Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Nursing Research and Practice
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 749563, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/749563
Research Article

Enhancing the Participation of African Americans in Health-Related Genetic Research: Findings of a Collaborative Academic and Community-Based Research Study

1University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee College of Nursing, 1921 E Hartford Avenue, P.O. Box 413, Cunningham Hall, Room 422/423, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA
2University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee College of Nursing, Center for Nursing Research and Evaluation, WI 53201, USA

Received 5 June 2013; Revised 28 August 2013; Accepted 3 October 2013

Academic Editor: Jacquelyn Taylor

Copyright © 2013 Sandra Millon Underwood et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. National Human Genome Research Institute, International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium, “International Consortium Completes Human Genome Project: All Goals Achieved, New Vision for Genome Research Unveiled,” 2003, http://www.genome.gov/11006929.
  2. F. S. Collins, E. D. Green, A. E. Guttmacher, and M. S. Guyer, “A vision for the future of genomics research,” Nature, vol. 422, no. 6934, pp. 835–847, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. W. G. Feero, A. E. Guttmacher, and F. S. Collins, “The genome gets personal—almost,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 299, no. 11, pp. 1351–1352, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), “Human Genome Project Fact Sheet,” 2005, http://report.nih.gov/nihfactsheets/ViewFactSheet.aspx?csid=45.
  5. A. Hamosh, A. F. Scott, J. S. Amberger, C. A. Bocchini, and V. A. McKusick, “Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man,” 2005, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/omim.
  6. National Center for Biotechnology Information, “Gene Tests,” 2013, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/GeneTests/?db=GeneTests.
  7. E. Eiseman and S. B. Haga, Handbook of Human Tissue Sources: A National Resource of Human Tissue Samples, Rand Corp, Santa Monica, Calif, USA, 1999.
  8. C. A. McCarty, R. L. Chisholm, C. G. Chute et al., “The eMERGE Network: a consortium of biorepositories linked to electronic medical records data for conducting genomic studies,” BMC Medical Genomics, vol. 4, article no. 13, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. M. Roden, J. M. Pulley, M. A. Basford et al., “Development of a large-scale de-identified DNA biobank to enable personalized medicine,” Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 362–369, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K. E. Ormond, A. L. Cirino, I. B. Helenowski, R. L. Chisholm, and W. A. Wolf, “Assessing the understanding of biobank participants,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A, vol. 149, no. 2, pp. 188–198, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Baker, “Biorepositories: building better biobanks,” Nature, vol. 486, pp. 141–146, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  12. V. L. Bonham, T. Citrin, S. M. Modell, T. H. Franklin, E. W. B. Bleicher, and L. M. Fleck, “Community-based dialogue: engaging communities of color in the United States' genetics policy conversation,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 325–359, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. N. G. Jones and J. J. Harris, “African americans and genetic research, risk versus benefit: implications for the profession of social work,” Social Work in Public Health, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 380–391, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. M. Hartz, E. O. Johnson, N. L. Saccone, D. Hatsukami, N. Breslau, and L. J. Bierut, “Inclusion of African Americans in genetic studies: what is the barrier?” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 174, no. 3, pp. 336–344, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. M. E. Halverson and F. L. Ross, “Engaging African-Americans about biobanks and the return of research results,” Journal of Community Genetics, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 275–283, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  16. V. A. Johnson, Y. M. Powell-Young, E. R. Torres, and I. J. Spruill, “A systematic review of strategies that increase the recruitment and retention of African American adults in genetic and genomic studies,” The ABNF Journal, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 84–88, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. B. Haga, “Impact of limited population diversity of genome-wide association studies,” Genetics in Medicine, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 81–84, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. I. Spruill, B. Coleman, and J. Collins-McNeil, “Knowledge, beliefs and practices of African-American nurses regarding genetics/genomics,” Journal of National Black Nurses' Association, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 20–24, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. Knerr, D. Wayman, and V. L. Bonham, “Inclusion of racial and ethnic minorities in genetic research: advance the spirit by changing the rules?” Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 502–512, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. A. Streicher, S. C. Sanderson, E. W. Jabs et al., “Reasons for participating and genetic information needs among racially and ethnically diverse biobank participants: a focus group study,” Journal of Community Genetics, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 153–163, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. V. A. Johnson, Y. M. Powell-Young, E. R. Torres, and I. J. Spruill, “A systematic review of strategies that increase the recruitment and retention of African American adults in genetic and genomic studies,” The ABNF Journal, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 84–88, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. A. Lemke, C. Halverson, and L. F. Ross, “Biobank participation and returning research results: perspectives from a deliberative engagement in South Side Chicago,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A, vol. 158, no. 5, pp. 1029–1037, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Y. M. Powell and I. J. Spruill, “Views of Black nurses toward genetic research and testing,” Journal of Nursing Scholarship, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 151–159, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  24. J. Bussey-Jones, G. Henderson, J. Garrett, M. Moloney, C. Blumenthal, and G. Corbie-Smith, “Asking the right questions: views on genetic variation research among black and white research participants,” Journal of General Internal Medicine, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 299–304, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. E. Murphy and A. Thompson, “An exploration of attitudes among Black Americans towards psychiatric genetic research,” Psychiatry, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 177–194, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. G. Buseh, P. E. Stevens, S. M. Underwood, L. Townsend, and S. T. Kelber, “Community leaders' perspectives on engaging African Americans in biobanks and other human genetics initiatives,” Journal of Community Genetics, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 483–494, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  27. S. A. Streicher, S. C. Sanderson, E. W. Jabs et al., “Reasons for participating and genetic information needs among racially and ethnically diverse biobank participants: a focus group study,” Journal of Community Genetics, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 153–163, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. A. A. Lemke, C. Halverson, and L. F. Ross, “Biobank participation and returning research results: perspectives from a deliberative engagement in South Side Chicago,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A, vol. 158, no. 5, pp. 1029–1037, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. S. M. Underwood, A. G. Buseh, P. E. Stevens, L. Townsend, and S. T. Kelber, “Reflections and perspectives of African-American community leaders regarding genetics and genomic research: sentiment and wisdom of Sankofa,” Journal of the National Black Nurses Association, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 16–23, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  30. A. G. Buseh, S. M. Underwood, P. E. Stevens, L. Townsend, and S. T. Kelber, “Black African immigrant community leaders' views on participation in genomics research and DNA biobanking,” Nursing Outlook, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 196–204, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  31. Committee on Community Engagement Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Principles of Community Engagement, CDC/ATSDR, Atlanta, Ga, USA, 2011.
  32. B. A. Israel, E. Eng, A. J. Schulz, and E. A. Parker, Eds., Methods in Community-Based Participatory Research for Health, Jossey Bass, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 2005.
  33. J. Emery, “Is informed choice in genetic testing a different breed of informed decision-making? A discussion paper,” Health Expectations, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 81–86, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. P. Briss, B. Rimer, B. Reilley et al., “Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 67–80, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J. Haydon, “Genetics: uphold the rights of all clients to informed decision-making and voluntary action,” Nursing Standard, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 48–51, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. W. S. Chieng, N. Chan, and S. C. Lee, “Non-directive genetic counselling—respect for autonomy or unprofessional practice?” Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 36–42, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. L. Henneman, D. R. M. Timmermans, and G. Van Der Wal, “Public attitudes toward genetic testing: perceived benefits and objections,” Genetic Testing, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 139–145, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. D. Kaufman, J. Murphy, J. Scott, and K. Hudson, “Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study,” Genetics in Medicine, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 831–839, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. D. J. Kaufman, J. Murphy-Bollinger, J. Scott, and K. L. Hudson, “Public opinion about the importance of privacy in Biobank research,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 643–654, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. J. Murphy, J. Scott, D. Kaufman, G. Geller, L. LeRoy, and K. Hudson, “Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research,” American Journal of Bioethics, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 36–43, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. J. Murphy, J. Scott, D. Kaufman, G. Geller, L. LeRoy, and K. Hudson, “Public perspectives on informed consent for biobanking,” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 99, no. 12, pp. 2128–2134, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. J. Audrain, M. D. Schwartz, C. Lerman, C. Hughes, B. N. Peshkin, and B. Biesecker, “Psychological distress in women seeking genetic counseling for breast- ovarian cancer risk: the contributions of personality and appraisal,” Annals of Behavioral Medicine, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 370–377, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Genetic testing: How it is used for healthcare,” 2013, http://www.report.nih.gov/NIHfactsheets/ViewFactSheet.aspx?csid=43&key=G.
  44. G. Elwyn, J. Gray, and A. Clarke, “Shared decision making and non-directiveness in genetic counselling,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 135–138, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. A. Clarke, “Is non-directive genetic counselling possible?” The Lancet, vol. 338, no. 8773, pp. 998–1001, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. J. Weil, “Psychosocial genetic counseling in the post-nondirective era: a point of view,” Journal of Genetic Counseling, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 199–211, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. “Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) policies and regulations,” 2013, http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/index/index.html.
  48. “U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Regulations on the Protection of Human Subjects,” 2009, http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.html.
  49. NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 Public Law 103-43. Federal Register, 59FR14508, March 28, 1.