Possible Clues for Brain Energy Translation via Endolysosomal Trafficking of APP-CTFs in Alzheimer’s Disease

Sivanesan, Senthilkumar; Mundugaru, Ravi; Rajadas, Jayakumar

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2764831

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Mitochondrial Bioenergetics and Quality Control Mechanisms in Health and Disease

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 | Article ID 2764831 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2764831

Possible Clues for Brain Energy Translation via Endolysosomal Trafficking of APP-CTFs in Alzheimer’s Disease

Senthilkumar Sivanesan,¹Ravi Mundugaru,¹and Jayakumar Rajadas^2,3

Academic Editor: Marcelo Mori

Received10 Apr 2018

Revised14 Jul 2018

Accepted19 Aug 2018

Published21 Oct 2018

Abstract

Vascular dysfunctions, hypometabolism, and insulin resistance are high and early risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease (AD), a leading neurological disease associated with memory decline and cognitive dysfunctions. Early defects in glucose transporters and glycolysis occur during the course of AD progression. Hypometabolism begins well before the onset of early AD symptoms; this timing implicates the vulnerability of hypometabolic brain regions to beta-secretase 1 (BACE-1) upregulation, oxidative stress, inflammation, synaptic failure, and cell death. Despite the fact that ketone bodies, astrocyte-neuron lactate shuttle, pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), and glycogenolysis compensate to provide energy to the starving AD brain, a considerable energy crisis still persists and increases during disease progression. Studies that track brain energy metabolism in humans, animal models of AD, and in vitro studies reveal striking upregulation of beta-amyloid precursor protein (β-APP) and carboxy-terminal fragments (CTFs). Currently, the precise role of CTFs is unclear, but evidence supports increased endosomal-lysosomal trafficking of β-APP and CTFs through autophagy through a vague mechanism. While intracellular accumulation of Aβ is attributed as both the cause and consequence of a defective endolysosomal-autophagic system, much remains to be explored about the other β-APP cleavage products. Many recent works report altered amino acid catabolism and expression of several urea cycle enzymes in AD brains, but the precise cause for this dysregulation is not fully explained. In this paper, we try to connect the role of CTFs in the energy translation process in AD brain based on recent findings.

1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD), a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, evolves over many years and is characterized by episodes of memory impairments, loss of cognitive skills [1], and personality changes [2]. Although both tau and amyloid beta (Aβ) reportedly play normal functions at the synapse, the transsynaptic spread of pathogenic tau aggregates and accumulation of toxic Aβ oligomers are together believed to be crucial for synapse loss and neurodegeneration in AD [3]. Despite marked neuronal death during late AD, it is worthwhile to examine the survival of a limited number of Aβ-resistant neurons via increased glucose uptake [4]. Unfortunately, it is difficult to understand how and why only certain nerve cells become resistant to Aβ toxicity, a fact that emphasizes the need to identify precise therapeutic targets for AD. Notably, the toxicity of Aβ oligomer species occurs within seconds to minutes, although it takes several years to attain disease severity. This inequality, along with disparate results of antiamyloid clinical trials, questions the centrality of Aβ as the chief mediator of neuronal cell death [5]. Moreover, whether Aβ oligomeric species directly cause AD is still arguable [6].

Early stages of AD include white matter changes that involve pericyte degeneration and vascular defects with loss of myelinated axons and oligodendrocytes [7]. Hypometabolism occurs early in AD progression, with oxidative stress and impaired mitochondrial bioenergetics [8]. Disruption of normal Aβ synaptic signaling and nonfulfillment of synaptic energy demands presumably cause amyloid toxicity and metabolic stress [5, 9]. Currently, the amyloid cascade hypothesis accentuates the role of soluble Aβ oligomers [10–12] and tau aggregates [13, 14] in AD pathogenesis. However, notable emerging views on the role of insulin resistance and hypometabolism connected to AD suggest that the damage induced by pathogenic Aβ entities could be a secondary effect rather than the early and precise cause of AD.

As part of normal aging, oxygen and glucose metabolic rates are consistently altered in brain cells [15] and are drastically changed in many neurodegenerative diseases [16]. Although numerous alternative pathways could fulfill brain energy needs, there will still be an unmet energy demand [17]. Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production could be age dependently decreased owing to poor nutrient and oxygen supply as well as reduced rates of glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation [18]. Brain hypoperfusion and loss of blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity can diminish nutrient import and/or toxin removal [19]. Recent research focuses on AD hypometabolism-associated cognitive impairments. Reduced glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) levels cause an age-dependent decrease in cerebral capillary density, reduced cerebral blood flow and glucose uptake, and increased BBB leakage [20]. Indeed, these metabolic and vascular alterations precede dendritic spine loss in cornu ammonis 1 (CA1) hippocampal neurons, and associated behavioral impairments implicate energy dysfunctions during the course of AD. Several seminal works also implicate alterations in spine shape, density, and size of aged neurons, indicative of gross changes in dendritic structures [18].

The precise cellular events of hypometabolism associated with AD progression are poorly understood. Unfortunately, apart from ketone bodies, astrocyte-neuron lactate shuttle, the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), and glycogenolysis, there are no clear-cut data that support other energy compensatory mechanisms to balance the bioenergetic deficits in AD brain. Several findings substantiate that plasma levels of certain amino acids are significantly altered in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD patients compared to control individuals [21–23]. The BBB restricts the entry of glutamate and other anionic excitatory amino acids from the circulation [24], although it allows selective transport of certain amino acids to support neuronal functions through transporters [25, 26]. However, whether transported amino acids could support brain energy functions during starvation/hypometabolism is not clear. A growing body of evidence suggests that starvation/hypometabolism in AD brain increases endosomal-lysosomal trafficking of β-amyloid precursor protein (β-APP) meant for clearance during autophagy. The intricate role of such events and further functions need to be further explored. Moreover, the apparent cause for abnormal β-APP processing in AD brains is relatively unclear. This review envisages the importance of vascular abnormalities, hypometabolism, insulin resistance, and altered β-APP processing in AD along with our hypothetical views on possible energy compensatory mechanisms in AD brain (Figure 1).

1.1. Hypoxia and Hypometabolism Are Early Events in AD

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy- (CAA-) associated microbleeds are one of several causative factors attributed to brain hypometabolism and atrophy in AD [27]. Vascular risk factors, such as adversely affected hippocampus microvasculature length [28], hypoperfusion [29], hypoxia, and hypometabolism, contribute greatly to early AD progression [30–34]. A stronger correlation seems to exist between brain energy inhibition and AD severity [35, 36]. Consistently, agents used to alleviate brain energy dysfunctions are promising for the treatment of cognitive and neurological diseases including AD [37–40].

While fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG-PET) helps to detect the cerebral metabolic rate of glucose metabolism (MRglc) in AD [41], voxel-based morphometry (VBM) of T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could reveal brain atrophy [42]. Recent ¹⁸F-FDG-PET studies confirm hypometabolism in early sporadic AD [43, 44]. Moreover, region-specific severe hypometabolism in AD brain regions shows age invariance with greatly reduced frontal cortex glucose metabolism [45, 46]. There is a strong correlation between glucose hypometabolism and atrophy in the precuneus in early AD subjects based on ¹⁸F-FDG-PET studies [47]. In mild AD subjects, there is significantly lower MRglc in the parietal cortex, posterior cingulate, and thalamus [48]. Different research groups report hypometabolism in AD/probable AD subjects in the temporal cortex, bilateral middorsolateral frontal region, frontal brain, and parieto-mesial cortex regions based on ¹⁸F-FDG-PET [42, 49, 50]. Although Stein et al. [51] identified energy fluctuations manifested as poor glucose metabolic rate in the limbic areas of the temporal lobe, a voxel-based study that analyzed AD brain regions revealed significant atrophy of the hippocampus and amygdala [52]. Metabolic fluctuations of key glycolytic enzymes [53] and oxygen delivery in the circulating erythrocytes could also be risk factors for brain hypometabolism in AD [54].

The “Warburg effect,” well described for cancer cells, appears to apply to neuronal cells [4], notably during the mild phase of AD where neurons with defective glucose uptake show resistance to Aβ toxicity. Thus, the predementia phase of AD provides evidence of gray matter loss and brain glucose deficits [55]. Reduced expression of energy metabolism genes that encode subunits of the mitochondrial electron transport chain is also apparent in the posterior cingulate neurons of AD brains [56]. Mitoenergetic failure develops in Aβ overexpressing Caenorhabditis elegans, a finding that demonstrates this phenomenon is not unique to human AD [57]. Using Trem2^−/− 5xFAD transgenic mice, mutations in triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) can lead to energy dysfunctions in the immune cell microglia and thereby cause impaired clearance of amyloid plaques; energy supplementation with cyclocreatine to immune cells reduces the plaque load to protect the neurons [58]. Altogether, vascular and metabolic fluctuations are well indicated during the early course of AD.

1.2. Defective Glycolytic Enzymes, Glucose Transporters, and Impaired Insulin Signaling in AD

It is difficult to determine whether brain hypometabolic status is a consequence or cause of AD pathology, but many recent works support the latter. Elevated plasma glucose concentrations in fasting conditions are attributed to increased brain glucose levels in AD, a finding that implicates insulin resistance [59]. Human and animal studies clearly show reduced expression of glucose transporters in aged [60] and AD [59] brains, including changes in the expression of key enzymes involved in glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation [61–63]. Evidence supports considerable neuronal loss in AD brain that involves oxidative stress-mediated inhibition of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) activity [64]. The reduced flux of pyruvate carboxylase (PC) in gluconeogenesis and pentose phosphate from the hexose monophosphate shunt reported in the brains of AβPP-PS1 mice (an AD model) further indicates poor glucose metabolism [65]. A study with Thy-1 mito-CFP mice showed reduced ATP levels in white matter during aging, in correlation with ultrastructural alterations in mitochondria, as well as reduced association of mitochondria with the endoplasmic reticulum [66]. The van Gijsel-Bonnello et al. group [67] recently performed metabolomic analysis using 5xFAD transgenic mouse astrocytes and showed marked changes in the glycolytic pathway and tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA).

A considerable number of research substantiates glucose transporter defects [20, 68–70], neurovascular dysfunctions associated with glucose transporter defects [20], poor glucose utilization [71, 72], and cognitive dysfunctions [73] in AD. The defective insulin signaling mechanisms reported in AD [70, 74–77] further strengthen the vascular and metabolic anomalies in AD, and the disease could be described as type 3 diabetes [78, 79]. Therefore, therapeutics aimed towards curing AD would need to significantly rely on regulating insulin levels and brain cellular energy levels [80–84]. Insulin improves cognition and may be neuroprotective, yet different intranasal insulin concentrations exert varying responses in subsets of AD patients [39, 40, 84–86].

1.3. Hypoxia and Energy Stress/Starvation Influences β-APP Processing and Beta-Secretase 1 (BACE1) Levels

Defective glycolysis [59] and oxidative phosphorylation tend to be part of the metabolic adaptation process implicated as early signs of sporadic AD [15]. Substantial evidence pinpoints that hypoxia significantly increases BACE1 gene expression through hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (Hif1α) upregulation [32, 87–89]. Although increased BACE1 activity reduces mitochondrial glucose uptake [90], a majority of work supports the view that BACE1 upregulation accounts for energy inhibition [36, 91–93]. Gabuzda et al. [94] explored energy-related metabolic stress on APP processing using sodium azide and agents that inhibit protein transport in the secretory pathway (monensin and brefeldin A). These agents could ultimately drive oxidative energy impairment in mitochondria to alter several-fold APP proteolytic processing into an 11.5 kDa carboxy terminal fragment. In another work, Velliquette et al. [91] revealed that energy inhibition by agents such as insulin, 2-deoxyglucose, 3-nitropropionic acid, and kainic acid in wild-type and Tg2576 transgenic mice strikingly elevates cerebral BACE1 levels concomitant with progressive AD pathology. Xiong et al. [93] inhibited mitochondrial complex I, II, and IV with rotenone, nitropropionic acid, and sodium azide, respectively, to prove that mitochondrial respiratory inhibition and oxidative stress trigger BACE1 expression as well as the presence of β-APP carboxy terminal fragments. Gatta et al. [92] inhibited heme synthesis and mitochondrial energy production using small interfering RNA and N-methylprotoporphyrin IX; these actions alter APP processing and amyloid aggregation. In another work [95], fasting differentially activates macroautophagy in 5xFAD mouse neurons compared to control mice. Fasting alters the numbers and pattern of autophagosomes in neurons, although the study suggests that activated macroautophagy after fasting does not degrade intracellular Aβ that is increased due to enhanced uptake from the extracellular space [95]. Inhibition of the key glycolytic enzyme 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase in astrocyte cultures increases amyloidogenic processing of APP [96]. Unfortunately, the cause for increased BACE1 and β-APP processing in conditions such as energy inhibition, starvation, and hypometabolism in AD brain is still unclear. However, there is a plausible relationship between hypometabolism and autophagy. Specifically, defects in mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling in AD brain correlate with impaired mitochondrial functions and energy metabolism [97]. Whether hypometabolism precedes defective autophagy or the vice versa requires further exploration.

1.4. Connection between Early Autophagy/Macrophagy and β-APP Processing

Macroautophagy activation occurs during conditions such as cellular stress due to nutritional deficit or cell injury [98]. This process represents a lysosomal pathway for the turnover of organelles and long-lived proteins and is a key determinant of cell survival and longevity [99]. While chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) involves chaperone-mediated degradation of proteins near the lysosomal lumen that have specific sequence signals [100], macroautophagy degrades misfolded and aggregated proteins by lysosomal machinery [101]. Using a fusion protein called tandem-fluorescent-APP, investigators showed that starvation triggers the trafficking of APP and APP-carboxy-terminal fragments (APP-CTFs) to the degradative endolysosomal network, a finding that provides a new hint for identifying key therapeutics for AD [102]. A more recent work indicates increased BACE1 turnover in the vicinity of suppressed autophagy after lysosomal inhibition [103]. Since BACE1 recruitment to the autophagy pathway and its comigration with autophagic vacuoles seems to occur similarly along the entire axon, autophagic induction with concomitant BACE1 retention could promote increased β-APP cleavage processing. Taken together, the protective role of autophagy elicited under metabolic stress conditions reveals bioenergetic adaptations in the cellular environment [104]. Thus, autophagy could provide compensatory regulation of brain energy through the APP trafficking pathway.

Culminating evidence pinpoints early induction of neuronal macroautophagy in sporadic AD brains and transgenic mouse models of AD pathology even before the visualization of extracellular Aβ deposits [99, 105]. While dystrophic dendrites are the sites where autophagosomes and late autophagic vacuoles (AVs) accumulate, it is possible that purified AVs are the source of APP, beta-cleaved APP, presenilin 1, nicastrin, and γ-secretase activity. Nonetheless, Boland et al. [106] reveal that although neuronal macroautophagy does not directly regulate APP metabolism, there is plausible proof for an antiamyloidogenic role of lysosomal proteolysis in postsecretase APP-CTF catabolism. Indeed, agents/drugs that can reduce Aβ levels in the brain probably account for the increased degradation of APP-CTFs as well as Aβ clearance [107].

1.5. Amino Acid Sensing in Lysosomes Provides Hints about the Brain Energy Translation Process

The role of lysosomal machinery in the degradation and recycling of cellular waste is not novel. Moreover, the localization of lysosomal hydrolases within neurons is a feature of AD [108]. However, compelling evidence supports additional lysosomal machinery functions involved in secretion, plasma membrane repair, and energy metabolism [109]. While several studies provide mechanistic insights about the lysosome and cellular energy metabolism [109–112], much remains to be explored in brain regions and particularly in AD. Other studies show a favoring of amino acid sensing and mTOR signaling promoted by vacuolar H⁺-ATPase within the lysosomal compartment [113–115]. In a recent review, Carroll and Dunlop [116] detail the role of lysosomes in autophagy, in amino acid sensing by mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1), and the key signaling events associated among lysosomes, adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK), and mTORC1. Considering this point of view, the events associated with endosomal-lysosomal trafficking of β-APP [102, 117] need much more exploration to support energy-related functions of cleaved APP fragments.

1.6. Culminating Work Shows Amino Acid Catabolism and Urea Cycle Activation in AD Brain

While ketone bodies [118, 119], PPP [67], and astrocyte-neuron lactate shuttle [120] try to compensate for AD brain energy deficits, there is still (to some extent) an increasing demand for brain energy. Urea cycle activation in AD brain [121–123] to remove ammonia generated from increased amino acid catabolism [121, 123, 124] provides evident and plausible insights into amino acid catabolism for energy conversion. AD brains exhibit increased expression of carbamoyl phosphate synthetase 1 (CPS-1) and peptidylarginine deiminase (PAD), which catalyzes the conversion of arginine into citrulline during ammonia formation [124]. The normal brain lacks urea-cycle-related ornithine transcarbamylase (OTC) and CPS-1 enzymes, a finding that strengthens the fact that AD brains are vulnerable to ammonia toxicity. Favorably, defects in ammonia detoxification owing to the adversely affected energy-producing pathway of glucose metabolism (involving PC and PPP) were reported in 20-month-old AβPP-PS1 mice [65].

According to Seiler [125], hyperammonemia in the blood and brain of AD subjects can provoke toxicity, contribute to AD pathogenesis, and alter β-APP processing in the lysosome. Ammonia is the major end product of cellular amino acid metabolism [126], and the brain can derive ammonia from both endogenous and exogenous pathways [125, 127]. Endogenous sources include degradation of neurotransmitters (glutamate, aspartate, and other monoamines), amino acids (e.g., glutamine, asparagine, and glycine), and hexamines. Deamination of amino-purines, amino-pyrimidines, and oxidative deamination of primary amines overall contribute to the endogenous sources of brain ammonia. Given the fact that the urea cycle in AD brains generates copious amounts of ammonia, a considerable amount of protein degradation must occur during AD pathogenesis. Increasing evidence pinpoints amino acid catabolism [128, 129] and ammonia accumulation in AD brain [128, 130, 131], although the exact processes remain unclear. However, such notable findings could indicate activation of energy compensation regulatory mechanisms in hypometabolic AD brain. Findings from Hansmannel et al. [121] strikingly reveal that all urea cycle enzymes are expressed in AD brain, with notably increased arginase-2 (Arg2) gene expression compared to control. Moreover, vulnerable AD brain regions exhibit region-specific alterations in arginase and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) [132]. OTC induction and Arg2 upregulation in AD would attempt to reduce brain ammonia, including reduction of NO and inducible NOS levels, actions that may emphasize the intricate neuroprotective role of the urea cycle pathway [121]. In Huntington’s disease (HD), another neurodegenerative disease, markedly elevated toxic urea levels in the brain before dementia onset precede brain damage in a transgenic sheep HD model and human subjects [133]. Since urea and ammonia are the key metabolic units of protein catabolism, there is a clear-cut indication for major protein catabolism in neurodegenerative HD and AD. Interestingly, a recent ongoing phase 2 clinical trials for AD is testing AMX0035 which is an oral formulation of two drugs, sodium phenylbutyrate (PB) and tauroursodeoxycholic-acid (TUDCA). While PB is an FDA-approved drug prescribed for urea-cycle disorders to reduce toxic unfolded proteins, TUDCA helps in reducing cellular energy loss.

1.7. Evidence Spotlights the Importance of APP-CTFs-Derived Amino Acids in Brain Energy Functions in AD

Serum and cerebrospinal fluid metabolomics studies reveal major alterations in canonical energy metabolism pathways, Krebs cycle, mitochondrial function and amino acid metabolism in MCI and AD patients [22]. Since starvation promotes trafficking of both APP and APP-CTFs to the degradative endolysosome [102], it provides clues for compensatory mechanisms initiated to counterbalance the energy deficits. Proteolytic processing of APP mainly involves amyloidogenic and nonamyloidogenic pathways [134, 135] as detailed below (Figure 2). BACE1 cleavage of APP within its extracellular/luminal domain represents the amyloidogenic pathway and promotes shedding of soluble β-secreted APP (sAPPβ) and membrane-associated C-terminal fragment of 99 amino acids (βCTF/C99) or 89 amino acids (βCTF/C89). After ectodomain shedding, γ-secretase (protein complex comprised of presenilin 1 or 2, Aph1 homolog A or B, nicastrin, and presenilin enhancer protein 2) cleavage occurs in the membrane-tethered C89 and C99 and thereby releasing p3 from C89 or Aβ peptides from C99. The nonamyloidogenic pathway at the plasma membrane involves cleavage by α-secretases (ADAM10/ADAM17) that generates soluble α-secreted APP (sAPPα) and a C-terminal membrane-bound fragment of 83 amino acids (αCTF/C83). Further cleavage of this fragment by γ-secretase releases the p3 peptide. The retrograde trafficking mechanisms that follow either α- or β-secretase cleavage allow delivery of APP-CTFs to the trans-Golgi network (TGN). Based on recent findings, the majority of γ-secretase cleavage of APP occurs in the TGN [136]. Notably, γ-secretase cleavage of both βCTF/C99 and αCTF/C83 generates the APP intracellular domain (AICD), but it is rapidly degraded similar to p3. Growing evidence depicts novel/alternative metabolic processing pathways (η-secretase, δ-secretase, and meprin pathways) during physiological processing of APP [137, 138]. Usually, carboxy-terminal fragments, such as βCTF/C89, βCTF/C99, and αCTF/C83, are targeted to the endosomal-lysosomal compartment [102, 139]. The biological importance of βCTF/C99, βCTF/C89, αCTF/C83, and p3 remains unclear [135], although many studies substantiate the neuroprotective functions of sAPPα, including in brain development, growth factor, neural cell proliferation [140, 141], and synaptic plasticity [142]. sAPPβ is involved in pruning of synapses during the development of both central and peripheral neurons [143] but reported to cause suppression of neuronal stem cell differentiation [144]. Although controversies exist about the biological functions of the AICD fragment, it is reported to be involved in gene transcription, cytoskeletal dynamics, and apoptosis [145]. However, during lysosomal degradation that recruits various CTFs (βCTF/C89, βCTF/C99, and αCTF/C83), it is likely that constitutive amino acids formed after proteolytic cleavage could serve as TCA cycle intermediates to fulfill brain energy deficits [146]. It remains elusive whether cleaved amino acids from APP after degradation in endolysosomes [102] also provide energy via the TCA cycle. This could be due to the fact that during APP sorting, beclin1 promotes targeting of a smaller fraction of surface-internalized APP to microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3- (LC3-) positive phagophores for degradation [147]. According to Hoyer et al. [148], hypoxia/sodium azide insults in HEK293 cells stably transfected with bAPP695 show energy failure with strikingly elevated ATP turnover and adenosine levels that parallel intracellular APP increases. In another work, upon hypoglycemic induction, rat neuronal cultures increase utilization of amino acids as evidenced by ammonia formation due to amino acid catabolism [149]. Overall, there is a considerable body of evidence that supports β-APP energy-related functions during AD hypometabolism. Further detailed investigations are warranted on APP-related energy functions in order to accurately track the pathological cascade to develop precise therapeutic targets. Recently, a study revealed that a greater number of dendritic spines in healthy brains (controls) compared to age-matched AD brains poorly correlate with symptoms such as dementia in controls, despite marked amyloid plaques and tangles observed in both types of brains [150]. This intriguing result demarcates the disease and healthy brains from the amyloid cascade hypothesis and creates avenues for further exploration in AD research.

2. Summary

AD brain is vulnerable to increased β-APP proteolytic cleavage and accumulation of various CTFs as well as APP in the endolysosomal compartment. While these intricate events are complicated, the relative cause and functions of cleavage products are poorly understood. In this paper, we hypothesize that in hypometabolic AD brains, the constitutive amino acids of CTFs and APP formed during endolysosomal degradation could compensate for metabolic demands through the TCA cycle. Our hypothetical views on APP-related brain energy functions can be justified with numerous recent works that implicate amino acid catabolism, urea cycle activation (due to increased amino acid catabolism), and ammonia toxicity propagated in AD brain. We also try to connect possible neuroprotective mechanisms in AD brain against ammonia toxicity through activation of urea cycle enzymes (Arg-2 and OTC) and decreased nitric oxide (NO) levels.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank Dr. Mathew D. Howell for providing critical English and grammar corrections in the manuscript.

References

R. Tarawneh and D. M. Holtzman, “The clinical problem of symptomatic Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 1–16, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. C. Bozzola, P. B. Gorelick, and S. Freels, “Personality changes in Alzheimer’s disease,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 297–300, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. L. Spires-Jones and B. T. Hyman, “The intersection of amyloid beta and tau at synapses in Alzheimer’s disease,” Neuron, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 756–771, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Atlante, L. de Bari, A. Bobba, and G. Amadoro, “A disease with a sweet tooth: exploring the Warburg effect in Alzheimer’s disease,” Biogerontology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 301–319, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. A. Engel, “Does metabolic failure at the synapse cause Alzheimer’s disease?” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 802–808, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. P. Morris, I. A. Clark, and B. Vissel, “Inconsistencies and controversies surrounding the amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease,” Acta Neuropathologica Communications, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 135, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Montagne, A. M. Nikolakopoulou, Z. Zhao et al., “Pericyte degeneration causes white matter dysfunction in the mouse central nervous system,” Nature Medicine, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 326–337, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Yao and R. Diaz Brinton, “Targeting mitochondrial bioenergetics for Alzheimer’s prevention and treatment,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 17, no. 31, pp. 3474–3479, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Godyn, J. Jonczyk, D. Panek, and B. Malawska, “Therapeutic strategies for Alzheimer’s disease in clinical trials,” Pharmacological Reports, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 127–138, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. M. Shankar, S. Li, T. H. Mehta et al., “Amyloid-β protein dimers isolated directly from Alzheimer’s brains impair synaptic plasticity and memory,” Nature Medicine, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 837–842, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Selkoe and J. Hardy, “The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease at 25 years,” EMBO Molecular Medicine, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 595–608, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Sivanesan, A. Tan, and J. Rajadas, “Pathogenesis of Abeta oligomers in synaptic failure,” Current Alzheimer Research, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 316–323, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. S. Bloom, “Amyloid-β and tau: the trigger and bullet in Alzheimer disease pathogenesis,” JAMA Neurology, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 505–508, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Koss, G. Jones, A. Cranston, H. Gardner, N. M. Kanaan, and B. Platt, “Soluble pre-fibrillar tau and β-amyloid species emerge in early human Alzheimer’s disease and track disease progression and cognitive decline,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 132, no. 6, pp. 875–895, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mamelak, “Sporadic Alzheimer’s disease: the starving brain,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 459–474, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Hoyer, “The young-adult and normally aged brain. Its blood flow and oxidative metabolism. A review--part I,” Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 101–116, 1982.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Hoyer, “Abnormalities of glucose metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 640, no. 1, pp. 53–58, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Camandola and M. P. Mattson, “Brain metabolism in health, aging, and neurodegeneration,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 1474–1492, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. V. Zlokovic, “Neurovascular pathways to neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease and other disorders,” Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 723–738, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. A. Winkler, Y. Nishida, A. P. Sagare et al., “GLUT1 reductions exacerbate Alzheimer’s disease vasculo-neuronal dysfunction and degeneration,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 521–530, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Ravaglia, P. Forti, F. Maioli et al., “Incidence and etiology of dementia in a large elderly Italian population,” Neurology, vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 1525–1530, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Trushina, T. Dutta, X. M. T. Persson, M. M. Mielke, and R. C. Petersen, “Identification of altered metabolic pathways in plasma and CSF in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease using metabolomics,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 5, article e63644, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Corso, A. Cristofano, N. Sapere et al., “Serum amino acid profiles in normal subjects and in patients with or at risk of Alzheimer dementia,” Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 143–159, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. R. Smith, “Transport of glutamate and other amino acids at the blood-brain barrier,” The Journal of Nutrition, vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 1016S–1022S, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. M. Pardridge, “Brain metabolism: a perspective from the blood-brain barrier,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 1481–1535, 1983.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Malandro and M. S. Kilberg, “Molecular biology of mammalian amino acid transporters,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 305–336, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Samuraki, I. Matsunari, M. Yoshita et al., “Cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related microbleeds correlate with glucose metabolism and brain volume in Alzheimer’s disease,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 517–528, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Decker, A. Müller, E. Németh et al., “Analysis of the vasculature by immunohistochemistry in paraffin-embedded brains,” Brain Structure & Function, vol. 223, no. 2, pp. 1001–1015, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Verclytte, R. Lopes, P. Lenfant et al., “Cerebral hypoperfusion and hypometabolism detected by arterial spin labeling MRI and FDG-PET in early-onset Alzheimer’s disease,” Journal of Neuroimaging, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 207–212, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. S. Ashok, T. A. Ajith, and S. Sivanesan, “Hypoxia-inducible factors as neuroprotective agent in Alzheimer’s disease,” Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology & Physiology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 327–334, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Snyder, B. Shell, J. T. Cunningham, and R. L. Cunningham, “Chronic intermittent hypoxia induces oxidative stress and inflammation in brain regions associated with early-stage neurodegeneration,” Physiological Reports, vol. 5, no. 9, article e13258, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Salminen, A. Kauppinen, and K. Kaarniranta, “Hypoxia/ischemia activate processing of amyloid precursor protein: impact of vascular dysfunction in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 140, no. 4, pp. 536–549, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Joubert, N. Gour, E. Guedj et al., “Early-onset and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease are associated with distinct patterns of memory impairment,” Cortex, vol. 74, pp. 217–232, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Grammas, D. Tripathy, A. Sanchez, X. Yin, and J. Luo, “Brain microvasculature and hypoxia-related proteins in Alzheimer’s disease,” International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 616–627, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Arias, T. Montiel, R. Quiroz-Báez, and L. Massieu, “β-amyloid neurotoxicity is exacerbated during glycolysis inhibition and mitochondrial impairment in the rat hippocampus in vivo and in isolated nerve terminals: implications for Alzheimer’s disease,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 176, no. 1, pp. 163–174, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. O'Connor, K. R. Sadleir, E. Maus et al., “Phosphorylation of the translation initiation factor eIF2α increases BACE1 levels and promotes amyloidogenesis,” Neuron, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 988–1009, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. H. Rosenbloom, T. R. Barclay, M. Pyle et al., “A single-dose pilot trial of intranasal rapid-acting insulin in apolipoprotein E4 carriers with mild-moderate Alzheimer’s disease,” CNS Drugs, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 1185–1189, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Freiherr, M. Hallschmid, W. H. Frey et al., “Intranasal insulin as a treatment for Alzheimer’s disease: a review of basic research and clinical evidence,” CNS Drugs, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 505–514, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Benedict, W. H. Frey II, H. B. Schiöth, B. Schultes, J. Born, and M. Hallschmid, “Intranasal insulin as a therapeutic option in the treatment of cognitive impairments,” Experimental Gerontology, vol. 46, no. 2-3, pp. 112–115, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. R. Hanson and W. H. Frey, “Intranasal delivery bypasses the blood-brain barrier to target therapeutic agents to the central nervous system and treat neurodegenerative disease,” BMC Neuroscience, vol. 9, Supplement 3, p. S5, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Li, J. O. Rinne, L. Mosconi et al., “Regional analysis of FDG and PIB-PET images in normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 2169–2181, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Frisch, J. Dukart, B. Vogt et al., “Dissociating memory networks in early Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration - a combined study of hypometabolism and atrophy,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 2, article e55251, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. Gatchel, N. J. Donovan, J. J. Locascio et al., “Regional 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose hypometabolism is associated with higher apathy scores over time in early Alzheimer disease,” The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 683–693, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Vanhoutte, F. Semah, A. Rollin Sillaire et al., “¹⁸F-FDG PET hypometabolism patterns reflect clinical heterogeneity in sporadic forms of early-onset Alzheimer’s disease,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 59, pp. 184–196, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Oh, C. Madison, S. Baker, G. Rabinovici, and W. Jagust, “Dynamic relationships between age, amyloid-β deposition, and glucose metabolism link to the regional vulnerability to Alzheimer’s disease,” Brain, vol. 139, no. 8, pp. 2275–2289, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Chen and C. Zhong, “Decoding Alzheimer’s disease from perturbed cerebral glucose metabolism: implications for diagnostic and therapeutic strategies,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 108, pp. 21–43, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Adriaanse, K. R. A. van Dijk, R. Ossenkoppele et al., “The effect of amyloid pathology and glucose metabolism on cortical volume loss over time in Alzheimer’s disease,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1190–1198, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Castellano, S. Nugent, N. Paquet et al., “Lower brain ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake but normal ¹¹C-acetoacetate metabolism in mild Alzheimer’s disease dementia,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1343–1353, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Adriaanse, A. M. Wink, B. M. Tijms et al., “The association of glucose metabolism and eigenvector centrality in Alzheimer’s disease,” Brain Connectivity, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. K. P. Woo, D. G. Harwood, R. J. Melrose et al., “Executive deficits and regional brain metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease,” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1150–1158, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Stein, M. S. Buchsbaum, P. R. Hof, B. V. Siegel Jr, and L. Shihabuddin, “Greater metabolic rate decreases in hippocampal formation and proisocortex than in neocortex in Alzheimer’s disease,” Neuropsychobiology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 10–19, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. B. Frisoni, M. Lorenzi, A. Caroli, N. Kemppainen, K. Någren, and J. O. Rinne, “In vivo mapping of amyloid toxicity in Alzheimer disease,” Neurology, vol. 72, no. 17, pp. 1504–1511, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. G. Kaminsky, V. P. Reddy, G. M. Ashraf et al., “Age-related defects in erythrocyte 2,3-diphosphoglycerate metabolism in dementia,” Aging and Disease, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 244–255, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. A. Kosenko, L. A. Tikhonova, C. Montoliu, G. E. Barreto, G. Aliev, and Y. G. Kaminsky, “Metabolic abnormalities of erythrocytes as a risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 11, p. 728, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Araque Caballero, M. Brendel, A. Delker et al., “Mapping 3-year changes in gray matter and metabolism in Aβ-positive nondemented subjects,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 2913–2924, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. S. Liang, E. M. Reiman, J. Valla et al., “Alzheimer’s disease is associated with reduced expression of energy metabolism genes in posterior cingulate neurons,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 11, pp. 4441–4446, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Fong, E. Teo, L. F. Ng et al., “Energy crisis precedes global metabolic failure in a novel Caenorhabditis elegans Alzheimer disease model,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, article 33781, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. K. Ulland, W. M. Song, S. C. C. Huang et al., “TREM2 maintains microglial metabolic fitness in Alzheimer’s disease,” Cell, vol. 170, no. 4, pp. 649–663.e13, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. An, V. R. Varma, S. Varma et al., “Evidence for brain glucose dysregulation in Alzheimer’s disease,” Alzheimer's & Dementia, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 318–329, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Ding, J. Yao, J. R. Rettberg, S. Chen, and R. D. Brinton, “Early decline in glucose transport and metabolism precedes shift to ketogenic system in female aging and Alzheimer’s mouse brain: implication for bioenergetic intervention,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 11, article e79977, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Meier-Ruge, P. Iwangoff, K. Reichlmeier, and P. Sandoz, “Neurochemical findings in the aging brain,” Advances in Biochemical Psychopharmacology, vol. 23, pp. 323–338, 1980.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Ulfert, U. Schmidt, and S. Hoyer, “Glucose and energy metabolism of rat cerebral cortex during aging,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 5, pp. 102–111, 1982.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. C. Bowling, E. M. Mutisya, L. C. Walker, D. L. Price, L. C. Cork, and M. H. Beal, “Age-dependent impairment of mitochondrial function in primate brain,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 1964–1967, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. A. Butterfield, S. S. Hardas, and M. L. B. Lange, “Oxidatively modified glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and Alzheimer’s disease: many pathways to neurodegeneration,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 369–393, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Tiwari and A. B. Patel, “Pyruvate carboxylase and pentose phosphate fluxes are reduced in AβPP-PS1 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease: a ¹³C NMR study,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 387–399, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. E. Stahon, C. Bastian, S. Griffith, G. J. Kidd, S. Brunet, and S. Baltan, “Age-related changes in axonal and mitochondrial ultrastructure and function in white matter,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 36, no. 39, pp. 9990–10001, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. van Gijsel-Bonnello, K. Baranger, P. Benech et al., “Metabolic changes and inflammation in cultured astrocytes from the 5xFAD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease: alleviation by pantethine,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 4, article e0175369, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. R. Hooijmans, C. Graven, P. J. Dederen, H. Tanila, T. van Groen, and A. J. Kiliaan, “Amyloid beta deposition is related to decreased glucose transporter-1 levels and hippocampal atrophy in brains of aged APP/PS1 mice,” Brain Research, vol. 1181, pp. 93–103, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Liu, F. Liu, K. Iqbal, I. Grundke-Iqbal, and C. X. Gong, “Decreased glucose transporters correlate to abnormal hyperphosphorylation of tau in Alzheimer disease,” FEBS Letters, vol. 582, no. 2, pp. 359–364, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Deng, B. Li, Y. Liu, K. Iqbal, I. Grundke-Iqbal, and C. X. Gong, “Dysregulation of insulin signaling, glucose transporters, O-GlcNAcylation, and phosphorylation of tau and neurofilaments in the brain: Implication for Alzheimer’s disease,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 175, no. 5, pp. 2089–2098, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. A. Simpson, K. R. Chundu, T. Davies-Hill, W. G. Honer, and P. Davies, “Decreased concentrations of GLUT1 and GLUT3 glucose transporters in the brains of patients with Alzheimer’s disease,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 546–551, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. D. Harr, N. A. Simonian, and B. T. Hyman, “Functional alterations in Alzheimer’s disease: decreased glucose transporter 3 immunoreactivity in the perforant pathway terminal zone,” Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 38–41, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Landau, D. Harvey, C. M. Madison et al., “Comparing predictors of conversion and decline in mild cognitive impairment,” Neurology, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 230–238, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. S. Watson and S. Craft, “The role of insulin resistance in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease: implications for treatment,” CNS Drugs, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 27–45, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Q. Zhao, F. G. de Felice, S. Fernandez et al., “Amyloid beta oligomers induce impairment of neuronal insulin receptors,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 246–260, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. M. Chua, M. L. Lim, P. R. Chong, Z. P. Hu, N. S. Cheung, and B. S. Wong, “Impaired neuronal insulin signaling precedes Aβ42 accumulation in female AβPPsw/PS1ΔE9 mice,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 783–791, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. T. Ferreira, J. R. Clarke, T. R. Bomfim, and F. G. De Felice, “Inflammation, defective insulin signaling, and neuronal dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease,” Alzheimers Dement, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. S76–S83, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. De la Monte and J. R. Wands, “Alzheimer’s disease is type 3 diabetes-evidence reviewed,” Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 1101–1113, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Pilcher, “Alzheimer’s disease could be “type 3 diabetes”,” Lancet Neurology, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 388-389, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. G. Jolivalt, C. A. Lee, K. K. Beiswenger et al., “Defective insulin signaling pathway and increased glycogen synthase kinase-3 activity in the brain of diabetic mice: parallels with Alzheimer’s disease and correction by insulin,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 86, no. 15, pp. 3265–3274, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. B. Schioth, S. Craft, S. J. Brooks, W. H. Frey, and C. Benedict, “Brain insulin signaling and Alzheimer’s disease: current evidence and future directions,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 4–10, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. R. Bomfim, L. Forny-Germano, L. B. Sathler et al., “An anti-diabetes agent protects the mouse brain from defective insulin signaling caused by Alzheimer’s disease- associated Aβ oligomers,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 122, no. 4, pp. 1339–1353, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. G. De Felice, “Alzheimer’s disease and insulin resistance: translating basic science into clinical applications,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 531–539, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. De la Monte, “Intranasal insulin therapy for cognitive impairment and neurodegeneration: current state of the art,” Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1699–1709, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Reger, G. S. Watson, P. S. Green et al., “Intranasal insulin administration dose-dependently modulates verbal memory and plasma amyloid-β in memory-impaired older adults,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 323–331, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Craft, L. D. Baker, T. J. Montine et al., “Intranasal insulin therapy for Alzheimer disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a pilot clinical trial,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 29–38, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Sun, G. He, H. Qing et al., “Hypoxia facilitates Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis by up-regulating BACE1 gene expression,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 49, pp. 18727–18732, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zhang, K. Zhou, R. Wang et al., “Hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α)-mediated hypoxia increases BACE1 expression and β-amyloid generation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 15, pp. 10873–10880, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Guglielmotto, M. Aragno, R. Autelli et al., “The up-regulation of BACE1 mediated by hypoxia and ischemic injury: role of oxidative stress and HIF1α,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 1045–1056, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Findlay, D. L. Hamilton, and M. L. J. Ashford, “BACE1 activity impairs neuronal glucose oxidation: rescue by beta-hydroxybutyrate and lipoic acid,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 9, article 382, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. Velliquette, T. O'Connor, and R. Vassar, “Energy inhibition elevates β-secretase levels and activity and is potentially amyloidogenic in APP transgenic mice: possible early events in Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 25, no. 47, pp. 10874–10883, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. B. Gatta, M. Vitali, R. Verardi, P. Arosio, and D. Finazzi, “Inhibition of heme synthesis alters amyloid precursor protein processing,” Journal of Neural Transmission, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 79–88, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Xiong, H. Cai, X. G. Luo, R. G. Struble, R. W. Clough, and X. X. Yan, “Mitochondrial respiratory inhibition and oxidative stress elevate β-secretase (BACE1) proteins and activity in vivo in the rat retina,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 181, no. 3, pp. 435–446, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Gabuzda, J. Busciglio, L. B. Chen, P. Matsudaira, and B. A. Yankner, “Inhibition of energy metabolism alters the processing of amyloid precursor protein and induces a potentially amyloidogenic derivative,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 269, no. 18, pp. 13623–13628, 1994.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Chen, K. Kondo, K. Motoki, H. Homma, and H. Okazawa, “Fasting activates macroautophagy in neurons of Alzheimer’s disease mouse model but is insufficient to degrade amyloid-beta,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, no. 1, article 12115, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Fu, D. Shi, D. Westaway, and J. H. Jhamandas, “Bioenergetic mechanisms in astrocytes may contribute to amyloid plaque deposition and toxicity,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 290, no. 20, pp. 12504–12513, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Perluigi, F. Di Domenico, and D. A. Butterfield, “mTOR signaling in aging and neurodegeneration: at the crossroad between metabolism dysfunction and impairment of autophagy,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 84, pp. 39–49, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. C. Rubinsztein, M. DiFiglia, N. Heintz et al., “Autophagy and its possible roles in nervous system diseases, damage and repair,” Autophagy, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11–22, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. H. Yu, A. M. Cuervo, A. Kumar et al., “Macroautophagy--a novel β-amyloid peptide-generating pathway activated in Alzheimer’s disease,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 171, no. 1, pp. 87–98, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Cuervo and J. F. Dice, “A receptor for the selective uptake and degradation of proteins by lysosomes,” Science, vol. 273, no. 5274, pp. 501–503, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Loos, D. J. Klionsky, and E. Wong, “Augmenting brain metabolism to increase macro- and chaperone-mediated autophagy for decreasing neuronal proteotoxicity and aging,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 156, pp. 90–106, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. K. Hein, P. M. Apaja, K. Hattersley et al., “A novel fluorescent probe reveals starvation controls the commitment of amyloid precursor protein to the lysosome,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research, vol. 1864, no. 10, pp. 1554–1565, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Feng, P. Tammineni, C. Agrawal, Y. Y. Jeong, and Q. Cai, “Autophagy-mediated regulation of BACE1 protein trafficking and degradation,” Biological Chemistry, vol. 292, no. 5, pp. 1679–1690, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Giordano, M. Dodson, S. Ravi et al., “Bioenergetic adaptation in response to autophagy regulators during rotenone exposure,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 131, no. 5, pp. 625–633, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Holcomb, M. N. Gordon, E. McGowan et al., “Accelerated Alzheimer-type phenotype in transgenic mice carrying both mutant amyloid precursor protein and presenilin 1 transgenes,” Nature Medicine, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 97–100, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Boland, D. A. Smith, D. Mooney, S. S. Jung, D. M. Walsh, and F. M. Platt, “Macroautophagy is not directly involved in the metabolism of amyloid precursor protein,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 48, pp. 37415–37426, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Shinohara, N. Sato, H. Kurinami et al., “Reduction of brain β-amyloid (Aβ) by fluvastatin, a hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitor, through increase in degradation of amyloid precursor protein C-terminal fragments (APP-CTFs) and Aβ clearance,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 29, pp. 22091–22102, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. Nixon, J. Wegiel, A. Kumar et al., “Extensive involvement of autophagy in Alzheimer disease: an immuno-electron microscopy study,” Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 113–122, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Settembre, A. Fraldi, D. L. Medina, and A. Ballabio, “Signals from the lysosome: a control centre for cellular clearance and energy metabolism,” Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 283–296, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Y. Lim and R. Zoncu, “The lysosome as a command-and-control center for cellular metabolism,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 214, no. 6, pp. 653–664, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. K. Mony, S. Benjamin, and E. J. O'Rourke, “A lysosome-centered view of nutrient homeostasis,” Autophagy, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 619–631, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Settembre, R. Zoncu, D. L. Medina et al., “A lysosome-to-nucleus signalling mechanism senses and regulates the lysosome via mTOR and TFEB,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1095–1108, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Zoncu, L. Bar-Peled, A. Efeyan, S. Wang, Y. Sancak, and D. M. Sabatini, “mTORC1 senses lysosomal amino acids through an inside-out mechanism that requires the vacuolar H⁺-ATPase,” Science, vol. 334, no. 6056, pp. 678–683, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Jewell, R. C. Russell, and K. L. Guan, “Amino acid signalling upstream of mTOR,” Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 133–139, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. C. I. Goberdhan, C. Wilson, and A. L. Harris, “Amino acid sensing by mTORC1: intracellular transporters mark the spot,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 580–589, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Carroll and E. A. Dunlop, “The lysosome: a crucial hub for AMPK and mTORC1 signalling,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 474, no. 9, pp. 1453–1466, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. K. Tam, M. R. Cobb, C. Seah, and S. H. Pasternak, “Tyrosine binding protein sites regulate the intracellular trafficking and processing of amyloid precursor protein through a novel lysosome-directed pathway,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 10, article e0161445, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. C. Cunnane, A. Courchesne-Loyer, V. St-Pierre et al., “Can ketones compensate for deteriorating brain glucose uptake during aging? Implications for the risk and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1367, no. 1, pp. 12–20, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Heininger, “A unifying hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease. IV. Causation and sequence of events,” Reviews in the Neurosciences, vol. 11, pp. 213–328, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Pellerin and P. J. Magistretti, “Sweet sixteen for ANLS,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1152–1166, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Hansmannel, A. Sillaire, M. I. Kamboh et al., “Is the urea cycle involved in Alzheimer’s disease?” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1013–1021, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Bensemain, D. Hot, S. Ferreira et al., “Evidence for induction of the ornithine transcarbamylase expression in Alzheimer’s disease,” Molecular Psychiatry, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 106–116, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Xu, P. Begley, S. J. Church et al., “Graded perturbations of metabolism in multiple regions of human brain in Alzheimer’s disease: snapshot of a pervasive metabolic disorder,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1862, no. 6, pp. 1084–1092, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Cicolini, Y. Jing, H. J. Waldvogel, R. L. M. Faull, and P. Liu, “Urea cycle enzymes and peptidylarginine deiminase in Alzheimer’s superior frontal gyrus,” Alzheimer’s & Dementia, vol. 12, no. 7, p. P460, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Seiler, “Ammonia and Alzheimer’s disease,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 41, no. 2-3, pp. 189–207, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. A. Wright, “Nitrogen excretion: three end products, many physiological roles,” Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 198, Part 2, pp. 273–281, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
M. J. O'Donnell, “Mechanisms of excretion and ion transport in invertebrates,” in Comparative Physiology, W. H. Dantzler, Ed., pp. 1207–1289, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
J. W. D. Griffin and P. C. Bradshaw, “Amino acid catabolism in Alzheimer’s disease brain: friend or foe?” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2017, Article ID 5472792, 15 pages, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Gallart-Ayala, T. Teav, F. Mehl et al., “Altered brain metabolism in Alzheimer disease: linking peripheral and central metabolic changes,” in MSACL 2017 EU Abstract, Salzburg, Austria, September 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
A. J. Cooper and T. M. Jeitner, “Central role of glutamate metabolism in the maintenance of nitrogen homeostasis in normal and hyperammonemic brain,” Biomolecules, vol. 6, no. 2, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Adlimoghaddam, M. G. Sabbir, and B. C. Albensi, “Ammonia as a potential neurotoxic factor in Alzheimer’s disease,” Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, vol. 9, p. 57, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Liu, M. S. Fleete, Y. Jing et al., “Altered arginine metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease brains,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 1992–2003, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. R. Handley, S. J. Reid, R. Brauning et al., “Brain urea increase is an early Huntington’s disease pathogenic event observed in a prodromal transgenic sheep model and HD cases,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 114, no. 52, pp. E11293–E11302, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. De Strooper and W. Annaert, “Proteolytic processing and cell biological functions of the amyloid precursor protein,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 113, Part 11, pp. 1857–1870, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
V. W. Chow, M. P. Mattson, P. C. Wong, and M. Gleichmann, “An overview of APP processing enzymes and products,” Neuromolecular Medicine, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. W.-Y. Choy, Z. Cheng, and R. Schekman, “Amyloid precursor protein (APP) traffics from the cell surface via endosomes for amyloid β (Aβ) production in the trans-Golgi network,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 30, pp. E2077–E2082, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Coronel, A. Bernabeu-Zornoza, C. Palmer et al., “Role of amyloid precursor protein (APP) and its derivatives in the biology and cell fate specification of neural stem cells,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 7107–7117, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Norstrom, “Metabolic processing of the amyloid precursor protein -- new pieces of the Alzheimer’s puzzle,” Discovery Medicine, vol. 23, no. 127, pp. 269–276, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
Q. Xiao, P. Yan, X. Ma et al., “Neuronal-targeted TFEB accelerates lysosomal degradation of APP, reducing Aβ generation and amyloid plaque pathogenesis,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 35, no. 35, pp. 12137–12151, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Gralle, M. G. Botelho, and F. S. Wouters, “Neuroprotective secreted amyloid precursor protein acts by disrupting amyloid precursor protein dimers,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 284, no. 22, pp. 15016–15025, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. P. Demars, C. Hollands, K. D. (. T.). Zhao, and O. Lazarov, “Soluble amyloid precursor protein-α rescues age-linked decline in neural progenitor cell proliferation,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 2431–2440, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. H. Tyan, A. Y. J. Shih, J. J. Walsh et al., “Amyloid precursor protein (APP) regulates synaptic structure and function,” Molecular and Cellular Neurosciences, vol. 51, no. 1-2, pp. 43–52, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Nikolaev, T. McLaughlin, D. D. M. O’Leary, and M. Tessier-Lavigne, “APP binds DR6 to trigger axon pruning and neuron death via distinct caspases,” Nature, vol. 457, no. 7232, pp. 981–989, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. D. Kwak, C. L. Brannen, T. Qu et al., “Amyloid precursor protein regulates differentiation of human neural stem cells,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 381–389, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Müller, H. E. Meyer, R. Egensperger, and K. Marcus, “The amyloid precursor protein intracellular domain (AICD) as modulator of gene expression, apoptosis, and cytoskeletal dynamics-relevance for Alzheimer’s disease,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 393–406, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Senthilkumar and R. Jayakumar, “Can proteolytic events of β-APP pave pathway for brain energy metabolism in human Alzheimer models?” Journal of Neurological Sciences [Turkish], vol. 21, pp. 147–154, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Swaminathan, W. Zhu, and E. D. Plowey, “BECN1/Beclin 1 sorts cell-surface APP/amyloid β precursor protein for lysosomal degradation,” Autophagy, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 2404–2419, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Hoyer, H. J. Bardenheuer, E. Martin, and K. Plaschke, “Amyloid precursor protein (APP) and its derivatives change after cellular energy depletion. An in vitro-study,” Journal of Neural Transmission, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 239–253, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Honegger, O. Braissant, H. Henry et al., “Alteration of amino acid metabolism in neuronal aggregate cultures exposed to hypoglycaemic conditions,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 1141–1151, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. D. Boros, K. M. Greathouse, E. G. Gentry et al., “Dendritic spines provide cognitive resilience against Alzheimer’s disease,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 602–614, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2018 Senthilkumar Sivanesan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1667

Downloads

960

Citations