Research Article

The Feasibility of Societal Cost Equivalence between Robotic Hysterectomy and Alternate Hysterectomy Methods for Endometrial Cancer

Table 1

Cohort characteristics. Number and % or mean and standard deviation (range).

CharacteristicsTAH
(31.2%)
TLH
(50.4%)
TRH
(18.4%)

Age (years)61.9, 9.2 (43–87)59.9, 10.4 (34–91)58.2, 7.57 (43–74)
BMI (kg/m2)35.7, 10.1 (16.7–69.4)29.8*, 7.5 (19.7–59.2)40.5*, 11.0 (18.6–61.4)
Prior laparotomy32 (46.4%)35 (31.5%)19 (46.3%)
Prior laparoscopy13 (19.7%)11 (10.5%)10 (23.8%)
Adhesions24 (32.9%)17 (14.4%)17 (39.5%)
Uterine weight (g)243.5, 330.12 (25–2170)134.4, 101.4 (34–704)176.3, 153.34 (45.5–905)
Lymph Node Dissection (LND)54 (74.0%)*45 (38.5%)16 (37.9%)

TAH: total abdominal hysterectomy, TLH: total laparoscopic hysterectomy, and TRH: total robotic hysterectomy; standard deviation reported where % does not occur. * .