Research Article
Development and Validation of an Online Program for Promoting Self-Management among Korean Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B
Table 3
Online program evaluation by expert panel (
).
| Criteria | Item | Mean score | Mean score of each criteria |
| | Purpose described | 4.58 | | Purpose | Intended audience described | 4.52 | 4.35 | Sufficient information provided | 4.34 | | Consistent content organization | 3.98 | |
| | Appropriate site title | 4.15 | | | Relevant content for the purpose | 4.25 | | | Relevant content to intended audience | 4.20 | | Appropriateness | Relevant content for a subject | 4.37 | 4.22 | | Appropriate information presentation | 4.28 | | | Relevant linkage | 4.33 | | | Understandable content to intended audience | 3.94 | |
| | Accurate information | 3.96 | | Accuracy | Source of the information | 4.28 | 3.92 | Responsiveness | 3.88 | | Validation process described | 3.57 | |
| Credibility | Organization behind the site clearly presented | 3.78 | 4.07 | Organization address, phone, email | 4.36 |
| | Site map | 4.24 | | Ease of use | Structure of the site clearly communicated | 4.11 | 4.14 | | Search function | 4.08 | |
| Interactivity | Clear user feedback mechanisms | 3.52 | 3.73 | Care of users' feedback | 3.95 |
| | Easy to access | 4.08 | | Currency | Date of first posting | 3.32 | 3.54 | | Date of last modification | 3.21 | |
| Authority | Authors of all information | 3.56 | 3.83 | Authors' name and affiliation | 4.10 |
|
|