Research Article

Assessment of Anti-Cytogenotoxic Effects of Quercetin in Animals Treated with Topotecan

Table 1

DNA strand breaks in bone marrow of mice after treatment with quercetin and/or topotecan (TPT) or cyclophosphamide (mean ± SD).

Treatment groups
(mg/kg)
Tail moment (arbitrary unit) Tail DNA
(%)
Tail length
(μm )
Olive tail moment (arbitrary units)

Control2.32 ± 0.406.78 ± 1.1216.0 ± 4.845.18 ± 1.52
Quercetin (50)2.68 ± 0.826.56 ± 1.6714.4 ± 5.224.34 ± 0.89
Quercetin (100)2.12 ± 0.356.62 ± 2.1815.2 ± 5.403.40 ± 1.11
TPT (0.5)7.12 ± 1.83**18.2 ± 3.07**35.0 ± 9.38*12.4 ± 3.28*
Quercetin (50) + TPT (0.5)3.98 ± 1.29a10.2 ± 1.95b24.4 ± 5.227.02 ± 1.53a
Quercetin (100) + TPT (0.5)2.64 ± 0.82b7.9 0 ± 2.57b16.8 ± 4.32b5.12 ± 1.66b
TPT (1)13.2 ± 2.27**22.5 ± 4.42**50.0 ± 6.44**18.0 ± 2.51*
Quercetin (50) + TPT (1)9.54 ± 1.8214.6 ± 3.54a37.6 ± 4.27a10.9 ± 3.4a
Quercetin (100) + TPT (1)4.28 ± 1.52b11.3 ± 3.90b22.8 ± 6.72b6.88 ± 1.25b
Cyclophosphamide 4023.9 ± 4.57#26.0 ± 6.17#64.2 ± 6.76#14.58 ± 1.93#

and versus control (Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test). and versus the corresponding TPT alone; versus control (Mann-Whitney U test).