Assessment of Anti-Cytogenotoxic Effects of Quercetin in Animals Treated with Topotecan
Table 1
DNA strand breaks in bone marrow of mice after treatment with quercetin and/or topotecan (TPT) or cyclophosphamide (mean ± SD).
Treatment groups (mg/kg)
Tail moment (arbitrary unit)
Tail DNA (%)
Tail length (μm )
Olive tail moment (arbitrary units)
Control
2.32 ± 0.40
6.78 ± 1.12
16.0 ± 4.84
5.18 ± 1.52
Quercetin (50)
2.68 ± 0.82
6.56 ± 1.67
14.4 ± 5.22
4.34 ± 0.89
Quercetin (100)
2.12 ± 0.35
6.62 ± 2.18
15.2 ± 5.40
3.40 ± 1.11
TPT (0.5)
7.12 ± 1.83**
18.2 ± 3.07**
35.0 ± 9.38*
12.4 ± 3.28*
Quercetin (50) + TPT (0.5)
3.98 ± 1.29a
10.2 ± 1.95b
24.4 ± 5.22
7.02 ± 1.53a
Quercetin (100) + TPT (0.5)
2.64 ± 0.82b
7.9 0 ± 2.57b
16.8 ± 4.32b
5.12 ± 1.66b
TPT (1)
13.2 ± 2.27**
22.5 ± 4.42**
50.0 ± 6.44**
18.0 ± 2.51*
Quercetin (50) + TPT (1)
9.54 ± 1.82
14.6 ± 3.54a
37.6 ± 4.27a
10.9 ± 3.4a
Quercetin (100) + TPT (1)
4.28 ± 1.52b
11.3 ± 3.90b
22.8 ± 6.72b
6.88 ± 1.25b
Cyclophosphamide 40
23.9 ± 4.57#
26.0 ± 6.17#
64.2 ± 6.76#
14.58 ± 1.93#
and versus control (Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test). and versus the corresponding TPT alone; versus control (Mann-Whitney U test).