Discussion

For the most part, the cranial vault is a closed container with little room for expansion or compliance. The spinal canal typically has much greater compliance due to the large lumbar cistern and absence of the cord. CSF volume and pressure in the cranial vault are directly related and pressure increases exponentially with increases in volume. The total volume of the cranial vault is a combination of brain, arterial blood, venous blood, CSF, and ISF. Increases in the volume of blood, CSF, brain, or space occupying lesions, such as tumors, cause an increase in ICP. Arterial volume and pressure in the cranial vault fluctuate causing pulsatile flow and pressure waves in the brain. Arterial flow can be increased or decreased by cerebral autoregulatory circulatory controls located in the cavernous and suboccipital cavernous sinus in order to maintain a relatively stable arterial supply. Stable blood flow is further maintained by proportionate outflows of venous blood and CSF from the cranial vault. A decrease in venous outflow reduces the volume of arterial blood that can enter the brain. It also increases turgor and decreases compliance, which decreases capacity of the veins in the subarachnoid space to buffer incoming arterial pressure fluctuations before they are transmitted to the parenchyma.

An increase in brain, blood, or CSF volume in the cranial vault, which occurs in space occupying lesions, hemorrhages, and hydrocephalus, can cause compression of the bridging veins and venous hypertension. Venous hypertension decreases cerebral perfusion pressure and thus arterial inflows. Chronic decreases in arterial flow can lead to oxidative stress, ischemia, and subsequent atrophy resulting in a compensatory increase in CSF volume, which occurs in normal pressure hydrocephalus ex vacuo. Atrophy can also be caused by compression, tension, and shear stresses acting on the brain and blood vessels due to hydrocephalus and increased pulsatility. In either case, enlarged ventricles and cisterns are a sign of hydrocephalus and an increase in CSF volume that can be caused by atrophy or chronic strains and deformation of the brain and brainstem.

In brief, craniospinal hydrodynamics are a complex interaction between brain, blood, and CSF in the relatively closed compartments of the cranial vault and spinal canal compounded by cardiac cycles and arterial pulsations that cause continuous fluctuations in blood volume and ICP. Faulty craniospinal hydrodynamics have been associated with hydrocephalus, anomalies of the CCJ, Chiari malformations (cerebellar tonsillar ectopia), craniosynostosis, craniofacial anomalies, and Dandy-Walker complex in children. Faulty craniospinal hydrodynamics may also play a role in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, multiple sclerosis, dementia, and motor neuron diseases, as well as other neurological conditions including migraines, silent-strokes, seizures, psychosis, schizophrenia, depression, and mania. Manual and surgical methods for correcting obstructions, as well as manipulation of blood and CSF flow, may help to restore or improve faulty craniospinal hydrodynamics in certain cases and decrease the prevalence, progression, and severity of neurodegenerative and other neurological conditions. Further studies using upright and cine MRI coupled with computer modeling are needed to determine the role of malformations and misalignments of the CCJ and spondylosis, stenosis and scoliosis in the lower spine in faulty craniospinal hydrodynamics, and neurodegenerative and neurological conditions, as well as the impact of the manual, mechanical, and surgical correction of structural strains and faulty craniospinal hydrodynamics on patient pathology and symptomatology.

Conflict of Interests

The author declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. H. L. Magoun, Osteopathy in the Cranial Field, Sutherland Cranial Teaching Foundation, Meridian, Idaho, USA, 3rd edition, 1976.
  2. J. E. Upledger and J. D. Vredevoogd, Craniosacral Therapy, Eastland Press, Seattle, Wash, USA, 1983.
  3. D. S. Walther, Applied Kinesiology. Vol. II. The Stomatognathic System, Systems DC, Pueblo, Colo, USA, 1983.
  4. M. B. DeJarnette, Sacrooccipital Technique, Self Published, Nebraska City, Neb, USA, 1984.
  5. J. D. Grostic, “Dentate ligament—cord distortion hypothesis,” Chiropractic Research Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 47–55, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  6. D. S. Butler, “Adverse mechanical tension in the nervous system: a model for assessment and treatment,” The Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 227–238, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. A. Farmer and C. L. Blum, “Dural port therapy,” Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 54–61, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. N. Hodgson, “The role of the spinal dura mater in spinal subluxation,” pp. 1–15, 2006, http://torquerelease.com.au.
  9. D. Greitz, “Cerebrospinal fluid circulation and associated intracranial dynamics. A radiologic investigation using MR imaging and radionuclide cisternography,” Acta Radiologica, Supplement, vol. 386, pp. 1–23, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. E. A. Bering Jr., “Choroid plexus and arterial pulsation of cerebrospinal fluid; demonstration of the choroid plexuses as a cerebrospinal fluid pump,” AMA Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 165–172, 1955. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. E. A. Bering and F. D. Ingraham, “The arterial pulsation of the cerebrospinal fluid; its origin, configuration and possible clinical importance,” Transactions of the American Neurological Association, vol. 3, no. 78, pp. 44–52, 1953. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. H. S. Dunbar, T. C. Guthrie, and B. Karpell, “A study of the cerebrospinal fluid pulse wave,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 624–630, 1966. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. L. M. Levy and G. Di Chiro, “MR phase imaging and cerebrospinal fluid flow in the head and spine,” Neuroradiology, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 399–406, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. Greitz, A. Franck, and B. Nordell, “On the pulsatile nature of intracranial and spinal CSF-circulation demonstrated by MR imaging,” Acta Radiologica, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 321–328, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. B. P. Poncelet, V. J. Wedeen, R. M. Weisskoff, and M. S. Cohen, “Brain parenchyma motion: measurement with cine echo-planar MR imaging,” Radiology, vol. 185, no. 3, pp. 645–651, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. E. Wagshul, P. K. Eide, and J. R. Madsen, “The pulsating brain: a review of experimental and clinical studies of intracranial pulsatility,” Fluids and Barriers of the CNS, vol. 8, article 5, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. Asgari, P. M. Vespa, M. Bergsneider, and X. Hu, “Latency relationships between cerebral blood flow velocity and intracranial pressure,” Acta Neurochirurgica. Supplement, vol. 114, pp. 5–9, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. W. Rong-Wen Tain, Mathematical modeling of craniospinal hydrodynamics: investigation of CSF dynamics and compliance function [Ph.D. thesis], University of Miami, 2012.
  19. J. J. Iliff, M. Wang, D. M. Zeppenfeld et al., “Cerebral arterial pulsation drives paravascular CSF-Interstitial fluid exchange in the murine brain,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 33, no. 46, pp. 18190–18199, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. F. Flanagan, “Relationship between CSF and fluid dynamics in the neural canal,” Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 489–492, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. F. Flanagan, “The hypothetical role of neural canal stenosis in normal pressure hydrocephalus and brain edema,” American Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–83, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  22. J. E. Eckenhoff, “The physiologic significance of the vertebral venous plexus,” Surgery Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 72–78, 1970. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. H. M. Epstein, H. W. Linde, A. R. Crampton, I. S. Ciric, and J. E. Eckenhoff, “The vertebral venous plexus as a major cerebral venous outflow tract,” Anesthesiology, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 332–337, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. E. Eckenhoff, “The cerebral circulation,” Postgraduate Medical Journal, vol. 50, no. 587, pp. 566–567, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. D. Falk, “Evolution of cranial blood drainage in hominids: enlarged occipital/marginal sinuses and emissary foramina,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 311–324, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. Andeweg, “The anatomy of collateral venous flow from the brain and its value in aetiological interpretation of intracranial pathology,” Neuroradiology, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 621–628, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. R. D. Caruso, A. E. Rosenbaum, J. K. Chang, and S. E. Joy, “Craniocervical junction venous anatomy on enhanced MR images: the suboccipital cavernous sinus,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1127–1131, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. F. Flanagan, “The accessory drainage system: its role in humans and other mammals,” Dynamic Chiropractic, vol. 20, no. 26, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  29. D. S. M. Rúiz, P. Gailloud, D. A. Rüfenacht, J. Delavelle, F. Henry, and J. H. D. Fasel, “The craniocervical venous system in relation to cerebral venous drainage,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1500–1508, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. Tanoue, H. Kiyosue, Y. Sagara et al., “Venous structures at the craniocervical junction: anatomical variations evaluated by multidetector row CT,” British Journal of Radiology, vol. 83, no. 994, pp. 831–840, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. W. R. Smoker, “Craniovertebral junction: normal anatomy, craniometry, and congenital anomalies,” Radiographics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 255–277, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. Marin-Padilla and T. M. Marin-Padilla, “Morphogenesis of experimentally induced arnold-chiari malformation,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 29–55, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. W. Schady, R. A. Metcalfe, and P. Butler, “The incidence of craniocervical bony anomalies in the adult Chiari malformation,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 82, no. 1–3, pp. 193–203, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. Vega, F. Quintana, and J. Berciano, “Basichondrocranium anomalies in adult Chiari type I malformation: a morphometric study,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 99, no. 2-3, pp. 137–145, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. F. Karagöz, N. Izgi, and S. K. Sencer, “Morphometric measurements of the cranium in patients with Chiari type I malformation and comparison with the normal population,” Acta Neurochirurgica, vol. 144, no. 2, pp. 165–171, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. A. A. Fernández, A. I. Guerrero, M. I. Martínez et al., “Malformations of the craniocervical junction (chiari type I and syringomyelia: classification, diagnosis and treatment),” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 10, article S1, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. F. C. Henderson, W. A. Wilson, S. Mott et al., “Deformative stress associated with an abnormal clivo-axial angle: a finite element analysis,” Surgical Neurology International, vol. 1, no. 1, article 30, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. R. S. Tubbs, J. C. Wellons III, J. P. Blount, P. A. Grabb, and W. J. Oakes, “Inclination of the odontoid process in the pediatric Chiari I malformation,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 98, supplement 1, pp. 43–49, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. H. Abdulameer, “Morphometric analysis of the odontoid process,” Iraqi Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 57–65, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  40. Z. L. Khaleel, D. A. Besachio, E. F. Bisson, and L. M. Shah, “Estimation of odontoid process posterior inclination, odontoid height, and pB-C2 line in the adult population,” Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 172–177, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. T. R. Ladner, M. C. Dewan, M. A. Day et al., “Posterior odontoid process angulation in pediatric Chiari I malformation: an MRI morphometric external validation study,” Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 138–145, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. L. J. Stovner, U. Bergan, G. Nilsen, and O. Sjaastad, “Posterior cranial fossa dimensions in the Chiari I malformation: relation to pathogenesis and clinical presentation,” Neuroradiology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 113–118, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. H. Williams, “Gender, head size and disease: a hypothesis related to posterior fossa growth,” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 1108–1111, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. T. H. Milhorat, M. Nishikawa, R. W. Kula, and Y. D. Dlugacz, “Mechanisms of cerebellar tonsil herniation in patients with Chiari malformations as guide to clinical management,” Acta Neurochirurgica, vol. 152, no. 7, pp. 1117–1127, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. B. J. Iskandar, M. Quigley, and V. M. Haughton, “Foramen magnum cerebrospinal fluid flow characteristics in children with Chiari I malformation before and after craniocervical decompression,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 101, no. 2, supplement, pp. 169–178, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. A. Prescher, “The craniocervical junction in man, the osseous variations, their significance and differential diagnosis,” Annals of Anatomy, vol. 179, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. R. V. Botelho and E. D. Z. Ferreira, “Angular craniometry in craniocervical junction malformation,” Neurosurgical Review, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 603–610, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. L. R. Charnas and J. C. Marini, “Communicating hydrocephalus, basilar invagination, and other neurologic features in osteogenesis imperfecta,” Neurology, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 2603–2608, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. P. D. Sawin and A. H. Menezes, “Basilar invagination in osteogenesis imperfecta and related osteochondrodysplasias: medical and surgical management,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 950–960, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. W. A. Gustafson and E. Oldberg, “Neurologic significance of platybasia,” Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1184–1198, 1940. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. W. E. Chamberlain, “Basilar impression (platybasia): a bizarre developmental anomaly of the occipital bone and upper cervical spine with striking and misleading neurologic manifestations,” The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 487–496, 1939. View at Google Scholar
  52. M. Shohat, R. Lachman, and D. L. Rimoin, “Odontoid hypoplasia with vertebral cervical subluxation and ventriculomegaly in metatropic dysplasia,” The Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 239–243, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. R. K. Das, S. Behari, N. Singhal, A. K. Jaiswal, and A. K. Mahapatra, “Aqueductal stenosis and mental retardation associated with OS odontoideum, ‘hypermobile’ atlantoaxial dislocation and congenital stenosis of atlas leading to spastic quadriparesis,” Journal of Pediatric Neurosciences, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 10–15, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. W. J. Taylor, R. D. Hayward, P. Lasjaunias et al., “Enigma of raised intracranial pressure in patients with complex craniosynostosis: the role of abnormal intracranial venous drainage,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 377–385, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. G. Cinalli, C. Sainte-Rose, E. M. Kollar et al., “Hydrocephalus and craniosynostosis,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 209–214, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. P. M. Rich, T. C. S. Cox, and R. D. Hayward, “The jugular foramen in complex and syndromic craniosynostosis and its relationship to raised intracranial pressure,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 45–51, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. D. N. P. Thompson, W. Harkness, B. M. Jones, and R. D. Hayward, “Aetiology of herniation of the hindbrain in craniosynostosis. An investigation incorporating intracranial pressure monitoring and magnetic resonance imaging,” Pediatric Neurosurgery, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 288–295, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. S. W. Herring, “Mechanical influences on suture development and patency,” Frontiers of Oral Biology, vol. 12, pp. 41–56, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. G. F. Tuite, J. Evanson, W. K. Chong et al., “The beaten copper cranium: a correlation between intracranial pressure, cranial radiographs, and computed tomographic scans in children with craniosynostosis,” Neurosurgery, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 691–699, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. G. Tamburrini, M. Caldarelli, L. Massimi, P. Santini, and C. Di Rocco, “Intracranial pressure monitoring in children with single suture and complex craniosynostosis: a review,” Child’s Nervous System, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 913–921, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. D. W. Baker and H. V. Vinters, “Hydrocephalus with cerebral aqueductal dysgenesis and craniofacial anomalies,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 170–173, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. B. H. Grayson, N. Weintraub, F. L. Bookstein, and J. G. McCarthy, “A comparative cephalometric study of the cranial base in craniofacial anomalies: Part I: tensor analysis,” Cleft Palate Journal, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 75–87, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. A. M. Tokumaru, A. J. Barkovich, S. F. Ciricillo, and M. S. B. Edwards, “Skull base and calvarial deformities: association with intracranial changes in craniofacial syndromes,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 619–630, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. G. Tunçbilek, Y. Alanay, H. Uzun, A. Kaykçoğlu, N. A. Akarsu, and K. Benli, “Intracranial and extracranial malformations in patients with craniofacial anomalies,” Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1460–1464, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. A. Odhiambo, E. C. Rotich, M. L. Chindia, F. G. Macigo, M. Ndavi, and F. Were, “Craniofacial anomalies amongst births at two hospitals in Nairobi, Kenya,” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 596–603, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. W. E. Krauss, J. M. Bledsoe, M. J. Clarke, E. W. Nottmeier, and M. A. Pichelmann, “Rheumatoid arthritis of the craniovertebral junction,” Neurosurgery, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. A83–A95, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. T. H. Milhorat, P. A. Bolognese, M. Misao Nishikawa, N. B. McDonnell, and C. A. Francomano, “Syndrome of occipitoatlantoaxial hypermobility, cranial settling, and Chiari malformation Type I in patients with hereditary disorders of connective tissue,” Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 601–609, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. J. A. L. Vanneste, “Three decades of normal pressure hydrocephalus: are we wiser now?” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 1021–1025, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. H. Kitagaki, E. Mori, K. Ishii, S. Yamaji, N. Hirono, and T. Imamura, “CSF spaces in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: morphology and volumetry,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1277–1284, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. G. A. Bateman, “Vascular compliance in normal pressure hydrocephalus,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1574–1585, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. G. D. Silverberg, “Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH): ischaemia, CSF stagnation or both,” Brain, vol. 127, no. 5, pp. 947–948, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. G. A. Bateman, “The role of altered impedance in the pathophysiology of normal pressure hydrocephalus, Alzheimer’s disease and syringomyelia,” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 980–985, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. G. A. Bateman, “The pathophysiology of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: cerebral ischemia or altered venous hemodynamics?” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 198–203, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. B. P. Damasceno, “Normal pressure hydrocephalus: diagnostic and predictive evaluation,” Dementia e Neuropsychologia, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 8–15, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. M. E. Castro, H. D. Portnoy, and J. Maesaka, “Elevated cortical venous pressure in hydrocephalus,” Neurosurgery, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 232–238, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. H. D. Portnoy, C. Branch, and M. E. Castro, “The relationship of intracranial venous pressure to hydrocephalus,” Child’s Nervous System, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 29–35, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. H. Williams, “The venous hypothesis of hydrocephalus,” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 743–747, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. G. A. Bateman, “Hyperemic hydrocephalus: a new form of childhood hydrocephalus analogous to hyperemic intracranial hypertension in adults,” Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 20–26, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. G. A. Bateman and S. H. Siddique, “Cerebrospinal fluid absorption block at the vertex in chronic hydrocephalus: obstructed arachnoid granulations or elevated venous pressure?” Fluids and Barriers of the CNS, vol. 11, no. 1, article 11, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. E. L. Foltz and C. Aine, “Diagnosis of hydrocephalus by CSF pulse-wave analysis: a clinical study,” Surgical Neurology, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 283–293, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. E. L. Foltz, J. P. Blanks, and K. Yonemura, “CSF pulsatility in hydrocephalus: respiratory effect on pulse wave slope as an indicator of intracranial compliance,” Neurological Research, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 67–74, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. D. Greitz, R. Wirestam, A. Franck, B. Nordell, C. Thomsen, and N. Stahlberg, “Pulsatile brain movement and associated hydrodynamics studied by magnetic resonance phase imaging. The Monro-Kellie doctrine revisited,” Neuroradiology, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 370–380, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. M. Bergsneider, A. A. Alwan, L. Falkson, and E. H. Rubinstein, “The relationship of pulsatile cerebrospinal fluid flow to cerebral blood flow and intracranial pressure: a new theoretical model,” Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, vol. 71, pp. 266–268, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  84. J. R. Madsen, M. Egnor, and R. Zou, “Cerebrospinal fluid pulsatility and hydrocephalus: the fourth circulation,” Clinical Neurosurgery, vol. 53, pp. 48–52, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. J. D. Spillane, C. Pallis, and A. M. Jones, “Developmental abnormalities in the region of the foramen magnum,” Brain, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 11–48, 1957. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. J. D. Spillane and L. Rogers, “Lumbosacral spina bifida cystica with craniovertebral anomalies: report of two cases presenting with neurological disorder in adult life,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 44–49, 1959. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. A. H. Menezes, “Specific entities affecting the craniocervical region: osteogenesis imperfecta and related osteochondrodysplasias: medical and surgical management of basilar impression,” Child’s Nervous System, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 1169–1172, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  88. J.-F. Hirsch, A. Pierre-Kahn, D. Renier, C. Sainte-Rose, and E. Hoppe-Hirsch, “The Dandy-Walker malformation. A review of 40 cases,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 515–522, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. J. Cardoso, M. C. Lange, P. J. Lorenzoni, R. H. Scola, and L. C. Werneck, “Dandy-Walker syndrome in adult mimicking myasthenia gravis,” Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 173–175, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. M. Alaywan, N. A. Chahine, P. Hage, and A. K. Nachanakian, “Dandy-Walker malformation: surgical treatment of 17 cases,” Pan Arab Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. M. F. Flanagan, “Alzheimer’s disease: can chiropractic make a difference?” Dynamic Chiropractic, vol. 9, no. 23, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  92. S. Savolainen, L. Paljärvi, M. Vapalahti, and S. E. Borgesen, “Prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease in patients investigated for presumed normal pressure hydrocephalus: a clinical and neuropathological study,” Acta Neurochirurgica, vol. 141, no. 8, pp. 849–853, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. A. Chakravarty, “Unifying concept for Alzheimer’s disease, vascular dementia and normal pressure hydrocephalus—a hypothesis,” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 827–833, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. G. Silverberg, M. Mayo, T. Saul, J. Fellmann, and D. McGuire, “Elevated cerebrospinal fluid pressure in patients with Alzheimer’s disease,” Cerebrospinal Fluid Research, vol. 3, article 7, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. F. Marques, J. C. Sousa, N. Sousa, and J. A. Palha, “Blood-brain-barriers in aging and in Alzheimer’s disease,” Molecular Neurodegeneration, vol. 8, no. 1, article 38, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. D. Cabral, T. G. Beach, L. Vedders et al., “Frequency of Alzheimer’s disease pathology at autopsy in patients with clinical normal pressure hydrocephalus,” Alzheimer’s & Dementia, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 509–513, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. P. Wostyn, D. Van Dam, K. Audenaert, and P. P. De Deyn, “Increased cerebrospinal fluid production as a possible mechanism underlying caffeine’s protective effect against Alzheimer’s disease,” International Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, vol. 2011, Article ID 617420, 6 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. M. F. Flanagan, “Craniocervical syndrome: its potential role in Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and other diseases of the brain: part I: cranial hydrodynamics and the sutures,” Dynamic Chiropractic, vol. 19, no. 23, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  99. I. Akiguchi, M. Ishii, Y. Watanabe et al., “Shunt-responsive parkinsonism and reversible white matter lesions in patients with idiopathic NPH,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 255, no. 9, pp. 1392–1399, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. M. Ishii, T. Kawamata, I. Akiguchi et al., “Parkinsonian symptomatology may correlate with CT findings before and after shunting in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus,” Parkinson’s Disease, vol. 2010, Article ID 201089, 7 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. M. A. Fernández-Seara, E. Mengual, M. Vidorreta et al., “Cortical hypoperfusion in Parkinson’s disease assessed using arterial spin labeled perfusion MRI,” NeuroImage, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 2743–2750, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. M. F. Flanagan, “The craniocervical spine and multiple sclerosis, part 1 of 2,” Dynamic Chiropractic, vol. 21, no. 5–9, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  103. R. H. B. Benedict, J. M. Bruce, M. G. Dwyer et al., “Neocortical atrophy, third ventricular width, and cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 1301–1306, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. J. Martola, L. Stawiarz, S. Fredrikson et al., “Rate of ventricular enlargement in multiple sclerosis: a nine-year magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study,” Acta Radiologica, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 570–579, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. O. Algin, O. Taskapilioglu, B. Hakyemez, and M. Parlak, “Unusual patient with multiple sclerosis and shunt-responsive normal-pressure hydrocephalus,” Clinical Neuroradiology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 101–104, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. B. Juurlink, “Is normal pressure hydrocephalus a component of multiple sclerosis pathology?” Mutiple Sclerosis Discovery Forum—Discussions, October 2013.
  107. M. Müller, R. Esser, K. Kötter, J. Voss, A. Müller, and P. Stellmes, “Third ventricular enlargement in early stages of multiple sclerosis is a predictor of motor and neuropsychological deficits: a cross-sectional study,” BMJ Open, vol. 3, no. 9, Article ID e003582, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. S. Mandolesi, F. Mora, A. d’Alessandro et al., “Increased size of third ventricle in patients with multiple sclerosis and chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency,” Journal of Vascular Diagnostics, vol. 2, pp. 91–97, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  109. A. M. Thomsen, S. E. Børgesen, P. Bruhn, and F. Gjerris, “Prognosis of dementia in normal-pressure hydrocephalus after a shunt operation,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 304–310, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. D. W. J. Dippel and J. D. F. Habbema, “Probabilistic diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus and other treatable cerebral lesions in dementia,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 119, no. 2, pp. 123–133, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. M. Bergsneider, W. J. Peacock, J. C. Mazziotta, and D. P. Becher, “Beneficial effect of siphoning in treatment of adult hydrocephalus,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 1224–1229, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. A. Duinkerke, M. A. Williams, D. Rigamonti, and A. E. Hillis, “Cognitive recovery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus after shunt,” Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 179–184, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. P. Chaudhry, S. Kharkar, J. Heidler-Gary et al., “Characteristics and reversibility of dementia in normal pressure hydrocephalus,” Behavioural Neurology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 149–158, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. J. E. Riggs, “Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, heterogeneous susceptibility, trauma, and epidemiology,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 225–227, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. G. Fiskum, A. N. Murphy, and M. F. Beal, “Mitochondria in neurodegeneration: acute ischemia and chronic neurodegenerative diseases,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 351–369, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. O. Piazza, A.-L. Sirén, and H. Ehrenreich, “Soccer, neurotrauma and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: is there a connection?” Current Medical Research and Opinion, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 505–508, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. H. Chen, M. Richard, D. P. Sandler, D. M. Umbach, and F. Kamel, “Head injury and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 166, no. 7, pp. 810–816, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. A. Chiò, A. Calvo, M. Dossena, P. Ghiglione, R. Mutani, and G. Mora, “ALS in Italian professional soccer players: the risk is still present and could be soccer-specific,” Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 205–209, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. H. Rafael, “Sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. A clinical analysis,” Revista del Hospital Juárez de México, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 224–227, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  120. E. G. Valdésa and S. Garbuzova-Davisb, “Brain and spinal cord trauma as a risk factor for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a mini-review,” Open Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 3, pp. 3–4, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  121. H. Rafael, “Omental transplantation for neurodegenerative diseases,” American Journal of Neurodegenerative Diseases, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 50–63, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  122. N. T. Mathew, K. Ravishankar, and L. C. Sanin, “Coexistence of migraine and idiopathic intracranial hypertension without papilledema,” Neurology, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1226–1230, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  123. A. L. Huff, S. L. Hupp, and J. F. Rothrock, “Chronic daily headache with migrainous features due to papilledema-negative idiopathic intracranial hypertension,” Cephalalgia, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 451–452, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. M. T. Torbey, R. G. Geocadin, A. Y. Razumovsky, D. Rigamonti, and M. A. Williams, “Utility of CSF pressure monitoring to identify idiopathic intracranial hypertension without papilledema in patients with chronic daily headache,” Cephalalgia, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 495–502, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. D. S. S. Vieira, M. R. Masruha, A. L. Gonçalves et al., “Idiopathic intracranial hypertension with and without papilloedema in a consecutive series of patients with chronic migraine,” Cephalalgia, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 609–613, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  126. F. Bono, D. Salvino, T. Tallarico et al., “Abnormal pressure waves in headache sufferers with bilateral transverse sinus stenosis,” Cephalalgia, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 1419–1425, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  127. I. K. Koerte, C. J. Schankin, S. Immler et al., “Altered cerebrovenous drainage in patients with migraine as assessed by phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 434–440, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  128. M. F. Flanagan, “Migraines, strokes and chiropractic,” Dynamic Chiropractic, vol. 20, no. 21, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  129. M. C. Kruit, M. A. van Buchem, P. A. M. Hofman et al., “Migraine as a risk factor for subclinical brain lesions,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 291, no. 4, pp. 427–434, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  130. M. C. Kruit, L. J. Launer, M. D. Ferrari, and M. A. van Buchem, “Infarcts in the posterior circulation territory in migraine. The population-based MRI CAMERA study,” Brain, vol. 128, no. 9, pp. 2068–2077, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  131. J. Klepper, M. Büsse, H. M. Strassburg, and N. Sörensen, “Epilepsy in shunt-treated hydrocephalus,” Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 731–736, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  132. D. Agrawal and F. A. Durity, “Seizure as a manifestation of intracranial hypotension in a shunted patient,” Pediatric Neurosurgery, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 165–167, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  133. S. M. Lew, A. E. Matthews, A. L. Hartman, and N. Haranhalli, “Post-hemispherectomy hydrocephalus: results of a comprehensive, multi-institutional review,” Epilepsia, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 383–389, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  134. S. M. Lew, A. E. Matthews, A. L. Hartman, and N. Haranhalli, “Posthemispherectomy hydrocephalus: results of a comprehensive, multiinstitutional review,” Epilepsia, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 383–389, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  135. U. Lying-Tunell, “Psychotic symptoms in normal-pressure hydrocephalus,” Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 415–419, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  136. G. Lindqvist, H. Andersson, M. Bilting, C. Blomstrand, H. Malmgren, and C. Wikkelso, “Normal pressure hydrocephalus: psychiatric findings before and after shunt operation classified in a new diagnostic system for organic psychiatry,” Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Supplement, vol. 88, no. 373, pp. 18–32, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  137. S. Chatziioannidis, I. Charatsidou, N. Nikolaidis, G. Garyfallos, and I. Giouzepas, “Psychotic symptoms in normal pressure hydrocephalus,” Psychiatriki, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 217–224, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  138. M. F. Oliveira, J. R. M. Oliveira, J. M. Rotta, and F. C. G. Pinto, “Psychiatric symptoms are present in most of the patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus,” Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 435–438, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  139. A. M. Reveley and M. A. Reveley, “Aqueduct stenosis and schizophrenia,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 18–22, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  140. M. A. Reveley, “Ventricular enlargement in schizophrenia. The validity of computerised tomographic findings,” British Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 147, pp. 233–240, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  141. S. Raz, N. Raz, D. R. Weinberger et al., “Morphological brain abnormalities in schizophrenia determined by computed tomography: a problem of measurement?” Psychiatry Research, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 91–98, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  142. C. P. Maurizi, “The pathophysiology of enlarged ventricles in normal pressure communicating hydrocephalus and schizophrenia: a possible therapeutic role for melatonin,” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 61–66, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  143. A. Rossi, P. Stratta, L. D’Albenzio et al., “Quantitative computed tomographic study in schizophrenia: cerebral density and ventricle measures,” Psychological Medicine, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 337–342, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  144. A. Vita, M. Dieci, G. M. Giobbio, F. Tenconi, and G. Invernizzi, “Time course of cerebral ventricular enlargement in schizophrenia supports the hypothesis of its neurodevelopmental nature,” Schizophrenia Research, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  145. A. Agrawal, A. M. Tiwari, P. Tiple, M. K. Chauhan, and M. Nagarale, “Normal pressure hydrocephalus in a case of schizophrenia,” Indian Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 385–386, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  146. H. Rosen and M. E. Swigar, “Depression and normal pressure hydrocephalus. A dilemma in neuropsychiatric differential diagnosis,” The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, vol. 163, no. 1, pp. 35–40, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  147. V. K. Chopra, V. K. Sinha, and S. Das, “Normal pressure hydrocephalus presenting as psychotic depression: moderately successful treatment with a course of ECT & pharmacotherapy: a case report,” The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, vol. 163, no. 1, pp. 35–40, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  148. J. Savitz and W. C. Drevets, “Bipolar and major depressive disorder: neuroimaging the developmental-degenerative divide,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 699–771, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  149. J. A. Kwentus and R. P. Hart, “Normal pressure hydrocephalus presenting as mania,” Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, vol. 175, no. 8, pp. 500–502, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  150. T. Reisch, C. Brekenfeld, and A. Barth, “A case of hydrocephalus occlusus presenting as bipolar disorder,” Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 159–163, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  151. C.-Y. Lee and Y.-H. Chou, “Aripiprazole in treating a manic episode associated with hydrocephalus: a case report,” The Primary Care Companion for CNS Disorders, vol. 13, no. 1, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  152. M. Rojas-Estape, N. Berenger-Elias, and C. Iglesias-Rodriguez, “P-165—a case of hydrocephalus occlusus presenting as a manic episode,” European Psychiatry, vol. 27, supplement 1, p. 1, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  153. W. S. Blakemore, W. H. Hardesty, J. E. Bevilacqua, and T. A. Tristan, “Reversal of blood flow in the right vertebral artery accompanying occlusion of the innominate artery,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 161, no. 3, pp. 353–356, 1965. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  154. R. S. Lord, R. Adar, and R. L. Stein, “Contribution of the circle of Willis to the subclavian steal syndrome,” Circulation, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 871–878, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  155. J. Klingelhofer, B. Conrad, R. Benecke, and B. Frank, “Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography of carotid-basilar collateral circulation in subclavian steal,” Stroke, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1036–1042, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  156. C. F. Lum, P. F. Ilsen, and B. Kawasaki, “Subclavian steal phenomenon. Clinical and hemodynamic aspects,” Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 241–244, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  157. L. Thomassen and J. A. Aarli, “Subclavian steal syndrome,” Optometry, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 147–160, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  158. V. K. Sharma, B. Chuah, H. L. Teoh, B. P. L. Chan, A. K. Sinha, and P. A. Robless, “Chronic brainstem ischemia in subclavian steal syndrome,” Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1339–1341, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  159. M. J. Garcia-Antelo, A. Puy-Nuñez, O. Ayo-Martin, and T. Segura, “Relevance of basilar artery study in patients with subclavian steal phenomenon,” Open Neurology Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 34–36, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  160. S. Osiro, A. Zurada, J. Gielecki, M. M. Shoja, R. S. Tubbs, and M. Loukas, “A review of subclavian steal syndrome with clinical correlation,” Medical Science Monitor, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. RA57–RA63, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  161. F. Alcocer, M. David, R. Goodman, S. K. A. Jain, and S. David, “A forgotten vascular disease with important clinical implications. Subclavian steal syndrome,” American Journal of Case Reports, vol. 14, pp. 58–62, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  162. J. Flammer, M. Pache, and T. Resink, “Vasospasm, its role in the pathogenesis of diseases with particular reference to the eye,” Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 319–349, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  163. M. Bacigalupi, “Amaurosis fugax: a clinical review,” The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, vol. 4, no. 2, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  164. A. M. Awad, B. Estephan, W. Warnack, and O. Stüve, “Optic neuritis presenting with amaurosis fugax,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 256, no. 12, pp. 2100–2103, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  165. B. M. Grosberg, S. Solomon, and R. B. Lipton, “Retinal migraine,” Current Pain and Headache Reports, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 268–271, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  166. E. Doyle, B. J. Vote, and A. G. Cosswell, “Retinal migraine: caught in the act,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 301–302, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  167. L. S. Bowerman, “Transient visual field loss secondary to migraine,” Journal of the American Optometric Association, vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 912–917, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  168. A. Harris, B. Siesky, D. Zarfati et al., “Relationship of cerebral blood flow and central visual function in primary open-angle glaucoma,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 159–163, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  169. J. Flammer, K. Konieczka, and A. J. Flammer, “The role of ocular blood flow in the pathogenesis of glaucomatous damage,” US Ophthalmic Review, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 84–87, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  170. B. C. Chauhan, “The role of ocular blood flow abnormalities in the pathogenesis of glaucoma,” in Ocular Blood Flow, pp. 411–428, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  171. A. Harris, E. Rechtman, B. Siesky, C. Jonescu-Cuypers, L. McCranor, and H. J. Garzozi, “The role of optic nerve blood flow in the pathogenesis of glaucoma,” Ophthalmology Clinics of North America, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 345–353, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  172. M. C. Kruit, M. A. van Buchem, P. A. M. Hofman et al., “Migraine as a risk factor for subclinical brain lesions,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 291, no. 4, pp. 427–434, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  173. A. Pezzini, E. Del Zotto, A. Giossi et al., “The migraine-ischemic stroke relation in young adults,” Stroke Research and Treatment, vol. 2011, Article ID 304921, 7 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  174. Y. Kwong, N. Rao, and K. Latief, “Craniometric measurements in the assessment of craniovertebral settling: are they still relevant in the age of cross-sectional imaging?” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 196, no. 4, pp. W421–W425, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  175. K. I. Arnautović, O. Al-Mefty, T. G. Pait, A. F. Krisht, and M. M. Husain, “The suboccipital cavernous sinus,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 252–262, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  176. O. B. Paulson, S. Strandgaard, and L. Edvinsson, “Cerebral autoregulation,” Cerebrovascular and Brain Metabolism Reviews, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 161–192, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  177. O. B. Paulson, G. Waldemar, J. F. Schmidt, and S. Strandgaard, “Cerebral circulation under normal and pathologic conditions,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. C2–C5, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  178. M. F. Flanagan, “Relationship of hyperventilation to brain circulation in exercise physiology,” Chiropractic Sports Medicine, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 115–119, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  179. M. F. Flanagan, “Importance of neurovascular tunnels in brain cooling mechanisms and high endurance exercise,” Chiropractic Sports Medicine, vol. 2, no. 1, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  180. D. Falk, “Brain evolution in homo: the “radiator” theory,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 333–381, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  181. A. E. Bennett, “Cerebellar herniation into foramen magnum,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 100, no. 24, pp. 1922–1925, 1933. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  182. F. Simonetti, P. Pergami, M. Ceroni, A. H. Ropper, and R. Viviani, “About the original description of cerebellar tonsil herniation by Pierre Marie,” Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 63, no. 3, article 412, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  183. C. M. Fisher, “Brain herniations: a revision of classical concepts,” Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 83–91, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  184. K. N. Ramesha, K. Chandrashekaran, and S. V. Thomas, “Cerebrospinal fluid hypovolemia syndrome with benign course,” Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 293–296, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  185. B. Mokri, “Spontaneous low pressure, low CSF volume headaches: spontaneous CSF leaks,” Headache, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 1034–1053, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  186. T. Greitz, “Effect of brain distension on cerebral circulation,” The Lancet, vol. 1, no. 7600, pp. 863–865, 1969. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  187. H. L. Rekate, “Brain turgor (Kb): intrinsic property of the brain to resist distortion,” Pediatric Neurosurgery, vol. 18, no. 5-6, pp. 257–262, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  188. P. D. Brown, S. L. Davies, T. Speake, and I. D. Millar, “Molecular mechanisms of cerebrospinal fluid production,” Neuroscience, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 957–970, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  189. M. Chan and S. Amin-Hanjani, “Cerebrospinal fluid and its abnormalities,” in Encyclopedia of Life Sciences (ELS), John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  190. H. E. Killer, H. R. Laeng, J. Flammer, and P. Groscurth, “Architecture of arachnoid trabeculae, pillars, and septa in the subarachnoid space of the human optic nerve: anatomy and clinical considerations,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 777–781, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  191. B. A. Walter, V. A. Valera, S. Takahashi, and T. Ushiki, “The olfactory route for cerebrospinal fluid drainage into the peripheral lymphatic system,” Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 388–396, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  192. E. T. Zhang, H. K. Richards, S. Kida, and R. O. Weller, “Directional and compartmentalised drainage of interstitial fluid and cerebrospinal fluid from the rat brain,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 233–239, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  193. R. O. Weller, S. Kida, and E.-T. Zhang, “Pathways of fluid drainage from the brain—morphological aspects and immunological significance in rat and man,” Brain Pathology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 277–284, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  194. H. F. Cserr, C. J. Harling-Berg, and P. M. Knopf, “Drainage of brain extracellular fluid into blood and deep cervical lymph and its immunological significance,” Brain Pathology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 269–276, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  195. M. Johnston, A. Zakharov, C. Papaiconomou, G. Salmasi, and D. Armstrong, “Evidence of connections between cerebrospinal fluid and nasal lymphatic vessels in humans, non-human primates and other mammalian species,” Cerebrospinal Fluid Research, vol. 1, article 2, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  196. S. Kida, A. Pantazis, and R. O. Weller, “CSF drains directly from the subarachnoid space into nasal lymphatics in the rat. Anatomy, histology and immunological significance,” Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 480–488, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  197. R. O. Weller, E. Djuanda, H.-Y. Yow, and R. O. Carare, “Lymphatic drainage of the brain and the pathophysiology of neurological disease,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  198. D. M. Grzybowski, D. W. Holman, S. E. Katz, and M. Lubow, “In vitro model of cerebrospinal fluid outflow through human arachnoid granulations,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 3664–3672, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  199. M. Pollay, “The function and structure of the cerebrospinal fluid outflow system,” Cerebrospinal Fluid Research, vol. 7, article 9, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  200. J. Buishas, I. G. Gould, and A. A. Linninger, “A computational model of cerebrospinal fluid production and reabsorption driven by Starling forces,” Croatian Medical Journal, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 481–497, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  201. D. Orešković and M. Klarica, “Development of hydrocephalus and classical hypothesis of cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics: facts and illusions,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 238–258, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  202. M. Klarica, M. Radoš, G. Erceg, A. Petošić, I. Jurjević, and D. Orešković, “The influence of body position on cerebrospinal fluid pressure gradient and movement in cats with normal and impaired craniospinal communication,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 4, Article ID e95229, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  203. D. Orekovi and M. Klarica, “A new look at cerebrospinal fluid movement,” Fluids and Barriers of the CNS, vol. 11, article 16, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  204. T. Brinker, E. Stopa, J. Morrison, and P. Klinge, “A new look at cerebrospinal fluid circulation,” Fluids and Barriers of the CNS, vol. 11, no. 1, article 10, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  205. M. D. Freeman, S. Rosa, D. Harshfield et al., “A case-control study of cerebellar tonsillar ectopia (Chiari) and head/neck trauma (whiplash),” Brain Injury, vol. 24, no. 7-8, pp. 988–994, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  206. R. V. Damadian and D. Chu, “The possible role of cranio-cervical trauma and abnormal CSF hydrodynamics in the genesis of multiple sclerosis,” Physiological Chemistry and Physics and Medical NMR, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  207. D. L. Brockmeyer, “The complex Chiari: issues and management strategies,” Neurological Sciences, vol. 32, supplement 3, pp. S345–S347, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  208. H. L. Rekate, “The definition and classification of hydrocephalus: a personal recommendation to stimulate debate,” Cerebrospinal Fluid Research, vol. 5, article 2, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  209. H. L. Rekate, “What causes normal pressure hydrocephalus?” Barrow Quarterly, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 1–7, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  210. A. J. Raimondi, “A unifying theory for the definition and classification of hydrocephalus,” Child’s Nervous System, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 2–12, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  211. I. Akiguchi, Y. Shirkashi, H. Budka et al., “Disproportionate subarachnoid space hydrocephalus—outcome and perivascular space,” Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 562–569, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  212. D. Greitz, “Paradigm shift in hydrocephalus research in legacy of Dandy’s pioneering work: rationale for third ventriculostomy in communicating hydrocephalus,” Child’s Nervous System, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 487–489, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  213. R. Q. Sibayan, P. C. Begeman, A. I. King, E. S. Gurdjian, and L. M. Thomas, “Experimental hydrocephalus. Ventricular cerebrospinal fluid pressure and waveform studies,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 165–172, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  214. E. A. Bering Jr., “Circulation of the cerebrospinal fluid. Demonstration of the choroid plexuses as the generator of the force for flow of fluid and ventricular enlargement,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 19, pp. 405–413, 1962. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  215. M. E. Castro, H. D. Portnoy, J. Maesaka, M. Pollay, and F. Sklar, “Elevated cortical venous pressure in hydrocephalus,” Neurosurgery, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 232–238, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  216. H. D. Portnoy, C. Branch, and M. E. Castro, “The relationship of intracranial venous pressure to hydrocephalus,” Child’s Nervous System, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 29–35, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  217. G. A. Bateman and S. H. Siddique, “Cerebrospinal fluid absorption block at the vertex in chronic hydrocephalus: obstructed arachnoid granulations or elevated venous pressure?” Fluids and Barriers of the CNS, vol. 11, article 11, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  218. S. Hakim and R. D. Adams, “The special clinical problem of symptomatic hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Observations on cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 307–327, 1965. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  219. J. Andeweg, “Consequences of the anatomy of deep venous outflow from the brain,” Neuroradiology, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 233–241, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  220. J. Andeweg, “Intracranial venous pressures, hydrocephalus and effects of cerebrospinal fluid shunts,” Child’s Nervous System, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 318–323, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  221. S. El Sankari, C. Gondry-Jouet, A. Fichten et al., “Cerebrospinal fluid and blood flow in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: a differential diagnosis from idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus,” Fluids and Barriers of the CNS, vol. 8, no. 1, article 12, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  222. P. Zamboni, R. Galeotti, E. Menegatti et al., “Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in patients with multiple sclerosis,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 392–399, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  223. B. Williams, “Is aqueduct stenosis a result of hydrocephalus?” Brain, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 399–412, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  224. J. Vanneste and R. Hyman, “Non-tumoural aqueduct stenosis and normal pressure hydrocephalus in the elderly,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 529–535, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  225. B. Williams, “Simultaneous cerebral and spinal fluid pressure recordings. 2. Cerebrospinal dissociation with lesions at the foramen magnum,” Acta Neurochirurgica, vol. 59, no. 1-2, pp. 123–142, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  226. H. Williams, “A unifying hypothesis for hydrocephalus, Chiari malformation, syringomyelia, anencephaly and spina bifida,” Cerebrospinal Fluid Research, vol. 5, article 7, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  227. A. Erbetta, S. Bulgheroni, V. Contarino et al., “Neuroimaging findings in 41 low-functioning children with autism spectrum disorder: a single-center experience,” Journal of Child Neurology, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 1626–1631, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  228. H. K. Shahinian, R. Jaekle, R. H. Suh, R. Jarrahy, V. C. Aguilar, and M. Soojian, “Obstetrical factors governing the etiopathogenesis of lambdoid synostosis,” American Journal of Perinatology, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 281–286, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  229. W. G. Bradley, “Normal pressure hydrocephalus: new concepts on etiology and diagnosis,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1586–1590, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  230. W. G. Bradley Jr., A. R. Whittemore, A. S. Watanabe, S. J. Davis, L. M. Teresi, and M. Homyak, “Association of deep white matter infarction with chronic communicating hydrocephalus: implications regarding the possible origin of normal-pressure hydrocephalus,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 31–39, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  231. G. A. Bateman, “Pulse wave encephalopathy: a spectrum hypothesis incorporating Alzheimer’s disease, vascular dementia and normal pressure hydrocephalus,” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 182–187, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  232. M. C. Henry Feugeas, G. De Marco, I. I. Peretti, S. Godon-Hardy, D. Fredy, and E. S. Claeys, “Age-related cerebral white matter changes and pulse-wave encephalopathy: observations with three-dimensional MRI,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 929–937, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  233. G. A. Bateman, C. R. Levi, P. Schofield, Y. Wang, and E. C. Lovett, “The venous manifestations of pulse wave encephalopathy: windkessel dysfunction in normal aging and senile dementia,” Neuroradiology, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 491–497, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  234. M. F. Flanagan, “The potential effects of mechanical faults of the spine on cerebrospinal and interstitial fluid flow in the brain,” Dynamic Chiropractic, vol. 12, no. 8, article 19, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  235. R. D. Bell and B. V. Zlokovic, “Neurovascular mechanisms and blood-brain barrier disorder in Alzheimer’s disease,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 103–113, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  236. J. J. Iliff, M. Wang, Y. Liao et al., “A paravascular pathway facilitates CSF flow through the brain parenchyma and the clearance of interstitial solutes, including amyloid β,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 4, no. 147, Article ID 147ra111, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  237. J. J. Iliff, H. Lee, M. Yu et al., “Brain-wide pathway for waste clearance captured by contrast-enhanced MRI,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 1299–1309, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  238. J.-M. Serot, J. Peltier, A. Fichten et al., “Reduced CSF turnover and decreased ventricular Aβ42 levels are related,” BMC Neuroscience, vol. 12, article no. 42, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  239. C. E. Johanson, J. A. Duncan III, P. M. Klinge, T. Brinker, E. G. Stopa, and G. D. Silverberg, “Multiplicity of cerebrospinal fluid functions: new challenges in health and disease,” Cerebrospinal Fluid Research, vol. 5, article 10, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  240. W. J. Gardner and J. Angel, “The cause of syringomyelia and its surgical treatment,” Cleveland Clinic Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 4–8, 1958. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  241. W. J. Gardner, “Hydrodynamic mechanism of syringomyelia: its relationship to myelocele,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, vol. 28, pp. 247–259, 1965. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  242. E. H. Oldfield, K. Muraszko, T. H. Shawker, and N. J. Patronas, “Pathophysiology of syringomyelia associated with Chiari I malformation of the cerebellar tonsils. Implications for diagnosis and treatment,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 3–15, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  243. E. H. Oldfield, “Syringomyelia,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 153–155, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  244. B. Williams, “Cerebrospinal fluid pressure gradients in spina bifida cystica, with special reference to the Arnold Chiari malformation and aqueductal stenosis,” Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, vol. 17, no. 35, pp. 138–150, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  245. G. Pinna, F. Alessandrini, A. Alfieri, M. Rossi, and A. Bricolo, “Cerebrospinal fluid flow dynamics study in Chiari I malformation: implications for syrinx formation,” Neurosurgical Focus, vol. 8, no. 3, article E3, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  246. J. M. Eule, M. A. Erickson, M. F. O’Brien, and M. Handler, “Chiari I malformation associated with syringomyelia and scoliosis: a twenty-year review of surgical and nonsurgical treatment in a pediatric population,” Spine, vol. 27, no. 13, pp. 1451–1455, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  247. T. H. Milhorat, P. A. Bolognese, M. Nishikawa et al., “Association of Chiari malformation type I and tethered cord syndrome: preliminary results of sectioning filum terminale,” Surgical Neurology, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 20–35, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  248. L. G. Valentini, G. Selvaggio, S. Visintini, A. Erbetta, V. Scaioli, and C. L. Solero, “Tethered cord: natural history, surgical outcome and risk for Chiari malformation 1 (CM1)—a review of 110 detethering,” Neurological Sciences, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. S353–S356, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  249. S. Hakim, J. G. Venegas, and J. D. Burton, “The physics of the cranial cavity, hydrocephalus and normal pressure hydrocephalus: mechanical interpretation and mathematical model,” Surgical Neurology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 187–210, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  250. C. Di Rocco, G. Di Trapani, V. E. Pettorossi, and M. Caldarelli, “On the pathology of experimental hydrocephalus induced by artificial increase in endoventricular CSF pulse pressure,” Child’s Brain, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 81–95, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  251. J. D. Heiss, N. Patronas, H. L. DeVroom et al., “Elucidating the pathophysiology of syringomyelia,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 553–562, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  252. J. Y. Lee, Y. D. Cho, B. J. Kwon, and M. H. Han, “Dural arteriovenous fistula at the foramen magnum with holocord myelopathy: case report,” Neurointervention, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 53–57, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  253. Y. Samanci and S. E. Celik, “Syringomyelia associated with cervical spondylosis: a case report,” Romanian Neurosurgery, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 220–223, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  254. C. H. Kim, C.-K. Chung, B. J. Kwon, and H. J. Kim, “Holocord myelopathy with thoracic stenosis: case report and hypothesis,” Spinal Cord, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 696–699, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  255. S. Thakar, N. A. S. Kiran, and A. S. Hegde, “A sacral arachnoid cyst causing holocord syringomyelia—case report,” Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 299–302, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  256. A. Maheshwari, D. Yadav, S. Aneja, S. Kaur, B. Patra, and A. Seth, “Holocord syrinx, tethered cord and diastematomyelia: case report and review of literature,” Journal of Nepal Paediatric Society, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 169–171, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  257. H. S. Chang and H. Nakagawa, “Hypothesis on the pathophysiology of syringomyelia based on simulation of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics,” Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 344–347, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus