Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity / 2016 / Article
Special Issue

Interplay between Oxidative Stress and Metabolism in Signalling and Disease 2016

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 6032306 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6032306

Le Li, Creed M. Stary, "Targeting Glial Mitochondrial Function for Protection from Cerebral Ischemia: Relevance, Mechanisms, and the Role of MicroRNAs", Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2016, Article ID 6032306, 11 pages, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6032306

Targeting Glial Mitochondrial Function for Protection from Cerebral Ischemia: Relevance, Mechanisms, and the Role of MicroRNAs

Academic Editor: Adriana M. Cassina
Received24 Jun 2016
Revised21 Aug 2016
Accepted31 Aug 2016
Published29 Sep 2016


Astrocytes and microglia play crucial roles in the response to cerebral ischemia and are effective targets for stroke therapy in animal models. MicroRNAs (miRs) are important posttranscriptional regulators of gene expression that function by inhibiting the translation of select target genes. In astrocytes, miR expression patterns regulate mitochondrial function in response to oxidative stress via targeting of Bcl2 and heat shock protein 70 family members. Mitochondria play an active role in microglial activation, and miRs regulate the microglial neuroinflammatory response. As endogenous miR expression patterns can be altered with exogenous mimics and inhibitors, miR-targeted therapies represent a viable intervention to optimize glial mitochondrial function and improve clinical outcome following cerebral ischemia. In the present article, we review the role that astrocytes and microglia play in neuronal function and fate following ischemic stress, discuss the relevance of mitochondria in the glial response to injury, and present current evidence implicating miRs as critical regulators in the glial mitochondrial response to cerebral ischemia.

1. Introduction

Ischemic stroke remains a leading cause of death and long-term disability worldwide [1]. Despite hundreds of promising preclinical trials demonstrating efficacy of neuron-targeted therapies in animal models of stroke, the only clinical treatment remains early restoration of blood flow with thrombolysis [2]. The failure to translate neuron-targeted approaches to useful clinical therapy suggests that alternative cellular targets in the brain may more effectively coordinate the complex intra- and intercellular signaling cascades that contribute to neuronal injury. Astrocytes comprise the most numerous type of cell in the brain and play a crucial role in neuronal homeostasis both for normal physiologic functioning and in response to cell stress [3]. Microglia coordinate growth and remodeling of the neural network and regulate the neuroinflammatory response to stroke [4, 5]. In both astrocytes and microglia, mitochondria play a central role in determining local neuronal cell fate. Therapeutic strategies aimed at maintaining mitochondrial function in glia following stroke may therefore provide a novel approach to reduce the degree of injury and improve neurobehavioral outcome.

MicroRNAs (miRs) are a class of small noncoding RNAs that regulate gene expression by binding to the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of target genes and destabilizing or inhibiting their translation [6]. In glia, miRs have been shown to play an important role in the cellular response to ischemic injury (for reviews, see [79]). In particular, miRs can alter the expression of proteins that both directly and indirectly modulate glial mitochondrial function. The purpose of this review is to (1) provide an overview of astrocyte and microglia-mediated regulation of neuronal cell function and fate following ischemic injury; (2) discuss the relevance of glial mitochondrial function in response to ischemic injury; (3) review coordination of mitochondrial homeostasis by B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl2) and heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) family members; and (4) present current evidence demonstrating the critical role miRs play in regulating glial mitochondrial function in response to cerebral ischemic injury.

2. Glia in Health and in Response to Ischemia

2.1. Astrocytes

Neuronal maintenance, neurite outgrowth, and repair of the neuronal network are coordinated by resident astrocytes [1012]. As an essential component of the neurovascular unit (a dynamic structure also composed of endothelial cells, pericytes, basement membrane, and surrounding neurons), astrocytes control blood circulation, extracellular ion homeostasis, and release of energy substrates and growth factors in the central nervous system. In addition to their role in neuronal housekeeping and protection, astrocytes play a significant role in neurotransmission [11, 13]. Astrocytes are central to synapse formation and stabilization in development and disease [3, 14, 15] and modulate synaptic transmission via glutamate uptake [16]. Astrocytes extend many fine branching processes, putting them in direct contact with cell bodies, dendrites, and synaptic terminals, such that an individual astrocyte may contact up to 100,000 neurons [17]. Moreover, astrocytes communicate with adjacent astrocytes via intercellular gap junctions to function as a coordinated syncytium [18, 19]. As a consequence, astrocytes actively regulate and organize local and distant synaptic activity, excitability, transmission, and plasticity of the neuronal network [2023].

Ischemic stroke remains the most common and debilitating source of cerebral ischemia [1]. However, acute cerebral ischemia can occur via a number of mechanisms, including hemorrhagic stroke, subdural and epidural hematoma, subarachnoid hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury, cerebral edema, vascular compression from brain masses, cardiac arrest, or any physiologic condition resulting in low cardiac output. Following cerebral ischemia, astrocytes perform multiple functions beneficial for neuronal survival. One common pathway for neuronal cell death following cerebral ischemia is the accumulation of extrasynaptic glutamate, which triggers mitochondrial dysfunction characterized by imbalances in intracellular Ca2+ handling and excessive production of oxidants, eventually leading to neuronal cell death (Figure 1). Astrocytes have been shown to protect neurons from glutamate excitotoxicity during pathophysiologic stresses such as stroke [24], traumatic brain injury [25], and spinal cord injury [26]. However, the astrocyte response to oxidative stress also induces morphologic and phenotypic changes that can paradoxically exacerbate injury, a process termed reactive gliosis or astrogliosis [24, 27]. Reactive astrocytes are identified by increases in cytoplasmic mass and branching processes and increased production of cytoplasmic filaments, most notably glial fibrillary acidic protein. Reactive astrogliosis and subsequent development of an astrocytic scar surrounding the area of injury are essential for isolating the injury site and protecting neurons against harmful substances released from the infarct core. However, this process can also contribute to limiting neuronal regeneration by inhibiting axonal sprouting via secretion of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans [28, 29].

The astrocytic syncytium may also influence neuronal survival by coordinating the spatial delivery of metabolic fuels, thereby maintaining both mitochondrial and cellular integrity. Gap junctions are permeable to both glucose and lactate [30], regulate the development of postinjury edema [31], and have the potential to facilitate delivery of substrates to metabolically active neurons in local areas of decreased perfusion. However, the role of astrocytic gap junctions in stroke remains controversial [32]. For example, astrocytic gap junctions remaining open following ischemia [33] can allow proapoptotic factors and other molecules to spread through the syncytium, expanding the size of the infarct [34]. Moreover, persistently open gap junctions can allow Ca2+ waves to propagate throughout the syncytium and induce remote neuronal cell death [35].

