Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 906965, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/906965
Review Article

Global Consequences of Liver Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury

1Second Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Aretaieion University Hospital, University of Athens, 76 Vassilisis Sofia’s Avenue, 11528 Athens, Greece
2Second Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, University of Athens, 1 Rimini Street, 12462 Athens, Greece
3Division of Surgery & Interventional Sciences, Royal Free Hospital Campus, University College London, 8 South Pond Street, Hampstead, London NW3 2QG, UK
4First Department of Anesthesiology, Aretaieion Hospital, University of Athens School of Medicine, Vassilissis Sofias 76, 11528 Athens, Greece
5Fourth Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, University of Athens, 1 Rimini Street, 12462 Athens, Greece

Received 21 August 2013; Revised 2 January 2014; Accepted 13 January 2014; Published 1 April 2014

Academic Editor: Mengzhou Xue

Copyright © 2014 Constantinos Nastos et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Liver ischemia/reperfusion injury has been extensively studied during the last decades and has been implicated in the pathophysiology of many clinical entities following hepatic surgery and transplantation. Apart from its pivotal role in the pathogenesis of the organ’s post reperfusion injury, it has also been proposed as an underlying mechanism responsible for the dysfunction and injury of other organs as well. It seems that liver ischemia and reperfusion represent an event with “global” consequences that influence the function of many remote organs including the lung, kidney, intestine, pancreas, adrenals, and myocardium among others. The molecular and clinical manifestation of these remote organs injury may lead to the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, frequently encountered in these patients. Remote organ injury seems to be in part the result of the oxidative burst and the inflammatory response following reperfusion. The present paper aims to review the existing literature regarding the proposed mechanisms of remote organ injury after liver ischemia and reperfusion.

1. Introduction

Liver ischemia and reperfusion has been the topic of intense study during the last decades since it is implicated in many clinical scenarios, including hemorrhagic shock and resuscitation, trauma [1], liver resections [2], and liver transplantation [3].

After the introduction of vascular control techniques during hepatic surgery, liver ischemia and reperfusion has been recognized as one of the key elements that contribute to postoperative morbidity and mortality [4]. Liver dysfunction and failure are serious postoperative complications which may ensue as a result of reperfusion injury. Although the liver has been studied in the aforementioned clinical scenario (i.e., hepatic surgery) and liver dysfunction is widely recognized as a consequence of hepatic reperfusion injury, many other remote organs seem to be influenced during this process as well [57].

The aim of this paper is to review the existing literature and summarize the proposed mechanisms of remote organ injury that are mediated by liver ischemia/reperfusion injury in hepatic surgery.

2. Liver Injury

The topic of liver reperfusion injury has been extensively investigated in the context of hepatic surgery and therefore it is not the aim of the present review to describe in detail the pathophysiology of this entity.

Briefly, liver ischemia/reperfusion injury can be divided into two distinct phases. Ischemia seems to be the initial insult to the organ, which, although tolerable from the liver, triggers the production of molecules that are essential for the induction of reperfusion injury. During this phase intracellular production of xanthine oxidase and NADPH oxidase from liver cells is promoted [3]. The early phase of reperfusion occurs from the first minutes after ischemia and up to 6 hours later. Immediately after reperfusion, cellular swelling takes place due to the disturbance of NA/K/ATPase function [8]. In addition, reactive oxidant species (ROS) can be found inducing oxidative stress to the liver as well as to distant organs [9, 10]. ROS activate Kuppfer cells, promoting even further ROS as well as cytokine production. In the meantime, NO levels are reduced and there is an imbalance between endothelin-1 and nitric oxide (NO) production from NO synthase (NOS), leading to vasoconstriction of the sinusoids [11]. The narrowing of the sinusoids leads to entrapment of platelets and neutrophils. Hepatocyte injury is promoted through hepatocellular necrosis and apoptosis, though distinct pathways [1214].

An excessive inflammatory response is clearly recognized as a key mechanism of injury during reperfusion. Local production of cytokines (IL-1b and TNF-) is the precursor of the late phase of reperfusion injury [3]. This is the cellular phase and is characterized by activation and migration of neutrophil, CD4+ T lymphocytes, and platelets into the liver. Cell-surface adhesion molecules (such as intracellular cell adhesion molecule, ICAM, and vascular cell adhesion molecule, VCAM) are expressed in the hepatocytes and endothelial cells and inflammatory cell adherence takes place [15]. These cells are trapped in the constricted and narrowed sinusoids and result in inflammatory injury and microvasculature failure. CD4+ T lymphocytes produce granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, interferon gamma, and TNF-, which amplify Kupffer cell activation and cytokine release [15].

Although intravascular coagulation during inflow occlusion can reduce or block blood flow in sinusoids and cause liver injury, active vasoconstriction and cell entrapment seems to be the major contributing factor to microcirculatory problems [15]. Microcirculatory failure leads to aggravated and prolonged ischemia, as parts of the liver remain hypoxic, aggravating necrosis, Kupffer cell activation, further cytokine and ROS release, and creating a vicious cycle of excessive inflammatory response, reactive oxygen and nitrogen species production, and further oxidative tissue injury [4, 15].

Although the many aspects of liver reperfusion injury remain to be elucidated, there is extensive literature on the mechanisms that mediate liver injury. However, only recently has there been research concerning the mechanisms involved in remote organ injury after the initial insult to the liver. Distant organs that have been implicated in the remote injury after hepatic ischemia/reperfusion are depicted in Figure 1.

906965.fig.001
Figure 1: Distant organs that have been implicated in the remote injury after hepatic ischemia/reperfusion.

3. Kidney Injury

Ischemia/reperfusion injury of the liver remnant or donor liver is a frequent cause of acute liver failure (ALF) during the perioperative period and is a common complication after major liver resection or liver transplantation [4, 16, 17]. Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs frequently in patients with ALF and poses a serious clinical problem in the perioperative period [18, 19] increasing the associated morbidity and mortality. The reported incidence of AKI ranges from 40 to 85% [18, 20] and in the setting of liver transplantation can be as high as 95% [21]. Unfortunately, the pathophysiology of AKI associated with liver ischemia/reperfusion injury is not fully understood. However, there is emerging evidence suggesting multiple molecular mechanisms. The basic mechanisms are summarized in Figure 2.

906965.fig.002
Figure 2: Mechanisms involved in remote injury to the kidney after liver ischemia/reperfusion.

The initiating event appears to be portal hypertension, which is the result of portal vein occlusion, incorporated in various techniques of vascular control of the liver used during hepatic surgery. This induces splanchnic vasodilation with subsequent intrarenal vasoconstriction [20, 22, 23]. Splanchnic vasodilation leads to hypotension [20] which in turn leads to activation of the renin-angiotensin system [20, 24]. Upregulation of renin-angiotensin system can cause severe reduction of glomerular filtration rate, urinary sodium excretion, and free water excretion. It has been proposed that intense intrarenal ischemia subsequent to renin-angiotensin activation leads to renal tubular necrosis and renal dysfunction.

However, other mechanisms may play an important role in the pathogenesis of renal dysfunction after liver ischemia/reperfusion injury. Systemic inflammatory response may induce renal injury [20, 25]. Circulating levels of proinflammatory cytokines and transcription factors, including interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-), and high mobility group box (HMGB) 1, are increased and their release from the liver may promote inflammatory changes in the kidney after liver ischemia/reperfusion [2528]. Kupffer cells activation plays the predominant role in the production and release of these cytokines. Recently, Park et al. reported the significant role of Paneth cell derived IL-17A in the aggravation of the observed systemic inflammatory syndrome and the exacerbation of renal injury [29]. These proinflammatory factors can upregulate endothelial adhesion molecules in distant organs including the kidney. Upregulation of renal endothelial adhesion molecules including E-selectin, P-selectin, and intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 promotes leukocyte recruitment and extravasations to the renal interstitial space [30, 31]. Meyer et al. reported that liver ischemia/reperfusion results in significant ICAM-1 upregulation in remote tissues, including the kidney, and is likely mediated by cytokines such as TNF [32]. In addition, circulating bile acids and endotoxin and circulating immune complexes may contribute to the development of AKI [20].

The integrity of the endothelial barrier plays a pivotal role in the protection against AKI, by regulating leukocyte recruitment to the area of injury [25, 30]. Lee et al. reported that hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury produces marked endothelial cell apoptosis in the kidney, which is more prominent in the interstitial capillary endothelial cells [33]. Endothelial cell death due to apoptosis would impair the regulation of leukocyte infiltration, further exacerbating renal injury. Apoptotic cell death represents the execution of an ATP-dependent process often initiated by death ligand/death receptor interactions, such as Fas ligand with Fas [34, 35].

Except from the aforementioned mechanisms, oxidative stress is also a major determinant of liver ischemia/reperfusion induced AKI. Activated neutrophils [33] aggregate in the subendothelial space, where they release reactive oxygen species (ROS), enzymes, and cytokines, causing direct renal injury [36] and the recruitment of monocytes and macrophages leading to further aggravation of the oxidative injury. Kadkhodaee et al. reported that liver ischemia/reperfusion causes renal injury including oxidative status changes as shown by the increase in renal malondyaldehyde (MDA) levels and the decrease in superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase activity [28]. Similar results were reported in other studies showing that hepatic ischemia and reperfusion may cause oxidative stress to renal tissue and that administration of antioxidants seems to have a beneficial effect via the glutathione (GSH) system and the modulation of MDA levels [37, 38]. The pivotal role of reactive oxygen species in the development of AKI was also demonstrated by the beneficial effect of hepatic ischemic preconditioning and the administration of free radical scavengers [39]. However, although high concentrations of oxygen free radicals induce tissue injury during the reperfusion period after prolonged ischemia, moderate oxygen free radicals are an important prerequisite of ischemic preconditioning in renal cells [40]. Oxygen free radicals phosphorylate several important cytoprotective kinases, including extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2), mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK), and Akt, and are involved in the upregulation of several cytoprotective genes [41]. ROS are attractive signaling candidates to account for preconditioning in the kidney because renal cells are subject to obligatory bursts of oxidative stress during the reperfusion phase after each preconditioning stimulus. Therefore, distant renal exposure through the blood stream of moderate ROS caused by hepatic ischemic preconditioning may also initiate cytoprotective signaling to defend against subsequent and more severe free radical-mediated injury in renal tubule cells.

Damage of the actin cytoskeleton, which contributes to the development of AKI, is another proposed mechanism [42, 43]. Lee et al. have shown that liver ischemia/reperfusion promotes renal F-actin breakdown [33]. Additionally, F-actin disruption induces apoptosis in several cell lines [44]. Therefore, loss of actin cytoskeleton may contribute to the development of renal tubular and endothelial apoptosis.

At a molecular level, adenosine has been proposed to play a pivotal role. Adenosine release is increased after stress (e.g., hypoxia, ischemia/reperfusion) with subsequent activation of adenosine receptors (ARs), which protect against cell death in several cell types [45]. Endogenous adenosine production is crucial in protecting against ischemia-induced organ injury. Activation of cell surface Adenosine 1 (A1) ARs produces cytoprotective effects in many organ systems including the kidney [46]. A1AR activation produces several cellular effects that are suited to attenuate the multifaceted pathophysiology of AKI (endothelial and renal tubular cell apoptosis, inflammation, and necrosis). Acute renal protection after hepatic ischemia/reperfusion with A1AR activation is mediated by Akt activation [47]. In particular, Akt has diverse functions to counteract apoptosis including inhibition of mitochondrial cytochrome c and phosphorylation of several proapoptotic factors (e.g., caspase 9, glycogen synthase kinase 3) [48]. Akt can also increase the activity of heat shock protein 27 in certain cell types [49, 50] promoting F-actin stability. Better preserved F-actin cytoskeleton in the kidneys may contribute to reduced renal tubular necrosis and apoptosis [33].

Another suggested molecular pathway is the protease-activated receptor 1. As reported by Park et al. modulation of the receptor through the administration of activated protein C resulted in reduced expression of several proinflammatory genes, reduced kidney filamentous-actin degradation and neutrophil infiltration, and better preservation of vascular permeability of the kidney after liver ischemia/reperfusion [51]. Except from this receptor, the family of Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptors have been shown to play a role either in the protection or the development of ischemia/reperfusion induced AKI. More specifically, S1P1 receptor activation via S1P provides a protective signaling cascade, whereas S1P3 activation can potentially initiate detrimental effects. The authors also showed that the protective effect of S1P activated S1P1 receptor was induced via pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein (Gi/o) ERK and Akt-mediated pathways [52] and included reduced necrosis, inflammation and apoptosis, enhanced preservation of F-actin cytoskeleton, improved vascular integrity, and reduced neutrophil infiltration [53].

Endogenous hydrogen sulphide has also been demonstrated to play a role as a modulator of key peroxidant and inflammatory events occurring after total hepatic ischemia and reperfusion, attenuating lipid peroxidation and inflammation reactions by reducing MDA, nuclear factor-B (NF-B), and ICAM-1 production [54]. Finally, Suzuki et al. have proposed a putative role for platelet activating factor (PAF) and endothelin (ET)-1 in the pathogenesis of renal injury after hepatic ischemia and reperfusion. Specifically, they reported that the pretreatment with a PAF receptor antagonist resulted in attenuation of renal injury [55].

4. Lung Injury

The impact of pulmonary complications on morbidity and mortality after hepatic ischemia/reperfusion was acknowledged more than 2 decades ago [56, 57]. It was soon realized that lung injury resulted from the reperfusion of the donor liver during transplantation, a condition that also ensues during extensive hepatectomies. One of the proposed mechanisms is the release of TNF- from reperfused Kupffer cells, which interacts with pulmonary capillaries and elicits the expression of adhesion molecules, such as ICAM-1 and E-selectin, leading to migration of neutrophils and subsequent lung injury [5860]. In combination with TNF-, a variety of proinflammatory molecules, such as PAF, cytokine-induced neutrophil-chemoattractant protein [61], IL-6, and IL-18 [62, 63], as well as substance-P [64], are released from the reperfused liver and have been found to mediate lung injury after hepatic ischemia/reperfusion. On the contrary, IL-4 and IL-10 seem to exert a protective role [63, 65].

Cytokine production by the reperfused liver seems to provoke a sustained production of cytokines locally in the lung, such as TNF- from alveolar macrophages, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-2, and the pathway of interleukin-6/signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 (STAT3) [60, 65, 66]. The importance of the locally sustained pulmonary inflammation was underlined by the suppression of pulmonary NF-B through administration of IL-10, which was followed by cytokine suppression and prevention of hepatic ischemia/reperfusion-induced lung injury [65].

Another important mechanism is the translocation of endotoxin to the systemic circulation. Bacterial translocation is evident after liver resection under vascular control even after the creation of a portasystemic shunt [67]. In particular, insufficiency of Kupffer cells during reperfusion allows the spill-over of endotoxin in the pulmonary capillaries, stimulating TNF-, IL-6, epithelial neutrophil activating protein-78, and MIP-2 production and subsequent neutrophil infiltration of the lungs [68, 69]. The protective action of inhibition of endotoxin against hepatic and pulmonary injury after hepatic ischemia/reperfusion alone or in combination with hepatectomy further strengthens the role of endotoxin in the pathophysiology of the syndrome [70].

Oxidative stress during hepatic ischemia/reperfusion has been consistently shown to play a crucial role in the development of lung injury. Although the lung resists oxidative stress by upregulating antioxidant enzymes, exogenous antioxidants offer significant benefits [7]. Xanthine oxidase (XO) has been shown to release hydroxyl and superoxide radicals during reperfusion. Its inhibition by allopurinol has been reported to ameliorate lung injury in this setting [71, 72]. Data from our laboratory have also marked nitrosylation of pulmonary proteins as a prominent feature in liver ischemia/reperfusion induced lung injury [60]. However, production of NO seems to protect the lung from injury [7375]. In a recent work, we have also shown the role of oxidative reactions mediated by free iron in this setting, and the significant improvement of hepatic ischemia/reperfusion-induced lung injury by iron chelation [7]. Improvement has also been offered by other antioxidants, such as the general anesthetic propofol, methylene blue, and mannitol [7678]. Recently, preconditioning of the lungs with isoflurane showed promising results, although the involved mechanisms remain poorly understood [79].

Lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome can severely complicate the postoperative course following liver transplantation [80]. Hepatic ischemia/reperfusion-induced lung injury may be implicated in these complications, due to the release of cytokines in the bloodstream, such as TNF- and IL-6 and IL-8 [81, 82], as well as due to release of endotoxin, which seems to prolong ventilatory support [57, 83]. Whether this release of endotoxin and priming of neutrophils is responsible for the susceptibility of these patients to transfusion-related lung injury remains to be shown. Nevertheless, acute lung injury after liver transplantation has been repeatedly correlated to platelet transfusion [8486].

5. Gut Injury

Gut barrier failure in the form of bacterial and/or endotoxin translocation has been reported following liver ischemia/reperfusion, either during hepatic resections with the use of the Pringle maneuver or after liver transplantation, both in the experimental and clinical setting [67, 87, 88]. However, liver ischemia/reperfusion injury has been implicated in other forms of intestinal dysfunction, including motility, transit time, and absorption function changes [89].

Multiple mechanisms have been proposed, but the exact pathophysiology remains to be elucidated. Experimental data suggest that intestinal mucosa oxidative injury results from the effect of liver-produced ROS, which are “spilled” in the systemic circulation. This is demonstrated in small animal model experimental studies. Okay et al. have reported decreased intestinal mucosal MDA concentration, attenuated intestinal mucosa injury, and bacterial translocation 24 hours after extensive hepatectomy in rats, following the administration of the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine [90]. Alexandris et al. have also reported decreased levels of protein carbonyls and decreased endotoxin translocation after antioxidant treatment, following extensive hepatectomy in rats [91]. The proposed mechanism of remote oxidative injury to the gut mucosa from liver derived ROS is damage of the tight junctions between enterocytes, which results in increased permeability and gut barrier failure.

Another suggested mechanism is congestion of the portal venous system. During the Pringle maneuver, blood from the intestine and pancreas is pooled in the portal venous system leading to portal hypertension. It has been demonstrated by Filos et al. that rats subjected to the Pringle maneuver for 30 minutes had immediate (30 minutes) and delayed (24 hours) gut barrier failure with increased bacterial and endotoxin translocation, which might be attributed to portal stasis leading to intestinal congestion. Bowel wall edema may lead to intra-abdominal hypertension resulting in further compromisation of intestinal perfusion [92] and gut barrier dysfunction [93]. In addition, sinusoidal microcirculatory failure during reperfusion decreases the total vascular bed of the liver, increasing intrahepatic portal resistance and leading to postoperative portal hypertension [94]. However, this scenario is only applicable in cases of liver ischemia/reperfusion injury following liver surgery, where vascular occlusion techniques are applied.

Postoperative liver failure seems to be one of the most serious complications after hepatic surgery, when liver ischemia and reperfusion occurs. Many of the factors which comprise gut barrier function seem to be compromised in postoperative liver failure [95]. Bile production and intestinal motility are decreased [89, 96, 97]. Bile has a trophic role for the intestinal mucosa. It binds to intraluminal endotoxin and bacteria creating nonabsorbable complexes and contains secretory IGA, which has antibacterial properties. The decreased intestinal motility results in increased intestinal bacterial load, which in turn has been shown to cause intestinal mucosal injury [97].

Apoptosis is implicated in gut mucosal injury following liver ischemia and reperfusion, since it is already known that extracellular free radicals can induce cell apoptosis [98100]. It has been reported that oxidative stress can induce damage in enterocyte cell membranes and DNA, activating apoptotic pathways and thus disrupting the mucosal barrier [101, 102]. Ikeda et al. have shown that the typical intestinal oxidative injury after ischemia and reperfusion is the “lifting” of the epithelial layer from the lamina propria and that apoptosis and necrosis are the main involved mechanisms [103]. During this process, enterocytes create subepithelial crypts and “blubs”—microscopically known as Gruenhagen’s space [104]. Alterations in the expression of adhesion molecules between the cellular membrane and the matrix in the villi may be responsible. Beaulieu has implicated changes in the expression of B1 integrins [105], while Probstmeier et al. have reported changes in the expression and function of the complex molecule J1/tenascin in enterocytes located at the tip of the villi [106]. It is possible that oxygen free radicals damage these molecules leading to loss of interaction between enterocytes and matrix. It has been shown that loss of this interaction can lead to apoptotic cell death [107].

Remote intestinal injury has been reported by many authors in the setting of liver transplantation and liver ischemia and reperfusion protocols involving hepatectomy either under vascular control or not. Mochida et al. suggested that bacterial translocation, following liver transplantation in rats, is responsible for hypercoagulopathy in the graft’s sinusoids, reversing it with oral antibiotic therapy [108]. Lemaire et al. described a porcine model of severe, extraintestinal tissue injury, consisting of prolonged hepatic ischemia and reperfusion, in combination with hemihepatectomy. Venous congestion of the gut during ischemia was prevented with a temporary portal-caval shunt. This prevented direct congestive damage to the gut, associating injury with remote ischemia/reperfusion. They reported bacterial translocation to the portal vain, lymph nodes, systemic circulation, and thoracic duct very early after liver reperfusion. In their model, gut injury can only be attributed to remote ischemia and reperfusion from the liver. Portal congestion was eliminated, while the extent of hepatectomy was too limited to cause liver failure, and barrier failure was evident very early during reperfusion [67]. Filos et al. reported immediate and delayed gut barrier failure increasing bacterial translocation and endotoxaemia after 30 minutes of liver ischemia in rats. In addition, they found increased apoptosis in the intestinal mucosa 30 min after reperfusion [88]. Bedurlu et al. reported increased levels of TNF-, bacterial translocation, and endotoxaemia 48 hours after hepatectomy performed under liver ischemia and reperfusion [109]. Jiang et al. showed that remote injury of the intestinal mucosa takes place after 30 minutes of liver ischemia followed by reperfusion in a rat experimental model. Microscopic study revealed denuded villi, disintegration of the lamina propria, appearance of exposed capillaries, and infiltration of neutrophils and macrophages in the ileal mucosa. In addition, enterocyte apoptosis was found to be increased after liver ischemia and reperfusion. Splenectomy reversed these findings suggesting a role of the spleen in inflammatory and apoptotic pathways, through neutrophil activation and cytokine expression [110]. Leister et al. concluded that partial hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury leads to significant alterations of small bowel microcirculation and mucosal injury, while vasoactive intestinal polypeptide and gastrin-releasing peptide attenuated the damage [111]. Ochiai et al. showed increased intestinal permeability, endotoxinemia, and morphologic changes in the intestinal mucosa after liver ischemia and reperfusion combined with hepatectomy. These findings were reversed in the group treated with I2 prostaglandin analogues [112]. Finally, Meyer et al. have shown that liver ischemia and reperfusion increases the expression of ICAM in various organs including the intestine, implicating a possible mechanism of multiple organ failure [32].

Most of the experimental studies have been done in small animal models and, as a result, vascular occlusion is accompanied by transient portal hypertension. This is a major confounding factor, as direct damage to the intestinal mucosa can take place during splanchnic congestion. Only when this factor has been eliminated can the injury be attributed to remote injury by spillage of toxic substances from the liver.

Our team has developed an experimental model of liver ischemia and reperfusion injury combined with major hepatectomy, as a clinical analogue to major hepatectomy under vascular control [2]. In this model we have demonstrated that liver ischemia and reperfusion produces reactive oxygen species that result in oxidative injury to the intestinal mucosa. Intestinal mucosa oxidative markers were increased, suggesting a causative association with intestinal mucosa injury, apoptosis of enterocytes, and bacterial and endotoxin translocation. These parameters were reversed when antioxidant therapy was administered [6].

Clinical data regarding remote intestinal injury after liver ischemia/reperfusion derive mostly from liver transplantation series, because in liver resection studies addressing gut dysfunction, vascular control is not always used and, as a result, liver ischemia/reperfusion injury is not always present. In a randomized clinical study from Abdala et al. increased endotoxin translocation from the gut was reported following liver transplantation. The patients were divided in two groups, undergoing liver transplantation with a venovenous shunt or with the “piggyback” method. No endotoxin clearance was documented through the grafts of either group 2 hours after reperfusion [87]. In another study from Ronholm et al. postreperfusion hypotension observed after reperfusion of the graft was attributed to complement cascade activation originating from the gut during the reperfusion phase of orthotopic liver transplantation [113]. Wu et al. also demonstrated bacterial translocation in a clinical study of cirrhotic patients undergoing liver transplantation [114]. However, in clinical studies, no direct measurements of intestinal tissue injury have been made and there is no direct proof if mucosal injury exists, if it is the result of liver vascular manipulations, or if it preexisted prior to transplantation as a result of liver parenchyma injury.

The above mechanisms are summarized in Figure 3.

906965.fig.003
Figure 3: Mechanisms involved in remote injury to the gut mucosa leading to gut barrier failure after liver ischemia/reperfusion.

6. Pancreatic Injury

Pancreatic dysfunction has been reported following major liver resections both in clinical trials [115] and in experimental studies [116]. The etiology of pancreatic dysfunction after these operations has not yet been clarified. However, among the risk factors proposed to interpret hyperamylasemia following hepatectomy are chronic liver disease and extent of hepatectomy, as well as portal congestion caused by the vascular control of the liver during these surgical procedures [117]. In a clinical study, Miyagawa et al. reported that the use of the Pringle maneuver during liver resection increases the incidence of postoperative hyperamylasemia and that the severity of hyperamylasemia is increased as the vascular occlusion time is prolonged [118]. Hashimoto et al. described the same conclusion in their clinical study reporting attenuated pancreatic injury in patients who were subjected to selective vascular control techniques [119]. Although the fist assumption of pancreatic injury after hepatectomy proposed portal congestion during vascular control as being responsible, Kubota et al. carried out a series of hepatectomies, occluding the superior mesenteric artery as well, during hepatic vascular control and thus eliminating any increase in portal pressure [120]. There were no differences in amylase compared with patients with intraoperative portal hypertension, implying that the possible mechanism was remote ischemia/reperfusion injury of the liver. Meyer et al. have reported ICAM-1 upregulation in remote organs, after liver ischemia and reperfusion in rats, including the pancreas, intestine, kidney, and lung [121]. The proposed mechanism is oxidative damage, derived from ROS production during liver ischemia/reperfusion by the use of hepatic vascular control during surgery. Ochiai et al. have also demonstrated pancreatic tissue injury after partial hepatectomy combined with ischemia/reperfusion in rats. They demonstrated a peak of acinar cell necrosis at 24 hours postoperatively as well as increased apoptotic activity. These findings were attenuated after treatment with I2 prostaglandin analogues [122]. Yang et al. found increased pancreatic MDA content, decreased pancreatic SOD activity, and increased serum amylase after 6 hours of reperfusion in a rodent model of 45-minute hepatic ischemia and reperfusion [123].

Our team has studied the pathophysiology of pancreatic injury following hepatic ischemia/reperfusion combined with hepatectomy. The key factor of posthepatectomy pancreatitis is thought to be the production of ROS, resulting in remote organ injury. In our study we measured the MDA content of portal blood and pancreatic tissue samples as a marker of lipid peroxidation and oxidative damage. Portal blood and pancreatic tissue MDA content was increased during liver reperfusion. In addition, we found increased amylase and c-peptide levels during reperfusion and histological evidence of pancreatic necrosis [124]. These data support the hypothesis that ROS and oxidative stress, as assessed by lipid peroxidation and tissue necrosis, play a crucial role in pancreatitis following liver ischemia/reperfusion combined with hepatectomy. Further evidence from our team supports the aforementioned hypothesis. Antioxidant administration (desferrioxamine) attenuated pancreatic injury after major hepatectomy under vascular control in a porcine experimental model, possibly by preventing and reversing production and circulation of oxidative products [54].

Pancreatic injury, in the form of acute pancreatitis, is a rare but severe complication of liver transplantation in children and adults [125]. Although multiple factors have been implicated, it seems that remote oxidative burst plays a pivotal role. In a recent study in rodents from Li et al. pancreatic injury following liver transplantation was found to be oxidative stress dependant. They found increased MDA content in pancreatic tissue, increased amylase and lipase serum levels, and morphological changes. These were attenuated with antioxidant treatment [126].

7. Adrenal Injury

Adrenal function during liver ischemia/reperfusion has not been adequately studied to date. However, there are reports of macroscopic injury to the adrenals following hepatectomy under vascular control and orthotopic liver transplantation [127, 128]. In addition, relative adrenal insufficiency has been reported in patients undergoing liver transplantation, even in steroid-free immunosuppressant protocols, in an incidence of up to 92% [129]. This has been described as the “hepatoadrenal” syndrome. A possible proposed mechanism is the decreased levels of high density lipoprotein (HDL) after liver transplantation and thus decreased cortisol synthesis. HDL levels have been shown to be a predictor of posttransplant relative adrenal insufficiency [130]. During the anhepatic phase, the liver does not produce apoA-1 (which is essential for the formation of HDL) for a number of hours. In addition, the transplanted liver suffers ischemia/reperfusion injury that is responsible for postoperative liver dysfunction. ApoA-1 has a relatively short half-life and, therefore, the HDL levels are decreased after transplantation.

Liver ischemia/reperfusion has been shown to increase the levels of endotoxin, as well as various cytokines, including TNF-, IL-1, and IL-6. Endotoxin and TNF- have been shown to inhibit steroidogenesis. Endotoxin has been reported to bind to the HDL receptor, neutralizing it [131]. Increased levels of TNF-, IL-1, and IL-6, which are produced during hepatic ischemia/reperfusion, have been shown to decrease synthesis and secretion of apoA-1 [132]. In addition, TNF- has been demonstrated to directly inhibit steroidogenesis and increase resistance to cortisol [130].

8. Myocardial Injury

Although indications about a connection between acute liver injury and myocardial damage had already been reported [133, 134], this was brought sharply into focus in a study by the US Acute Liver Failure Study Group which showed that elevation of serum troponin I (cTnI) levels is common (74% overall) in patients with ALF of various etiologies [135]. However, in both this and the previous studies, liver ischemia/reperfusion was absent as a mechanism of injury. Furthermore, these studies focused more on clinical aspects and less on pathophysiology. Tanaka et al. showed that liver ischemia/reperfusion is accompanied by myocardial cell necrosis (manifested by elevated troponin levels) and proposed ROS production as a putative mechanism of injury [25]. However, this study suffered from a major design limitation: to achieve liver ischemia/reperfusion, the portal vein was totally occluded, leading to intestinal congestion during liver ischemia, with unknown effects in the observed results. A similar follow-up study also documented myocardium injury after total hepatic ischemia and reperfusion and reversal with antioxidant treatment. However, this study had similar limitations, as the inferior vena cava was also occluded in the process, leading to certain hemodynamic instability and altered cardiac output, making pathophysiologic mechanisms unclear [54]. Recently, the same group published data showing attenuation of myocardium injury after total hepatic ischemia and reperfusion after the administration of tacrolimus, implicating inflammatory mechanisms in the pathophysiology as well [5].

Trying to overcome these limitations, our team designed a porcine model of liver ischemia/reperfusion that diverted portal blood flow during ischemia to the inferior vena cava and restored normal flow path during reperfusion. Our results showed a relatively subtle yet consistent injury to the myocardium early after liver ischemia/reperfusion, manifested mainly by increase in cardiac troponin I blood levels and confirmed histologically by myocardiocyte necrosis [136].

An unexpected result of this study was the early myocardial injury (prior to 6 hours after reperfusion), certainly before acute liver failure manifestations (e.g., increase in liver enzymes, intracranial hypertension, and hemodynamic instability). It is therefore speculated that myocardial injury was probably attributed to liver ischemia/reperfusion and not to the ensuing acute liver failure. A putative mechanism involves the generation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species during liver ischemia/reperfusion. However, myocardial damage in this setting was subclinical and mostly evident under microscopic examination; therefore the heart might be one of the least clinically affected organs in liver ischemia/reperfusion. It must not be forgotten, however, that all experimental as well as most clinical observations are made in relatively healthy hearts and not those burdened with ischemia, cardiomyopathy, and/or systolic or diastolic dysfunction.

9. Comments

Liver ischemia/reperfusion injury has been shown to play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of the frequently observed remote organ injury following a variety of clinical scenarios including hepatic surgery and transplantation. Multiple mechanisms have been implicated in the pathophysiology of this remote organ injury. Among them, the oxidative and the inflammatory pathway have been shown to play an important role. However, most of the available studies of remote organ injury after hepatic ischemia/reperfusion examine the liver and the respective organ in vivo. Therefore the employed therapeutic strategies could be hypothesized to ameliorate remote organ injury through attenuation of liver injury, without knowing their net effect on remote organ injury alone. A possible exception could be the experimental models of isolated perfused organs. Although the former strategy is clearly more applicable to the clinical scenario, the latter methodology could be more helpful in the elucidation and clarification of the underlying mechanisms implicated in the pathophysiology of hepatic ischemia/reperfusion-induced remote organ injury. One of course could argue that remote organ injury is dependent on cellular and molecular events following liver reperfusion and could be effectively attenuated with appropriate interventions to reduce hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury. Such interventions can be targeted towards specific molecular mechanisms, as mentioned above, or towards more holistic methods such ischemic preconditioning or bioartificial liver devices. Finally, since most of the current knowledge on remote organ injury derives from experimental studies, the investigation of this entity and the assessment of the efficacy of the various therapeutic strategies in the clinical setting are warranted.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. E. E. Douzinas, O. Livaditi, M.-K. Tasoulis et al., “Nitrosative and oxidative stresses contribute to post-ischemic liver injury following severe hemorrhagic shock: the role of hypoxemic resuscitation,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 3, Article ID e32968, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. N. Arkadopoulos, G. Defterevos, C. Nastos et al., “Development of a porcine model of post-hepatectomy liver failure,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 170, no. 2, pp. e233–e242, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. Jaeschke, “Molecular mechanisms of hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury and preconditioning,” American Journal of Physiology—Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 284, no. 1, pp. G15–G26, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. F. Serracino-Inglott, N. A. Habib, and R. T. Mathie, “Hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury,” American Journal of Surgery, vol. 181, no. 2, pp. 160–166, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Y. Chen and X. Xie, “Tacrolimus attenuates myocardium damage to the total hepatic ischemia-reperfusion via regulation of the mitochondrial function,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 172, no. 1, pp. e47–e54, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. Nastos, K. Kalimeris, N. Papoutsidakis et al., “Antioxidant treatment attenuates intestinal mucosal damage and gut barrier dysfunction after major hepatectomy. Study in a porcine model,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 809–817, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. Kalimeris, C. Nastos, N. Papoutsidakis et al., “Iron chelation prevents lung injury after major hepatectomy,” Hepatology Research, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 841–850, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. B. Vollmar, J. Glasz, R. Leiderer, S. Post, and M. D. Menger, “Hepatic microcirculatory perfusion failure is a determinant of liver dysfunction in warm ischemia-reperfusion,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 145, no. 6, pp. 1421–1431, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. V. Smyrniotis, C. Farantos, G. Kostopanagiotou, and N. Arkadopoulos, “Vascular control during hepatectomy: review of methods and results,” World Journal of Surgery, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 1384–1396, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. Garcea, A. Gescher, W. Steward, A. Dennison, and D. Berry, “Oxidative stress in humans following the Pringle manoeuvre,” Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases International, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 210–214, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. I. Marzi, Y. Takei, M. Rücker et al., “Endothelin-1 is involved in hepatic sinusoidal vasoconstriction after ischemia and reperfusion,” Transplant International, vol. 7, supplement 1, pp. S503–S506, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. B. Vollmar and M. D. Menger, “The hepatic microcirculation: mechanistic contributions and therapeutic targets in liver injury and repair,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 1269–1339, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. Uhlmann, S. Glasser, G. Gaebel et al., “Improvement of postischemic hepatic microcirculation after endothelin A receptor blockade—endothelin antagonism influences platelet-endothelium interactions,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 187–197, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. D. Collard and S. Gelman, “Pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and prevention of ischemia-reperfusion injury,” Anesthesiology, vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 1133–1138, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Mendes-Braz, M. Elias-Miro, M. B. Jimenez-Castro, A. Casillas-Ramirez, F. S. Ramalho, and C. Peralta, “The current state of knowledge of hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury based on its study in experimental models,” Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, vol. 2012, Article ID 298657, 20 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. N. C. Teoh and G. C. Farrell, “Hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury: pathogenic mechanisms and basis for hepatoprotection,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 891–902, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. Fondevila, R. W. Busuttil, and J. W. Kupiec-Weglinski, “Hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury—a fresh look,” Experimental and Molecular Pathology, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 86–93, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. P. Betrosian, B. Agarwal, and E. E. Douzinas, “Acute renal dysfunction in liver diseases,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 13, no. 42, pp. 5552–5559, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. V. Arroyo, J. Fernandez, and P. Ginès, “Pathogenesis and treatment of hepatorenal syndrome,” Seminars in Liver Disease, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 81–95, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. L. Davis, T. A. Gonwa, and A. H. Wilkinson, “Pathophysiology of renal disease associated with liver disorders: implications for liver transplantation. Part I,” Liver Transplantation, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 91–109, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. Y. M. Barri, E. Q. Sanchez, L. W. Jennings et al., “Acute kidney injury following liver transplantation: definition and outcome,” Liver Transplantation, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 475–483, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H. M. Wadei, M. L. Mai, N. Ahsan, and T. A. Gonwa, “Hepatorenal syndrome: pathophysiology and management,” Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 1066–1079, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. Schepke, “Hepatorenal syndrome: current diagnostic and therapeutic concepts,” Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation, vol. 22, supplement 8, pp. viii2–viii4, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. Rivera-Huizar, A. R. Rincón-Sánchez, A. Covarrubias-Pinedo et al., “Renal dysfunction as a consequence of acute liver damage by bile duct ligation in cirrhotic rats,” Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology, vol. 58, no. 2-3, pp. 185–195, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Y. Tanaka, J. M. Maher, C. Chen, and C. D. Klaassen, “Hepatic ischemia-reperfusion induces renal heme oxygenase-1 via NF-E2-related factor 2 in rats and mice,” Molecular Pharmacology, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 817–825, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. Tsung, R. A. Hoffman, K. Izuishi et al., “Hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury involves functional TLR4 signaling in nonparenchymal cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 175, no. 11, pp. 7661–7668, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. R. M. Levy, K. P. Mollen, J. M. Prince et al., “Systemic inflammation and remote organ injury following trauma require HMGB1,” American Journal of Physiology—Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 293, no. 4, pp. R1538–R1544, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. Kadkhodaee, S. Mikaeili, M. Zahmatkesh et al., “Alteration of renal functional, oxidative stress and inflammatory indices following hepatic ischemia-reperfusion,” General Physiology and Biophysics, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 195–202, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  29. S. W. Park, M. Kim, K. M. Brown, V. D. D'Agati, and H. T. Lee, “Paneth cell-derived interleukin-17A causes multiorgan dysfunction after hepatic ischemia and reperfusion injury,” Hepatology, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1662–1675, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. T. A. Sutton, H. E. Mang, S. B. Campos, R. M. Sandoval, M. C. Yoder, and B. A. Molitoris, “Injury of the renal microvascular endothelium alters barrier function after ischemia,” American Journal of Physiology—Renal Physiology, vol. 285, no. 2, pp. F191–F198, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. B. A. Molitoris, R. Sandoval, and T. A. Sutton, “Endothelial injury and dysfunction in ischemic acute renal failure,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 30, no. 5, supplement, pp. S235–S240, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. K. Meyer, M. F. Brown, G. Zibari et al., “ICAM-1 upregulation in distant tissues after hepatic ischemia/reperfusion: a clue to the mechanism of multiple organ failure,” Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 350–353, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. H. T. Lee, S. W. Park, M. Kim, and V. D. D'Agati, “Acute kidney injury after hepatic ischemia and reperfusion injury in mice,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 196–208, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. H. T. Lee, M. Kim, M. Jan, R. B. Penn, and C. W. Emala, “Renal tubule necrosis and apoptosis modulation by A1 adenosine receptor expression,” Kidney International, vol. 71, no. 12, pp. 1249–1261, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. B. Li, B. Chen, G. Zhang, K. Wang, L. Zhou, and S. Hu, “Cell apoptosis and Fas gene expression in liver and renal tissues after ischemia-reperfusion injury in liver transplantation,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1550–1556, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. L. E. C. Miranda, V. K. Capellini, G. S. Reis, A. C. Celotto, C. G. Carlotti Jr., and P. R. B. Evora, “Effects of partial liver ischemia followed by global liver reperfusion on the remote tissue expression of nitric oxide synthase: lungs and kidneys,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1557–1562, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. C. Polat, Ç. Tokyol, A. Kahraman, B. Sabuncuoǧlu, and S. Yìlmaz, “The effects of desferrioxamine and quercetin on hepatic ischemia-reperfusion induced renal disturbance,” Prostaglandins Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 379–383, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. B. Seifi, M. Kadkhodaee, F. Delavari, S. Mikaeili, S. Shams, and S. N. Ostad, “Pretreatment with pentoxifylline and N-acetylcysteine in liver ischemia reperfusion-induced renal injury,” Renal Failure, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 610–615, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  39. J. A. Lee, J. W. Choi, J. H. In et al., “Hepatic ischemic preconditioning provides protection against distant renal ischemia and reperfusion injury in mice,” Journal of Korean Medical Science, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 547–552, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  40. J. D. Joo, M. Kim, V. D. D'Agati, and H. T. Lee, “Ischemic preconditioning provides both acute and delayed protection against renal ischemia and reperfusion injury in mice,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 3115–3123, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. M. Torres and H. J. Forman, “Redox signaling and the MAP kinase pathways,” BioFactors, vol. 17, no. 1–4, pp. 287–296, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. P. S. Kellerman, S. L. Norenberg, and G. M. Jones, “Early recovery of the actin cytoskeleton during renal ischemic injury in vivo,” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 709–714, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. B. A. Molitoris, “Actin cytoskeleton in ischemic acute renal failure,” Kidney International, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 871–883, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. S. R. White, P. Williams, K. R. Wojcik et al., “Initiation of apoptosis by actin cytoskeletal derangement in human airway epithelial cells,” American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 282–294, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. D. Dinour and M. Brezis, “Effects of adenosine on intrarenal oxygenation,” American Journal of Physiology—Renal Fluid and Electrolyte Physiology, vol. 261, no. 5, part 2, pp. F787–F791, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. H. T. Lee, G. Gallos, S. H. Nasr, and C. W. Emala, “A1 adenosine receptor activation inhibits inflammation, necrosis, and apoptosis after renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 102–111, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. S. W. Park, S. W. C. Chen, M. Kim, K. M. Brown, V. D. D'Agati, and H. T. Lee, “Protection against acute kidney injury via A1 adenosine receptor-mediated Akt activation reduces liver injury after liver ischemia and reperfusion in mice,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 333, no. 3, pp. 736–747, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. T. G. Cross, D. Scheel-Toellner, N. V. Henriquez, E. Deacon, M. Salmon, and J. M. Lord, “Serine/threonine protein kinases and apoptosis,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 256, no. 1, pp. 34–41, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. M. J. Rane, P. Y. Coxon, D. W. Powell et al., “p38 Kinase-dependent MAPKAPK-2 activation functions as 3-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-2 for Akt in human neutrophils,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 5, pp. 3517–3523, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. M. J. Rane, Y. Pan, S. Singh et al., “Heat shock protein 27 controls apoptosis by regulating Akt activation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 30, pp. 27828–27835, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. S. W. Park, S. W. C. Chen, M. Kim, V. D. D'Agati, and H. T. Lee, “Human activated protein C attenuates both hepatic and renal injury caused by hepatic ischemia and reperfusion injury in mice,” Kidney International, vol. 76, no. 7, pp. 739–750, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. S. W. Park, M. Kim, S. W. C. Chen, K. M. Brown, V. D. D'Agati, and H. T. Lee, “Sphinganine-1-phosphate protects kidney and liver after hepatic ischemia and reperfusion in mice through S1P 1 receptor activation,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 90, no. 8, pp. 1209–1224, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. S. W. Park, M. Kim, S. W. C. Chen, V. D. D'Agati, and H. T. Lee, “Sphinganine-1-phosphate attenuates both hepatic and renal injury induced by hepatic ischemia and reperfusion in mice,” Shock, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 31–42, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. Y. Chen, Z. Liu, and X. Xie, “Hydrogen sulphide attenuates renal and cardiac injury after total hepatic ischemia and reperfusion,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 164, no. 2, pp. e305–e313, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. S. Suzuki, A. Serizawa, T. Sakaguchi et al., “The roles of platelet-activating factor and endothelin-1 in renal damage after total hepatic ischemia and reperfusion,” Transplantation, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 2267–2273, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. D. J. Plevak, P. A. Southorn, B. J. Narr, and S. G. Peters, “Intensive-care unit experience in the Mayo liver transplantation program: the first 100 cases,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 433–445, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. T. Miyata, I. Yokoyama, S. Todo, A. Tzakis, R. Selby, and T. E. Starzl, “Endotoxaemia, pulmonary complications, and thrombocytopenia in liver transplantation,” The Lancet, vol. 2, no. 8656, pp. 189–191, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. L. M. Colletti, S. L. Kunkel, A. Walz et al., “Chemokine expression during hepatic ischemia/reperfusion-induced lung injury in the rat. The role of epithelial neutrophil activating protein,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 134–141, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. L. M. Colletti, A. Cortis, N. Lukacs, S. L. Kunkel, M. Green, and R. M. Strieter, “Tumor necrosis factor up-regulates intercellular adhesion molecule 1, which is important in the neutrophil-dependent lung and liver injury associated with hepatic ischemia and reperfusion in the rat,” Shock, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 182–191, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. N. Arkadopoulos, K. Kalimeris, A. Papalois et al., “Treatment with bioartificial liver improves lung injury in a swine model of partial hepatectomy and ischemia/reperfusion,” International Journal of Artificial Organs, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 105–113, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. A. Serizawa, S. Nakamura, S. Suzuki, S. Baba, and M. Nakano, “Involvement of platelet-activating factor in cytokine production and neutrophil activation after hepatic ischemia-reperfusion,” Hepatology, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1656–1663, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. G. A. Wanner, W. Ertel, P. Müller et al., “Liver ischemia and reperfusion induces a systemic inflammatory response through Kupffer cell activation,” Shock, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 34–40, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. D. Takeuchi, H. Yoshidome, H. Kurosawa et al., “Interleukin-18 exacerbates pulmonary injury after hepatic ischemia/reperfusion in mice,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 158, no. 1, pp. 87–93, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. T. Okaya, R. Holthaus, A. Kato, and A. B. Lentsch, “Involvement of the neuropeptide substance P in lung inflammation induced by hepatic ischemia/reperfusion,” Inflammation Research, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 257–261, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. H. Yoshidome, A. Kato, M. J. Edwards, and A. B. Lentsch, “Interleukin-10 inhibits pulmonary NF-κB activation and lung injury induced by hepatic ischemia-reperfusion,” American Journal of Physiology—Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, vol. 277, no. 5, part 1, pp. L919–L923, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. M. P. Callery, T. Kamei, M. J. Mangino, and M. W. Flye, “Organ interactions in sepsis: Host defense and the hepatic-pulmonary macrophage axis,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 28–32, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. L. C. J. M. Lemaire, B. A. van Wagensveld, T. M. van Gulik, J. Dankert, J. J. B. van Lanschot, and D. J. Gouma, “Bacterial translocation to the thoracic duct in a setting of ischemia, partial resection and reperfusion of the porcine liver,” Digestive Surgery, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 222–228, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. G. M. Matuschak, K. A. Henry, C. A. Johanns, and A. J. Lechner, “Liver-lung interactions following Escherichia coil bacteremic sepsis and secondary hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 163, no. 4, pp. 1002–1009, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. L. M. Colletti and M. Green, “Lung and liver injury following hepatic ischemia/ reperfusion in the rat is increased by exogenous lipopolysaccharide which also increases hepatic tnf production in vivo and in vitro,” Shock, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 312–319, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. S. Q. van Veen, S. Dinant, A. K. van Vliet, and T. M. van Gulik, “Alkaline phosphatase reduces hepatic and pulmonary injury in liver ischaemia-reperfusion combined with partial resection,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 448–456, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. A. Weinbroum, V. G. Nielsen, S. Tan et al., “Liver ischemia-reperfusion increases pulmonary permeability in rat: role of circulating xanthine oxidase,” American Journal of Physiology—Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 268, no. 6, pp. G988–G996, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. V. G. Nielsen, S. Tan, A. Weinbroum et al., “Lung injury after hepatoenteric ischemia-reperfusion: role of xanthine oxidase,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 154, no. 5, pp. 1364–1369, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. C. Peralta, N. Prats, C. Xaus, E. Gelpí', and J. Roselló-Catafau, “Protective effect of liver ischemic preconditioning on liver and lung injury induced by hepatic ischemia-reperfusion in the rat,” Hepatology, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1481–1489, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. P. Liu, B. Xu, and C. E. Hock, “Inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis by L-name exacerbates acute lung injury induced by hepatic ischemia-reperfusion,” Shock, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 211–217, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. Y. Takamatsu, K. Shimada, K. Yamaguchi, S. Kuroki, K. Chijiiwa, and M. Tanaka, “Inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase prevents hepatic, but not pulmonary, injury following ischemia-reperfusion of rat liver,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 571–579, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. A. A. Weinbroum, G. Paret, O. Szold, V. Rudick, and L. Krupitzky, “Selective attenuation of acute lung ventilatory injury by methylene blue after liver ischemia-reperfusion: a drug response study in an isolated perfused double organ model,” Transplantation, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 385–392, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. A. A. Weinbroum, I. Shapira, R. B. Abraham, and A. Szold, “Mannitol dose-dependently attenuates lung reperfusion injury following liver ischemia reperfusion: a dose-response study in an isolated perfused double-organ model,” Lung, vol. 180, no. 6, pp. 327–338, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. K.-C. Chan, C.-J. Lin, P.-H. Lee et al., “Propofol attenuates the decrease of dynamic compliance and water content in the lung by decreasing oxidative radicals released from the reperfused liver,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 1284–1289, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. X. Lv, Z.-M. Wang, S.-D. Huang, S.-H. Song, F.-X. Wu, and W.-F. Yu, “Emulsified isoflurane preconditioning reduces lung injury induced by hepatic ischemia/reperfusion in rats,” International Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 353–361, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. S. K. Hong, S. Hwang, S. G. Lee et al., “Pulmonary complications following adult liver transplantation,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 2979–2981, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. X.-H. Wen, H.-Y. Kong, S.-M. Zhu, J.-H. Xu, S.-Q. Huang, and Q.-L. Chen, “Plasma levels of tumor necrotic factor-alpha and interleukin-6, -8 during orthotopic liver transplantation and their relations to postoperative pulmonary complications,” Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases International, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 38–41, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. X.-J. Chi, J. Cai, C.-F. Luo et al., “Relationship between the expression of Toll-like receptor 2 and 4 in mononuclear cells and postoperative acute lung injury in orthotopic liver transplantation,” Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 122, no. 8, pp. 895–899, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. M. Goto, Y. Takei, S. Kawano et al., “Tumor necrosis factor and endotoxin in the pathogenesis of liver and pulmonary injuries after orthotopic liver transplantation in the rat,” Hepatology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 487–493, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. C. Spencer Yost, M. A. Matthay, and M. A. Gropper, “Etiology of acute pulmonary edema during liver transplantation: a series of cases with analysis of the edema fluid,” Chest, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 219–223, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. C. C. Silliman, L. K. Boshkov, Z. Mehdizadehkashi et al., “Transfusion-related acute lung injury: epidemiology and a prospective analysis of etiologic factors,” Blood, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 454–462, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. I. T. A. Pereboom, M. T. de Boer, E. B. Haagsma, H. G. D. Hendriks, T. Lisman, and R. J. Porte, “Platelet transfusion during liver transplantation is associated with increased postoperative mortality due to acute lung injury,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 1083–1091, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. E. Abdala, C. E. Sandoll Baía, S. Mies et al., “Bacterial translocation during liver transplantation: a randomized trial comparing conventional with venovenous bypass vs. piggyback methods,” Liver Transplantation, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 488–496, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. K. S. Filos, I. Kirkilesis, I. Spiliopoulou et al., “Bacterial translocation, endotoxaemia and apoptosis following Pringle manoeuvre in rats,” Injury, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 35–43, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. C. Zheyu and Y. Lunan, “Early changes of small intestine function in rats after liver transplantation,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1564–1568, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. E. Okay, A. Karadenizli, B. Müezzinoglu, U. Zeybek, H. A. Ergen, and T. Isbir, “N-acetylcysteine attenuates bacterial translocation after partial hepatectomy in rats,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 127, no. 2, pp. 164–170, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. I. H. Alexandris, S. F. Assimakopoulos, C. E. Vagianos et al., “Oxidative state in intestine and liver after partial hepatectomy in rats. Effect of bombesin and neurotensin,” Clinical Biochemistry, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 350–356, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. F. Bongard, N. Pianim, S. Dubecz et al., “Adverse consequences of increased intra-abdominal pressure on bowel tissue oxygen,” Journal of Trauma—Injury, Infection and Critical Care, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 519–525, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. S. Wattanasirichaigoon, M. J. Menconi, R. L. Delude, and M. P. Fink, “Effect of mesenteric ischemia and reperfusion or hemorrhagic shock on intestinal mucosal permeability and ATP content in rats,” Shock, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 127–133, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. D. G. Farmer, F. Amersi, J. Kupiec-Weglinski, and R. W. Busuttil, “Current status of ischemia and reperfusion injury in the liver,” Transplantation Reviews, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 106–126, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. X. D. Wang, H. Parsson, R. Andersson, V. Soltesz, K. Johansson, and S. Bengmark, “Bacterial translocation, intestinal ultrastructure and cell membrane permeability early after major liver resection in the rat,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 579–584, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. B. A. van Wagensveld, T. M. van Gulik, E. E. E. Gabeler, A. J. van der Kleij, H. Obertop, and D. J. Gouma, “Intrahepatic tissue pO2 during continuous or intermittent vascular inflow occlusion in a pig liver resection model,” European Surgical Research, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 13–25, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. X.-D. Wang, W.-D. Guo, Q. Wang et al., “The association between enteric bacterial overgrowth and gastrointestinal motility after subtotal liver resection or portal vein obstruction in rats,” European Journal of Surgery, Acta Chirurgica, vol. 160, no. 3, pp. 153–160, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. S. Raha and B. H. Robinson, “Mitochondria, oxygen free radicals, and apoptosis,” American Journal of Medical Genetics—Seminars in Medical Genetics, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 62–70, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. I. Yokoyama, M. Negita, A. Hayakawa et al., “Free radicals and apoptosis of the endothelial cells,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 32, no. 1, p. 26, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. I. Stoian, A. Oros, and E. Moldoveanu, “Apoptosis and free radicals,” Biochemical and Molecular Medicine, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 93–97, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. C. Zhang, Z.-Y. Sheng, S. Hu, J.-C. Gao, S. Yu, and Y. Liu, “The influence of apoptosis of mucosal epithelial cells on intestinal barrier integrity after scald in rats,” Burns, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 731–737, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. T. Noda, R. Iwakiri, K. Fujimoto, S. Matsuo, and T. Y. Aw, “Programmed cell death induced by ischemia-reperfusion in rat intestinal mucosa,” American Journal of Physiology—Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 274, no. 2, part 1, pp. G270–G276, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. H. Ikeda, Y. Suzuki, M. Suzuki et al., “Apoptosis is a major mode of cell death caused by ischaemia and ischaemia/reperfusion injury to the rat intestinal epithelium,” Gut, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 530–537, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. K. A. Shah, S. Shurey, and C. J. Green, “Apoptosis after intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury: a morphological study,” Transplantation, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 1393–1397, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. J.-F. Beaulieu, “Differential expression of the VLA family of integrins along the crypt-villus axis in the human small intestine,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 102, part 3, pp. 427–436, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. R. Probstmeier, R. Martini, and M. Schachner, “Expression of J1/tenascin in the crypt-villus unit of adult mouse small intestine: implications for its role in epithelial cell shedding,” Development, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 313–321, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. S. M. Frisch and H. Francis, “Disruption of epithelial cell-matrix interactions induces apoptosis,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 124, no. 4, pp. 619–626, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. S. Mochida, M. Arai, A. Ohno, and K. Fujiwara, “Bacterial translocation from gut to portal blood in the recipient as a factor of hypercoagulopathy in hepatic sinusoids after orthotopic liver transplantation in rats,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 29, no. 1-2, pp. 874–875, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. A. Bedurlu, S. Gokahmetoglu, K. C. Kucuk, I. Soyuer, L. Guler, and O. Sakrak, “Bacterial translocation after partial hepatic resection under ischemia and reperfusion in rats: incidence and time course,” Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 33, pp. 135–140, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  110. H. Jiang, F. Meng, W. Li, L. Tong, H. Qiao, and X. Sun, “Splenectomy ameliorates acute multiple organ damage induced by liver warm ischemia reperfusion in rats,” Surgery, vol. 141, no. 1, pp. 32–40, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. I. Leister, J. Sydow, T. Stojanovic et al., “Impact of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide and gastrin-releasing peptide on small bowel microcirculation and mucosal injury after hepatic ischemia/reperfusion in rats,” International Journal of Colorectal Disease, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 42–48, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. H. Ochiai, S. Nakamura, S. Suzuki, S. Baba, and S. Baba, “Pancreatic damage resulting from temporary portal triad interruption during partial hepatectomy: protective effect of a prostaglandin I2 analogue,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 129–136, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. E. Ronholm, H. Tomasdottir, J. Runeborg et al., “Complement system activation during orthotopic liver transplantation in man: indications of peroperative complement system activation in the gut,” Transplantation, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 1594–1597, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. Z.-W. Wu, K.-J. Xu, L.-J. Li et al., “Investigation of intestinal bacterial translocation in 78 patients with cirrhosis after liver transplantation,” Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi, vol. 44, no. 21, pp. 1456–1459, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. T. Tsuzuki, S. Shimizu, S. Takahashi, and H. Iio, “Hyperamylasemia after hepatic resection,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 734–736, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. S. Sjovall, T. Holmin, A. Evander, and U. Stenram, “Splenic and gastro-duodenal vein occlusion-influence on the pancreatic gland and on the outcome of experimental pancreatitis,” International Journal of Pancreatology, vol. 3, no. 2-3, pp. 143–149, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. S. Miyagawa, M. Makuuchi, S. Kawasaki, and T. Kakazu, “Changes in serum amylase level following hepatic resection in chronic liver disease,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 129, no. 6, pp. 634–638, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. S. Miyagawa, M. Makuuchi, S. Kawasaki, T. Kakazu, K. Hayashi, and H. Kasai, “Serum amylase elevation following hepatic resection in patients with chronic liver disease,” American Journal of Surgery, vol. 171, no. 2, pp. 235–238, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. N. Hashimoto, S. Haji, H. Nomura, and H. Ohyanagi, “Hyperamylasemia after hepatic resection,” Hepato-Gastroenterology, vol. 50, no. 53, pp. 1472–1473, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  120. K. Kubota, M. Makuuchi, T. Noie et al., “Risk factors for hyperamylasemia after hepatectomy using the pringle maneuver: randomized analysis of surgical parameters,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 133, no. 3, pp. 303–308, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  121. K. Meyer, M. F. Brown, G. Zibari et al., “ICAM-1 upregulation in distant tissues after hepatic ischemia/reperfusion: a clue to the mechanism of multiple organ failure,” Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 350–353, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  122. H. Ochiai, S. Nakamura, S. Suzuki, S. Baba, and S. Baba, “Pancreatic damage resulting from temporary portal triad interruption during partial hepatectomy: protective effect of a prostaglandin I2 analogue,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 129–136, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  123. J.-C. Yang, Z.-W. Wang, C.-L. Li, J.-H. Lin, X.-G. Liu, and Q.-X. Ji, “Multiple organ injury at early stage of intestinal and hepatic ischemia-reperfusion in rats,” Di Yi Jun Yi da Xue Xue Bao, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 198–203, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. N. Arkadopoulos, C. Nastos, G. Defterevos et al., “Pancreatic injury after major hepatectomy: a study in a porcine model,” Surgery Today, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 368–375, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. C. A. Camargo Jr., P. D. Greig, G. A. Levy, and P.-A. Clavien, “Acute pancreatitis following liver transplantation,” Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 181, no. 3, pp. 249–256, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  126. Y. Li, P.-J. Zhang, C. Jin et al., “Protective effects of deferoxamine mesylate preconditioning on pancreatic tissue in orthotopic liver autotransplantation in rats,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1450–1455, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  127. A. D. Gouliamos, A. Metafa, S. G. Ispanopoulou, F. Stamatelopoulou, L. J. Vlahos, and J. D. Papadimitriou, “Right adrenal hematoma following hepatectomy,” European Radiology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 583–585, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  128. R. W. Prokesch, W. Schima, G. Berlakovich, and J. Zacherl, “Adrenal hemorrhage after orthotopic liver transplantation: MR appearance,” European Radiology, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 2484–2487, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  129. T. Iwasaki, M. Tominaga, T. Fukumoto et al., “Relative adrenal insufficiency manifested with multiple organ dysfunction in a liver transplant patient,” Liver Transplantation, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 1896–1899, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  130. P. E. Marik, T. Gayowski, and T. E. Starzl, “The hepatoadrenal syndrome: a common yet unrecognized clinical condition,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1254–1259, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  131. T. G. Vishnyakova, A. V. Bocharov, I. N. Baranova et al., “Binding and internalization of lipopolysaccharide by Cla-1, a human orthologue of rodent scavenger receptor B1,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 25, pp. 22771–22780, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  132. W. H. Ettinger, V. K. Varma, M. Sorci-Thomas et al., “Cytokines decrease apolipoprotein accumulation in medium from Hep G2 cells,” Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 8–13, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  133. J. M. Mann, M. Pierre-Louis, P. J. Kragel, A. H. Kragel, and W. C. Roberts, “Cardiac consequences of massive acetaminophen overdose,” American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 63, no. 13, pp. 1018–1021, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  134. R. A. Wakeel, H. T. Davies, and J. D. Williams, “Toxic myocarditis in paracetamol poisoning,” British Medical Journal, vol. 295, no. 6606, p. 1097, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  135. N. K. Parekh, L. S. Hynan, J. De Lemos et al., “Elevated troponin I levels in acute liver failure: is myocardial injury an integral part of acute liver failure?” Hepatology, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1489–1495, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  136. N. Papoutsidakis, N. Arkadopoulos, V. Smyrniotis et al., “Early myocardial injury is an integral component of experimental acute liver failure—a study in two porcine models,” Archives of Medical Science, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 217–223, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus