Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Volume 2018, Article ID 7409131, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7409131
Research Article

Pelvic Ultrasound Findings in Women with Obstetric Fistula: A Cross-Sectional Study of Cases and Controls

1Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Global Women’s Health, Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
2University of North Carolina, Department of Epidemiology, 401 Rosenau Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7455, USA
3Freedom from Fistula Foundation, Fistula Care Centre, Lilongwe, Malawi
4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi
5Malawi Ministry of Health, Bwaila Maternity Hospital, Lilongwe, Malawi
6University of North Carolina, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 101 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7570, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Jeffrey P. Wilkinson; ude.mcb@nosnikliw.yerffej

Received 1 June 2017; Accepted 19 September 2017; Published 10 January 2018

Academic Editor: Peter E. Schwartz

Copyright © 2018 Jeffrey P. Wilkinson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. De Ridder, G. H. Badlani, A. Browning, P. Singh, I. Sombie, and L. L. Wall, “Fistulas in the developing world,” in Incontinence, P. Abrams, L. Cardozo, S. Khoury, and A. Wein, Eds., pp. 1419–1458, Health Publications Ltd., Paris, 4th edition, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  2. V. E. Aimakhu, “Reproductive functions after the repair of obstetric vesicovaginal fistulae,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 586–591, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. J. Emembolu, “The obstetric fistula: factors associated with improved pregnancy outcome after a successful repair,” International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 205–212, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. L. Wilson, E. Chipeta, L. Kalilani-Phiri, F. Taulo, and A. O. Tsui, “Fertility and pregnancy outcomes among women with obstetric fistula in rural Malawi,” International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 196–198, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Browning, “Obstetric fistula: clinical considerations in the creation of a new urethra and the management of a subsequent pregnancy,” International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. S94–S97, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. B. Hancock and A. Browning, Practical Obstetric Fistula Surgery, Royal Society of Medicine Press, London, UK, 2009.
  7. V. A. Adetiloye and F. O. Dare, “Obstetric fistula: evaluation with ultrasonography,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 243–249, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. J. D. Iams, R. L. Goldenberg, P. J. Meis et al., “The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 334, no. 9, pp. 567–572, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Ludmir, M. B. Landon, S. G. Gabbe, P. Samuels, and M. T. Mennuti, “Management of the diethylstilbestrol-exposed pregnant patient: a prospective study,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 157, no. 3, pp. 665–669, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. A. Golan, R. Langer, S. Wexler, E. Segev, D. Niv, and M. P. David, “Cervical cerclage–its role in the pregnant anomalous uterus,” International Journal of Fertility, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 164–170, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  11. D. Reichman, M. R. Laufer, and B. K. Robinson, “Pregnancy outcomes in unicornuate uteri: a review,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 1886–1894, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Zemlyn, “The length of the uterine cervix and its significance,” Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 267–269, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. P. Londero, S. Bertozzi, A. Fruscalzo, L. Driul, and D. Marchesoni, “Ultrasonographic assessment of cervix size and its correlation with female characteristics, pregnancy, BMI, and other anthropometric features,” Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 283, no. 3, pp. 545–550, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. A. Harris, R. Taylor, R. Thielke, J. Payne, N. Gonzalez, and J. G. Conde, “Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support,” Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 377–381, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Arrowsmith, C. E. Hamlin, and L. L. Wall, “Obstructed labor injury complex: obstetric fistula formation and the multifaceted morbidity of maternal birth trauma in the developing world,” Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 568–574, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus