Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Volume 2011, Article ID 547946, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/547946
Clinical Study

The Value of Hysterosalpingography following Medical Treatment with Methotrexate for Ectopic Pregnancy

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí, 08208 Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitari del Mar, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08003 Barcelona, Spain
3Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Health Sciences, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal

Received 19 April 2011; Revised 21 July 2011; Accepted 26 July 2011

Academic Editor: Thomas Herzog

Copyright © 2011 Emma Garcia Grau et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), “Ectopic pregnancy—United States, 1990–1992,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, vol. 44, pp. 46–48, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  2. J. Bouyer, J. Coste, H. Fernandez, J. L. Pouly, and N. Job-Spira, “Sites of ectopic pregnancy: a 10 year population-based study of 1800 cases,” Human Reproduction, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 3224–3230, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. Murray, H. Baakdah, T. Bardell, and T. Tulandi, “Diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy,” CMAJ, vol. 173, no. 8, pp. 905–912, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  4. F. Mol, B. W. Mol, W. M. Ankum, F. Van der Veen, and P. J. Hajenius, “Current evidence on surgery, systemic methotrexate and expectant management in the treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 309–319, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  5. L. V. Mukul and S. B. Teal, “Current management of ectopic pregnancy,” Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 403–419, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  6. K. Barnhart, C. Coutifaris, and M. Esposito, “The pharmacology of methotrexate,” Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 409–417, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  7. J. Elito Jr., K. K. Han, and L. Camano, “Tubal patency after clinical treatment of unruptured ectopic pregnancy,” International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 309–313, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  8. P. Swart, B. W. J. Mol, F. Van der Veen, M. Van Beurden, W. K. Redekop, and P. M. M. Bossuyt, “The accuracy of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology: a meta-analysis,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 486–491, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. B. W. J. Mol, P. Swart, P. M. M. Bossuyt, M. Van Beurden, and F. Van Der Veen, “Reproducibility of the interpretation of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology,” Human Reproduction, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1204–1208, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Papaioannou, M. Afnan, and J. Jafettas, “Tubal assessment tests: still have not found what we are looking for,” Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 15, no. 4, article 2792, pp. 376–382, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Fertility Assessment and Treatment for People with Fertility Problems. Clinical Guideline, RCOG Press, London, UK, 2004.
  12. H. Spalding, A. Tekay, H. Martikainen, and P. Jouppila, “Assessment of tubal patency with transvaginal salpingosonography after treatment for tubal pregnancy,” Human Reproduction, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 306–309, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Elito Jr., K. K. Han, and L. Camano, “Tubal patency following surgical and clinical treatment of ectopic pregnancy,” Sao Paulo Medical Journal, vol. 124, no. 5, pp. 264–266, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Elito Jr., N. A. Montenegro, C. Soares Rda, and L. Camano, “Unruptured ectopic pregnancy: diagnosis and treatment. State of art,” Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, vol. 30, pp. 149–159, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  15. J. Elito Jr., K. K. Han, and L. Camano, “Values of beta-human chorionic gonadotropin as a risk factor for tubal obstruction after tubal pregnancy,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 84, pp. 864–867, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  16. B. W. J. Mol, P. Swart, P. M. M. Bossuyt, and F. Van der Veen, “Is hysterosalpingography an important tool in predicting fertility outcome?” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 663–669, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine, “Medical treatment of ectopic pregnancy,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 90, pp. S206–S212, 2008. View at Google Scholar