Nursing Research and Practice / 2012 / Article / Tab 2

Review Article

Toothbrush Contamination: A Review of the Literature

Table 2

Studies Selected.


In vitro studies

Bunetel et al. (2000) [8]Does retention and survival of microorganisms on toothbrushes pose a threat to patients at risk of infection?Experimental toothbrush types with two series of experimentsContamination of toothbrushes occurs early in the life of the brush and tends to increase with repeated use.
Dayoub et al. (1977) [18]To determine the degree of bacterial contamination of toothbrushes after contamination and storage in vented containers or in air.Experimental toothbrushesThe numbers of bacteria on toothbrushes stored in room air after use decrease more quickly than on brushes in containers.
Glass and Jensen (1994) [9]To evaluate toothbrush design and UV sanitation on microbial growth.Experimental toothbrushesUV sanitizing kills bacteria; viruses can survive on toothbrushes for 24 hours; toothbrush design, color, opacity, and bristle arrangement are a major factor in retaining microorganisms.

In vivo studies

Efstratiou et al. (2007) [14]To examine the contamination and the survival rate of periodontopathic and cariogenic species on new toothbrushes with antibacterial properties after a single use in periodontic patients.Experimental patients; 4 toothbrushes per patient.Immediately after brushing, the toothbrushes harbored a significant number of microorganisms with no difference between the types of toothbrushes. The antibacterial toothbrush did not limit bacterial contamination.
Mehta et al. (2007) [10]To determine the extent of bacterial contamination of toothbrushes after use, evaluate the efficacy of chlorhexidine and Listerine in decontamination, and effectiveness of covering the toothbrush head with a cap.Experimental patientsToothbrushes become contaminated during use; retention of moisture and the presence of organic matter may promote bacterial growth. Toothbrush contamination may lead to colonization and infection. Caps increase bacterial growth. Chlorhexidine was more effective than Listerine.
Quirynen et al. (2003) [15]To evaluate the effects of coated tuffs and toothpaste on toothbrush contamination.Experimental patientsToothbrushes become contaminated and toothpaste reduced bacterial growth in toothbrushes.
Taji and Rogers (1998) [11]To investigate the microbial contamination of toothbrushes.Descriptive patientsMost toothbrushes were contaminated.
Verran and Leahy-Gilmartin (1996) [13]To evaluate toothbrush contamination using a range of selective and nonselective media.Descriptive toothbrushesUsed toothbrushes supported a wide variety of microorganisms. All media showed growth.

Combination of both in vitro and in vivo studies

Caudry et al. (1995) [5]To demonstrate, quantitatively, the presence of microorganisms adherent to toothbrush bristles.Experimental toothbrushesToothbrushes, in normal use, are heavily contaminated by microorganisms and the bacteria are extremely adherent to the bristles.
Glass and Lare (1986) [6]Do toothbrushes harbor pathogenic microorganisms and if there is a correlation between contaminated brushes and the presence of disease.Descriptive toothbrushesToothbrushes can harbor pathogenic microorganisms.

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.