Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 9628726, 12 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9628726
Research Article

Are There Differences in the Anthropometric, Hemodynamic, Hematologic, and Biochemical Profiles between Late- and Early-Onset Preeclampsia?

1Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil
2Institute of Genetics and Biochemistry, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil

Correspondence should be addressed to Nilson Penha-Silva; rb.ufu@ahnepsn

Received 29 August 2017; Revised 13 November 2017; Accepted 4 January 2018; Published 1 March 2018

Academic Editor: Curt W. Burger

Copyright © 2018 Márcia Aires Rodrigues de Freitas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. Valensise, B. Vasapollo, G. Gagliardi, and G. P. Novelli, “Early and late preeclampsia: two different maternal hemodynamic states in the latent phase of the disease,” Hypertension, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 873–880, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. E. Abalos, C. Cuesta, A. L. Grosso, D. Chou, and L. Say, “Global and regional estimates of preeclampsia and eclampsia: a systematic review,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 170, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. W. Redman and I. L. Sargent, “Latest advances in understanding preeclampsia,” Science, vol. 308, no. 5728, pp. 1592–1594, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Z. S. Reis, E. M. Lage, P. G. Teixeira et al., “Early-onset preeclampsia: is it a better classification for maternal and perinatal outcomes?” Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 584–590, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. Raymond and E. Peterson, “A critical review of early-onset and late-onset preeclampsia,” Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 497–506, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. J. Cipolla, “Cerebrovascular function in pregnancy and eclampsia,” Hypertension, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 14–24, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. P. Schreurs, C. A. Hubel, I. M. Bernstein, A. Jeyabalan, and M. J. Cipolla, “Increased oxidized low-density lipoprotein causes blood-brain barrier disruption in early-onset preeclampsia through LOX-1,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1254–1263, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. A. Belfort, G. R. Saade, C. Grunewald, G. A. Dildy, M. A. Varner, and H. Nisell, “Effects of blood pressure on orbital and middle cerebral artery resistances in healthy pregnant women and women with preeclampsia,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 180, no. 3, pp. 601–607, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Marra, M. Vargas, P. Striano, L. Del Guercio, P. Buonanno, and G. Servillo, “Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: the endothelial hypotheses,” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 619–622, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. O. Nevo, J. F. Soustiel, and I. Thaler, “Maternal cerebral blood flow during normal pregnancy: a cross-sectional study,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 203, no. 5, pp. 475.e1–475.e6, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. G. G. Zeeman, M. R. Hatab, and D. M. Twickler, “Increased cerebral blood flow in preeclampsia with magnetic resonance imaging,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 191, no. 4, pp. 1425–1429, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. L. Diniz, A. F. Moron, M. C. dos Santos, N. Sass, C. R. Pires, and C. L. Debs, “Ophthalmic artery Doppler as a measure of severe pre-eclampsia,” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 216–220, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. T. H. Williamson and A. Harris, “Color Doppler ultrasound imaging of the eye and orbit,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 255–267, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. C. Kane, S. P. Brennecke, and F. da Silva Costa, “Ophthalmic artery Doppler analysis: a window into the cerebrovasculature of women with pre-eclampsia,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 15–21, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. S. Matias, R. F. Costa, B. S. Matias, L. Gordiano, and L. C. Correia, “Predictive value of ophthalmic artery Doppler velocimetry in relation to development of pre-eclampsia,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 419–426, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. C. A. de Oliveira, R. A. M. de Sa, L. G. C. Velarde, F. C. da Silva, F. A. doVale, and H. C. Netto, “Changes in ophthalmic artery Doppler indices in hypertensive disorders during pregnancy,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 609–616, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. M. Takata, M. Nakatsuka, and T. Kudo, “Differential blood flow in uterine, ophthalmic, and brachial arteries of preeclamptic women,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 931–939, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. T. Hata, D. Senoh, K. Hata, and M. Kitao, “Ophthalmic artery velocimetry in preeclampsia,” Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 32–35, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. S. Barbosa, A. K. Pereira, Z. S. Reis, E. M. Lage, H. V. Leite, and A. C. Cabral, “Ophthalmic artery-resistive index and evidence of overperfusion-related encephalopathy in severe preeclampsia,” Hypertension, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 189–193, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. J. Bell, “A historical overview of preeclampsia-eclampsia,” Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 510–518, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. B. Huppertz, “Placental origins of preeclampsia: challenging the current hypothesis,” Hypertension, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 970–975, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. Chabanel, M. Flamm, K. L. Sung, M. M. Lee, D. Schachter, and S. Chien, “Influence of cholesterol content on red cell membrane viscoelasticity and fluidity,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 171–176, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. C. N. Spracklen, C. J. Smith, A. F. Saftlas, J. G. Robinson, and K. K. Ryckman, “Maternal hyperlipidemia and the risk of preeclampsia: a meta-analysis,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 180, no. 4, pp. 346–358, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. N. Z. Dordevic, G. M. Babic, S. D. Markovic et al., “Oxidative stress and changes in antioxidative defense system in erythrocytes of preeclampsia in women,” Reproductive Toxicology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 213–218, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. L. M. Amaral, M. W. Cunningham Jr., D. C. Cornelius, and B. LaMarca, “Preeclampsia: long-term consequences for vascular health,” Vascular Health and Risk Management, vol. 11, pp. 403–415, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. C. M. Spickett, J. Reglinski, W. E. Smith, R. Wilson, J. J. Walker, and J. McKillop, “Erythrocyte glutathione balance and membrane stability during preeclampsia,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1049–1055, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. G. Barshtein, A. Gural, N. Manny, O. Zelig, S. Yedgar, and D. Arbell, “Storage-induced damage to red blood cell mechanical properties can be only partially reversed by rejuvenation,” Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 197–204, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. A. Chasis and N. Mohandas, “Erythrocyte membrane deformability and stability: two distinct membrane properties that are independently regulated by skeletal protein associations,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 343–350, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. M. V. de Freitas, L. F. Marquez-Bernardes, L. R. de Arvelos et al., “Influence of age on the correlations of hematological and biochemical variables with the stability of erythrocyte membrane in relation to sodium dodecyl sulfate,” Hematology, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 424–430, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. Bernardino Neto, E. B. de Avelar Jr., T. S. Arantes et al., “Bivariate and multivariate analyses of the correlations between stability of the erythrocyte membrane, serum lipids and hematological variables,” Biorheology, vol. 50, no. 5-6, pp. 305–320, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. da Silva Garrote-Filho, M. Bernardino-Neto, and N. Penha-Silva, “Influence of erythrocyte membrane stability in atherosclerosis,” Current Atherosclerosis Reports, vol. 19, no. 4, p. 17, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. S. Magid, M. Perlin, and E. L. Gottfried, “Increased erythrocyte osmotic fragility in pregnancy,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 144, no. 8, pp. 910–914, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. G. S. Lemos, L. F. Marquez-Bernardes, L. R. Arvelos, L. F. Paraiso, and N. Penha-Silva, “Influence of glucose concentration on the membrane stability of human erythrocytes,” Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 531–537, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. M. Roberts, P. A. August, G. Bakris et al., “Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 122, no. 5, pp. 1122–1131, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. P. von Dadelszen, L. A. Magee, and J. M. Roberts, “Subclassification of preeclampsia,” Hypertension in Pregnancy, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 143–148, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. D. S. Matias, R. F. Costa, B. Matias, L. Gordiano, and L. C. Correia, “Ophthalmic artery Doppler velocimetric values in pregnant women at risk for preeclampsia,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 1659–1664, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. A. J. Balloch and M. N. Cauchi, “Reference ranges for haematology parameters in pregnancy derived from patient populations,” Clinical & Laboratory Haematology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 7–14, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  38. E. J. van Buul, E. A. Steegers, H. W. Jongsma, T. K. Eskes, C. M. Thomas, and P. R. Hein, “Haematological and biochemical profile of uncomplicated pregnancy in nulliparous women; a longitudinal study,” The Netherlands Journal of Medicine, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 73–85, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  39. M. Abbassi-Ghanavati, L. G. Greer, and F. G. Cunningham, “Pregnancy and laboratory studies: a reference table for clinicians,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 114, no. 6, pp. 1326–1331, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. D. James, P. Steer, C. Weiner et al., “Pregnancy and laboratory studies: a reference table for clinicians,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 115, no. 4, p. 868, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. A. L. Tranquilli, G. Dekker, L. Magee et al., “The classification, diagnosis and management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a revised statement from the ISSHP,” Pregnancy Hypertension, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 97–104, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. B. Thilaganathan, “Placental syndromes: getting to the heart of the matter,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 7–9, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. C. Abad, M. J. Carrasco, S. Pinero et al., “Effect of magnesium sulfate on the osmotic fragility and lipid peroxidation of intact red blood cells from pregnant women with severe preeclampsia,” Hypertension in Pregnancy, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 38–53, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. A. Constantinescu, D. Han, and L. Packer, “Vitamin E recycling in human erythrocyte membranes,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 268, no. 15, pp. 10906–10913, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  45. M. Suhail, S. Patil, S. Khan, and S. Siddiqui, “Antioxidant vitamins and lipoperoxidation in non-pregnant, pregnant, and gestational diabetic women: erythrocytes osmotic fragility profiles,” Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 266–273, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. L. Heilmann, “Blood rheology and pregnancy,” Baillière’s Clinical Haematology, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 777–799, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. S. Lurie, Y. Gidron, I. Piper et al., “Memory performance in late pregnancy and erythrocyte indices,” Journal of the Society for Gynecologic, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 293–296, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. S. Lurie and Y. Mamet, “Red blood cell survival and kinetics during pregnancy,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 185–192, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. L. Y. Wang, “[Changes in blood visco-elasticity in normal pregnancy and pregnancy induced hypertension],” Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 711–713, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  50. G. F. von Tempelhoff, E. Velten, A. Yilmaz, G. Hommel, L. Heilmann, and J. Koscielny, “Blood rheology at term in normal pregnancy and in patients with adverse outcome events,” Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 127–139, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. G. F. von Tempelhoff, S. Ullrich, and L. Heilmann, “[Erythrocyte deformability in pregnancy-induced hypertension],” Zentralblatt für Gynäkologie, vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 160–163, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  52. T. W. Harstad, R. A. Mason, and S. M. Cox, “Serum erythropoietin quantitation in pregnancy using an enzyme-linked immunoassay,” American Journal of Perinatology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 233–235, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. S. Lurie and D. Danon, “Life span of erythrocytes in late pregnancy,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 123–126, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  54. N. Mohandas and P. G. Gallagher, “Red cell membrane: past, present, and future,” Blood, vol. 112, no. 10, pp. 3939–3948, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. G. Lippi, F. Sanchis-Gomar, E. Danese, and M. Montagnana, “Association of red blood cell distribution width with plasma lipids in a general population of unselected outpatients,” Kardiologia Polska, vol. 71, no. 9, pp. 931–936, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. R. A. Cooper, E. C. Arner, J. S. Wiley, and S. J. Shattil, “Modification of red cell membrane structure by cholesterol-rich lipid dispersions. A model for the primary spur cell defect,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 115–126, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. E. Herrera, “Metabolic adaptations in pregnancy and their implications for the availability of substrates to the fetus,” European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. S47–S51, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. P. Brizzi, G. Tonolo, F. Esposito et al., “Lipoprotein metabolism during normal pregnancy,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 181, no. 2, pp. 430–434, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. A. Barden, L. J. Beilin, K. Both et al., “Effects of lipoproteins from pre-eclamptic women on umbilical endothelial cell 6-oxo-prostaglandin f1alpha and endothelin 1 synthesis, and nitric oxide synthase 3 mRNA expression,” Clinical Science, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 697–706, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. J. A. Alves, S. P. Brennecke, and F. da Silva Costa, “OS088. First trimester triple vascular test for pre-eclampsia prediction,” Pregnancy Hypertension, vol. 2, no. 3, p. 226, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  61. F. G. Cunninhmann, “Normal reference ranges for laboratory values in pregnancy,” UpToDate, Waltham, MA, USA, 2017. View at Google Scholar