Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Volume 2009, Article ID 275613, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/275613
Research Article

Maternal History and Uterine Artery Doppler in the Assessment of Risk for Development of Early- and Late-Onset Preeclampsia and Intrauterine Growth Restriction

1Department of Obstetrics, Fetal Medicine Unit, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08035-Barcelona, Spain
2Department of Obstetrics, Son Llatze Hospital, Mallorca, Spain
3Department of Obstetrics, Granoller Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
4Department of Obstetrics, Terrassa Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
5Department of Stadistics, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08035-Barcelona, Spain

Received 29 September 2008; Revised 27 February 2009; Accepted 12 March 2009

Academic Editor: Robert L. Coleman

Copyright © 2009 Elisa Llurba et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. C. Hauth, M. G. Ewell, R. J. Levine et al., “Pregnancy outcomes in healthy nulliparas who developed hypertension,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 24–28, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. F. De Wolf, C. De Wolf-Peeters, I. Brosens, and W. B. Robertson, “The human placental bed: electron microscopic study of trophoblastic invasion of spiral arteries,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 137, no. 1, pp. 58–70, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  3. J. W. Meekins, R. Pijnenborg, M. Hanssens, I. R. McFadyen, and A. van Asshe, “A study of placental bed spiral arteries and trophoblast invasion in normal and severe pre-eclamptic pregnancies,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 101, no. 8, pp. 669–674, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. S. Campbell, D. R. Griffen, J. M. Pearce et al., “New Doppler technique for assessing uteroplacental blood flow,” The Lancet, vol. 321, no. 8326, pp. 675–677, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. A. T. Papageorghiou, C. K. H. Yu, and K. H. Nicolaides, “The role of uterine artery Doppler in predicting adverse pregnancy outcome,” Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 383–396, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. F. Prefumo, N. J. Sebire, and B. Thilaganathan, “Decreased endovascular trophoblast invasion in first trimester pregnancies with high-resistance uterine artery Doppler indices,” Human Reproduction, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 206–209, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. A. T. Papageorghiou, C. K. H. Yu, S. Cicero, S. Bower, and K. H. Nicolaides, “Second-trimester uterine artery Doppler screening in unselected populations: a review,” Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 78–88, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. C. Lees, “Uterine artery Doppler: time to establish the ground rules,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 607–609, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. A. T. Papageorghiou, C. K. H. Yu, R. Bindra, G. Pandis, and K. H. Nicolaides, “Multicenter screening for pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction by transvaginal uterine artery Doppler at 23 weeks of gestation,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 441–449, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. S. A. Steel, J. M. Pearce, P. McParland, and G. V. P. Chamberlain, “Early Doppler ultrasound screening in prediction of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy,” The Lancet, vol. 335, no. 8705, pp. 1548–1551, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. S. Bower, K. Schuchter, and S. Campbell, “Doppler ultrasound screening as part of routine antenatal scanning: prediction of pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 100, no. 11, pp. 989–994, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  12. K. Harrington, D. Cooper, C. Lees, K. Hecher, and S. Campbell, “Doppler ultrasound of the uterine arteries: the importance of bilateral notching in the prediction of pre-eclampsia, placental abruption or delivery of a small-for-gestational-age baby,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 182–188, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. T. Frusca, M. Soregaroli, A. Valcamonico, F. Guandalini, and L. Danti, “Doppler velocimetry of the uterine arteries in nulliparous women,” Early Human Development, vol. 48, no. 1-2, pp. 177–185, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. G. Albaiges, H. Missfelder-Lobos, C. Lees, M. Parra, and K. H. Nicolaides, “One-stage screening for pregnancy complications by color Doppler assessment of the uterine arteries at 23 weeks' gestation,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 559–564, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. W. Kurdi, S. Campbell, J. Aquilina, P. England, and K. Harrington, “The role of color Doppler imaging of the uterine arteries at 20 weeks' gestation in stratifying antenatal care,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 339–345, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. J. Aquilina, O. Thompson, B. Thilaganathan, and K. Harrington, “Improved early prediction of pre-eclampsia by combining second-trimester maternal serum inhibin-A and uterine artery Doppler,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 477–484, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. B. Sibai, G. Dekker, and M. Kupferminc, “Pre-eclampsia,” The Lancet, vol. 365, no. 9461, pp. 785–799, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. F. Crispi, E. Llurba, C. Domínguez, P. Martín-Gallán, L. Cabero, and E. Gratacós, “Predictive value of angiogenic factors and uterine artery Doppler for early- versus late-onset pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 303–309, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. F. P. Zuspan, “The hypertensive disorders of pregnancy,” Technical Report Series 758, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 1978. View at Google Scholar
  20. P. W. Soothill, C. S. Bobrow, and R. Holmes, “Small for gestational age is not a diagnosis,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 225–228, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. S. Bower, K. Schuchter, and S. Campbell, “Doppler ultrasound screening as part of routine antenatal scanning: prediction of pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 100, no. 11, pp. 989–994, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. The Guideline Development Group (GDG), 2008.
  23. A. T. Papageorghiou, C. K. H. Yu, I. E. Erasmus, H. S. Cuckle, and K. H. Nicolaides, “Assessment of risk for the development of pre-eclampsia by maternal characteristics and uterine artery Doppler,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 112, no. 6, pp. 703–709, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. K. Harrington, D. Cooper, C. Lees, K. Hecher, and S. Campbell, “Doppler ultrasound of the uterine arteries: the importance of bilateral notching in the prediction of pre-eclampsia, placental abruption or delivery of a small-for-gestational-age baby,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 182–188, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. W. Kurdi, S. Campbell, J. Aquilina, P. England, and K. Harrington, “The role of color Doppler imaging of the uterine arteries at 20 weeks' gestation in stratifying antenatal care,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 339–345, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. A. T. Papageorghiou, C. K. H. Yu, R. Bindra, G. Pandis, and K. H. Nicolaides, “Multicenter screening for pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction by transvaginal uterine artery Doppler at 23 weeks of gestation,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 441–449, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. D. J. Murphy and G. M. Stirrat, “Mortality and morbidity associated with early-onset pre-eclampsia,” Hypertension in Pregnancy, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 221–231, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. F. Crispi, C. Dominguez, E. Llurba, P. Martin-Gallan, L. Cabero, and E. Gratacós, “Placental angiogenic growth factors and uterine artery Doppler findings for characterization of different subsets in pre-eclampsia and in isolated intrauterine growth restriction,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 195, no. 1, pp. 201–207, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. R. B. Ness and B. M. Sibai, “Shared and disparate components of the pathophysiologies of fetal growth restriction and pre-eclampsia,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 195, no. 1, pp. 40–49, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. B. M. Sibai, “Maternal and uteroplacental hemodynamics for the classification and prediction of pre-eclampsia,” Hypertension, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 805–806, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar