Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Volume 2010 (2010), Article ID 743097, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/743097
Clinical Study

Loop Electrosurgical Excisional Procedure (LEEP) Done for Discrepancy: Does the Time from HGSIL Affect Pathologic Grade of CIN in LEEP Specimen?

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-6460, USA
2Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-6460, USA

Received 29 November 2009; Revised 22 May 2010; Accepted 25 May 2010

Academic Editor: Peter E. Schwartz

Copyright © 2010 Sue L. Moreni et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Objective. When pathologic discrepancy arises between high-grade cytology on Papanicolaou (Pap) smear and low-grade histology on cervical biopsy, Loop Electrosurgical Excisional Procedure (LEEP) is one management alternative. Our objective was to determine whether the time from initial HGSIL Pap to LEEP affects the pathologic grade of the LEEP specimen. Study Design. We performed a retrospective case-control study identifying LEEPs performed for discrepancy over a 10-year period (1997–2007). 121 subjects were separated into two groups based on LEEP pathology ( 1 and CIN 2,3) and compared using . Results. Of the 121 LEEP specimens, 67 (55.4%) had CIN 2,3. CIN 2,3 was more often discovered when LEEP was performed within 3 months of the HGSIL Pap smear versus after 5 months (55.2% versus 16.4%, ). Conclusion. Women undergoing LEEP for discrepancy >5 months from their HGSIL Pap demonstrated a trend toward less CIN 2,3 on LEEP pathology.