Neurology Research International

Neurology Research International / 2016 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 9468193 |

Raghavendra Sanivarapu, Vijayalakshmi Vallabhaneni, Vivek Verma, "The Potential of Curcumin in Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury", Neurology Research International, vol. 2016, Article ID 9468193, 11 pages, 2016.

The Potential of Curcumin in Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury

Academic Editor: Mohammed Rachidi
Received22 Feb 2016
Revised10 Apr 2016
Accepted04 May 2016
Published19 May 2016


Current treatment for spinal cord injury (SCI) is supportive at best; despite great efforts, the lack of better treatment solutions looms large on neurological science and medicine. Curcumin, the active ingredient in turmeric, a spice known for its medicinal and anti-inflammatory properties, has been validated to harbor immense effects for a multitude of inflammatory-based diseases. However, to date there has not been a review on curcumin’s effects on SCI. Herein, we systematically review all known data on this topic and juxtapose results of curcumin with standard therapies such as corticosteroids. Because all studies that compare the two show superior results for curcumin over corticosteroids, it could be true that curcumin better acts at the inflammatory source of SCI-mediated neurological injury, although this question remains unanswered in patients. Because curcumin has shown improvements from current standards of care in other diseases with few true treatment options (e.g., osteoarthritis), there is immense potential for this compound in treating SCI. We critically and systematically summarize available data, discuss clinical implications, and propose further testing of this well-tolerated compound in both the preclinical and the clinical realms. Analyzing preclinical data from a clinical perspective, we hope to create awareness of the incredible potential that curcumin shows for SCI in a patient population that direly needs improvements on current therapy.

1. Introduction

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a form of neurological trauma that can be devastating for patients, in part owing to the high rates of disability and resulting medical costs. The most common etiologies of SCI involve trauma; hence, in addition to the 12,400 that are affected yearly in the United States, many more are affected in developing countries as well [1, 2].

Clinical presentation of SCI manifests with a wide variety of neurological deficits, depending on the type and location of injury to the spinal cord (SC). Whereas anteriorly located injuries (anterior cord syndrome) more commonly result in motor deficits, posterior SCI (posterior cord syndrome) results in greater sensory deficits. A third pathology, named central cord syndrome, results in greater motor weakness in upper extremities than in lower extremities, due to anatomic localization of cervical and thoracic tracts closer to the center of the spinal cord.

These clinical symptoms are often the result of profound cellular and molecular alterations in the injured microenvironment. Acute inflammation as well as more delayed glial fibrosis predominates in the injured area, and these factors have made regeneration and therapy after SCI infamously difficult [35]. Two phases of SCI exist; primary injury starts after physical impact causing damage to some axons, and the cascade of inflammatory events that follows causes the loss of large numbers of axons resulting in sensorimotor losses, termed secondary injury [6]. Primary physical injury to the SC disrupts cell membranes, destroys myelin and axons, and damages vessels, which in turn triggers inflammatory events and secondary injury. In secondary injury, neutrophils appear at the site of injury within 4 to 6 hours and secrete oxidative and proteolytic enzymes, causing tissue damage [7]. Microglial cells, derived from tissue monocytes, differentiate into macrophages and migrate to the site of injury within 2 days and peak by 5 to 7 days. They further release proinflammatory molecules as well as tissue-damaging reactive oxygen species [8]. These events cause astrocytes to activate and proliferate with overexpression of the glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP), which contributes to subsequent glial scar formation which is another major deterrent to neuroregeneration.

Current clinical management of SCI is largely supportive. The immediate posttraumatic period can be fraught with cardiovascular and respiratory dysregulation [9, 10]. However, aside from clinical trials showing benefit to corticosteroids as an acute intervention [1114], and spine surgery if warranted, active interventions are indeed quite few as compared to passive supportive interventions.

Therefore, there is a clear necessity not only for other therapeutic interventions for SCI but also for other modalities of intervention altogether. Natural forms of therapy with minimal to no side effects, as either primary or adjunctive medication for this devastating condition, would be a welcome addition in the clinical arsenal if proven efficacious in preclinical testing. The yellow extract from a rhizome is named Curcuma longa; the compound curcumin is a polyphenol substance that has been widely used for medicinal purposes, religious rituals, and local cuisines in the Indian subcontinent. Curcumin has a multitude of effects in the cardiovascular [15], gastrointestinal [16], renal [17], endocrine [18], musculoskeletal [19], and neurologic [20] systems. A central element to curcumin’s action on these multiple organ systems is potent inhibition of acute and chronic inflammation [21]. Indeed, the pathogenesis of many chronic diseases is rooted in inflammation. Because inflammation is central to the natural history of SCI, there is deservedly great interest in the potential of curcumin to alleviate the detrimental effects of inflammation and subsequent neurological damage in SCI. Though there are currently no clinical studies, it is a certain hope that the positive results brought forth by this compound in laboratory and translational testing could be eventually used in patients, either on or off a clinical protocol. Because there is currently no summative review in existence that evaluates all available data of curcumin for SCI, we provide the first known systematic review to date in efforts to determine curcumin’s role in future clinical testing.

2. Materials and Methods

Eligibility criteria for this systematic review included published work in English evaluating the efficacy of curcumin (turmeric) after spinal cord injury. Sources of information included PubMed, EMBASE, those found in references from the major articles identified, and articles known to the authors. Searches were conducted to identify all articles addressing curcumin for spinal cord injury with the following headings: curcumin, turmeric, diferuloylmethane, spinal cord, and spinal cord injury. Search terms were not restricted in time; all searches were completed by August 1, 2015. Based on initial searches, 102 articles/abstracts were identified. Care was taken to ensure that inclusion criteria were sufficiently broad such that possibly pertinent publications were excluded by individual screening rather than the initial database search. After duplicates were removed, each of the 97 remaining eligible items was independently screened for the criteria described above, and 77 were further excluded. Specifically, articles without specific assessments/reflections on the efficacy of curcumin intervention on SCI, thus being outside the scope of this review, were excluded. Additionally, editorials/commentaries were excluded. Thus, twenty original investigations were found to have sufficient focus and relevance to be incorporated (Figure 1).

3. Mobilization of Stem Cells

The spinal cord was not thought to harbor endogenous stem cells until relatively recently [22]. After SCI, it is hence important from a therapeutic perspective to mobilize these stem cells. To this extent, curcumin has previously been found to induce neural stem cell proliferation using stem cells in the brain [23]. However, a group has recently discovered that curcumin stimulates proliferation of neural progenitor cells specifically of the spinal cord [24]. In this work, an extract of spinal cord cells was obtained from experimental rats and was cultured to form neurospheres. The dissociated neuroprogenitor cells were cultured in medium containing different concentrations of curcumin and blank medium as the control. The cell proliferation was quantified at different time periods, and after 48 hours there was enhanced cell proliferation in the low-dose curcumin group as compared to control group. Interestingly, cultures with high-dose curcumin showed decreased proliferation, indicating a dose-dependent action of curcumin in cell proliferation. The authors endorsed that a possible mechanism involves the mitogen activated protein kinase pathway.

Table 1 summarizes these studies. Implications of these findings, if corroborated, are several. First, if curcumin can be utilized to induce neural stem cell proliferation of the SC in vivo, there may be less of a necessity to externally implant stem cells in SCI models, which though efficacious, would need greater levels and time of clinical testing. Second, the endogenous progenitors that do proliferate in the SC after SCI [25] may be augmented by curcumin, which would be an important finding for future research to document. Lastly, it will also be essential to assess whether curcumin causes differential proliferation in neural progenitors as opposed to largely unwanted glial cells, which are known to cause barriers in post-SCI recovery [35].

ReferenceCell typeAnimal typeStudy designCurcumin administrationOutcomes/results

Hucklenbroich et al. [23]Fetal rat neural stem cellsWistar ratsIn vitro (in cell cultures) & in vivo (six control, three treated) examination of proliferation (BrdU immunofluorescence)In culture medium at various concentrations (1–25 μM); intracerebroventricular injection in ratsCurcumin with increased proliferation in vitro at lower doses (1–6 μM), decrease at higher dose levels (12–25 μM)
In vivo, curcumin induced increased proliferation, with majority of subsequent differentiation into neurons/neuroblasts

Son et al. [24]Neural progenitor cells from Sprague-Dawley rat spinal cordsExamine cellular proliferation (MTS assay) between control (no curcumin) and curcumin at 6 different dose levelsIn culture medium at 0.1, 0.5, 1, 10, 20, and 50 μMLower doses (0.1, 0.5, and 1 μM) increase proliferation; higher doses (10, 20, and 50 μM) decrease proliferation; potential mechanism via mitogen-associated protein kinase pathway

4. Antioxidant Effects

SCI has been well-associated with increased free radical production, likely as a result of inflammation [7, 8]. Free radicals have unpaired electrons in their valence orbit and thus look to react with nearby tissue, which causes cytoarchitectural damage. Curcumin has been shown in multiple studies to offer antioxidant properties (Table 2). In one report [26], SCI rats were subjected to decompressive laminectomy alone, surgery and curcumin, or surgery with methylprednisolone (a corticosteroid). Blood levels of the antioxidant superoxide dismutase (SOD) and the oxidative agent malondialdehyde (MDA) were measured after 24 hours. The results showed higher SOD levels and lower MDA levels in the curcumin group as compared to both the control and methylprednisolone groups. These results are particularly interesting in light of the fact that methylprednisolone is very often used in clinical SCI treatment. It suggests that the corticosteroid may be a symptomatic measure but not necessarily address the cellular and molecular aspects of SCI-mediated injury.

ReferenceSample sizeAnimal typeMethod of SCITreatment groupsRoute & timing of curcumin administrationPathological findingsOutcomes/results

Şahin Kavakli et al. [26]24Wistar ratsWeight dropAfter SCI: curcumin, methylprednisolone, or controlOrally; continuously until sacrificingHigher SOD levels in curcumin group versus other two groups; lower MDA levels in curcumin & methylprednisolone groups versus control

Sanli et al. [27]40Wistar ratsWeight dropNo SCI, SCI alone, SCI/DMSO, SCI/curcumin/DMSO, and SCI/methylprednisoloneSingle intraperitoneal dose directly after SCINo difference in caliber of myelinated axons; less mitochondrial trauma in curcumin, methylprednisolone, and DMSO groupsDecreased lipid peroxidation and MDA levels in curcumin group; curcumin, methylprednisolone, and DMSO groups with improved neurological/functional tests

Liu et al. [28]36New Zealand rabbitsTransient (30 min) abdominal aortic occlusionSham SCI, SCI only, and SCI/curcuminSingle venous injection 10 minutes prior to SCIGreater histologically normal neurons & fewer apoptotic cells in curcumin groupImproved neurological (motor) function in curcumin group

Yao et al. [29]8VariousMeta-analysis of 8 studies of curcumin versus controlVariousCurcumin-treated animals with lesser MDA levels and improved neuromotor functioning with potential dose response

A short paper evaluated one known effect of free radicals, lipid peroxidation [27]. In also examining rats treated with curcumin and methylprednisolone, though the results did not point to improved neurological recovery with curcumin over methylprednisolone (a finding contrary to all available publications), the authors did observe that lipid peroxidation is decreased in the curcumin-treated rats. Hence, intuitively, one would not expect that corticosteroids decrease free radicals, and this remains an advantage of curcumin over existing therapies.

Another report examined antioxidant effects of curcumin specifically in the reperfusion phase of ischemic SCI [28]. Though ischemia is a relatively uncommon etiology of SCI, inflammation-induced neurological damage remains a central aspect of pathogenesis in both traumatic and nontraumatic SCI. Rabbits were subjected to transient spinal cord ischemia and a subpopulation was given curcumin. The results a mere 48 hours after treatment with curcumin showed statistically significant improvement in neurological function, reduced apoptosis, and lowered MDA levels with increased SOD activity. Hence, this report illustrated the consistency of curcumin to produce antioxidation in both traumatic and nontraumatic models of SCI.

A systematic review and network meta-analysis has also addressed curcumin’s antioxidant effects [29]. Not only does curcumin decrease MDA levels, it also induces neurological recovery in a dose-dependent manner, utilizing a locomotor scoring method. Though the concept of curcumin and neurologic improvements will be discussed in a subsequent section, these results are significant for elucidating that though causation cannot be implied, the “clinical rewards” of tipping the oxidation-antioxidation balance towards the latter could be associated with enhanced functional recovery.

5. Decreasing Inflammation and Fibrosis

The major mechanism impeding neurological recovery after SCI is the uncontrolled inflammation and glial-mediated scarring, which creates an antineurogenic niche that is vastly better described in experiments of the brain as compared with SC [30]. Occurring concurrently with acute inflammation and preceding fibrosis, spinal cord edema plays a large role in neurologic damage and patient symptoms, which is a main reason why corticosteroids are clinically used in the management of SCI patients. Though not without methodological flaws, a study examined tissue edema in rats with chronic constrictive SCI models treated with or without curcumin [31]. The edematous content in damaged SCs was reduced significantly in curcumin-treated rats, along with decreased expression of the water-obtaining protein aquaporin. Associated with decreased tissue edema was the finding of improved neuromotor activity in the curcumin-treated rats.

Results to support this finding exist from other data that examined both inflammation and fibrosis in mice with laminectomy-induced SCI [32]. Mice were given either adjuvant curcumin, dimethyl sulfoxide (control), or sham surgery only. In the curcumin group, there were several important findings of note. First, the curcumin-treated mice had decreased expression of NF-κB (a proinflammatory cytokine known to be inhibited by curcumin) and Iba-1 (a marker for inflammatory microglia). Second, GFAP expression and glial scars were also reduced in curcumin-treated mice. Lastly, neurofilament-200 expression (a marker for neurons) was dramatically increased in the curcumin group, suggesting that more native neurons remained in mice treated with curcumin, although it is illogical to conclude that the simple presence of neurons in postinjury SCs could be similarly functional as preinjury circumstances.

Corroborative results were found in another report that demonstrated neuroprotective effects of curcumin [33]. Herein, rats with experimentally induced hemisectioned SCs were randomized into sham, vehicle, and curcumin groups. The recovery of motor function and glial activity after SCI were examined, which showed decreased GFAP expression as detected by polymerase chain reaction. Similar to the previous data, decreased neuronal loss in the curcumin group was also evidenced. Functional outcomes by the standard scaling systems as aforementioned studies also supported their results of enhanced recovery with curcumin.

An intriguing recent study [34] is the first to assess inflammatory and fibrotic parameters in rats treated with curcumin versus methylprednisolone. The spinal cord cavities were compared among all groups (including vehicle and sham groups) for expression of the inflammatory and fibrosis-related molecules TNF-α, IL-1β, NF-κB, GFAP, TGF-β1, TGF-β2, and SOX-9. In curcumin-treated rats, there was reduced expression of all the aforementioned proteins, along with decreased extracellular matrix deposition (prescarring). These observations had a dose-dependent effect with higher doses leading to more significant effects. Importantly, the methylprednisolone treated groups had levels of the aforementioned parameters that were greater than the control groups but less than the curcumin group. These results, especially if validated, have large implications on potential future clinical practice. Similar to a previously discussed paper [26], if curcumin shows decreased cellular and molecular profiles of inflammation and fibrosis as compared with established clinical pharmaceuticals (e.g., methylprednisolone), then it likely has clinical effects at minimum equivalent to corticosteroids. That curcumin has showed that high-dose tolerance—up to 12,000 mg curcumin per day—certainly beckons phase I-II trial testing [35]. Tabulated preclinical studies examining inflammation and fibrosis are given in Table 3.

ReferenceSample sizeAnimal typeMethod of SCITreatment groupsRoute & timing of curcumin administrationPathological findingsOutcomes/results

Zu et al. [31]64Sprague-Dawley ratsWeight dropSham/DMSO, sham/curcumin, SCI/DMSO, and SCI/curcuminSingle intraperitoneal injection 30 minutes after SCIIn curcumin/SCI versus SCI/DMSO group, increased gray-white matter interface, tissue edema/AQP-4 expression, as well as GFAP/pJAK-STAT expressionFunctional motor scores higher in SCI/curcumin group than in SCI/DMSO group

Wang et al. [32]Not specifiedBALB/c miceExtradural clip for 3 secondsSham, SCI/DMSO, and SCI/curcuminSingle intraperitoneal injection immediately after SCIIn SCI/curcumin versus SCI/DMSO group, decreased tissue expression of GFAP & Iba-1 and increased NF-200With curcumin, decreased levels of IL-1β, NO, and NF-κB; increased neuromotor scores

Lin et al. [33]39Sprague-Dawley ratsSpinal cord hemisectionSham (), SCI/DMSO (), and SCI/curcumin ()Daily intraperitoneal injection beginning 1 day after SCI, for 6 total daysIn SCI/curcumin versus SCI/DMSO group, fewer apoptotic & GFAP cells and more NeuN/cellsImprovement in motor performance in SCI/curcumin group over SCI/DMSO group at days 3 & 7

Yuan et al. [34]36Sprague-Dawley ratsClip for 60 secondsSham, SCI only, SCI/curcumin (three dose levels), and SCI/methylprednisoloneImmediate intraperitoneal injection after SCI, followed by daily injections for 7 total daysOver other groups, smaller histological glial scar and GFAP expression in SCI/curcumin group, with numerical dose responseDecreased expression of several inflammatory and fibrotic cytokines, viable axonal fibers, and functional recovery in SCI/curcumin group over other groups, no appreciable dose response

6. Induction of Functional Neurologic Recovery

Though many previous pertinent results have been already mentioned, others will be presented in greater detail hereafter (Table 4). An investigation from New York Medical College used traumatic SCI rat models receiving curcumin or dimethyl sulfoxide within 30 minutes after contusion and weekly thereafter for 6 weeks via percutaneous epidural injections [36]. SCI recovery was assessed using standard aforementioned scoring systems. Throughout the study, motor scores of the curcumin group were higher than the control group. The group used body weight as a surrogate marker for recovery, and this was also increased in curcumin-treated rats. At 6 weeks, soleus muscle weights were significantly higher as well, and histopathological quantitative analysis revealed greater grey matter sparing in the curcumin group, coinciding with less gliosis. Similar results have been strongly indicative of validation in other studies as well which have used similar, yet different, methodologies, suggesting consistency of curcumin in inducing neuromotor recovery [37]. A strength of many studies examining functional recovery is that a uniform scale (the Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan score) is used for interstudy comparison, making extrapolations at least somewhat more reliable than utilizing different scales.

ReferenceSample sizeAnimal typeMethod of SCITreatment groupsRoute & timing of curcumin administrationPathological findingsOutcomes/results

Ormond et al. [36]14Sprague-Dawley ratsWeight dropAfter SCI: curcumin versus DMSOEpidural injection within 30 minutes of SCI & weekly thereafter, until sixth weekCurcumin group with greater spinal cord tissue sparing & neuronal tissue sparingIn curcumin group, improved functional scores after 3 weeks and greater soleus weight

Kim et al. [37]36Sprague-Dawley ratsClipping for 120 secondsSham, SCI/vehicle, and SCI/curcumin Seven consecutive days of intraperitoneal injections after SCICurcumin group with decreased cavity size two weeks after SCIIn curcumin group, higher neuromotor scores after 7 days; increased SOD and decreased MDA and macrophage markers

Zhang et al. [38]30Sprague-Dawley ratsPermanent ligation of lumbar arterySham, SCI/saline, and SCI/curcuminIntraperitoneal injection daily for 7 days starting 24 hours after SCICurcumin group with decreased iNOS and NMDA expression as compared with saline groupHigher hind limb motor function in curcumin group at 7 days

Sun and Xu [39]200Rats, unknown typeNot specifiedSham, SCI/saline, SCI/low-dose curcumin, and SCI/high-dose curcuminIntraperitoneal injection immediately after SCICurcumin group with increase in CGRP+ cells, starting at 3 days, with dose responseEnhanced motor scores of curcumin-treated groups starting at 3 days; dose response between high- and low-dose curcumin groups starting at 7 days

Lee et al. [40]40ICR miceMonofilament-based chronic constriction injuryVehicle, gabapentin (positive control), and KMS4034 (0.1, 1, and 10 mg/kg)Not specified10 mg/kg KMS4034 group with decrease in CGRP+ cellsKMS4034 and gabapentin groups with decreased postnoxious stimulus paw licking, flinching, and withdrawal latency

Zhao et al. [41]Not specifiedC57BL/6J miceChronic constrictive injury of sciatic nerveVehicle, curcumin at various dose levels (5, 15, and 45 mg/kg)Orally, twice daily for three weeks starting 10 days after SCIDecreased mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia in curcumin groups with dose response; effects abrogated with impedance of monoamine signaling

Joseph et al. [42]52C57BL/6J miceSpinal cord transectionControl diet/sedentary, control diet/exercise, DHA/curcumin/sedentary, and DHA/curcumin/exercise21 days prior to intervention; diet ad libitumEnhanced spinal cord motor learning in both curcumin/DHA groups and highest in group with exercise; effects mediated by several signaling factors including neurotrophic factors

Holly et al. [43]27Sprague-Dawley ratsPlacement of paraspinal nonresorbable polymerControl (no SCI), SCI/Western diet, and SCI/DHA/curcuminDiet ad libitum and for 6 weeks after procedureImproved gait at 3 & 6 weeks in the DHA/curcumin groups; potential mediation via neurotrophic factors

Di et al. [44]72Sprague-Dawley ratsChronic constrictive injury of sciatic nerveSham, SCI only, SCI/vehicle, and SCI/curcuminIntraperitoneal injection daily for 14 days, starting 1 day after SCIDecreased corticosteroid synthesis/expression in curcumin groupCurcumin group with improved withdrawal to thermal stimulation, starting at 7 days

Ormond et al. [45]63Sprague-Dawley ratsWeight drop from close (moderate SCI) or afar (severe SCI)SCI only ( = 18), SCI/curcumin ( = 10), SCI/NSCs ( = 16), and SCI/curcumin/NSCs ( = 19)Intramuscular injection near site of injury, within 20 minutesNumerically greatest spinal cord parenchymal sparing with curcumin/NSCsSynergistic effect of curcumin and NSCs in neuromotor recovery, along with body weight after SCI and soleus muscle weight (after severe SCI)

An ischemic SCI model was established in another publication, testing similar parameters [38]. In this study, after ligating the specific vasculature, rats treated with intraperitoneal curcumin showed downregulated inducible nitric oxide synthase and N-methyl aspartate receptor expression; these serve as reliable surrogate markers of excitotoxicity caused by vasogenic inflammation. Though this paper used a different neuromotor scale than most other papers, results were similarly favorable for curcumin. Therefore, together with traumatic SCI models, nontraumatic models of SCI also result in similar successes for curcumin in animal models.

Though curcumin is known to act in multiple pathways, several of which have been previously discussed, another group has demonstrated that calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) expression is related to improvement in neuromotor function [39]. Rat models of SCI were given low and high doses of curcumin and were compared with sham and control groups. Outcome measures included CGRP expression and motor function scores, both with standard scoring as well as the inclined plane test. Both the curcumin groups showed superior neuromotor scores as well as CGRP-positive cells. Further testing will be needed to ascertain various effector-mediated mechanisms of curcumin in vivo.

A large part of healthcare costs and patient morbidities after SCI relate to persistent and chronic neurogenic pain after the insult, and hence a group evaluated curcumin as antinociceptive therapy in murine SCI models [40, 41]. In fact, the novel curcuminoid KMS4034 was used, owing to its greater bioavailability. The mice were subjected to subcutaneous injections of formalin in order to assess the duration of paw flinches, licking, and biting in curcumin and control groups. Decreased licking and flinching durations indicate greater relief of pain, which were seen after curcuminoid administration, as well as concurrent administration of gabapentin, a medication used clinically for a wide variety of nerve-related pathologies. The hot plate test was done to evaluate acute pain; the withdrawal latency to noxious stimuli in mice treated with the curcuminoid was reduced compared to control animals. Though the paper also delves into mechanisms, neuropathic pain mechanisms are immensely complicated and a thorough discussion is beyond the scope of this review. These authors do note that one potential mechanism of the analgesic effect of curcumin is through modulating TRPV1, a ligand gated calcium ion channel involved in nociceptive signaling as well as the descending monoamine system. Though this necessitates further study, the results of this paper clearly show that nociception can indeed be improved in animals and warrants further testing in humans, either empirically or with trials in hopes for similar benefits. Demonstration of even slight improvement in humans could potentially go a long way in relieving morbidities and healthcare costs in this patient population.

A major emphasis of neurorehabilitation after SCI is for the patient to mobilize and aggressively undergo physical therapy as much as possible, especially early after the event. A group at the University of California, Los Angeles, examined rats with transected SCs and investigated sensorimotor learning in four groups of rats while altering two variables [42]. Diet was varied from control to that containing curcumin and the omega-3 fatty acid DHA and activity levels being either sedentary or with exercise. Improved functional learning outcomes were observed in those rats given DHA and curcumin, irrespective of exercise level. Though molecular mechanisms were proposed, the most important was thought to be brain-derived neurotrophic factor, syntaxin-3, and decreasing lipid peroxidation, which are thought to be involved in physical conditioning and maintaining “muscle learning” in these rats [43]. It is intriguing to examine from a therapeutic perspective that the dogma of aggressive exercise/rehabilitation did not show improvements as much as dietary omega-3 and curcumin (although exercise and rehabilitation in animal models are clearly unequal). Though the role of omega-3 in these patients remains relatively equally less-defined, these data also are notable for involving oral intake of curcumin, from which traditionally scientists have shied away owing to poor bioavailability. Further analyses are needed in order to determine whether oral curcumin—most practical in human subjects—can suffice in lieu of parenteral administration. Additionally, it cannot even be currently determined whether curcumin’s main actions are on the SC itself, vasculature, or downstream peripheral nerves from the degenerating SC—in other studies of curcumin in chronic constriction of the sciatic nerve with intact SCs, the compound delivers nearly equal functional recovery as SCI models [44]. Further analyses must be conducted in order to determine these answers.

Lastly, emerging modalities of cell therapy for neurodegenerative conditions have shown great promise for brain regeneration, but regeneration after SCI in conjunction with curcumin has to date been shown in only one report [45]. After isolating neural stem cells from the subventricular zone of the brain, curcumin was shown to induce greater proliferation at low doses only (consistent with other studies [24]). SCI was defined in this paper as moderate or severe depending on the distance of the traumatic weight drop, simulating crush injury on the SC. Whereas after moderate SCI, salubrious effects of neural stem cells and curcumin together were similar to the cells alone, severe SCI showed synergistic effects of curcumin with the stem cells. These synergistic results in severe SCI were also seen in the body weight and soleus muscle weight parameters as well. These data are extremely intriguing not only for regenerative scientists but also for clinicians interested in cell therapy for use in the clinic, which have been accomplished with positive clinical results in the setting of another neurodegenerative disease, Parkinson’s [46]. Because cell therapy faces challenges of its own, such as suboptimal postimplantation cell survival and integration, molecules that could aid implanted cells are certainly a welcome notion.

7. Future Directions

SCI is a substantial health epidemic throughout the world, and the relative stagnation of developments past corticosteroid therapies necessitates other routes of improving function and quality of life in these patients [47]. There are several methods being utilized as experimental therapies for patients with SCI, including electrical nerve stimulation [48], therapeutic hypothermia [49], and cell therapy [50]. We propose the benefit of adding curcumin to these methods, not only because of high, albeit untested, likelihood for functional improvements, but also because of the fact that curcumin acts at the central pathogenesis of SCI-induced neurological injury—inflammation.

Many questions remain in need of greater assessment before curcumin can transition into the clinical realm. First, the bioavailability of oral curcumin is notoriously low, but despite increasing with lipid intake, would it be enough to make a clinical impact? It has been established that the lipophilic curcumin can penetrate the blood-brain barrier and percolate into the CSF, which is the primary route by which neuroprotection is largely mediated [51, 52]. Studies in osteoarthritis have shown great promise with conjugated delivery forms, having outpaced current standards of care in patients with osteoarthritis [53]. These formulations can also greatly augment CNS biodistribution of curcumin, as expounded by Tsai and colleagues [54]. Second, with high-dose tolerance and essentially no side effects of curcumin, is it feasible to deliver megadoses of curcumin parenterally in patients? There are currently several parenteral formulations of curcumin, including the trademark names known as Lipocurc, NanoCurc, Meriva, and CurcuVET [5559]. Though these are not approved by the USA Food and Drug Administration, is it also feasible to take megadoses of oral curcumin (with appropriate lipid-laden meals to increase gastrointestinal absorption) after SCI—in a sense of “off-label” and empiric use? In turn, would curcumin and corticosteroids make a greater clinical impact than the latter alone? Third, can the future bring more corroborative evidence of the effects of curcumin when given in a delayed setting? Though only a few studies herein administered curcumin at ≥ 24 hours after SCI, it will be important to more precisely evaluate curcumin’s contributions if administered in the nonacute setting. Lastly, can clinicians shed the “herbal medicine” stigma and be able to acknowledge that ignoring its beneficial effects is largely due to a lack of clinical data and not necessarily a result of inferior clinical efficacy?


SCI:Spinal cord injury
SC:Spinal cord
GFAP:Glial fibrillary acidic protein
SOD:Superoxide dismutase
CGRP:Calcitonin gene-related peptide.

Additional Points

(i) Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a type of neurotrauma characterized by acute and chronic inflammation and delayed scarring; there are currently no major options for clinical management other than supportive care and perhaps corticosteroids. (ii) Curcumin is a natural compound known to have many anti-inflammatory and anticancer properties, although a dearth of data, especially summative data, exist on its role in ameliorating SCI. (iii) Curcumin has been shown to mobilize neural stem cells of the spinal cord and provide antioxidant effects after SCI’s free radical-mediated damage to the spinal cord. (iv) Curcumin’s powerful anti-inflammatory activity in the post-SCI environment has been shown to translate to decreased inflammatory cells and proinflammatory molecules. (v) In animal studies, curcumin has substantially improved functional neurologic recovery after SCI; moreover, on both the microscopic and macroscopic levels, curcumin has been shown in multiple publications to be an improvement over corticosteroids alone. (vi) These encouraging laboratory data need to be translated to the clinical realm for further testing, as well as corroboration in the laboratory as well.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests.


  1. A. Ackery, C. Tator, and A. Krassioukov, “A global perspective on spinal cord injury epidemiology,” Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1355–1370, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. M. J. Devivo, “Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury: trends and future implications,” Spinal Cord, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 365–372, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. P. G. Popovich, P. Wei, and B. T. Stokes, “Cellular inflammatory response after spinal cord injury in Sprague-dawley and Lewis rats,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 377, no. 3, pp. 443–464, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. David and A. Kroner, “Repertoire of microglial and macrophage responses after spinal cord injury,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 388–399, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. Oudega, “Molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the role of blood vessels in spinal cord injury and repair,” Cell and Tissue Research, vol. 349, no. 1, pp. 269–288, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. C. H. Tator and M. G. Fehlings, “Review of the secondary injury theory of acute spinal cord trauma with emphasis on vascular mechanisms,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 15–26, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. O. N. Hausmann, “Post-traumatic inflammation following spinal cord injury,” Spinal Cord, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 369–378, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. N. Zhang, Y. Yin, S.-J. Xu, Y.-P. Wu, and W.-S. Chen, “Inflammation & apoptosis in spinal cord injury,” Indian Journal of Medical Research, vol. 135, no. 3, pp. 287–296, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  9. F. L. Vale, J. Burns, A. B. Jackson, and M. N. Hadley, “Combined medical and surgical treatment after acute spinal cord injury: results of a prospective pilot study to assess the merits of aggressive medical resuscitation and blood pressure management,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 239–246, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. X. Jia, R. G. Kowalski, D. M. Sciubba, and R. G. Geocadin, “Critical care of traumatic spinal cord injury,” Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 12–23, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. B. Bracken, M. J. Shepard, W. F. Collins Jr. et al., “Methylprednisolone or naloxone treatment after acute spinal cord injury: 1-year follow-up data. Results of the second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 23–31, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. B. Bracken, M. J. Shepard, T. R. Holford et al., “Methylprednisolone or tirilazad mesylate administration after acute spinal cord injury: 1-year follow up: results of the third national acute spinal cord injury randomized controlled trial,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 699–706, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. B. Bracken, M. J. Shepard, T. R. Holford et al., “Administration of methylprednisolone for 24 or 48 hours or tirilazad mesylate for 48 hours in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury. Results of the Third National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Randomized Controlled Trial. National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 277, no. 20, pp. 1597–1604, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. B. Bracken, “Steroids for acute spinal cord injury,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 1, Article ID CD001046, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. Khurana, K. Venkataraman, A. Hollingsworth, M. Piche, and T. C. Tai, “Polyphenols: benefits to the cardiovascular system in health and in aging,” Nutrients, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 3779–3827, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. L. V. Brumatti, A. Marcuzzi, P. M. Tricarico, V. Zanin, M. Girardelli, and A. M. Bianco, “Curcumin and inflammatory bowel disease: potential and limits of innovative treatments,” Molecules, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 21127–21153, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. S. Ghosh, T. W. B. Gehr, and S. Ghosh, “Curcumin and chronic kidney disease (CKD): major mode of action through stimulating endogenous intestinal alkaline phosphatase,” Molecules, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 20139–20156, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. B. Meng, J. Li, and H. Cao, “Antioxidant and antiinflammatory activities of curcumin on diabetes mellitus and its complications,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 2101–2113, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  19. K. V. Peddada, K. V. Peddada, S. K. Shukla, A. Mishra, and V. Verma, “Role of curcumin in common musculoskeletal disorders: a review of current laboratory, translational, and clinical data,” Orthopaedic Surgery, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 222–231, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. K. Kulkarni and A. Dhir, “An overview of curcumin in neurological disorders,” Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 149–154, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. C. Gautam, X. Gao, and S. Dulchavsky, “Immunomodulation by curcumin,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 595, pp. 321–341, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. S. Weiss, C. Dunne, J. Hewson et al., “Multipotent CNS stem cells are present in the adult mammalian spinal cord and ventricular neuroaxis,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 16, no. 23, pp. 7599–7609, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  23. J. Hucklenbroich, R. Klein, B. Neumaier et al., “Aromatic-turmerone induces neural stem cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo,” Stem Cell Research and Therapy, vol. 5, no. 4, article 100, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. S. Son, K.-T. Kim, D.-C. Cho, H.-J. Kim, J.-K. Sung, and J.-S. Bae, “Curcumin stimulates proliferation of spinal cord neural progenitor cells via a Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling Pathway,” Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. S.-I. Yamamoto, N. Yamamoto, T. Kitamura, K. Nakamura, and M. Nakafuku, “Proliferation of parenchymal neural progenitors in response to injury in the adult rat spinal cord,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 172, no. 1, pp. 115–127, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. H. Şahin Kavakli, C. Koca, and Ö. Alici, “Antioxidant effects of curcumin in spinal cord injury in rats,” Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 14–18, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. M. Sanli, E. Turkoglu, G. Serbes et al., “Effect of curcumin on lipid peroxidation, early ultrastructural findings and neurological recovery after experimental spinal cord contusion injury in rats,” Turkish Neurosurgery, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 189–195, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. Z.-Q. Liu, S.-S. Xing, and W. Zhang, “Neuroprotective effect of curcumin on spinal cord in rabbit model with ischemia/reperfusion,” Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 147–152, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. Yao, L. Yang, J. Wang et al., “Neurological recovery and antioxidant effects of curcumin for spinal cord injury in the rat: a network meta-analysis and systematic review,” Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 381–391, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. C. T. Ekdahl, J.-H. Claasen, S. Bonde, Z. Kokaia, and O. Lindvall, “Inflammation is detrimental for neurogenesis in adult brain,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 23, pp. 13632–13637, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. Zu, Y. Wang, G. Xu, J. Zhuang, H. Gong, and J. Yan, “Curcumin improves the recovery of motor function and reduces spinal cord edema in a rat acute spinal cord injury model by inhibiting the JAK/STAT signaling pathway,” Acta Histochemica, vol. 116, no. 8, pp. 1331–1336, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. Y.-F. Wang, J.-N. Zu, J. Li, C. Chen, C.-Y. Xi, and J.-L. Yan, “Curcumin promotes the spinal cord repair via inhibition of glial scar formation and inflammation,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 560, pp. 51–56, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. M.-S. Lin, Y.-H. Lee, W.-T. Chiu, and K.-S. Hung, “Curcumin provides neuroprotection after spinal cord injury,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 166, no. 2, pp. 280–289, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. J. Yuan, M. Zou, X. Xiang et al., “Curcumin improves neural function after spinal cord injury by the joint inhibition of the intracellular and extracellular components of glial scar,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 195, no. 1, pp. 235–245, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. C. D. Lao, M. T. Ruffin IV, D. Normolle et al., “Dose escalation of a curcuminoid formulation,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 6, article 10, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. D. R. Ormond, H. Peng, R. Zeman, K. Das, R. Murali, and M. Jhanwar-Uniyal, “Recovery from spinal cord injury using naturally occurring antiinflammatory compound curcumin: laboratory investigation,” Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 497–503, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. K.-T. Kim, M.-J. Kim, D.-C. Cho et al., “The neuroprotective effect of treatment with curcumin in acute spinal cord injury: laboratory investigation,” Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 387–394, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. J. H. Zhang, H. Wei, M. M. Lin, C. M. Chen, C. H. Wang, and M. B. Liu, “Curcumin protects against ischemic spinal cord injury the pathway effect,” Neural Regeneration Research, vol. 8, no. 36, pp. 3391–3400, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. D. Sun and J. Xu, “Effect of curcumin on calcitionin gene related peptide expression after spinal cord injury in rats,” Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 1225–1229, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  40. J. Y. Lee, T. J. Shin, J. M. Choi et al., “Antinociceptive curcuminoid, KMS4034, effects on inflammatory and neuropathic pain likely via modulating TRPV1 in mice,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 667–672, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. X. Zhao, Y. Xu, Q. Zhao, C.-R. Chen, A.-M. Liu, and Z.-L. Huang, “Curcumin exerts antinociceptive effects in a mouse model of neuropathic pain: descending monoamine system and opioid receptors are differentially involved,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 843–854, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. M. S. Joseph, Z. Ying, Y. Zhuang et al., “Effects of diet and/or exercise in enhancing spinal cord sensorimotor learning,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 7, Article ID e41288, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. L. T. Holly, D. Blaskiewicz, A. Wu, C. Feng, Z. Ying, and F. Gomez-Pinilla, “Dietary therapy to promote neuroprotection in chronic spinal cord injury: laboratory investigation,” Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 134–140, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. Y. X. Di, C. Hong, L. Jun, G. Renshan, and L. Qinquan, “Curcumin attenuates mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia in chronic constrictive injury model of neuropathic pain,” Pain and Therapy, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 59–69, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. D. R. Ormond, C. Shannon, J. Oppenheim et al., “Stem cell therapy and curcumin synergistically enhance recovery from spinal cord injury,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 2, article e88916, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. Z. Kefalopoulou, M. Politis, P. Piccini et al., “Long-term clinical outcome of fetal cell transplantation for parkinson disease: two case reports,” JAMA Neurology, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 83–87, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. J. W. McDonald and C. Sadowsky, “Spinal-cord injury,” The Lancet, vol. 359, no. 9304, pp. 417–425, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. W. Keith, K. L. Kilgore, P. H. Peckham, K. S. Wuolle, G. Creasey, and M. Lemay, “Tendon transfers and functional electrical stimulation for restoration of hand function in spinal cord injury,” Journal of Hand Surgery, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 89–99, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. J. Wang and D. D. Pearse, “Therapeutic hypothermia in spinal cord injury: the status of its use and open questions,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 16848–16879, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. J. W. McDonald, “Repairing the damaged spinal cord,” Scientific American, vol. 281, no. 3, pp. 64–73, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  51. S. Mishra and K. Palanivelu, “The effect of curcumin (turmeric) on Alzheimer's disease: an overview,” Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 13–19, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. M. Garcia-Alloza, L. A. Borrelli, A. Rozkalne, B. T. Hyman, and B. J. Bacskai, “Curcumin labels amyloid pathology in vivo, disrupts existing plaques, and partially restores distorted neurites in an Alzheimer mouse model,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 1095–1104, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. G. Belcaro, M. Dugall, R. Luzzi et al., “Meriva+glucosamine versus condroitin+glucosamine in patients with knee osteoarthritis: an observational study,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 18, no. 24, pp. 3959–3963, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  54. Y.-M. Tsai, C.-F. Chien, L.-C. Lin, and T.-H. Tsai, “Curcumin and its nano-formulation: the kinetics of tissue distribution and blood-brain barrier penetration,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 416, no. 1, pp. 331–338, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. L. Song, Y. Shen, J. Hou, L. Lei, S. Guo, and C. Qian, “Polymeric micelles for parenteral delivery of curcumin: preparation, characterization and in vitro evaluation,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 390, no. 1–3, pp. 25–32, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. B. Ray, S. Bisht, A. Maitra, A. Maitra, and D. K. Lahiri, “Neuroprotective and neurorescue effects of a novel polymeric nanoparticle formulation of curcumin (NanoCurc) in the neuronal cell culture and animal model: implications for Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 61–77, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. L. Helson, G. Bolger, M. Majeed, B. Vcelar, K. Pucaj, and D. Matabudul, “Infusion pharmacokinetics of Lipocurc (liposomal curcumin) and its metabolite tetrahydrocurcumin in beagle dogs,” Anticancer Research, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 4365–4370, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  58. G. Belcaro, M. R. Cesarone, M. Dugall et al., “Product-evaluation registry of Meriva®, a curcumin-phosphatidylcholine complex, for the complementary management of osteoarthritis.,” Panminerva Medica, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 55–62, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  59. M. Colitti, B. Gaspardo, A. Della Pria, C. Scaini, and B. Stefanon, “Transcriptome modification of white blood cells after dietary administration of curcumin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug in osteoarthritic affected dogs,” Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, vol. 147, no. 3-4, pp. 136–146, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Raghavendra Sanivarapu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.