Astrocyte-targeted therapies have been shown to protect against neurotoxicity in animal models of neurodegeneration. For example, in astrocytes with an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis- (ALS-) linked mutation in mitochondrial superoxide dismutase () that disrupts mitochondrial function and results in motor neuron cell death, pretreatment of astrocytes with mitochondrial-targeted antioxidants (ubiquinone and carboxy-proxyl nitroxide coupled to triphenylphosphonium) or with dichloroacetate (DCA, an activator of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex that improves oxidative phosphorylation coupling) mitigated neuronal cell death in cocultures [36, 37]. Studies specifically targeting astrocytes for improving outcome following cerebral ischemia are limited but have shown promise in rodent models. Augmenting astrocyte extrasynaptic glutamate sequestration by increasing the activity of astrocytic glutamate transporter GLT-1 has been effective at decreasing glutamate excitotoxicity, thereby indirectly maintaining mitochondrial function [38, 39]. However, targeting of the astrocyte response to oxidative stress has also been effective: overexpression of superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2) in astrocytes reduced evidence of oxidative stress in the hippocampus from transient global ischemia [40] and was also accompanied by preservation of GLT-1. Additionally, increasing astrocytic pyruvate preserved mitochondrial function and improved neuronal survival via a glutathione-dependent mechanism [41]. Utilizing direct mitochondrial-targeted approaches in astrocytes may serve to outweigh the negative consequences of reactive gliosis, a necessary astrocyte response for minimizing the degree of injury from cerebral ischemia [42].

2.2. Microglia

Microglia constitute 10–15% of all cells in the brain and play an important role in neuronal migration, axonal growth, and synaptic remodeling and in response to ischemic injury (for reviews, see [4, 5, 43]). Microglia share a common myeloid lineage with monocytes and macrophages and similarly act as the primary form of tissue immune defense. The primary functions of microglia are (1) pathogen recognition; (2) phagocytosis of damaged cells, inactive synapses, debris, and infectious agents; and (3) regulation of T-cell responses and induction of inflammation. Under normal physiological conditions, microglia exist in a “resting” state, although they remain highly dynamic with continuous extension and retraction of processes that survey the local microenvironment. Cerebral ischemia induces microglial activation [43], characterized by a change from a ramified to amoeboid shape, loss of branching processes, and production of lysosomes and phagosomes. Mitochondrial function (and dysfunction) appears to play a direct role in microglial activation [44]. Similar to astrocytes, activated microglia have been observed to exert both injurious and protective effects subsequent to cerebral ischemia [45]. This ambiguity has been partially resolved by the observation that microglial activation in response to stroke is a polarized process, described as M1 and M2 activation states (for review, see [5]).

Morphologically, microglia of both M1 and M2 activation states become spherical and retract their processes. Differentiation between the two states is therefore based on antigen expression and cytokine secretion patterns. In M1 or “classical” activation, microglia are characterized by upregulation of proinflammatory surface antigens that can be induced by bacterial lipopolysaccharides or the proinflammatory cytokine interferon-γ. M1 activation triggers the production of proinflammatory factors such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), nitric oxide, and reactive oxygen species (ROS), which, in excess, can exacerbate brain injury. TNF-α is a critical proinflammatory cytokine released from M1 microglial cells following ischemia, which serves as an activator of receptor-mediated proapoptotic pathways within the neuron, and can further stimulate microglia via inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase 2 [46].

Activation of the M2 phenotype by IL-4, IL-10, and/or IL-13 induces surface-receptor expression of several distinct antigens, such as arginase, heparin-binding lectin Ym-1, CD206, and CD36. M2 polarization may also result in a greater capacity for phagocytosis [4749], important for sequestration of cytotoxic material and in activation of the adaptive immune response. Observations suggest that the time course of polarization and the relative abundance of the two phenotypes depend on the severity, location, and duration of ischemia and reperfusion [43]. Although the precise poststroke temporal kinetics of microglial polarization and mechanisms that determine polarization remain to be determined, current evidence suggests that oxidative stress and mitochondrial function play a central regulatory role [50]. However, more recently, the M1 and M2 classification scheme has been brought into question [51], with the suggestion that, with the advent of novel technologies that better define the complexities of the immunological landscape, the present dichotomy will likely be replaced by a spectrum of activation states that will more accurately reflect the microglial response to ischemic injury.

3. Mitochondrial Function in Response to Ischemic Injury

3.1. Calcium and Oxidative Stress

Therapeutic strategies that optimize mitochondrial homeostasis may offer a unifying approach to simultaneously target multiple deleterious pathways: mitochondria are central regulators of apoptosis, ROS, and intracellular Ca2+ handling. Depletion of energy reserves as occurs during ischemia leads to a massive rise in free cytosolic Ca2+ (Figure 1), both from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and from the extracellular space, which can then be transmitted to the matrix of mitochondria via the mitochondrial-associated membrane (MAM) (for review, see [52]). When mitochondrial matrix Ca2+ exceeds buffering capacity, mitochondrial function becomes compromised and results in increased generation of free radicals and formation of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP, [53]). Activation and opening on the MPTP can cause release of cytochrome c [54, 55] and other proapoptotic factors into the cytoplasm. The combination of Ca2+ accumulation in cytosolic and mitochondrial compartments and excessive ROS levels from reperfusion can induce alterations in protein folding homoeostasis, leading to MAM-mediated amplification in cytosolic Ca2+, which can then activate protease, nuclease, and lipase pathways, ultimately contributing to necrotic cell death [52, 56]. Oxidative stress mediated by nitric oxide (e.g., peroxynitrate, ONOO) can also induce reactive gliosis and induce neuronal cell death, an effect mitigated by coadministration of nitric acid synthase (NOS) inhibitors or peroxynitrite scavengers [57].

3.2. Glia Mitochondrial Function Regulates Neuronal Survival

Astrocytic mitochondrial function plays several direct and indirect roles in maintaining neuronal survival from ischemic injury (Figure 2). Davis et al. [58] previously observed sequestration of degraded neuronal mitochondria by local astrocytes, suggesting a role for astrocytes in neuronal mitochondrial recycling and biogenesis. More recently, Hayakawa et al. [59] demonstrated that astrocytes are capable of direct transfer of functional mitochondria to neurons and that suppression of this process worsens injury and neurologic outcome from cerebral ischemia. Together, these observations demonstrate a role for mitochondria as a novel medium for neuronal-astrocyte communication and position astrocytes as central to maintenance of neuronal metabolism and bioenergetics in response to cell stress. For example, in addition to coordinating apoptosis, mitochondria are fundamental to maintaining ATP levels via oxidative phosphorylation. Neurons, with a relatively higher rate of ATP consumption compared with glia, require a constant source of reducing equivalents to rephosphorylate ATP from ADP and AMP. ATP is required to establish and maintain resting electrochemical gradients and repolarize membranes after depolarization and synaptic transmission and is essential for a host of intracellular signaling and biosynthetic functions. During ischemia, substrate for oxidative phosphorylation (i.e., oxygen and glucose) is reduced, and energy deprivation results in impaired cellular function and eventually cell death (for review, see [60]). Neurons do not normally store glucose as glycogen and must rely on exogenous delivery of substrate [61, 62]. Astrocytes can store glycogen and are therefore critical in maintaining a steady source of metabolic fuel to neurons during ischemic conditions [61, 62]. Lactate generated by astrocytes is transported into neurons via the monocarboxylate transporter-2 (MCT-2, [63]), which can serve as a metabolic fuel to maintain basal neuronal activity, particularly when the blood supply of glucose is interrupted [64, 65]. Triggering astrocytic glycolysis is at least in part due to neuronal-astrocyte energy coupling via activation of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK), an evolutionarily conserved enzyme that functions as an energy sensor by coupling changes in ATP supply to ATP production [66]. Neuronal release of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), a strong activator of AMPK in astrocytes, induces a switch to glycolysis and subsequent release of lactate, which is then transported into neurons via MCT-2 [67]. However, in the nonstressed state, particularly in the poststroke recovery phase when energy requirements are high, a return to oxidative phosphorylation is preferred [60].

Astrocytes are therefore predictably more tolerant to injury than neurons: similar exposure times to oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) result in greater injury to primary neuronal cultures versus primary astrocyte cultures [68]. Neurons also have limited antioxidant capacity and rely heavily on the antioxidant capacity of astrocyte cytosolic and mitochondrial superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione reductase, and glutathione peroxidase to combat oxidative stress [69, 70]. By these and other mechanisms, astrocyte mitochondrial dysfunction can lead to increased neuronal death [70]. For example, disruptions in astrocyte mitochondrial function have been shown to play a direct role in neurotoxicity in animal models of neurodegeneration. Nagai et al. [71] observed that the ALS-linked mutation was associated with increased neurotoxicity and cell death of motor neurons. Cassina et al. [36] observed that astrocytes with the mutation demonstrate severe disruptions in oxidative phosphorylation coupling and enhanced mitochondrial superoxide production and recapitulated their neurotoxic effect by pretreatment of astrocytes in neuronal-astrocyte cocultures with mitochondrial inhibitors (rotenone, antimycin A, sodium azide, or fluorocitrate). A further example is that the mitochondrial Ca2+ buffering capacity of astrocytes determines astrocyte GLT-1 expression [72], and therefore astrocyte mitochondrial function is intimately tied to the capacity of astrocytes to buffer excessive (extrasynaptic) glutamate and prevent excitotoxicity [73, 74].

In microglia, the role of mitochondrial function in neuronal survival can be considered direct, as neuronal survival is a function of microglial ROS production [75], and indirect, via polarization of activation state and subsequent downstream production of cytokines (Figure 2). Cytotoxic M1 activation of microglia is associated with neuronal loss and decline of cognitive and neurobehavioral function [76]. Conversely, M2 activated microglia secrete neurotrophic factors and neuroprotective cytokines. NF-κB, a transcription factor that activates genes regulating cellular survival, growth, differentiation, inflammation, and cell death, plays a central role in regulating the effect of microglia by participating both in protective and in deleterious responses. High concentrations of ROS inactivate NF-κB, inhibiting its binding to DNA, while moderate levels of ROS lead to the sequential phosphorylation, polyubiquitination, and degradation of IκB (inhibitor of κB), allowing activation of NF-κB. Once activated, NF-κB plays a prosurvival role by inhibiting caspase cell death pathways and upregulating transcriptional activation of antiapoptotic proteins and genes involved in decreasing mitochondrial ROS, such as manganese superoxide dismutase [77]. NF-κB also activates antiapoptotic responses regulated by mitochondria, thereby protecting neurons from ischemic brain injury [78]. Therefore, mitochondrial function and microglial activation serve reciprocal roles: targeting cytokines that promote the microglial M2 activation state may result in protecting mitochondrial homeostasis, while direct approaches to augment microglial mitochondrial function may promote M2 activation.

4. Hsp70 and Bcl2 in Mitochondrial Homeostasis

Two families of well-known cytoprotective proteins, the Hsp70 family of chaperones and the Bcl2 apoptosis-regulating family, have been shown to be integral to maintaining mitochondrial homeostasis. The Hsp70 family of chaperones is a functionally related group of proteins that assist in the folding or unfolding of proteins, sequestration of denatured proteins, and assembly of protein complexes. Two relevant Hsp70 family members known to regulate glial mitochondrial function are cytosolic Hsp70/Hsp72 and glucose-related binding protein 78 (Grp78)/binding immunoglobulin protein (BiP). The Bcl2 protein family is a central regulator of cell survival by helping to maintain mitochondrial membrane integrity and function and coordinating apoptotic signaling [79, 80].

4.1. Bcl2

The Bcl2 family is known to play an important role in the evolution of injury following cerebral ischemia [81]. Overexpressing prosurvival Bcl2 family members protects against cerebral ischemia in vivo [82, 83] and in vitro [84]. Cytosolic Bcl2 was shown to contribute to MAM formation by localizing to both the ER and the mitochondrial outer membranes [85] and to coordinate ER and mitochondrial Ca2+ homeostasis following cerebral ischemia [8, 86]. In addition to regulating induction of apoptosis by controlling mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization, Bcl2 protein family members have been shown to regulate calcium handling [87] and modulate intercompartmental cross talk between mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum [88, 89].

4.2. Hsp70/Hsp72

Hsp72, a cytosolic member of the Hsp70 family, participates in protein import and sorting at MAM [90] and regulates downstream Bcl2 expression [91]. Hsp72 is induced in response to a variety of stresses, particularly oxidative stress, and is protective from both necrotic and apoptotic cell death [92, 93].

Hsp72 has been shown to preserve mitochondrial function, reduce oxidative stress, regulate inflammation, and protect from cerebral ischemia [40, 92, 94]. Overexpression protected hippocampus neurons from global cerebral ischemia, mediated in part by increased Bcl2 expression [91]. Overexpression of Hsp72 has been shown to protect both animal and cell models of cerebral ischemia [92]. Astrocyte-specific overexpression of Hsp72 was shown to preserve GLT-1 activity and reduce oxidative stress in the hippocampus following transient global cerebral ischemia [40]. Specifically increasing Hsp72 level in astrocytes demonstrated a reduction in oxidative stress and reduced neuronal vulnerability to global cerebral ischemia [40], as well as improving long-term recovery following focal cerebral ischemia [95]. Evidence suggests that Hsp72 also modulates inflammation from cerebral ischemia [96]. Regulation of NF-κB by Hsp72 can occur via inhibition of IκB phosphorylation by IKK and NF-κB dissociation [97] and via binding IKK to impair NF-κB signaling [98]. Increased levels of Hsp72 have been shown to decrease the negative effects of NF-κB activation in astrocytes via reductions in iNOS expression [98]. Activation of NF-κB was inhibited significantly in Hsp72-overexpressing microglia and transgenic mice [97].

4.3. Grp78

Grp78, a regulator of the ER unfolded protein response [52, 99], is largely localized to the endoplasmic reticulum [100] but has been shown to translocate to mitochondria [101], suggesting a role in MAM-dependent Ca2+ transport between ER and mitochondria. Studies utilizing a green fluorescent/Grp78 fusion protein reported targeting to mitochondria within a short period of ischemia-like stress [86]. Overexpression of Grp78 in BV2 mouse microglial cell lines [102] and astrocytes protected against ischemic injury and preserved respiratory activity and mitochondrial membrane potential after ischemic stress [103]. Pharmacological induction of Grp78 reduced neuronal loss in both forebrain and focal cerebral ischemia [104, 105]. Grp78 appears to play an important role in ischemia associated with oxidative stress: increased levels of Grp78 were observed in astrocytes and microglia associated with overproduction of ROS [106, 107].

In addition to effects on oxidative stress and mitochondrial function, Grp78 also mediates the inflammatory response. Grp78 was shown to stimulate the production of the anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-4 and IL-10 through specific T lymphocytes [108, 109]. Interestingly, IL-10 deprivation in mice brains also induced Grp78 expression [110], suggesting a negative-feedback mechanism. Conversely, lower levels of Grp78 inhibited upregulation of IL-6 under glucose-deprived conditions [111]. Though the precise regulatory role of Grp78 in the inflammatory cascade remains to be elucidated, the critical role of astrocytes and microglia in the neuroinflammatory response to cerebral ischemia suggests that pharmacologic manipulation of Hsp72 family members in glia may be a powerful therapeutic approach.

5. MicroRNAs Regulate the Mitochondrial Response to Ischemia

Studies investigating the role of miRs in cerebral ischemia have largely focused on changes in miR expression patterns with ischemia [112]. To define the role of a given miR of interest, predicted molecular targets that have complementarity to the binding sequence of the miR are identified using a bioinformatic approach. Efficacy of translational inhibition can be tested when the 3′UTR of the putative target mRNA is placed downstream of a luciferase reporter construct. Using this approach, two brain-enriched miRs, miR-181a and miR-29a, were identified as important mediators in the evolution of injury and in determining outcome following stroke (see [113]). A recent microarray analysis of miR expression in the four principal cell types of the CNS (neurons, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and microglia) delineated a preferential cellular expression pattern of individual miRs [114]. Notably, miR-181a and miR-29a were more highly expressed in astrocytes, corroborating previous observations [115, 116].

5.1. miR-181

The brain-enriched miR-181 family contains four highly conserved members, miR-181a, miR-181b, miR-181c, and miR-181d, which play a role in mitochondrial function, redox state, and inflammatory pathways [7]. Bioinformatics and dual luciferase assays were used to identify and validate miR-181a as a regulator of several Hsp70 [117, 118] and Bcl2 family members [118]. Increased miR-181a exacerbated injury both in vitro and in vivo, while reduced levels were associated with reduced injury and increased Grp78 protein levels [118]. Overexpression of miR-181a in astrocytes enhanced disruption of mitochondrial membrane potential and increased ROS formation and cell death from glucose deprivation [118]. Intracerebroventricular infusion and intravenous injection of 181a antagomir, a chemically modified 181a inhibitor optimized for in vivo use, were used to treat mice after ischemic injury. miR-181a antagomir was effective at abolishing endogenous expression of miR-181a and showed substantial neuroprotective effects against ischemic neuronal damage and neurological impairment in mice. This protective effect, including recovery of motor function and coordination, persisted over 28 days [119], concordant with decreased expression of Bcl2 and X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP). Interestingly in primary neurons miR-181a failed to significantly alter levels of Bcl2 and did not improve survival after ischemia-like injury [120]. The difference in effects of miR-181a suppression between different brain cell types may be the result of differences in baseline levels of expression or changes in expression in response to ischemia.

Another member of this family, miR-181c, was identified as directly targeting tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) following ischemia, thereby regulating microglial activation and microglial-mediated neuronal injury [121]. Ectopic expression of miR-181c was also shown to suppress expression of iNOS, leading to decreased production of NO following OGD [121]. Additionally, the microglial activator Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) was shown to be a target of miR-181c in microglial cells. miR-181c inhibited NF-κB activation induced by OGD and the downstream production of proinflammatory mediators by suppressing TLR4 expression [122].

5.2. miR-29

The miR-29 family, composed of miR-29a, miR-29b, and miR-29c, is distributed across the central nervous system and enriched in astrocytes [123, 124]. All members have been shown to regulate various facets of inflammation [125]. Inhibition of miR-29b significantly reduced expression of activated microglial proinflammatory mediators such as TNF-α, IL-1b, IL-6, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 [126]. Recently, miR-29b has been recognized as a survival factor in neuronal cells by silencing the proapoptotic BH3-only family [127]. Interestingly, Shi et al. reported that increasing miR-29b had the effect of promoting neuronal cell death in focal ischemia by inhibiting Bcl2l2 (protein BCL-w), an antiapoptotic member of the Bcl2 protein family [128]. Whether the same effect occurs in astrocytes or microglia has not been investigated; however, computational algorithms (i.e., TargetScan5.1, http://www.targetscan.org/) predict that miR-29b targets several members of the Bcl2 family known to be both protective and harmful. The multiple functions of miR-29b are therefore likely due to which Bcl2 family member exerts the more dominant effect in a given cell type and in response to a given injury paradigm.

Ischemic stroke induced by middle-cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) in mice caused loss of miR-29b and higher 12-lipoxygenase activity in infarcted tissue [129]; delivery of miR-29b mimic markedly attenuated the infarct size. Ouyang et al. observed that miR-29a expression significantly increased in the more ischemia-resistant hippocampal subregion dentate gyrus but decreased in the more ischemia-sensitive cornu ammonis 1 subregion following transient global ischemia [115]. In the setting of in vitro ischemia, Ouyang et al. observed that miR-29a mimic protected and miR-29a inhibitor aggravated astrocyte injury and mitochondrial function by targeting the Bcl2 family member p53 upregulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA, [115]). PUMA binds and antagonizes all known antiapoptotic Bcl2 family members and activates two key multidomain proapoptotic Bcl2 family proteins, BAX and BAK, leading to mitochondrial dysfunction and caspase activation [130]. Most recently [131], we observed in astrocytes cultured from CA1 and DG hippocampal subregions that CA1 astrocytes exhibited more cell death and a greater decrease in miR-29a subsequent to glucose deprivation injury. We identified the mitochondrial voltage-dependent cation channel 1 (VDAC1) as a target of miR-29a in these astrocytes. Located in the outer mitochondrial membrane, VDACs mediate intercompartmental transport of anions, cations, and ATP between the cytosol and mitochondria (for review, see [132]). VDAC1 is the most abundantly expressed and is thought to regulate mitochondrial function and cell survival in response to injury [133]. We observed that increasing miR-29a in CA1 astrocytes decreased VDAC1 and improved cell survival, while knockdown of VDAC1 improved survival. Moreover, the protective effect of miR-29a was eliminated by inhibition of miR-29a/VDAC1 binding via cotreatment with a target-site blocker. Together, these findings suggest that the selective vulnerability of the CA1 to injury may be due in part to a limited miR-29a response in CA1 astrocytes, thereby allowing a greater increase in VDAC1-mediated cellular dysfunction in CA1 astrocytes.

6. Conclusions and Future Directions

As targets for stroke therapy, miR-based strategies provide the advantage of rapid onset of action, a critical element in developing effective clinical treatments for stroke, and endogenous miR expression levels can be pharmacologically manipulated. A successful phase 2 trial of the first miR-targeted drug, a locked nucleic acid targeting miR-122 to treat hepatitis C, has recently been completed [134], demonstrating that rapid translation of miR-based therapies from bench to clinic may be possible once candidate targets are identified.

Astrocytes and microglia play critical roles in neuronal survival following stroke and are ideal cellular targets for novel therapeutic approaches. miRs target proteins directly involved in maintaining astrocyte mitochondrial homeostasis in response to stress and neuroinflammatory mediators that regulate microglial activation with downstream effects on mitochondrial function (Figure 3). Recent findings [58, 59] demonstrating a novel role for mitochondria as a potential transduction pathway for neuronal-astrocyte cross talk and the emerging relevance of astrocytes as regulators of the neuronal bioenergetic response to cell stress [59] suggest that future studies investigating the role of miRs in these processes may provide a novel angle to overcome prior translational hurdles in the search for new clinical therapies for cerebral ischemia. Moreover, microglial activation can depend on astrocytic release of ATP in response to local injury, suggesting that astrocyte mitochondrial function plays a direct role in microglial activation state [24]. Therefore, miR-based therapeutic interventions targeting mechanisms that mediate cross talk between astrocytes and microglia may provide an alternative approach to simultaneously coordinate both glial mitochondrial function and microglial activation polarization.

The short (only 5–7-nucleotide-long) sequence in the mature miR determines binding specificity to target mRNAs; as a consequence, a single miR can bind multiple mRNAs, and a single mRNA can be bound by multiple miRs, creating a new and complex layer of posttranscriptional control. Identifying glial-enriched miRs that target multiple mitochondria-regulating genes and gene families may produce a substantial effect versus single gene silencing techniques, for example, with small interfering RNA or short hairpin RNA. However, the combinatorial effect of the short binding sequence can also offset any protective effects if the same miR simultaneously binds gene family members with opposite functions, as has been demonstrated with miR-29 and Bcl2 family members. Therefore, it remains critical to identify glial mitochondrial targets, test and verify the predicted miR/mRNA interaction, and investigate the effect of varying miR levels both in vitro and in vivo on mitochondrial function and injury in response to cerebral ischemia.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests regarding the publication of this paper.


This study was supported by American Heart Association Grant FTF19970029 awarded to Dr. Creed M. Stary and National Institutes of Health Grant R01 NS084396 awarded to Dr. Rona G. Giffard.


  1. V. L. Roger, A. S. Go, D. M. Lloyd-Jones et al., “Heart disease and stroke statistics-2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association,” Circulation, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. e18–e19, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. O. Blakeley and R. H. Llinas, “Thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 261, no. 1-2, pp. 55–62, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. C. Eroglu and B. A. Barres, “Regulation of synaptic connectivity by glia,” Nature, vol. 468, no. 7321, pp. 223–231, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. A. Yenari, T. M. Kauppinen, and R. A. Swanson, “Microglial activation in stroke: therapeutic targets,” Neurotherapeutics, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 378–391, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J.-Y. Kim, N. Kim, and M. A. Yenari, “Mechanisms and potential therapeutic applications of microglial activation after brain injury,” CNS Neuroscience and Therapeutics, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 309–319, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. H. Park and C. Shin, “MicroRNA-directed cleavage of targets: mechanism and experimental approaches,” BMB Reports, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 417–423, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. Y.-B. Ouyang, C. M. Stary, R. E. White, and R. G. Giffard, “The use of microRNAs to modulate redox and immune response to stroke,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 187–202, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. Y.-B. Ouyang, C. M. Stary, G.-Y. Yang, and R. Giffard, “microRNAs: innovative targets for cerebral ischemia and stroke,” Current Drug Targets, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 90–101, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. C. M. Stary and R. G. Giffard, “Advances in astrocyte-targeted approaches for stroke therapy: an emerging role for mitochondria and microRNAS,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 301–307, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. E. E. Benarroch, “Neuron-astrocyte interactions: partnership for normal function and disease in the central nervous system,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 80, no. 10, pp. 1326–1338, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. Araque, R. P. Sanzgiri, V. Parpura, and P. G. Haydon, “Astrocyte-induced modulation of synaptic transmission,” Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 77, no. 9, pp. 699–706, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Z. Liu and M. Chopp, “Astrocytes, therapeutic targets for neuroprotection and neurorestoration in ischemic stroke,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 144, pp. 103–120, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. E. Blanco-Suarez, A. L. Caldwell, and N. J. Allen, “Role of astrocyte-synapse interactions in CNS disorders,” The Journal of Physiology, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. L. E. Clarke and B. A. Barres, “Emerging roles of astrocytes in neural circuit development,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 311–321, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J. B. Zuchero and B. A. Barres, “Glia in mammalian development and disease,” Development, vol. 142, no. 22, pp. 3805–3809, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. Schousboe, N. Westergaard, U. Sonnewald, S. B. Petersen, A. C. H. Yu, and L. Hertz, “Regulatory role of astrocytes for neuronal biosynthesis and homeostasis of glutamate and GABA,” Progress in Brain Research, vol. 94, pp. 199–211, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. E. A. Bushong, M. E. Martone, Y. Z. Jones, and M. H. Ellisman, “Protoplasmic astrocytes in CA1 stratum radiatum occupy separate anatomical domains,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 183–192, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  18. N. Rouach, J. Glowinski, and C. Giaume, “Activity-dependent neuronal control of gap-junctional communication in astrocytes,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 149, no. 7, pp. 1513–1526, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. G. Cheung, O. Chever, and N. Rouach, “Connexons and pannexons: newcomers in neurophysiology,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 8, article 348, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. G. Arcuino, J. H.-C. Lin, T. Takano et al., “Intercellular calcium signaling mediated by point-source burst release of ATP,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 15, pp. 9840–9845, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. Y. Gordleeva, S. V. Stasenko, A. V. Semyanov, A. E. Dityatev, and V. B. Kazantsev, “Bi-directional astrocytic regulation of neuronal activity within a network,” Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, vol. 6, article 92, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. V. Parpura and P. G. Haydon, “Physiological astrocytic calcium levels stimulate glutamate release to modulate adjacent neurons,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 15, pp. 8629–8634, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. Pérez-Alvarez and A. Araque, “Astrocyte-neuron interaction at tripartite synapses,” Current Drug Targets, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1220–1224, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. T. Takano, N. A. Oberheim, M. L. Cotrina, and M. Nedergaard, “Astrocytes and ischemic injury,” Stroke, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. S8–S12, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. Shields, D. E. Kimbler, W. Radwan, N. Yanasak, S. Sukumari-Ramesh, and K. M. Dhandapani, “Therapeutic targeting of astrocytes after traumatic brain injury,” Translational Stroke Research, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 633–642, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. Falnikar, K. Li, and A. C. Lepore, “Therapeutically targeting astrocytes with stem and progenitor cell transplantation following traumatic spinal cord injury,” Brain Research, vol. 1619, pp. 91–103, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. J. L. Zamanian, L. Xu, L. C. Foo et al., “Genomic analysis of reactive astrogliosis,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 18, pp. 6391–6410, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. P. Gris, A. Tighe, D. Levin, R. Sharma, and A. Brown, “Transcriptional regulation of scar gene expression in primary astrocytes,” Glia, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 1145–1155, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. J. R. Faulkner, J. E. Herrmann, M. J. Woo, K. E. Tansey, N. B. Doan, and M. V. Sofroniew, “Reactive astrocytes protect tissue and preserve function after spinal cord injury,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 2143–2155, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. C. R. Rose and B. R. Ransom, “Gap junctions equalize intracellular Na+ concentration in astrocytes,” Glia, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 299–307, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. Vella, C. Zammit, G. Di Giovanni, R. Muscat, and M. Valentino, “The central role of aquaporins in the pathophysiology of ischemic stroke,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 9, article 108, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. T. Nakase, G. Söhl, M. Theis, K. Willecke, and C. C. G. Naus, “Increased apoptosis and inflammation after focal brain ischemia in mice lacking connexin43 in astrocytes,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 164, no. 6, pp. 2067–2075, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. A. D. Martínez and J. C. Sáez, “Regulation of astrocyte gap junctions by hypoxia-reoxygenation,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 250–258, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. J. H.-C. Lin, H. Weigel, M. L. Cotrina et al., “Gap-junction-mediated propagation and amplification of cell injury,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 494–500, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. Q.-P. Dong, J.-Q. He, and Z. Chai, “Astrocytic Ca2+ waves mediate activation of extrasynaptic NMDA receptors in hippocampal neurons to aggravate brain damage during ischemia,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 58, pp. 68–75, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. P. Cassina, A. Cassina, M. Pehar et al., “Mitochondrial dysfunction in SOD1G93A-bearing astrocytes promotes motor neuron degeneration: prevention by mitochondrial-targeted antioxidants,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 28, no. 16, pp. 4115–4122, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. E. Miquel, A. Cassina, L. Martínez-Palma et al., “Modulation of astrocytic mitochondrial function by dichloroacetate improves survival and motor performance in inherited amyotrophic lateral sclerosis,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 4, Article ID e34776, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. Y.-B. Ouyang, L. A. Voloboueva, L.-J. Xu, and R. G. Giffard, “Selective dysfunction of hippocampal CA1 astrocytes contributes to delayed neuronal damage after transient forebrain ischemia,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 16, pp. 4253–4260, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. M. L. Weller, I. M. Stone, A. Goss, T. Rau, C. Rova, and D. J. Poulsen, “Selective overexpression of excitatory amino acid transporter 2 (EAAT2) in astrocytes enhances neuroprotection from moderate but not severe hypoxia-ischemia,” Neuroscience, vol. 155, no. 4, pp. 1204–1211, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. L. Xu, J. F. Emery, Y.-B. Ouyang, L. A. Voloboueva, and R. G. Giffard, “Astrocyte targeted overexpression of Hsp72 or SOD2 reduces neuronal vulnerability to forebrain ischemia,” Glia, vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 1042–1049, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. Y. Miao, Y. Qiu, Y. Lin, Z. Miao, J. Zhang, and X. Lu, “Protection by pyruvate against glutamate neurotoxicity is mediated by astrocytes through a glutathione-dependent mechanism,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 3235–3242, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. H. Nawashiro, M. Brenner, S. Fukui, K. Shima, and J. M. Hallenbeck, “High susceptibility to cerebral ischemia in GFAP-null mice,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 1040–1044, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  43. C. Benakis, L. Garcia-Bonilla, C. Iadecola, and J. Anrather, “The role of microglia and myeloid immune cells in acute cerebral ischemia,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 8, article 461, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. J. Ye, Z. Jiang, X. Chen, M. Liu, J. Li, and N. Liu, “Electron transport chain inhibitors induce microglia activation through enhancing mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 340, no. 2, pp. 315–326, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. S. Gordon, “Alternative activation of macrophages,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 23–35, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. M. K. McCoy and M. G. Tansey, “TNF signaling inhibition in the CNS: Implications for normal brain function and neurodegenerative disease,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 5, article 45, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. T. S. Kapellos, L. Taylor, H. Lee et al., “A novel real time imaging platform to quantify macrophage phagocytosis,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 116, pp. 107–119, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. Leidi, E. Gotti, L. Bologna et al., “M2 macrophages phagocytose rituximab-opsonized leukemic targets more efficiently than M1 cells in vitro,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 182, no. 7, pp. 4415–4422, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. W. Li, B. P. Katz, and S. M. Spinola, “Haemophilus ducreyi-induced interleukin-10 promotes a mixed M1 and M2 activation program in human macrophages,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 80, no. 12, pp. 4426–4434, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. E. A. Bordt and B. M. Polster, “NADPH oxidase- and mitochondria-derived reactive oxygen species in proinflammatory microglial activation: a bipartisan affair?” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 34–46, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. R. M. Ransohoff, “A polarizing question: do M1 and M2 microglia exist?” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 987–991, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. N. Chaudhari, P. Talwar, A. Parimisetty, C. L. d'Hellencourt, and P. Ravanan, “A molecular web: endoplasmic reticulum stress, inflammation, and oxidative stress,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 8, article 213, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. A. Ruiz, C. Matute, and E. Alberdi, “Endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release through ryanodine and IP3 receptors contributes to neuronal excitotoxicity,” Cell Calcium, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 273–281, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. D. R. Green, L. Galluzzi, and G. Kroemer, “Mitochondria and the autophagy-inflammation-cell death axis in organismal aging,” Science, vol. 333, no. 6046, pp. 1109–1112, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. S. W. G. Tait and D. R. Green, “Mitochondria and cell death: outer membrane permeabilization and beyond,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 621–632, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. K. A. Webster, “Mitochondrial membrane permeabilization and cell death during myocardial infarction: roles of calcium and reactive oxygen species,” Future Cardiology, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 863–884, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. P. Cassina, H. Peluffo, M. Pehar et al., “Peroxynitrite triggers a phenotypic transformation in spinal cord astrocytes that induces motor neuron apoptosis,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 21–29, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. C.-H. O. Davis, K.-Y. Kim, E. A. Bushong et al., “Transcellular degradation of axonal mitochondria,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 111, no. 26, pp. 9633–9638, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. K. Hayakawa, E. Esposito, X. Wang et al., “Transfer of mitochondria from astrocytes to neurons after stroke,” Nature, vol. 535, no. 7613, pp. 551–555, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. L. Hertz, “Bioenergetics of cerebral ischemia: a cellular perspective,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 289–309, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. R. Wender, A. M. Brown, R. Fern, R. A. Swanson, K. Farrell, and B. R. Ransom, “Astrocytic glycogen influences axon function and survival during glucose deprivation in central white matter,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 18, pp. 6804–6810, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  62. L. Hertz and G. A. Dienel, “Energy metabolism in the brain,” International Review of Neurobiology, vol. 51, pp. 1–102, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. I. A. Simpson, A. Carruthers, and S. J. Vannucci, “Supply and demand in cerebral energy metabolism: the role of nutrient transporters,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 1766–1791, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. P. T. Fox, M. E. Raichle, M. A. Mintun, and C. Dence, “Nonoxidative glucose consumption during focal physiologic neural activity,” Science, vol. 241, no. 4864, pp. 462–464, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. L. Pellerin and P. J. Magistretti, “Glutamate uptake into astrocytes stimulates aerobic glycolysis: a mechanism coupling neuronal activity to glucose utilization,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 91, no. 22, pp. 10625–10629, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. S. Amato and H.-Y. Man, “Bioenergy sensing in the brain: the role of AMP-activated protein kinase in neuronal metabolism, development and neurological diseases,” Cell Cycle, vol. 10, no. 20, pp. 3452–3460, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. J. An, W. B. Haile, F. Wu, E. Torre, and M. Yepes, “Tissue-type plasminogen activator mediates neuroglial coupling in the central nervous system,” Neuroscience, vol. 257, pp. 41–48, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. M. P. Goldberg and D. W. Choi, “Combined oxygen and glucose deprivation in cortical cell culture: calcium-dependent and calcium-independent mechanisms of neuronal injury,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 3510–3524, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  69. G. E. Barreto, J. Gonzalez, Y. Torres, and L. Morales, “Astrocytic-neuronal crosstalk: implications for neuroprotection from brain injury,” Neuroscience Research, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 107–113, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. M. W. Greve and B. J. Zink, “Pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury,” Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 97–104, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. M. Nagai, D. B. Re, T. Nagata et al., “Astrocytes expressing ALS-linked mutated SOD1 release factors selectively toxic to motor neurons,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 615–622, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. R. C. Reyes and V. Parpura, “Mitochondria modulate Ca2+-dependent glutamate release from rat cortical astrocytes,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 28, no. 39, pp. 9682–9691, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. F. Zhang, X. L. Ma, Y. X. Wang et al., “TPEN, a specific Zn2+ chelator, inhibits Sodium Dithionite and Glucose Deprivation (SDGD)-induced neuronal death by modulating apoptosis, glutamate signaling, and voltage-gated K+ and Na+ channels,” Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. K. Inoue, T. Leng, T. Yang, Z. Zeng, T. Ueki, and Z. Xiong, “Role of serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinases in stroke,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 354–361, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. J. Zhang, A. Malik, H. B. Choi, R. W. Y. Ko, L. Dissing-Olesen, and B. A. MacVicar, “Microglial CR3 activation triggers long-term synaptic depression in the hippocampus via NADPH oxidase,” Neuron, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 195–207, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. M. L. Block, L. Zecca, and J.-S. Hong, “Microglia-mediated neurotoxicity: uncovering the molecular mechanisms,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 57–69, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. D. A. Patten, M. Germain, M. A. Kelly, and R. S. Slack, “Reactive oxygen species: stuck in the middle of neurodegeneration,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 20, supplement 2, pp. S357–S367, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. M. P. Mattson, “NF-κB in the survival and plasticity of neurons,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 30, no. 6-7, pp. 883–893, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. J. M. Adams and S. Cory, “Bcl-2-regulated apoptosis: mechanism and therapeutic potential,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 488–496, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. M. J. Parsons and D. R. Green, “Mitochondria in cell death,” Essays in Biochemistry, vol. 47, pp. 99–114, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. Y.-B. Ouyang and R. G. Giffard, “MicroRNAs affect BCL-2 family proteins in the setting of cerebral ischemia,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 77, pp. 2–8, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. K. Kitagawa, M. Matsumoto, Y. Tsujimoto et al., “Amelioration of hippocampal neuronal damage after global ischemia by neuronal overexpression of BCL-2 in transgenic mice,” Stroke, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 2616–2621, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. H. Zhao, M. A. Yenari, D. Cheng, R. M. Sapolsky, and G. K. Steinberg, “Bcl-2 overexpression protects against neuron loss within the ischemic margin following experimental stroke and inhibits cytochrome c translocation and caspase-3 activity,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 1026–1036, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. Y.-B. Ouyang, S. G. Carriedo, and R. G. Giffard, “Effect of Bcl-xL overexpression on reactive oxygen species, intracellular calcium, and mitochondrial membrane potential following injury in astrocytes,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 544–551, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. E. Szegezdi, D. C. MacDonald, T. N. Chonghaile, S. Gupta, and A. Samali, “Bcl-2 family on guard at the ER,” American Journal of Physiology—Cell Physiology, vol. 296, no. 5, pp. C941–C953, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. Y.-B. Ouyang and R. G. Giffard, “ER-mitochondria crosstalk during cerebral ischemia: molecular chaperones and ER-mitochondrial calcium transfer,” International Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 2012, Article ID 493934, 8 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. B. Bonneau, J. Prudent, N. Popgeorgiev, and G. Gillet, “Non-apoptotic roles of Bcl-2 family: the calcium connection,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Molecular Cell Research, vol. 1833, no. 7, pp. 1755–1765, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. S. Grimm, “The ER-mitochondria interface: the social network of cell death,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Molecular Cell Research, vol. 1823, no. 2, pp. 327–334, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. D. Rodriguez, D. Rojas-Rivera, and C. Hetz, “Integrating stress signals at the endoplasmic reticulum: the BCL-2 protein family rheostat,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Molecular Cell Research, vol. 1813, no. 4, pp. 564–574, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. G. Szabadkai and R. Rizzuto, “Chaperones as parts of organelle networks,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 594, pp. 64–77, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. S. Kelly, Z. J. Zhang, H. Zhao et al., “Gene transfer of HSP72 protects cornu ammonis 1 region of the hippocampus neurons from global ischemia: influence of Bcl-2,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 160–167, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. R. G. Giffard, R.-Q. Han, J. F. Emery, M. Duan, and J. F. Pittet, “Regulation of apoptotic and inflammatory cell signaling in cerebral ischemia: the complex roles of heat shock protein 70,” Anesthesiology, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 339–348, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. S. Kesaraju, G. Nayak, H. M. Prentice, and S. L. Milton, “Upregulation of Hsp72 mediates anoxia/reoxygenation neuroprotection in the freshwater turtle via modulation of ROS,” Brain Research, vol. 1582, pp. 247–256, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. X. Sun, R. Crawford, C. Liu, T. Luo, and B. Hu, “Development-dependent regulation of molecular chaperones after hypoxia-ischemia,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 82, pp. 123–131, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. L. Xu, X. Xiong, Y. Ouyang, G. Barreto, and R. Giffard, “Heat shock protein 72 (Hsp72) improves long term recovery after focal cerebral ischemia in mice,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 488, no. 3, pp. 279–282, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. Z. Zheng, J. Y. Kim, H. Ma, J. E. Lee, and M. A. Yenari, “Anti-inflammatory effects of the 70 kDa heat shock protein in experimental stroke,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 53–63, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. M. A. Yenari, S. L. Fink, G. H. Sun et al., “Gene therapy with HSP72 is neuroprotective in rat models of stroke and epilepsy,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 584–591, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. D. L. Feinstein, E. Galea, D. A. Aquino, G. C. Li, H. Xu, and D. J. Reis, “Heat shock protein 70 suppresses astroglial-inducible nitric-oxide synthase expression by decreasing NFκB activation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 30, pp. 17724–17732, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. M. Ni, Y. Zhang, and A. S. Lee, “Beyond the endoplasmic reticulum: atypical GRP78 in cell viability, signalling and therapeutic targeting,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 434, no. 2, pp. 181–188, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. M. K. E. Schäfer, A. Pfeiffer, M. Jaeckel, A. Pouya, A. M. Dolga, and A. Methner, “Regulators of mitochondrial Ca2+ homeostasis in cerebral ischemia,” Cell and Tissue Research, vol. 357, no. 2, pp. 395–405, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. F.-C. Sun, S. Wei, C.-W. Li, Y.-S. Chang, C.-C. Chao, and Y.-K. Lai, “Localization of GRP78 to mitochondria under the unfolded protein response,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 396, no. 1, pp. 31–39, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. G.-H. Lee, H.-R. Kim, S.-Y. Han et al., “Gastrodia elata Blume and its pure compounds protect BV-2 microglial-derived cell lines against β-amyloid: the involvement of GRP78 and CHOP,” Biological Research, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 403–410, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. Y.-B. Ouyang, L.-J. Xu, J. F. Emery, A. S. Lee, and R. G. Giffard, “Overexpressing GRP78 influences Ca2+ handling and function of mitochondria in astrocytes after ischemia-like stress,” Mitochondrion, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 279–286, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. Y. Oida, H. Izuta, A. Oyagi et al., “Induction of BiP, an ER-resident protein, prevents the neuronal death induced by transient forebrain ischemia in gerbil,” Brain Research, vol. 1208, pp. 217–224, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. T. Kudo, S. Kanemoto, H. Hara et al., “A molecular chaperone inducer protects neurons from ER stress,” Cell Death & Differentiation, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 364–375, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. D. P. K. Wong, J. M. T. Chu, V. K. L. Hung et al., “Modulation of endoplasmic reticulum chaperone GRP78 by high glucose in hippocampus of streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice and C6 astrocytic cells,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 551–560, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. B. Chantong, D. V. Kratschmar, A. Lister, and A. Odermatt, “Inhibition of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 induces cellular stress through pertussis toxin-sensitive Gi-proteins in murine BV-2 microglia cells,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 11, article 190, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. Z. Dong, P. Wu, Y. Li et al., “Myocardial infarction worsens glomerular injury and microalbuminuria in rats with pre-existing renal impairment accompanied by the activation of ER stress and inflammation,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 7911–7921, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. G. S. Panayi and V. M. Corrigall, “BiP regulates autoimmune inflammation and tissue damage,” Autoimmunity Reviews, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 140–142, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. S. Koriauli, N. Natsvlishvili, T. Barbakadze, and D. Mikeladze, “Knockdown of interleukin-10 induces the redistribution of sigma1-receptor and increases the glutamate-dependent NADPH-oxidase activity in mouse brain neurons,” Biological Research, vol. 48, article 55, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. T. Hosoi, T. Oba, and K. Ozawa, “ER stress-mediated regulation of immune function under glucose-deprived condition in glial cells: up- and down-regulation of PGE2 + IFNγ-induced IL-6 and iNOS expressions,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 441, no. 2, pp. 525–528, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  112. A. Dharap, K. Bowen, R. Place, L.-C. Li, and R. Vemuganti, “Transient focal ischemia induces extensive temporal changes in rat cerebral microRNAome,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 675–687, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  113. Y.-B. Ouyang, L. Xu, S. Yue, S. Liu, and R. G. Giffard, “Neuroprotection by astrocytes in brain ischemia: importance of microRNAs,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 565, pp. 53–58, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  114. A. Jovičić, R. Roshan, N. Moisoi et al., “Comprehensive expression analyses of neural cell-type-specific miRNAs identify new determinants of the specification and maintenance of neuronal phenotypes,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 5127–5137, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  115. Y.-B. Ouyang, L. Xu, Y. Lu et al., “Astrocyte-enriched miR-29a targets PUMA and reduces neuronal vulnerability to forebrain ischemia,” Glia, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 1784–1794, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  116. E. R. Hutchison, E. M. Kawamoto, D. D. Taub et al., “Evidence for miR-181 involvement in neuroinflammatory responses of astrocytes,” Glia, vol. 61, no. 7, pp. 1018–1028, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  117. Y.-B. Ouyang, Y. Lu, S. Yue et al., “MiR-181 regulates GRP78 and influences outcome from cerebral ischemia in vitro and in vivo,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 555–563, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  118. Y.-B. Ouyang, Y. Lu, S. Yue, and R. G. Giffard, “miR-181 targets multiple Bcl-2 family members and influences apoptosis and mitochondrial function in astrocytes,” Mitochondrion, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 213–219, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  119. L.-J. Xu, Y.-B. Ouyang, X. Xiong, C. M. Stary, and R. G. Giffard, “Post-stroke treatment with miR-181 antagomir reduces injury and improves long-term behavioral recovery in mice after focal cerebral ischemia,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 264, pp. 1–7, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  120. J.-M. Moon, L. Xu, and R. G. Giffard, “Inhibition of microRNA-181 reduces forebrain ischemia-induced neuronal loss,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1976–1982, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  121. L. Zhang, L.-Y. Dong, Y.-J. Li, Z. Hong, and W.-S. Wei, “The microRNA miR-181c controls microglia-mediated neuronal apoptosis by suppressing tumor necrosis factor,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 9, article 211, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  122. L. Zhang, Y.-J. Li, X.-Y. Wu, Z. Hong, and W.-S. Wei, “MicroRNA-181c negatively regulates the inflammatory response in oxygen-glucose-deprived microglia by targeting Toll-like receptor 4,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 132, no. 6, pp. 713–723, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  123. L. Smirnova, A. Gräfe, A. Seiler, S. Schumacher, R. Nitsch, and F. G. Wulczyn, “Regulation of miRNA expression during neural cell specification,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1469–1477, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  124. X. Cao, G. Yeo, A. R. Muotri, T. Kuwabara, and F. H. Gage, “Noncoding RNAs in the mammalian central nervous system,” Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 29, pp. 77–103, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  125. J. W. Graff, A. M. Dickson, G. Clay, A. P. McCaffrey, and M. E. Wilson, “Identifying functional microRNAs in macrophages with polarized phenotypes,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 26, pp. 21816–21825, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  126. M. C. Thounaojam, D. K. Kaushik, K. Kundu, and A. Basu, “MicroRNA-29b modulates Japanese encephalitis virus-induced microglia activation by targeting tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced protein 3,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 143–154, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  127. A. J. Kole, V. Swahari, S. M. Hammond, and M. Deshmukh, “miR-29b is activated during neuronal maturation and targets BH3-only genes to restrict apoptosis,” Genes & Development, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 125–130, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  128. G. Shi, Y. Liu, T. Liu et al., “Upregulated miR-29b promotes neuronal cell death by inhibiting Bcl2L2 after ischemic brain injury,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 216, no. 2, pp. 225–230, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  129. S. Khanna, C. Rink, R. Ghoorkhanian et al., “Loss of miR-29b following acute ischemic stroke contributes to neural cell death and infarct size,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1197–1206, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  130. J. Yu and L. Zhang, “PUMA, a potent killer with or without p53,” Oncogene, vol. 27, supplement 1, pp. S71–S83, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  131. C. M. Stary, X. Sun, Y. B. Ouyang, L. Li, and R. G. Giffard, “miR-29a differentially regulates cell survival in astrocytes from cornu ammonis 1 and dentate gyrus by targeting VDAC1,” Mitochondrion, vol. 30, pp. 248–254, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  132. V. Shoshan-Barmatz and D. Ben-Hail, “VDAC, a multi-functional mitochondrial protein as a pharmacological target,” Mitochondrion, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 24–34, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  133. H. Huang, K. Shah, N. A. Bradbury, C. Li, and C. White, “Mcl-1 promotes lung cancer cell migration by directly interacting with VDAC to increase mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake and reactive oxygen species generation,” Cell Death and Disease, vol. 5, no. 10, Article ID e1482, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  134. H. L. A. Janssen, H. W. Reesink, E. J. Lawitz et al., “Treatment of HCV infection by targeting microRNA,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 368, no. 18, pp. 1685–1694, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Le Li and Creed M. Stary. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles