Review Article

Still No Substantial Evidence to Use Prophylactic Antibiotic at Operative Vaginal Delivery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 2

Obstetric procedures and traumatic and infectious complications (redeveloped from the original study by Knight et al. with some additional variables and analysis).

Procedures and complicationsAntibiotic trial group (n = 1715), no (%)Placebo group (n = 1705), no (%) value

Episiotomy (total)1519 (89.0)1525 (89.0)0.2
Perineal tear (total)493 (29.0)560 (33.0)0.004
Isolated perineal tear126 (7.0)140 (8.0)0.2
Perineal tear and episiotomy367 (21.0)420 (25.0)0.01
Sutured perineal wound1645 (99.0)1665 (100.0)NA
Confirmed or suspected maternal infection180 (11.0)306 (18.0)<0.0001
Perineal wound infection111 (7.0)222 (13.0)<0.0001
Maternal infection other than perineal wound infection69 (4.0)84 (5.0%)0.1
Wound breakdown142 (11.0)272 (21.0)<0.0001
Maternal infection other than wound breakdown38 (2.0)34 (2.0)0.2
Endometritis15 (1.0)23 (1.0)0.2
Ever too painful perineum136 (11.0)198 (15.0)<0.00025

The denominator for antibiotic trial and placebo groups is 1296 and 1297, respectively. The percentage in the original study for two variables in the placebo group (“confirmed or suspected maternal infection” and “ever too painful perineum”) was reported as 19% and 17%, respectively. We thought that as a typographic error and made corrections. The “missing” cases (54 for antibiotic trial group and 33 for the placebo group) were included in numerator in the original study report to determine the proportion, giving 99% and 100%, respectively.