Redox Signaling and the Cardiovascular and Skeletal Muscle SystemView this Special Issue
Review Article | Open Access
W. H. Davin Townley-Tilson, Xinchun Pi, Liang Xie, "The Role of Oxygen Sensors, Hydroxylases, and HIF in Cardiac Function and Disease", Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2015, Article ID 676893, 10 pages, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/676893
The Role of Oxygen Sensors, Hydroxylases, and HIF in Cardiac Function and Disease
Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of death worldwide. Oxygen-sensing proteins are critical components of the physiological response to hypoxia and reperfusion injury, but the role of oxygen and oxygen-mediated effects is complex in that they can be cardioprotective or deleterious to the cardiac tissue. Over 200 oxygen-sensing proteins mediate the effects of oxygen tension and use oxygen as a substrate for posttranslational modification of other proteins. Hydroxylases are an essential component of these oxygen-sensing proteins. While a major role of hydroxylases is regulating the transcription factor HIF, we investigate the increasing scope of hydroxylase substrates. This review discusses the importance of oxygen-mediated effects in the heart as well as how the field of oxygen-sensing proteins is expanding, providing a more complete picture into how these enzymes play a multifaceted role in cardiac function and disease. We also review how oxygen-sensing proteins and hydroxylase function could prove to be invaluable in drug design and therapeutic targets for heart disease.
Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of death in the world, killing an estimated 7.4 million people annually . Currently, in the US alone, more than 5 million people live with heart failure, primarily due to ischemia [2, 3]. Ischemia starves the heart of vital oxygen, leading to the death of cardiomyocytes. Because cardiomyocytes are generally thought of as postmitotic [4, 5], any cell death leads to a permanent reduction of heart function. Whether gradual, as seen in atherosclerotic plaque buildup, or acute, as in myocardial infarction, this oxygen-dependent damage to the heart is responsible for the vast majority of cardiac-related mortality. Therefore, the role of oxygen in cardiac function is essential in understanding how to ameliorate the effects of heart disease.
Oxygen is to be a central mediator of myriad protein functions and biochemical reactions. One of oxygen’s primary roles is producing adenosine triphosphate (ATP) through oxidative phosphorylation during aerobic cellular respiration , during which nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) and flavin adenine dinucleotide (FADH2) donate their electrons to oxygen, producing potential energy. This energy is then utilized by ATP synthase to generate ATP from ADP via phosphorylation. While this process is amazingly efficient in its ability to generate energy for the cell, converting up to 36 ATP molecules per one molecule of glucose , it also has the potential to generate nitric oxide (NO) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) like superoxide anion () and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) . These products have the potential to influence many disease states through signaling pathways and the damaging effects of free radicals on cell health. Thus, it is important to note that while oxygen plays a very beneficial role in cell metabolism and global organismal health, its byproducts can also mediate detrimental consequences in heart health including cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, excitation-contraction coupling, arrhythmia, and cell viability .
Though still under active study, the role of oxygen as a substrate for enzymatic function has been widely accepted as yet another regulator of many cellular processes. Currently, there are over 200 unique enzymes that use oxygen as a substrate  (Tables 1 and 2): these enzymes are typically broken down into two major categories, oxidases and oxygenases. Oxidases typically use a metal or flavin coenzyme to catalyze the oxidation of a substrate without incorporating oxygen into the main product, instead using oxygen as the electron acceptor . In contrast, oxygenases incorporate oxygen molecules into the substrate as a hydroxyl or carboxyl group in a two-step process, (1) the binding of the oxygen molecule to the catalytic domain of the enzyme and (2) the subsequent transference of the oxygen to the substrate .
As part of the oxygenase supergroup, hydroxylases are known to be increasingly important in the context of mediating numerous cellular processes. Collagen is one of the most well-known proteins whose function is mediated by hydroxylation state, whereby both proline and lysine hydroxylation enhance the “tightness” of the triple alpha-helix structure [13, 14]. Other notable hydroxylated proteins are the hypoxia inducible factors (HIFs), which are described in greater detail below in the section “Hydroxylases and Hydroxylation in the Heart”. HIFs play a major role during hypoxia in cell proliferation , angiogenesis , and embryonic vasculogenesis . Interestingly, HIF-1α signaling is dictated by hydroxylation in two ways: via von Hippel-Lindau- (VHL-) mediated degradation in the proteasome if prolines 402/564 (in humans) are hydroxylated by prolyl hydroxylase domain protein (PHD) [18–20] or via transactivational inhibition if asparagine 803 residue is hydroxylated by the factor inhibiting HIF (FIH) [21–23]. The inactivation of HIF, either through degradation or transactivational inhibition, directly impacts over 100 genes with functional consequences such as angiogenesis, metabolic adaptation, metastasis, apoptosis, and more [24–27] and indirectly impacts even more, as is the case for the p53 pathway  endothelial transcription factors  and genes regulated by histone methylation . Interestingly, HIF activity can also be enhanced through proline hydroxylation of its regulator pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2), which increases the interaction between HIF and PKM2, increasing HIF transactivation and transcriptional activity . While HIF signaling dominates the literature in terms of what is known about hydroxylation signaling in the heart, other cardiac events mediated by hydroxylation are becoming more appreciated. Of note, the β-adrenergic receptors (β-ARs), similar to HIF, can be hydroxylated by PHD proteins and subsequently targeted for ubiquitin-mediated degradation . Other cardiovascular targets of hydroxylation include inhibitor of κB kinase β (IKKβ)  and myogenin , though the role of these two proteins is unclear in regard to hypoxic stimuli. As the list of hydroxylated cardiac proteins grows, so too will our understanding of how oxygen and hydroxylases dictate signaling events in response to hypoxia.
2. Oxygen-Sensing Proteins: Functions and Consequences in the Heart
The oxygen concentration, both global and cellular, has a profound impact on the development, homeostasis, contractility, and injury response of the heart, and the effects can be beneficial or detrimental. Oxygen contributes to the formation of NO, which mediates cardiac and vascular contractility  through the oxygen concentration-dependent S-nitrosylation of cysteine residues, which in turn mediate calcium flux and excitation-contraction coupling . Oxygen is also the central component in ROS generation. While regarded as molecules with largely negative consequences, ROS can also mediate positive outcomes in regard to cell signaling events. For example, ROS are required for transforming growth factor beta- (TGFβ-) mediated myofibroblast differentiation in human cells , angiotensin II- (ANGII-) mediated bovine and hamster vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation , endothelin-mediated cardiac c-fos expression in rat myocytes , and other beneficial signaling events . However, ROS are still canonically regarded as harmful molecules, especially from the cardiac-centric perspective, which promotes cell death through mitochondrial damage in rat myocytes , lipid peroxidation in rat myocytes , chromatin remodeling , and protein interactions . In addition to broad antioxidant competition from superoxide dismutases [45–47], ROS are also negatively regulated by other signaling pathways, including the ubiquitin-proteasome system , further demonstrating the diverse role that these molecules can play.
Oxygen also serves as a molecule in posttranslational modification. Oxidases are one family of oxygen-conferring enzymes and are critical components with regard to oxygen utilization within the cell. One notable oxidase is cytochrome P450 oxidase, which is involved in myriad hydroxylation reactions [49–51]. NADPH oxidase regulates phagocytosis in neutrophils by generating , which in turn produces the oxidants H2O2 and hypochlorous acid, which itself is generated by myeloperoxidase (MPO) . The increase of NADPH oxidase activity also contributes to the progression of atherosclerosis since its superoxide generation leads to the oxidation of low density lipoprotein that exacerbates endothelial dysfunction and foam cell formation . Similarly, FADH2 is oxidized by flavoprotein dehydrogenase in the peroxisome during fatty acid oxidation to produce H2O2, another ROS molecule long known to be central in cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury . Interestingly, MPO is another key mediator of pathological cardiac events, including atherosclerosis, myocardial injury, and vascular remodeling in both humans and animal models [54–56], most notably through its role of increasing the oxidative potential of its cosubstrate hydrogen peroxide . Elevated levels of MPO in humans correspond to increased risk of cardiovascular disease [58, 59], while human MPO deficiency is cardioprotective [60, 61].
Oxygenases, the other group of enzyme utilizing oxygen as the substrate, can be further divided into two groups depending on whether they catalyze one atom (monooxygenases) or two oxygen atoms (dioxygenases) of oxygen onto the substrate. Monooxygenases are widely distributed in the cell and use coenzymes that use NADPH or FADH2 to reduce the second oxygen atom from molecular oxygen to water. Dioxygenases catalyze the oxidation of a substrate without the reduction of one oxygen atom from dioxygen into a water molecule, often by using iron as a cofactor in the reaction. This reaction is accomplished either by incorporating both atoms of molecular oxygen into the substrate or catalyzing molecular oxygen onto multiple substrates . The dioxygenases can further be categorized into three separate groups: iron-dependent enzymes, cambialistic oxygenases, and cofactor independent dioxygenases [63–65], which in turn can be further divided into various superfamilies and families of enzymes whose functions are just now becoming understood.
Of the dioxygenases, two are well known to be factors in cardiovascular disease. The first is cyclooxygenase (COX), which is responsible for the formation of prostanoids, which are oxygenated signaling molecules derived from arachidonic acid and polyunsaturated long-chain fatty acids . These prostanoids, which include prostaglandin and thromboxanes, are involved in the proinflammatory response . The widely popular nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) target COX activity but also have highly publicized cardiovascular effects in humans . COX inhibition leads to atherosclerotic plaque destabilization in human patients with recent ischemic events  and endothelial dysfunction during hypertension in humans  and promotes atherosclerotic lesion formation in LDL-deficient mice . This COX inhibition is thought to induce cardiovascular event by increasing the relative thromboxane levels and decreasing prostacyclin levels in damaged heart tissue .
Another well-known subgroup of the dioxygenases is the 2-oxoglutarate (OG)/Fe(II)-dependent superfamily. Also known as α-ketoglutarate, 2-OG is an important intermediate and rate-limiting factor of the mitochondrial citric acid cycle (also known as the Krebs or tricarboxylic acid cycle). In the context of oxygenases, most 2-OG-dependent enzymes catalyze the incorporation of one oxygen atom from molecular oxygen into their alcohol product and one into the succinate coproduct . These versatile enzymes are nonheme in character , have a double stranded β-helix (also referred to as a “jelly-roll”) motif , an Fe(II) center that is coordinated by a conserved motif , and utilize ascorbate for maximal activity , though more recent studies in humans show that ascorbate had little effect on HIF-mediated arterial pressure response to hypoxia , making the precise role of ascorbate in HIF-mediated hydroxylation more unclear. Upon substrate binding, 2-OG/Fe(II)-dependent enzymes most commonly catalyze protein hydroxylation [79–81] but are also employed in H3K36 demethylation . This broad class of enzymes is involved in wide-ranging functions like DNA repair , metabolism , stress response , growth factor signaling , and not surprisingly, hypoxic response signaling [87, 88].
3. Hydroxylases and Hydroxylation in the Heart
One of the best characterized proteins that are modified by 2-OG dependent hydroxylation is HIF. HIF is a heterodimer consisting of a labile α-subunit and a stable β-subunit . In normoxic conditions, HIF-1α protein expression is typically very short lived due to rapid degradation mediated by the VHL E3 ligase [18–20]. This oxygen-dependent degradation of HIF-1α is mediated by PHD (also known as EGLN) proteins [88, 90].
There are two proline residues modified in HIF-1α, corresponding to P402 (modified by PHD1 and PHD2) and P564 (modified by all three PHDs [PHD1/2/3]) . Through the use of siRNA knockdown experiments in mice, PHD2 has been shown to regulate overall HIF-1α stability ; however, the precise function and modifications to each proline residue seem to be more complex. Chan et al.  demonstrated that residue P564 was hydroxylated prior to residue P402 and that mutation of P564 significantly reduced P402 hydroxylation, but P402 mutation had little effect on P564 hydroxylation state. Additionally, they found that P402 hydroxylation was much more sensitive to physiologic oxygen concentrations relative to P564 hydroxylation . These data indicate that PHDs influence the signaling of HIF under a variety of conditions, demonstrating the divergence and overall complexity of hydroxyl modifications.
HIF activity impacts an array of cardiac phenotypes. Many of the downstream events that occur due to HIF protein stabilization and accumulation (through decreased PHD-mediated hydroxylation) are cardioprotective and are thought to serve as adaptive ischemic preconditioning (IPC) to hypoxia. The IPC phenomenon is thought to protect the heart against a subsequent myocardial damage through the exposure to brief episodes of nonlethal myocardial ischemia and reperfusion . This period of protective preconditioning in mice is initially mediated by HIF (and its corresponding hydroxylation state), possibly through ROS production, or another, as yet determined, transcriptionally independent mechanism . A later ICP effect (sometimes referred to as “SWOP” or Second window of protection) is also seen 24–74 hours after the initiation of preconditioning event  and is achieved through HIF’s transcriptional induction of the cardioprotective molecules nitric oxide synthase, heme oxygenase 1, and erythropoietin . Further, long-term hypoxia in humans has been shown to significantly reduce mortality due to ischemic heart disease, though the role of HIF in this population was not addressed in this report . Conversely, chronic HIF accumulation has also been shown to be detrimental to cardiac physiology by impairing cardiac metabolism and calcium handling, which are thought to promote cardiac decompensation and premature heart failure in aging mice . Interestingly, PHD proteins in cardiomyocytes are known to interact with the calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase (CaMKK) in rat cardiomyocytes, demonstrating the role of PHDs in cardiac calcium signaling pathways . Further PHD hydroxylases also regulate metabolic activity during stress. Specifically, glucose transporter 1 increases in response to PHD activation, leading to increase in glucose handling . In another report, PHD activation increased glycogen and ATP levels in metabolically stressed mouse cardiomyocytes . Adding yet another layer of complexity, HIF-1α has been recently shown to impact cardiac conduction in zebrafish. In Breakdance mutant fish, it is hypothesized that the accumulation of HIF-1α may partially explain the unexpected longevity and continued development of these fish, even with their characteristic cardiac arrhythmia phenotype . Likewise, PHDs are known to mediate -AR signaling in mice , which is responsible for cardiac arrhythmias . While direct evidence is scant, these similarities in HIF- and PHD-mediated cardiac homeostasis may be due to their respective hydroxylation state and enzymatic activity.
In addition to PHD-mediated hydroxylation, HIF-1α is also hydroxylated by factor inhibiting HIF (FIH) on asparagine 803 in humans . This hydroxylation event on the transactivation domain of HIF-1α prevents its translocation and transcriptional activity by inhibiting p300/CREB-binding protein coactivators binding to HIF-1α . Knockdown of FIH in mice has been shown to improve angiogenesis and stem cell mobility post-MI, though this was in addition to simultaneous PHD knockdown . Similarly, FIH has been shown to be an antiangiogenic factor through its association with the E3 ligase Mindbomb in zebrafish . Adding to the complexity of FIH-mediated hydroxylation is its ability to hydroxylate members of the ankyrin repeat family of proteins including the NF-κB inhibitor IκB , the receptor protein Notch , and the vascular E3 ligase ankyrin repeat and SOCS box containing 6 4 (ASB4) , which appears to regulate the angiogenic properties of these proteins in mouse models, possibly in conjunction with NF-κB [109, 110].
The field of cardiac-specific hydroxylation is still emerging. Contributing to this gap is our poor understanding of the hydroxylation event itself. That is, little is known about the role of endogenous hydroxlylase inhibitors, hydroxylases and their target signaling in hypoxia versus normoxia, or putative hydroxylation-site motifs. For example, while many other enzymatic reactions (ubiquitination, acetylation, methylation, etc.) have “counteracting” enzymes that reverse the specific modification (deubiquitinases , deacetylases , and demethylases , resp.), no specific dehydroxylase has been uncovered yet, though speculation of its/their existence has been postulated . Though only just now emerging, there is evidence for the role of HIF-1α in nonhypoxic conditions; that is, ANGII, thrombin, various interleukins, cyclicAMP, and other hormones stimulate the accumulation of HIF-1α in normoxia (reviewed in ). Additionally, glucose is known to stimulate HIF-1α-mediated signal transduction in a diabetic mouse model . In addition, HIF-1α accumulates in mouse cardiomyocytes during normoxia in response to miR-199a knockdown, increasing HIF-mediated IPC . Though not directly indicative of cardiovascular disease, these pathways and models may yield potential insights into the role of HIF-1α in its unhydroxylated state. Another scenario of divergent signaling based on hydroxylation state is with the E3 ligase ASB4. Specifically, ASB4 has been shown to be hydroxylated by FIH  and is expressed in the adult heart and brain [106, 117] but is also expressed in hypoxic milieus and functions in placental development and vasculogenesis [106, 118]. This may partially explain instances of a single hydroxylation substrate whose functional role is mediated by the hydroxylation state, independent of other factors such as oxygen availability. Certainly further investigation is warranted into the putative phenomenon of reversible hydroxylation.
Another aspect of hydroxylation that has yet to be fully elucidated is the occurrence and requirement of a hydroxyl-binding site motif. Recent advances in bioinformatics has yielded insights into the amino acid sequence motifs for other enzymatic reactions [119–121], but, while hydroxyl-site motifs have been proposed , it remains to be rigorously and empirically determined whether this site (or sites) is required for hydroxylase binding or is a function of happenstance, as other PHD-modified proteins do not contain this sequence . Similarly, unlike ubiquitination, which can seemingly occur on any lysine residue within a protein (though often times with vastly different outcomes) , prolyl hydroxylation only occurs on specific proline residues, without any sort of predictability. With the advent of the “-omics” revolution, it stands to reason that hydroxyl modifications are an apropos candidate for high throughput amino acid sequence screen now that better detection methods are available  for expanding the discovery of both hydroxylase enzymes and hydroxylated substrates.
The current works demonstrating oxygen-mediated cardiac events highlight the fact that, while we know that these enzymatic reactions are critical for cardiac homeostasis and disease, we are just beginning to realize the impact and scope of such events. The first hydroxylase was discovered in the 1940s , but we are only beginning to see the far reaching effect of these enzymes. While the list of substrates is small at present compared to other posttranslationally modifying enzymes, this literature is expanding. From this, we glean the fact that these enzymes are not only important from a basic research standpoint but from a therapeutic and clinical perspective.
Clinically, hydroxylases and hydroxylated proteins such as HIF present a challenging but uniquely rewarding target for drug therapies; that is, while other enzymes require the availability of their modification molecule (ubiquitin for ubiquitination, phosphate for phosphorylation, etc.), the rate limiting factor for hydroxylation is typically the oxygen itself. Therefore, small molecule inhibition/activation, ligand agonism/antagonism, and lipid permeabilization would not be required for changes in hydroxylase efficacy. To increase hydroxylase activity, simple exogenous introduction of recombinant protein would suffice. If accumulating HIF for IPC was desired, via PHD repression, then there is a wide assortment of effective, available treatments. These include cobalt chloride, which can protect the heart in mice by reducing infarct size , desferroxamine, an iron chelator that scavenges free radicals and inhibits PHD hydroxylation in rat cardiomyocytes , and dimethyloxalylglycine, a broad hydroxylase inhibitor, which also reduced infarct size in rat, mouse, and rabbit animal models due to HIF stabilization [129–131]. HIF itself can be directly targeted as well as a therapeutic intervention; that is, several investigations demonstrate that HIF polymorphisms directly contribute to the pathology of the coronary arteries [132, 133] in human patients. However, HIF has been successfully reintroduced as an adenoviral vector into patients with advanced coronary artery disease as part of a small phase 1 safety study .
Over the past decade or so, there have been a growing number of clinical trials of human disease that have focused on PHD proteins and HIF. Small molecule PHD inhibitors have been investigated in their ability to activate HIF and its downstream target genes. Fibrogen, a biotechnology company in California, has designed and implemented several PHD-specific small molecule inhibitors. One compound, FG-2216, has been shown to increase EPO levels  in patients with end-stage renal disease, while another compound from the company, FG-4592, has been shown to correct anemia in patients with peritoneal dialysis  and patients undergoing dialysis without iron supplementation . While none of these studies are cardiac in nature, these trials serve as a useful proof of principal that these compounds are safe and effective in stabilizing HIF in human patients.
In summary, the oxygen-sensing proteins are an important addition to the complete cardiovascular landscape. Furthering our understanding of the enzymes, substrates, and cofactors involved with oxygen-mediated reactions will not only provide additional knowledge of how heart tissue functions in different oxygen concentrations but also may yield therapeutic interventions for protecting the heart against ischemic injury.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
The authors would like to thank Dr. Laura Dyer and Dr. Stephen Sojka for their critical review of this paper.
- World Health Organization, The Top 10 Causes of Death, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2014, http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/.
- University TJH, Conditions We Treat: Coronary Artery Disease (Ischemic Heart Disease).
- A. S. Go, D. Mozaffarian, V. L. Roger et al., “Heart disease and stroke statistics—2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association,” Circulation, vol. 127, no. 1, pp. e6–e245, 2013.
- M. H. Soonpaa and L. J. Field, “Assessment of cardiomyocyte DNA synthesis in normal and injured adult mouse hearts,” The American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 272, no. 1, pp. H220–H226, 1997.
- P. Anversa and J. Kajstura, “Ventricular myocytes are not terminally differentiated in the adult mammalian heart,” Circulation Research, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 1998.
- D. F. Wilson and M. Erecińska, “The oxygen dependence of cellular energy metabolism,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 194, pp. 229–239, 1986.
- H. F. Lodish, Molecular Cell Biology, W.H. Freeman, New York, NY, USA, 2013.
- F. J. Giordano, “Oxygen, oxidative stress, hypoxia, and heart failure,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 500–508, 2005.
- A. D. Hafstad, A. A. Nabeebaccus, and A. M. Shah, “Novel aspects of ROS signalling in heart failure,” Basic Research in Cardiology, vol. 108, no. 4, article 359, 2013.
- R. Karimi, Biomedical & Pharmaceutical Sciences with Patient Care Correlations, Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2014.
- P. A. Frey and A. D. Hegeman, Enzymatic Reaction Mechanisms, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2007.
- T. Funabiki, Oxygenases and Model Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Mass, USA, 1997.
- M. D. Shoulders and R. T. Raines, “Collagen structure and stability,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 78, pp. 929–958, 2009.
- S. Lindy, H. Turto, and J. Uitto, “Protocollagen proline hydroxylase activity in rat heart during experimental cardiac hypertrophy,” Circulation Research, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 205–209, 1972.
- T. N. Seagroves, H. E. Ryan, H. Lu et al., “Transcription factor HIF-1 is a necessary mediator of the pasteur effect in mammalian cells,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 3436–3444, 2001.
- B. H. Jiang, F. Agani, A. Passaniti, and G. L. Semenza, “V-SRC induces expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) and transcription of genes encoding vascular endothelial growth factor and enolase 1: involvement of HIF-1 in tumor progression,” Cancer Research, vol. 57, no. 23, pp. 5328–5335, 1997.
- P. Yang and E. A. Reece, “Role of HIF-1α in maternal hyperglycemia-induced embryonic vasculopathy,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 204, no. 4, pp. 332.e1–332.e7, 2011.
- M. E. Cockman, N. Masson, D. R. Mole et al., “Hypoxia inducible factor-α binding and ubiquitylation by the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 33, pp. 25733–25741, 2000.
- T. Kamura, S. Sato, K. Iwai, M. Czyzyk-Krzeska, R. C. Conaway, and J. W. Conaway, “Activation of HIF1alpha ubiquitination by a reconstituted von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tumor suppressor complex,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 19, pp. 10430–10435, 2000.
- M. Ohh, C. W. Park, M. Ivan et al., “Ubiquitination of hypoxia-inducible factor requires direct binding to the β-domain of the von Hippel-Lindau protein,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 423–427, 2000.
- P. C. Mahon, K. Hirota, and G. L. Semenza, “FIH-1: a novel protein that interacts with HIF-1alpha and VHL to mediate repression of HIF-1 transcriptional activity,” Genes and Development, vol. 15, no. 20, pp. 2675–2686, 2001.
- K. S. Hewitson, L. A. McNeill, M. V. Riordan et al., “Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) asparagine hydroxylase is identical to factor inhibiting HIF (FIH) and is related to the cupin structural family,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 29, pp. 26351–26355, 2002.
- D. Lando, D. J. Peet, J. J. Gorman, D. A. Whelan, M. L. Whitelaw, and R. K. Bruick, “FIH-1 is an asparaginyl hydroxylase enzyme that regulates the transcriptional activity of hypoxia-inducible factor,” Genes and Development, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1466–1471, 2002.
- C. Brahimi-Horn, N. Mazure, and J. Pouysségur, “Signalling via the hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha requires multiple posttranslational modifications,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2005.
- G. L. Semenza, “Targeting HIF-1 for cancer therapy,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 721–732, 2003.
- J. E. Ziello, I. S. Jovin, and Y. Huang, “Hypoxia-Inducible Factor (HIF)-1 regulatory pathway and its potential for therapeutic intervention in malignancy and ischemia,” Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 51–60, 2007.
- W. Liu, S.-M. Shen, X.-Y. Zhao, and G.-Q. Chen, “Targeted genes and interacting proteins of hypoxia inducible factor-1,” International Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 165–178, 2012.
- D. Chen, M. Li, J. Luo, and W. Gu, “Direct interactions between HIF-1 alpha and Mdm2 modulate p53 function,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 16, pp. 13595–13598, 2003.
- D. J. Manalo, A. Rowan, T. Lavoie et al., “Transcriptional regulation of vascular endothelial cell responses to hypoxia by HIF-1,” Blood, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 659–669, 2005.
- A. J. Krieg, E. B. Rankin, D. Chan, O. Razorenova, S. Fernandez, and A. J. Giaccia, “Regulation of the histone demethylase JMJD1A by hypoxia-inducible factor 1α enhances hypoxic gene expression and tumor growth,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 344–353, 2010.
- W. Luo, H. Hu, R. Chang et al., “Pyruvate kinase M2 is a PHD3-stimulated coactivator for hypoxia-inducible factor 1,” Cell, vol. 145, no. 5, pp. 732–744, 2011.
- L. Xie, K. Xiao, E. J. Whalen et al., “Oxygen-regulated β2-Adrenergic receptor hydroxylation by EGLN3 and ubiquitylation by pVHL,” Science Signaling, vol. 2, no. 78, article ra33, 2009.
- E. P. Cummins, E. Berra, K. M. Comerford et al., “Prolyl hydroxylase-1 negatively regulates IkappaB kinase-beta, giving insight into hypoxia-induced NFkappaB activity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 48, pp. 18154–18159, 2006.
- J. Fu, K. Menzies, R. S. Freeman, and M. B. Taubman, “EGLN3 prolyl hydroxylase regulates skeletal muscle differentiation and myogenin protein stability,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 17, pp. 12410–12418, 2007.
- J. L. Balligand, R. A. Kelly, P. A. Marsden, T. W. Smith, and T. Michel, “Control of cardiac muscle cell function by an endogenous nitric oxide signaling system,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 347–351, 1993.
- N. Paolocc, U. E. G. Ekelund, T. Isoda et al., “cGMP-independent inotropic effects of nitric oxide and peroxynitrite donors: potential role for nitrosylation,” The American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 279, no. 4, pp. H1982–H1988, 2000.
- V. J. Thannickal and B. L. Fanburg, “Activation of an H2O2-generating NADH oxidase in human lung fibroblasts by transforming growth factor beta1,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 270, no. 51, pp. 30334–30338, 1995.
- S.-L. Lee, W.-W. Wang, G. A. Finlay, and B. L. Fanburg, “Serotonin stimulates mitogen-activated protein kinase activity through the formation of superoxide anion,” The American Journal of Physiology—Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, vol. 277, no. 2, pp. L282–L291, 1999.
- T. H. Cheng, N. L. Shih, S. Y. Chen, D. L. Wang, and J. J. Chen, “Reactive oxygen species modulate endothelin-I-induced c-fos gene expression in cardiomyocytes,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 654–662, 1999.
- V. J. Thannickal and B. L. Fanburg, “Reactive oxygen species in cell signaling,” American Journal of Physiology—Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, vol. 279, no. 6, pp. L1005–L1028, 2000.
- N. Suematsu, H. Tsutsui, J. Wen et al., “Oxidative stress mediates tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced mitochondrial DNA damage and dysfunction in cardiac myocyte,” Circulation, vol. 107, no. 10, pp. 1418–1423, 2003.
- N. Rathore, S. John, M. Kale, and D. Bhatnagar, “Lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzymes in isoproterenol induced oxidative stress in rat tissues,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 297–303, 1998.
- I. Rahman, “Oxidative stress, chromatin remodeling and gene transcription in inflammation and chronic lung diseases,” Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 95–109, 2003.
- M. Nishida, Y. Maruyama, R. Tanaka, K. Kontani, T. Nagao, and H. Kurose, “Gα(i) and Gα(o) are target proteins of reactive oxygen species,” Nature, vol. 408, no. 6811, pp. 492–495, 2000.
- M. Conrad, C. Jakupoglu, S. G. Moreno et al., “Essential role for mitochondrial thioredoxin reductase in hematopoiesis, heart development, and heart function,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 24, no. 21, pp. 9414–9423, 2004.
- H. C. Yen, T. D. Oberley, S. Vichitbandha, Y.-S. Ho, and D. K. St. Clair, “The protective role of manganese superoxide dismutase against adriamycin-induced acute cardiac toxicity in transgenic mice,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 98, no. 5, pp. 1253–1260, 1996.
- E. P. Chen, H. B. Bittner, R. D. Davis, R. J. Folz, and P. van Trigt, “Extracellular superoxide dismutase transgene overexpression preserves postischemic myocardial function in isolated murine hearts,” Circulation, vol. 94, no. 9, pp. II412–II417, 1996.
- M. S. Willis, W. H. D. Townley-Tilson, E. Y. Kang, J. W. Homeister, and C. Patterson, “Sent to destroy: the ubiquitin proteasome system regulates cell signaling and protein quality control in cardiovascular development and disease,” Circulation Research, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 463–478, 2010.
- K. R. Chaudhary, S. N. Batchu, and J. M. Seubert, “Cytochrome P450 enzymes and the heart,” IUBMB Life, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 954–960, 2009.
- B. K. Park, “Cytochrome P450 enzymes in the heart,” The Lancet, vol. 355, no. 9208, pp. 945–946, 2000.
- B. N. M. Zordoky and A. O. S. El-Kadi, “Modulation of cardiac and hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes during heart failure,” Current Drug Metabolism, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 122–128, 2008.
- B. M. Babior, “Phagocytes and oxidative stress,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 33–44, 2000.
- J. Slezak, N. Tribulova, J. Pristacova et al., “Hydrogen peroxide changes in ischemic and reperfused heart: cytochemistry and biochemical and X-ray microanalysis,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 147, no. 3, pp. 772–781, 1995.
- E. A. Podrez, H. M. Abu-Soud, and S. L. Hazen, “Myeloperoxidase-generated oxidants and atherosclerosis,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 1717–1725, 2000.
- R. K. Schindhelm, L. P. van der Zwan, T. Teerlink, and P. G. Scheffer, “Myeloperoxidase: a useful biomarker for cardiovascular disease risk stratification?” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 1462–1470, 2009.
- S. J. Nicholls and S. L. Hazen, “Myeloperoxidase and cardiovascular disease,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1102–1111, 2005.
- R. Zhang, M.-L. Brennan, Z. Shen et al., “Myeloperoxidase functions as a major enzymatic catalyst for initiation of lipid peroxidation at sites of inflammation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 48, pp. 46116–46122, 2002.
- R. Zhang, M.-L. Brennan, X. Fu et al., “Association between myeloperoxidase levels and risk of coronary artery disease,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 286, no. 17, pp. 2136–2142, 2001.
- T. J. Mocatta, A. P. Pilbrow, V. A. Cameron et al., “Plasma concentrations of myeloperoxidase predict mortality after myocardial infarction,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 49, no. 20, pp. 1993–2000, 2007.
- D. Kutter, P. Devaquet, G. Vanderstocken, J. M. Paulus, V. Marchal, and A. Gothot, “Consequences of total and subtotal myeloperoxidase deficiency: risk or benefit?” Acta Haematologica, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 10–15, 2000.
- W. E. Cayley Jr., F. W. Asselbergs, J.-W. C. Tervaert et al., “Prognostic value of myeloperoxidase in patients with chest pain,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 350, no. 5, pp. 516–518, 2004.
- D. Gamenara, Redox Biocatalysis: Fundamentals and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013.
- M. E. Martin, B. R. Byers, M. O. J. Olson, M. L. Salin, J. E. Arceneaux, and C. Tolbert, “A Streptococcus mutans superoxide dismutase that is active with either manganese or iron as a cofactor,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 261, no. 20, pp. 9361–9367, 1986.
- S. Fetzner, “Oxygenases without requirement for cofactors or metal ions,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 243–257, 2003.
- L. Aravind and E. V. Koonin, “The DNA-repair protein AlkB, EGL-9, and leprecan define new families of 2-oxoglutarate- and iron-dependent dioxygenases,” Genome Biology, vol. 2, no. 3, Article ID RESEARCH0007, 2001.
- E. M. Antman, D. DeMets, and J. Loscalzo, “Cyclooxygenase inhibition and cardiovascular risk,” Circulation, vol. 112, no. 5, pp. 759–770, 2005.
- L. Parente and M. Perretti, “Advances in the pathophysiology of constitutive and inducible cyclooxygenases: two enzymes in the spotlight,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 153–159, 2003.
- B. Pitt, C. Penine, and J. T. Willerson, “Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition and cardiovascular events,” Circulation, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 167–169, 2002.
- F. Cipollone, C. Prontera, B. Pini et al., “Overexpression of functionally coupled cyclooxygenase-2 and prostaglandin E synthase in symptomatic atherosclerotic plaques as a basis of prostaglandin E2-dependent plaque instability,” Circulation, vol. 104, no. 8, pp. 921–927, 2001.
- D. Bulut, S. Liaghat, C. Hanefeld, R. Koll, T. Miebach, and A. Mügge, “Selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibition with parecoxib acutely impairs endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in patients with essential hypertension,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1663–1667, 2003.
- M. E. Burleigh, V. R. Babaev, J. A. Oates et al., “Cyclooxygenase-2 promotes early atherosclerotic lesion formation in LDL receptor-deficient mice,” Circulation, vol. 105, no. 15, pp. 1816–1823, 2002.
- R. J. Bing and M. Lomnicka, “Why do cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors cause cardiovascular events?” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 521–522, 2002.
- D. Ehrismann, E. Flashman, D. N. Genn et al., “Studies on the activity of the hypoxia-inducible-factor hydroxylases using an oxygen consumption assay,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 401, no. 1, pp. 227–234, 2007.
- E. Flashman and C. J. Schofield, “The most versatile of all reactive intermediates?” Nature Chemical Biology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 86–87, 2007.
- I. J. Clifton, M. A. McDonough, D. Ehrismann, N. J. Kershaw, N. Granatino, and C. J. Schofield, “Structural studies on 2-oxoglutarate oxygenases and related double-stranded β-helix fold proteins,” Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 644–669, 2006.
- M. Costas, M. P. Mehn, M. P. Jensen, and L. Que Jr., “Dioxygen activation at mononuclear nonheme iron active sites: enzymes, models, and intermediate,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 939–986, 2004.
- U. Puistola, T. M. Turpeeniemi Hujanen, R. Myllyla, and K. I. Kivirikko, “Studies on the lysyl hydroxylase reaction. II. Inhibition kinetics and the reaction mechanism,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 611, no. 1, pp. 51–60, 1980.
- N. P. Talbot, Q. P. Croft, M. K. Curtis et al., “Contrasting effects of ascorbate and iron on the pulmonary vascular response to hypoxia in humans,” Physiological Reports, vol. 2, no. 12, Article ID e12220, 2014.
- J. D. Webb, M. L. Coleman, and C. W. Pugh, “Hypoxia, hypoxia-inducible factors (HIF), HIF hydroxylases and oxygen sensing,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 66, no. 22, pp. 3539–3554, 2009.
- C. J. Schofield and P. J. Ratcliffe, “Oxygen sensing by HIF hydroxylases,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 343–354, 2004.
- E. Metzen, U. Berchner-Pfannschmidt, P. Stengel et al., “Intracellular localisation of human HIF-1α hydroxylases: implications for oxygen sensing,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 116, no. 7, pp. 1319–1326, 2003.
- Y.-I. Tsukada, J. Fang, H. Erdjument-Bromage et al., “Histone demethylation by a family of JmjC domain-containing proteins,” Nature, vol. 439, no. 7078, pp. 811–816, 2006.
- P. Ø. Falnes, R. F. Johansen, and E. Seeberg, “AlkB-mediated oxidative demethylation reverses DNA damage in Escherichia coli,” Nature, vol. 419, no. 6903, pp. 178–182, 2002.
- M. L. Odegaard, J. W. Joseph, M. V. Jensen et al., “The mitochondrial 2-oxoglutarate carrier is part of a metabolic pathway that mediates glucose- and glutamine-stimulated insulin secretion,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 22, pp. 16530–16537, 2010.
- K. A. Wehner, S. Schütz, and P. Sarnow, “OGFOD1, a novel modulator of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α phosphorylation and the cellular response to stress,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 2006–2016, 2010.
- S. McMahon, M. Charbonneau, S. Grandmont, D. E. Richard, and C. M. Dubois, “Transforming growth factor β1 induces hypoxia-inducible factor-1 stabilization through selective inhibition of PHD2 expression,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 34, pp. 24171–24181, 2006.
- Y.-H. Chen, L. M. Comeaux, S. J. Eyles, and M. J. Knapp, “Auto-hydroxylation of FIH-1: an Fe(II), -ketoglutarate-dependent human hypoxia sensor,” Chemical Communications, no. 39, pp. 4768–4770, 2008.
- A. C. R. Epstein, J. M. Gleadle, L. A. McNeill et al., “C. elegans EGL-9 and mammalian homologs define a family of dioxygenases that regulate HIF by prolyl hydroxylation,” Cell, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 43–54, 2001.
- W. G. Kaelin Jr., “The von Hippel-Lindau protein, HIF hydroxylation, and oxygen sensing,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 338, no. 1, pp. 627–628, 2005.
- M. Hirsilä, P. Koivunen, V. Günzler, K. I. Kivirikko, and J. Myllyharju, “Characterization of the human prolyl 4-hydroxylases that modify the hypoxia-inducible factor,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 33, pp. 30772–30780, 2003.
- E. Berra, E. Benizri, A. Ginouvès, V. Volmat, D. Roux, and J. Pouysségur, “HIF prolyl-hydroxylase 2 is the key oxygen sensor setting low steady-state levels of HIF-1α in normoxia,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 22, no. 16, pp. 4082–4090, 2003.
- D. A. Chan, P. D. Sutphin, S.-E. Yen, and A. J. Giaccia, “Coordinate regulation of the oxygen-dependent degradation domains of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 25, no. 15, pp. 6415–6426, 2005.
- C. E. Murry, R. B. Jennings, and K. A. Reimer, “Preconditioning with ischemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium,” Circulation, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 1124–1136, 1986.
- Z. Cai, H. Zhong, M. Bosch-Marce et al., “Complete loss of ischaemic preconditioning-induced cardioprotection in mice with partial deficiency of HIF-1,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 463–470, 2008.
- M. S. Marber, D. S. Latchman, J. M. Walker, and D. M. Yellon, “Cardiac stress protein elevation 24 hours after brief ischemia or heat stress is associated with resistance to myocardial infarction,” Circulation, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 1264–1272, 1993.
- D. Tekin, A. D. Dursun, and L. Xi, “Hypoxia inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) and cardioprotection,” Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1085–1094, 2010.
- D. Faeh, F. Gutzwiller, M. Bopp, and Swiss National Cohort Study G, “Lower mortality from coronary heart disease and stroke at higher altitudes in Switzerland,” Circulation, vol. 120, no. 6, pp. 495–501, 2009.
- M. Hölscher, K. Schäfer, S. Krull et al., “Unfavourable consequences of chronic cardiac HIF-1alpha stabilization,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 77–86, 2012.
- H. Yan, D.-X. Zhang, X. Shi, Q. Zhang, and Y.-S. Huang, “Activation of the prolyl-hydroxylase oxygen-sensing signal cascade leads to AMPK activation in cardiomyocytes,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 2049–2059, 2012.
- G. Wright, J. J. Higgin, R. T. Raines, C. Steenbergen, and E. Murphy, “Activation of the prolyl hydroxylase oxygen-sensor results in induction of GLUT1, heme oxygenase-1, and nitric-oxide synthase proteins and confers protection from metabolic inhibition to cardiomyocytes,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 22, pp. 20235–20239, 2003.
- V. Sridharan, J. Guichard, R. M. Bailey, H. Kasiganesan, C. Beeson, and G. L. Wright, “The prolyl hydroxylase oxygen-sensing pathway is cytoprotective and allows maintenance of mitochondrial membrane potential during metabolic inhibition,” The American Journal of Physiology—Cell Physiology, vol. 292, no. 2, pp. C719–C728, 2007.
- R. Kopp, I. Bauer, A. Ramalingam, M. Egg, T. Schwerte, and V. Lionetti, “Prolonged Hypoxia Increases Survival Even in Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Showing Cardiac Arrhythmia,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 2, Article ID e89099, 2014.
- M. J. Lohse, S. Engelhardt, and T. Eschenhagen, “What is the role of -adrenergic signaling in heart failure?” Circulation Research, vol. 93, no. 10, pp. 896–906, 2003.
- M. E. Cockman, D. E. Lancaster, I. P. Stolze et al., “Posttranslational hydroxylation of ankyrin repeats in IκB proteins by the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) asparaginyl hydroxylase, factor inhibiting HIF (FIH),” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 40, pp. 14767–14772, 2006.
- M. L. Coleman, M. A. McDonough, K. S. Hewitson et al., “Asparaginyl hydroxylation of the notch ankyrin repeat domain by factor inhibiting hypoxia-inducible factor,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 33, pp. 24027–24038, 2007.
- J. E. Ferguson III, Y. Wu, K. Smith et al., “ASB4 is a hydroxylation substrate of FIH and promotes vascular differentiation via an oxygen-dependent mechanism,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 27, no. 18, pp. 6407–6419, 2007.
- M. Huang, P. Nguyen, F. Jia et al., “Double knockdown of prolyl hydroxylase and factor-inhibiting hypoxia-inducible factor with nonviral minicircle gene therapy enhances stem cell mobilization and angiogenesis after myocardial infarction,” Circulation, vol. 124, no. 11, pp. S46–S54, 2011.
- J. H. So, J. D. Kim, K. W. Yoo et al., “FIH-1, a novel interactor of mindbomb, functions as an essential anti-angiogenic factor during zebrafish vascular development,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, Article ID e109517, 2014.
- M. Bode, Y. Wu, X. Pi et al., “Regulation of ankyrin repeat and suppressor of cytokine signalling box protein 4 expression in the immortalized murine endothelial cell lines MS1 and SVR: a role for tumour necrosis factor alpha and oxygen,” Cell Biochemistry and Function, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 334–341, 2011.
- A. B. Aurora, D. Biyashev, Y. Mirochnik et al., “NF-kappaB balances vascular regression and angiogenesis via chromatin remodeling and NFAT displacement,” Blood, vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 475–484, 2010.
- D. Komander, “Mechanism, specificity and structure of the deubiquitinases,” in Conjugation and Deconjugation of Ubiquitin Family Modifiers, vol. 54 of Subcellular Biochemistry, pp. 69–87, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2010.
- C. M. Grozinger and S. L. Schreiber, “Deacetylase enzymes: biological functions and the use of small-molecule inhibitors,” Chemistry and Biology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 3–16, 2002.
- A. Giaccia, B. G. Siim, and R. S. Johnson, “HIF-1 as a target for drug development,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 803–811, 2003.
- A. Kuschel, P. Simon, and S. Tug, “Functional regulation of HIF-1α under normoxia-is there more than post-translational regulation?” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 227, no. 2, pp. 514–524, 2012.
- T. Isoe, Y. Makino, K. Mizumoto et al., “High glucose activates HIF-1-mediated signal transduction in glomerular mesangial cells through a carbohydrate response element binding protein,” Kidney International, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 48–59, 2010.
- S. Rane, M. He, D. Sayed et al., “Downregulation of miR-199a derepresses hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha and Sirtuin 1 and recapitulates hypoxia preconditioning in cardiac myocytes,” Circulation Research, vol. 104, no. 7, pp. 879–886, 2009.
- J.-Y. Li, B.-X. Chai, W. Zhang, Y.-Q. Liu, J. B. Ammori, and M. W. Mulholland, “Akyrin repeat and SOCS box containing protein 4 (Asb-4) interacts with GPS1 (CSN1) and inhibits c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase activity,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1185–1192, 2007.
- W. H. D. Townley-Tilson, Y. Wu, J. E. Ferguson III, and C. Patterson, “The ubiquitin ligase ASB4 promotes trophoblast differentiation through the degradation of ID2,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 2, Article ID e89451, 2014.
- G. Xu, J. S. Paige, and S. R. Jaffrey, “Global analysis of lysine ubiquitination by ubiquitin remnant immunoaffinity profiling,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 868–873, 2010.
- A. Lundby, K. Lage, B. T. Weinert et al., “Proteomic analysis of lysine acetylation sites in rat tissues reveals organ specificity and subcellular patterns,” Cell Reports, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 419–431, 2012.
- F.-M. Boisvert, J. Côté, M.-C. Boulanger, and S. Richard, “A proteomic analysis of arginine-methylated protein complexes,” Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 1319–1330, 2003.
- M. Shimizu, T. Igasaki, M. Yamada et al., “Experimental determination of proline hydroxylation and hydroxyproline arabinogalactosylation motifs in secretory proteins,” Plant Journal, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 877–889, 2005.
- K. L. Gorres and R. T. Raines, “Prolyl 4-hydroxylase,” Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 106–124, 2010.
- F. Mattiroli and T. K. Sixma, “Lysine-targeting specificity in ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like modification pathways,” Nature Structural and Molecular Biology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 308–316, 2014.
- Y.-M. Tian, K. K. Yeoh, M. K. Lee et al., “Differential sensitivity of hypoxia inducible factor hydroxylation sites to hypoxia and hydroxylase inhibitors,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 15, pp. 13041–13051, 2011.
- I. W. Sizer, “The action of tyrosinase on proteins,” Federation proceedings, vol. 5, article 96, 1946.
- L. Xi, M. Taher, C. Yin, F. Salloum, and R. C. Kukreja, “Cobalt chloride induces delayed cardiac preconditioning in mice through selective activation of HIF-1α and AP-1 and iNOS signaling,” The American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 287, no. 6, pp. H2369–H2375, 2004.
- A. Dendorfer, M. Heidbreder, T. Hellwig-Bürgel, O. Jöhren, F. Qadri, and P. Dominiak, “Deferoxamine induces prolonged cardiac preconditioning via accumulation of oxygen radicals,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 117–124, 2005.
- R. Ockaili, R. Natarajan, F. Salloum et al., “HIF-1 activation attenuates postischemic myocardial injury: role for heme oxygenase-1 in modulating microvascular chemokine generation,” American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 289, no. 2, pp. H542–H548, 2005.
- T. Eckle, D. Kohler, R. Lehmann, K. C. E. Kasmi, and H. K. Eltzschig, “Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 is central to cardioprotection a new paradigm for ischemic preconditioning,” Circulation, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 166–175, 2008.
- J. A. Poynter, M. C. Manukyan, Y. Wang et al., “Systemic pretreatment with dimethyloxalylglycine increases myocardial HIF-1alpha and VEGF production and improves functional recovery after acute ischemia/reperfusion,” Surgery, vol. 150, no. 2, pp. 278–283, 2011.
- J. Duran, V. Götzens, J. Carballo et al., “The HIF1A C85T single nucleotide polymorphism influences the number of branches of the human coronary tree,” Cardiology, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 156–159, 2012.
- M. Alidoosti, M. Ghaedi, A. Soleimani et al., “Study on the role of environmental parameters and HIF-1A gene polymorphism in coronary collateral formation among patients with ischemic heart disease,” Clinical Biochemistry, vol. 44, no. 17-18, pp. 1421–1424, 2011.
- E. G. Kilian, S. Sadoni, C. Vicol et al., “Myocardial transfection of hypoxia inducible factor-1 via an adenoviral vector during coronary artery bypass grafting—a multicenter phase I and safety study,” Circulation Journal, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 916–924, 2010.
- W. M. Bernhardt, M. S. Wiesener, P. Scigalla et al., “Inhibition of prolyl hydroxylases increases erythropoietin production in ESRD,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 2151–2156, 2010.
- A. Besarab, D. T. M. Chan, S. L. Dua et al., “Hypoxia inducing factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor FG-4592 corrects anemia in peritoneal dialysis,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, SA-OR087, 2013.
- M. A. Besarab, E. N. Chernyavskaya, I. Motylev et al., “FG-4592, an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase-inhibitor, corrects anemia without iron supplementation in incident dialysis patients,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 23, p. 428A, 2012.
Copyright © 2015 W. H. Davin Townley-Tilson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.