Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Volume 2011, Article ID 986506, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/986506
Clinical Study

Comparison of Nulliparas Undergoing Cesarean Section in First and Second Stages of Labour: A Prospective Study in a Tertiary Teaching Hospital

Department of Perinatology, Zekai Tahir Burak Maternity and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

Received 4 February 2011; Accepted 21 July 2011

Academic Editor: William A. Grobman

Copyright © 2011 Ayhan Sucak et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Dumont, L. de Bernis, M. H. Bouvier-Colle, and G. Bréart, “Caesarean section rate for maternal indication in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review,” The Lancet, vol. 358, no. 9290, pp. 1328–1333, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. F. Murray and F. S. Pradenas, “Health sector reform and rise of caesarean birth in Chile,” The Lancet, vol. 349, no. 9044, p. 64, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Pai, P. Sundaram, K. K. Radhakrishnan, K. Thomas, and J. P. Muliyil, “A high rate of Caesarean sections in an affluent section of Chennai: is it cause for concern?” National Medical Journal of India, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 156–158, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. S. Gifford, S. C. Morton, M. Fiske, J. Keesey, E. Keeler, and K. L. Kahn, “Lack of progress in labor as a reason for cesarean,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 589–595, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. L. Seal, G. Kamilya, J. Mukherji, S. K. Bhattacharyya, A. De, and A. Hazra, “Outcome in second- versus first-stage cesarean delivery in a teaching institution in Eastern India,” American Journal of Perinatology, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 507–512, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  6. D. Selo-Ojeme, S. Sathiyathasan, and M. Fayyaz, “Caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation versus caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour: comparison of maternal and perinatal morbidity,” Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 278, no. 3, pp. 245–249, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  7. K. C. Winovitch, D. A. Wing, D. C. Lagrew, and J. H. Chung, “The risk of acute neonatal morbidities in the delivery room after primary cesarean at term: influence of labor and stage,” American Journal of Perinatology, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 545–551, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  8. V. M. Allen, C. M. O'Connell, and T. F. Baskett, “Maternal and perinatal morbidity of caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation compared with caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour,” BJOG, vol. 112, no. 7, pp. 986–990, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  9. W. R. Cohen, “Influence of the duration of second stage labor on perinatal outcome and puerperal morbidity,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 266–269, 1977. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. M. Hellman and H. Prystowsky, “The duration of the second stage of labor,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecolog, vol. 63, pp. 1223–1233, 1952. View at Google Scholar
  11. S. M. Menticoglou, F. Manning, C. Harman, and I. Morrison, “Perinatal outcome in relation to second-stage duration,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 173, no. 3 I, pp. 906–912, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. X. Chang, P. Chedraui, M. G. Ross, L. Hidalgo, and J. Peñafiel, “Vacuum assisted delivery in Ecuador for prolonged second stage of labor: maternal-neonatal outcome,” Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 381–384, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  13. L. Cebekulu and E. J. Buchmann, “Complications associated with cesarean section in the second stage of labor,” International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 110–114, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  14. J. M. Alexander, K. J. Leveno, D. J. Rouse, M. B. Landon, and S. Gilbert, “Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 917–921, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  15. V. Govender, M. Panday, and J. Moodley, “Second stage caesarean section at a tertiary hospital in South Africa,” Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1151–1155, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus