Research Article

Training Status as a Marker of the Relationship between Nitric Oxide, Oxidative Stress, and Blood Pressure in Older Adult Women

Table 1

Subjects’ characteristics.

VariablesTS1 ()TS2 ()TS3 ()Ranges of all participants
Minimum Maximum

Age (years)66.85 ± 5.8966.47 ± 5.3163.47 ± 6.7650.0079.00
Anthropometry and body composition variables
 Body mass index (kg/m2)29.46 ± 5.1127.22 ± 6.7527.23 ± 3.8319.1035.00
 Waist-hip ratio0.89 ± 0.090.88 ± 0.060.89 ± 0.080.341.33
 Total body fat mass (%)42.34 ± 5.0740.53 ± 5.8439.71 ± 4.5928.2051.95
 Android fat mass (%)43.59 ± 6,4439.66 ± 7.6840.68 ± 6.4320,7251.77
 Gynoid fat mass (%)42.92 ± 4.6541.42 ± 5.8141,30 ± 5.7425.951.07
 Bone mineral density (g/cm2)0.86 ± 0.100.84 ± 0.070.79 ± 0.090.571.10
Functional fitness variables
 Coordination (s)16.35 ± 4.7112.26 ± 2.2910.59 ± 1.748.3037.16
 Flexibility (cm)51.19 ± 10.9158.24 ± 10.5961.76 ± 9.2321.0080.5
 Muscular strength (rep)18.96 ± 4.0523.77 ± 3.77 27.35 ± 3.5310.0037.0
 Agility (s)31.54 ± 4.6824.32 ± 2.6920.52 ± 2.3216.1745.77
 Endurance (s)584.42 ± 76.39533.73 ± 52.96473.05 ± 35.02355.00802.00
 GFFI (score)130.47 ± 42.73249.40 ± 28.25361.50 ± 40.2135441
(mL/kg/min)24.65 ± 6.8527.54 ± 7.7830.94 ± 7.4612.449.20
 Number of exercises performed1.24 ± 0.821.50 ± 0.811.70 ± 1.0605

GFFI, general functional fitness index; TS1, very weak and weak GFFI; TS2, regular GFFI; TS3, good and very good GFFI. Values are mean (SE).
versus TS1.
versus TS2.