Review Article
Examining End-of-Life Case Management: Systematic Review
Table 2
Assessments of risk of bias in included studies, according to Newcastle-Ottawa scale.
| Study | Selection | Comparability | Outcome | Author and date | Representativeness of exposed cohort | Selection of nonexposed cohort | Assessment of outcome | Ascertainment of exposure | Demonstration outcome of interest not present in study start | Study controls for age | Study controls for any additional factor | Follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur | Adequacy of follow-up of cohorts |
| Back et al. (2005) [29] | * | * | * | * | * | | * | * | * | Head et al. (2010) [31] | * | * | * | * | * | | * | * | a |
Pfeifer et al. (2006) [40] | | | * | * | | | * | * | * | Seow et al. (2008) [30] | * | * | * | * | | * | * | * | * | Spettell et al. (2009) [32] | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | Twyman and Libbus (1994) [33] | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * |
|
|
aOnly 35 of the 68 patients consented to participate in the research project.
Case study: Head and Cantrell (2009), case study of one individual [36].
|