Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 414086, 6 pages
Research Article

Interobserver Agreement for Endometrial Cancer Characteristics Evaluated on Biopsy Material

1Department of Pathology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M4N 3M5
2Division of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada M4N 3M5

Received 13 May 2011; Accepted 17 October 2011

Academic Editor: Sean Blackwell

Copyright © 2012 S. Nofech-Mozes et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Citations to this Article [9 citations]

The following is the list of published articles that have cited the current article.

  • Jeong-Yeol Park, Dae-Yeon Kim, Tae-Jin Kim, Jae Weon Kim, Jong-Hyeok Kim, Yong-Man Kim, Young-Tak Kim, and Duk-Soo Bae, “Hormonal Therapy for Women With Stage IA Endometrial Cancer of All Grades,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 7–14, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Anna Luomaranta, Arto Leminen, and Mikko Loukovaara, “Prediction of lymph node and distant metastasis in patients with endometrial carcinoma: A new model based on demographics, biochemical factors, and tumor histology,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 28–32, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • L Helpman, R Kupets, A Covens, R S Saad, M A Khalifa, N Ismiil, Z Ghorab, V Dubé, and S Nofech-Mozes, “Assessment of endometrial sampling as a predictor of final surgical pathology in endometrial cancer,” British Journal of Cancer, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Denis Nastic, Frida Kahlin, Hanna Dahlstrand, and Joseph W. Carlson, “A Cell Type Independent Binary Grading System Does Not Significantly Improve Endometrial Biopsy Interpretation,” International Journal Of Gynecological Pathology, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 256–263, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • T.P. Batista, C.L.C. Cavalcanti, A.A.G. Tejo, and A.L.R. Bezerra, “Accuracy of preoperative endometrial sampling diagnosis for predicting the final pathology grading in uterine endometrioid carcinoma,” European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO), 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Juliette Phelippeau, Geoffroy Canlorbe, Sofiane Bendifallah, Iptissem Naoura, Marine Lefevre, Marcos Ballester, and Emile Daraï, “Preoperative diagnosis of tumor grade and type in endometrial cancer by pipelle sampling and hysteroscopy: Results of a French study,” Surgical Oncology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 370–377, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • F.A. Eggink, C.H. Mom, K. Bouwman, D. Boll, J.H. Becker, C.L. Creutzberg, G.C. Niemeijer, W.J. van Driel, A.K. Reyners, A.G. van der Zee, G.L. Bremer, N.P. Ezendam, R.F. Kruitwagen, J.M. Pijnenborg, H. Hollema, H.W. Nijman, and M.A. van der Aa, “Less-favourable prognosis for low-risk endometrial cancer patients with a discordant pre- versus post-operative risk stratification,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 78, pp. 82–90, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Tiago Selbach Garcia, Márcia Appel, Raquel Rivero, Lúcia Kliemann, and Maria Celeste Osório Wender, “Agreement Between Preoperative Endometrial Sampling and Surgical Specimen Findings in Endometrial Carcinoma,” International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 473–478, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Andressa M.S. Teixeira, Reitan Ribeiro, Kathleen M. Schmeler, Thomas J. Herzog, Sergio M. Nicolau, and Renato M. Marques, “A preoperative and intraoperative scoring system to predict nodal metastasis in endometrial cancer,” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol. 137, no. 1, pp. 78–85, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar