Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 3035718, 3 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3035718
Clinical Study

Can Transabdominal Scan Predict a Short Cervix by Transvaginal Scan?

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, KMC, Manipal 576104, India

Correspondence should be addressed to Jayaraman Mavila Nambiar

Received 18 February 2017; Accepted 30 March 2017; Published 9 April 2017

Academic Editor: Peter E. Schwartz

Copyright © 2017 Jayaraman Mavila Nambiar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. E. B. Fonseca, E. Celik, M. Parra, M. Singh, and K. H. Nicolaides, “Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 357, no. 5, pp. 462–469, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. S. Hassan, R. Romero, D. Vidyadhari et al., “Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 18–31, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. Sonek and C. Shellbaas, “Cervical sonography: a review,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 71–78, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. V. Berghella, “Novel developments on cervical length screening and progesterone for preventing preterm birth,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 182–187, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. E. F. Werner, C. S. Han, C. M. Pettker et al., “Universal cervical-length screening to prevent preterm birth: a cost-effectiveness analysis,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 32–37, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L. L. Saul, J. T. Kurtzman, C. Hagemann, M. Ghamsary, and D. A. Wing, “Is transabdominal sonography of the cervix after voiding a reliable method of cervical length assessment?” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1305–1311, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. C. Westerway, L. H. Pedersen, and J. Hyett, “Cervical length measurement: comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal approach,” Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 19–26, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. P. R. Stone, E. H. Y. Chan, L. M. E. McCowan, R. S. Taylor, and J. M. Mitchell, “Transabdominal scanning of the cervix at the 20-week morphology scan: comparison with transvaginal cervical measurements in a healthy nulliparous population,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 523–527, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. Hernandez-Andrade, R. Romero, H. Ahn et al., “Transabdominal evaluation of uterine cervical length during pregnancy fails to identify a substantial number of women with a short cervix,” Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1682–1689, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Clement, B. Candy, V. Heath, M. To, and K. H. Nicolaides, “Transvaginal ultrasound in pregnancy: its acceptability to women and maternal psychological morbidity,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 508–514, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. C. Vayssiere, C. Moriniere, E. Camus et al., “Measuring cervicallength with ultrasound: evaluation of the procedures andduration of a learning method,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 20, pp. 575–579, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  12. G. C. Mason and M. J. A. Maresh, “Alterations in bladder volume and the ultrasound appearance of the cervix,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 97, no. 5, pp. 457–458, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. E. Brown, G. A. Thieme, D. M. Shah, A. C. Fleischer, and F. H. Boehm, “Transabdominal and transvaginal endosonography: evaluation of the cervix and lower uterine segment in pregnancy,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 155, no. 4, pp. 721–726, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus